Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Jfk assassination research paper
Jfk assassination research paper
The hidden history of the JFK assassination
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Jfk assassination research paper
The vast amount of evidence associated with the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, an event that occurred more than fifty years ago, is still being collected and examined by an array of scientists, professional historians, and conspiracy theorists. Periodically, with continuous developments and improvements in technology, new information is being discovered that either relates to an existing theory about the assassination or inspires additional assumptions about the identity and location of another supposed shooter. According to author Don DeLillo, the immense quantity of the information pertaining to the heinous crime committed in Dallas on November 22nd of 1963 will never lead to or reveal a comprehensive and conclusive version of the event. In his novel Libra, DeLillo acknowledges the impossibility of collecting and studying the extensive evidence of the assassination and how this seemingly inexhaustible process is essentially responsible for creating more doubt and disorder in the case.
DeLillo shows the irrelevance and futility of obsessively studying the information of the assassination through the character of Nicholas Branch. As a CIA archivist, Branch is solely concerned with trying to uncover and catalogue every connection between Lee Harvey Oswald and anyone else who is or could conceivably be linked to the murder of President Kennedy. DeLillo remarks how Branch, after years of researching and gathering material, has not even begun composing the history of the assassination because more information is continuously being discovered and sent to him, he writes, “Branch must study everything. He is in too deep to be selective… The truth is he hasn’t written all that much. He has extensive and overlapping n...
... middle of paper ...
...as he subscribes to a single version of incidents that presents itself as a seamless and comprehensive whole in a culture where contradictions increase by the moment he will never finish the research, let alone the narrative” (143). DeLillo is content with not knowing the absolute facts about Kennedy’s assassination because he believes that it is the search for a complete truth that institutes uncertainty. His work has not been stalled by obsession for the case or by an obligation to uncover the truth. However Branch, and those who are like him, will be trapped in his room of chaos, doomed to forever dwell on his theories and forgetting to live.
Works Cited
DeLillo, Don. Libra. New York: Penguin Books, 2011. Print.
Mott, Christopher M. “Libra and the Subject of History.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 35.3 (1994): 131-145. Web. 18 April 2014.
Boston should have handled the Grove fire tragedy better than it did. The disaster preparedness team was ready, and so were the hospitals that were training their stuff in the treatment of burns prior to the occurrence. The author expertly incorporates the mass treatment of the burns into his narrative. Further, Esposito delves into the details of the event, exposing the corrupted political system of Boston at that time. He reveals how renowned political entities escaped justice through dubious manners as the search for
Killing Lincoln is a historic, non-fiction book co-written by Bill O’Reilly, a popular conservative TV show host and Martin Dugard, a well established author. Published by Henry Holt and Company on September 27, 2011, this piece of literature contains 336 pages with complete sources, and references. In addition, this book [insert award] for its literary impact on young adults. With this historical thriller, Bill O’Reilly and Martin Dugard seek to describe the antagonist, victim, and impact of one of the most devastating and historical event in American history.
O'Reilly, Bill, and Martin Dugard. Killing Lincoln: The Shocking Assassination That Changed America Forever. New York: Henry Holt and, 2011. Print.
Volume III: P-Z. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971. Print. The. Pittman, Benn. The Assassination of President Lincoln and the Trial of the Conspirators. New York, NY: Moore, Wilstach, and Baldwin, 1865.
There are similarities and differences in how the authors of “American History” and “ TV Coverage of JFK’s Death Forged Mediums’ Role” use Kennedy’s assassination in their writing.
August 12, 1963 – Oswald appears in court and is fined $10. B) Make a list of the evidence that suggests that Oswald was being setup as a patsy. November 1, 1963 – FBI agent James Hosty visits the home of Ruth Paine where Marina Oswald is living and asks questions about Oswald. August 27, 1963-A man claiming to be Oswald visits the Cuban Consulate in Mexico City. C)
The Cleveland massacre was the beginning of Rockefeller’s career and an end to many of the small oil refineries in Cleveland, Ohio. Frank Tarbell was one of those people. For 2 years, Tarbell searched for illegal activities that Rockefeller had committed and one of the major ways that Tarbell gained information from was interviewing businessmen and even senior officers of Standard Oil. At first, only a small amount of businessmen would talk because they were afraid of Rockefeller and his massive company. One man had even told Tarbell that Rockefeller was going to destroy McClure’s Magazine if she kept investigating Standard Oil (Ida Tarbell, 1857-1944: She Used Her Reporting Skills Against One of the Most Powerful Companies in the World). Soon she found evidence of the illegal methods that Rockefeller used to take over the oil industry. After she wrote an article about the illegal methods, many people began assisting her in exposing Standard Oil. With the help of Mark Twain, Tarbell was able to interview the most powerful senior executive of Standard Oil, Henry H. Rogers. During this interview with Henry H. Rogers, who was surprisingly open, Tarbell confirmed the information that she learned from other businessmen and published it in McClure’s Magazine. For over the next two years, Rogers and Tarbell held long interviews regularly and Tarbell was
The Public Conviction of Albert DeSalvo and the True Story of Eleven Shocking Murders makes a persuasive argument for DeSalvo being innocent of the strangling murders. She cites a number of reasons why she and others still believed that DeSalvo was innocent. One of the strongest of these reasons is that there was "not one shred of physical
[2] My analysis primarily focuses on Stone’s film Nixon, but it is noteworthy to mention JFK, since both films were embroiled in heated debates regarding historical authenticity and artistic license. In JFK, Stone pieces together several conspiracy theories as to who was responsible for President Kennedy’s assassination from “real” primary texts, news footage, ear and eye witnesses, and the Zapruder film, among others. In Nixon, Stone uses similar techniques to posit equally troubling theses: the first that Nixon, while Vice President, was involved in a plot to assassinate Fidel Castro, and, second, that Nixon was directly or inadvertently responsible for the deaths of John and Robert Kennedy. Stone elects to create scenes and embellish information but defends his mixing of fact and speculation: “Of course, there’s license and speculation, but they are based on reasonable assumptions which we’ve discussed with highly reliable technical advisers who lived through the history we’re recounting in the film” (Monsel 206).
"JFK: An "idealist without Illusion"" The Denver Post [Denver] 17 Nov. 2013: 1D. Tarrant County College. Web. 30 Apr. 2014.
On November 22, 1963, at 12:30 in the afternoon, President John F. Kennedy was shot at and killed while participating in a motorcade in Dallas, Texas. The most important question that arises from this incident is ‘Who killed President John F. Kennedy?’ This is an issue which has been debated by scholars, The Government, and even common people alike. Many people seem to feel that it was a conspiracy, some large cover-up within a cover-up.
Since November 23, 1963, the day after President John Fitzgerald Kennedy was assassinated, there have been speculations as to the happenings of November 22, 1963. Along with the Warren Commission, there are hundreds of conspiracies and theories attempting to explain the assassination of Kennedy. Many people agree with the Warren Commission in that Lee Harvey Oswald acted as the lone gunman, while others maintain that another gunman was involved. Because of extensive evidence, I believe that Oswald did not act alone on November 22, 1963 in the assassination of Kennedy. The additional gunman was strategically placed in the grassy knoll area, in order to shoot at Kennedy from a frontal view (Rubinstein 4).
Scott, Peter D. Deep Politics and the death of JFK. Washington, D.C.: National Geographic Society, 2003
Amongst other things, “The Dead Man” is a story of political ambition, and personal pride which ends up being the downfall of our protagonist. Benjamin Otalora, the Argentinean Buenos Aires hoodlum turned Uruguayan gaucho, is ambitious and most of all brave. However, he is also reckless and lacks any kind of discretion whatsoever. His physical daring is un-complimented by any higher meaning or purpose. He doesn’t save Azevedo Bandeira, the mobster boss, in the knife fight because of any morals or virtues he believes in, but simply because he was drawn “to the sheer taste of danger.” Otalora’s braveness is also completely selfish. It is a raw, violent, braveness that ultimately blinds him to the reality to which he becomes self-aware in the last moments of his life; he is a man who is completely oblivious to forces outside himself. Otalora’s uncontrolled ambition and unchecked bravery disallows him the ability to calmly make calculations, to make the most intelligent choices, to think things through; all essentials in leadership and especially in ultimately coordinating a power grab from someone the likes of Azevedo.
With all things considered, it becomes clear that the assassination of John F. Kennedy portrays the political and social tension of America during the 1960s. Whether it was the struggle to stop the spread of Communism or to achieve racial equality, all these events have proven to be associated with the event that took place on November 22, 1963. It was during this decade that society and politics began to change, with many Americans unsatisfied with the status of the country. It was perhaps this dissatisfaction that led to the assassination of the 35th President of the United States, a truly unforgettable moment in American history.