Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 cram
Thesis statement on voting rights act of 1965
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 cram
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Voting Rights Act of 1965 cram
In a nation where literacy tests used to determine voter eligibility were ran by “registrars who could not read or write”, a statement made by a Civil Rights activist in the film Mississippi is this America?, unfair racial practices were running rampant, especially in the South. The year was 1964, and while many positive changes had occurred in the nation thanks to the work of Civil Rights workers, such as integrated interstate travel and integrated schools, much work still had to be done to ensure equality for all races in the United States. Through the exploration of the Freedom Summer, the Mississippi Democratic Freedom Party (which emerged from the Freedom Summer), and the actions that occurred in Selma, Alabama in the name of voting rights …show more content…
and equality in the 1960s, we will see how voting rights became a priority within the Civil Rights movement, what activists did to achieve them, and how President Lyndon B. Johnson (LBJ or Johnson) would be inspired to aid in the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Direct action, nonviolent protests and demonstrations were an effective tool of the Civil Rights activists and volunteers. Activists would use mass media to draw attention to the violent actions of the South, and fill up the jails of the South (usually after a beating or mistreating caught on camera), to gain whatever concession or goal they were looking for in an area. While this was an effective way to work for the movement, many activists realized these actions were really only a band-aid to the problem. The real issue was that African Americans had little (really almost non-existent) political power in the South, and therefore could not vote for politicians or legislation that had their best interest in heart. This was due to a fear that ran rampant across the Southern elite, who felt that if blacks (who consisted of a majority of the population in some districts in the South) could vote, then they would only vote for black politicians, and the whites would lose all political, and by effect social, power in the South. Civil Rights activists decided to shift their focus from primarily direct action tactics to gaining voting rights for all African Americans, so that they could put the real power in the hands of the people, rather than hoping those currently in power would do something to change the current status quo. One way they would garner those voting rights is the Freedom Summer of 1964. The Freedom Summer was a project led by Bob Moses and the SNCC (Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee). It would consists of mostly white college-aged student volunteers, trained and working with black SNCC activists, going down to Mississippi, a state so racist that is was believed by a Civil Rights activist in the film Freedom Summer, that if activists could “crack Mississippi…(they could) crack the whole South,” and lead a voter registration campaign. According to Clayborne Carson in his text “Mississippi Challenge”, volunteers had to be “psychologically screened” in order to ensure that they could mentally handle the challenges that, as privileged college students, they have never faced (101). Activists would teach literacy and other subjects in what were called “Freedom Schools”, and they would also go door-to-door across Mississippi and persuade African Americans to go down to the registrar and register to vote. Many African Americans of Mississippi were scared to do so because, according to the Freedom Summer film, if you attempted to register to vote, your name could appear in the local paper, and your employer (who was most likely white) could see that. Many African Americans feared this blacklisting tactic, but quite a few still attempted to register. They would face impossible literacy tests, and registrars who were suddenly not open, or working erratic hours. These actions inspired the Freedom Summer activists to go a step further, and create their own political party, the Mississippi Democratic Freedom Party. African Americans of the South did not feel at home with the Democratic Party that in the past had supposedly supported them.
Because of this, and the frustrations arising from the Freedom Summer, the Mississippi Democratic Freedom Party (MDFP) was created. In addition to trying to get African American Mississippians to register to vote, the volunteers of the Freedom Summer added the new task of inspiring these people to join their new political party. The goal of this new political party was to give a voice to those who were oppressed and politically voiceless in the Mississippi. According to the film, Mississippi is this America?, 60,000 people joined the MDFP. The National Democratic Convention was going to occur in July 1964, and the MDFP was determined to have representation there. Led by Fannie Lou Hamer, representatives from the MDFP rode the bus to New Jersey to the convention, and came prepared with the necessary paperwork to appeal to the Credentials Committee. Fannie Lou Hamer spoke at the convention, drawing national attention; President Johnson intervened by cutting off her coverage. Unfortunately, this would not work out well for Johnson because as explained in the film, Freedom Summer, Hamer’s message would be replayed multiple times for those who had missed it due to the President’s intervention. The presence of the MDFP would bother not only the regular Mississippi Democrats, but other Southern Democrats as well. Fearing exposure of party-division Johnson …show more content…
would offer the MDFP, two seats at the convention, that they would ultimately turn down. In Mississippi is this America?, it explained how the MDFP would not take the compromise, but would gladly sit in the seats vacated by the regular Mississippi Democrats. In the end, the MDFP did not get the representation that they wanted at the convention, but they did draw national attention to the lack of political equality in Mississippi, and across the South, adding fuel to the fire of voting rights for all. This fire would spread to Selma, Alabama where the ultimate showdown in the fight for voting rights would go down. Alabama was arguably one of the most racist states in the United States during the Civil Rights Era. Martin Luther King decided to use his SCLC (Southern Christian Leadership Council) to lead a march from Selma, AL to Montgomery, AL, using direct action tactics to fight for voting rights. This would be no simple task; in fact, it took several marches to make this mission succeed. Alabama was filled with people who were tired of, as journalist Pat Watters stated in Adam Fairclough’s text “Selma”, “ugly, cop-baiting demonstrations” (248). One attempt to march led to what would be known as “Bloody Sunday.” When activists attempted to march out of Selma, they were greeted by cops who attacked them and pushed them back into city limits. According to an activist in the Eyes on the Prize film “Bridge to Freedom”, the “tear gas was so thick (that they) could not get help to people.” Bloody Sunday drew media attention nation-wide, and Alabama could not take the backlash that came from such negative attention. The march to Montgomery would gain a court-sanction, and President Johnson, in an attempt to calm the uproar would promise voting rights legislation. From the man who cut off the words of Fannie Lou Hamer, to the man who would come to heartedly support the Voting Rights Act of 1965, President Johnson made a huge support shift during his presidency.
He went from fearing the loss of the Southern Democrats, to being so inspired by the actions of the Civil Rights activists, particularly those in Selma (and probably publically pressured) to outwardly supporting the Voting Rights Bill of 1965. According to a speech he gave prior to presentation of the bill to congress, he described the bill as “a law designed to eliminate illegal barriers to the right to vote” (350). He appealed to the nation with statements about equality, and how the right to vote falls under “human rights” rather than “states rights or national rights” (351). Political equality for African Americans would finally be in
reach. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 did pass, and eliminated literacy tests, and other “restrictions used to deny Negroes the right to vote” (Johnson, 351). The work of the activists: the door-to-door marketing, the speeches, and marches, in the Freedom Summer, the MDFP, and in Selma, AL was not in vain. They would gain the political power to fight against the unjust laws of the South that had kept them oppressed for so long, and they gained the opportunity to put people in power that would speak and act in the best interest of all people, rather than just one race. They would inspire a nation, and a president, to fight and pass a bill that would ensure those rights forever.
The forties and fifties in the United States was a period dominated by racial segregation and racism. The declaration of independence clearly stated, “All men are created equal,” which should be the fundamental belief of every citizen. America is the land of equal opportunity for every citizen to succeed and prosper through determination, hard-work and initiative. However, black citizens soon found lack of truth in these statements. The Montgomery Bus Boycott and the murder of Emmett Till in 1955 rapidly captured national headlines of civil rights movement. In the book, Coming of Age in Mississippi, the author, Anne Moody describes her experiences, her thoughts, and the movements that formed her life. The events she went through prepared her to fight for the civil right.
Here, though, the focus is primarily on the Committee’s voter registration initiative starting in 1964. This documentary provides a more historical perspective, and offers glimpses into the strategies used in Selma, Alabama to obtain social change. It shows how those within the group questioned the effectiveness of the protests and the march, and
What exactly was the Civil Rights movement in Mississippi? It was a time during the 1960s that had affected people even up to this day, and had also initiated the formations of documentaries and cinematic material that were created to renovate events. It was a time when the privilege and opportunity of drinking from a publicly-used water fountain depended on your race and color of skin. A not so recent film, Mississippi Burning, was produced in order to show detailed happenings that occurred during this time period. The movie talks about many characters that actually existed throughout history. It was shocking to experience the way people were treated in Mississippi. People were murdered for racist reasons, organizations were created to pursue horrible deeds, and people that were looked up upon were a part of these organizations. This film reenacts certain situations and was talked about frequently when it was first released. Reviews stated that the movie was somewhat historically accurate. However there were also those who explained that the film was superficial in a way that abused what really did happen during that time. Mississippi Burning was historically factual in introducing characters who were actually alive during this time. However it failed to realistically demonstrate how actual quarrels took place, and included unnecessary, dramatic events for entertainment and economic reasons.
Anne Moody’s memoir, Coming of Age in Mississippi, is an influential insight into the existence of a young girl growing up in the South during the Civil-Rights Movement. Moody’s book records her coming of age as a woman, and possibly more significantly, it chronicles her coming of age as a politically active Negro woman. She is faced with countless problems dealing with the racism and threat of the South as a poor African American female. Her childhood and early years in school set up groundwork for her racial consciousness. Moody assembled that foundation as she went to college and scatter the seeds of political activism. During her later years in college, Moody became active in numerous organizations devoted to creating changes to the civil rights of her people. These actions ultimately led to her disillusionment with the success of the movement, despite her constant action. These factors have contributed in shaping her attitude towards race and her skepticism about fundamental change in society.
The United States of America, the land of the free. Mostly free if the skin tone matches with the approval of society. The never ending war on racism, equality, and segregation is a huge part of American culture. Prior to the Civil Rights Movement equality was laughed at. People of color were highly discriminated and hated for existing. During the years nineteen fifty to nineteen seventy, racism began to extinguish its mighty flames. Through the lives of numerous people equality would soon be a reality. Through the Autobiography “Coming of Age in Mississippi” by Anne Moody first person accounts of all the racism, social prejudice and violence shows how different America used to be. The autobiography holds nothing back, allowing the author to give insight on all the appalling events and tragedies. The Re-telling of actual events through Anne Moody’s eyes, reveal a connection to how wrong segregation was. The “Coming of Age in Mississippi” is an accurate representation of life in the south before and during the Civil Rights Movement.
Anne Moody was a part of the Civil Rights movement firsthand, but in her coming of age as a civil rights worker she came to doubt the ability of the movement to make real concrete change for her people. Many of the leaders of the Canton voter registration movement languished in jail and her people languished in the segregated South. The willingness of the whites to hold on to their racist attitudes, and her own people’s willingness to accept “We ain’t big enough to do it by ourselves” (p. 424), led her to doubt the ability for her people to overcome discrimination, as Anne responds to the chants of we shall overcome with “I wonder. I really wonder”(p. 424).
As one of the most proficient civil rights activist of the 1960's, Malcolm X and his speeches were very influential but particularly one speech was highly esteemed, that being the Ballot or the Bullet speech. A speech that was given after the "I have A Dream speech by Dr. Martin Luther King. Despite, Dr. Martin Luther King being a pacifist and also a civil rights activist as well; Malcolm X was more tyrannical and advocated the use of violence. During this era, the democrats were in control of the House of Representatives and the Senate, therefore both the Senate and the House of Representatives were leaning towards providing more civil rights to African-Americans. The purpose of Malcolm X’s speech was to convince African Americans to become more politically aware and to vote members of their own race into office. The year 1964 is known for civil rights activists, racist groups, and political strife. In order to achieve this goal and increase the speeches effectiveness, X utilizes a variety of rhetorical strategies within his speech.
to the african american minority at the time. His idea was the idea “to stop racial segregation in
One of the basic rights African Americans struggled to obtain was the right to vote. In 1870, the 15th Amendment was ratified. The amendment stated that “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” (U.S. Constitution). As this was thought as a victory, it was soon to be seen that it was anything but. White men in the nation saw this as a threat and improvised new ways to prevent African Americans to vote such as the installment of poll taxes, literacy test, and the “grandfather clause”. In Litwin’s book, Fighting for the Right to Vote, Litwin explains how Mississippi Delta activist, Fannie Lou Hamer assisted other African Americans in registering to vote and helping them gain a voice in the movement. Voting was not the only place where African Americans fell short of capabilities. Due to Jim Crow laws, African Americans could not do such basic things as ride first-class passenger on a primarily white train or a bus. A lady known as Rosa Parks in the neighboring state of Alabama found herself facing charges when she refused to give up her seat on the bus during the time of the movement. The Jim Crow laws were created to prevent African Americans from making any advancements that could potentially threaten white
He mentions the very recent violence that occurred in Selma, Alabama; where African Americans were attacked by police while preparing to march to Montgomery to protest voting rights discrimination. Without mentioning this violent event that occurred a week prior, there would not be much timeliness to his argument, and it wouldn’t have been as effective. The timeliness of his argument gave the speech a lot more meaning, and it heightened the emotions of many who heard the address. He is appealing to the emotions of many American people, both Congressmen and ordinary citizens, to encourage them to support his cause. He reminds us of all of the Americans around the world that are risking their lives for our freedom. He refers to them as “guardians of our liberty.” He also address the problem as the whole nation should be concerned not just the north, the south, or the African American
The Age of Jackson, from the 1820's to the 1830's, was a period of American history full of contradictions, especially in regard to democracy. The period saw an increase in voter participation, nominating committees replaced caucuses, and electors began to be popularly elected. Yet, all of these voting changes affected only a minority of the American people: White, Anglo-Saxon males. So, though one can easily tell that White, Anglo-Saxon males were gaining
When George Henry Evans cited the unalienable rights of the Declaration of Independence and that, “’to secure these rights’ against the undue influence of other classes of society, prudence… dictates the necessity of the organization of a party, who shall…prevent dangerous combinations to subvert these indefeasible and fundamental privileges”, he called for a party to become the sentinel of the original American democracy. And for many, the Jacksonian Democratic Party filled that role. The Democrats, who pursued a democracy that entailed economic and social independence for the common citizen, faced harsh opposition from the Whig Party in the Second American Party System. But apart from the political tensions of the era, the mid-1800’s were host to numerous movements and events that embodied, and didn’t embody, the Democratic ideals. Thus, it would be foolish to claim that the Democratic period merely represented a raising of the American democratic banner and even more foolish to ascribe any other black-and-white evaluation to this period. Rather, during a time of national and individual transformation, of economic missions, and of social revision, the Jacksonian Democrats succeeded in expanding their reality of individual liberty, in creating the circumstances for further change, and in falling short of some of their grandiose ideals for the “common citizen”.
Garrow, David J. Protest at Selma: Martin Luther King Jr. and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. New York: New Haven and London Yale University Press. 1978
Topic: Jacksonian Democrats viewed themselves as the guardians of the United States Constitution, political democracy, individual liberty, and equality of economic opportunity.
The purpose of the speech was to address the issues of segregation and racism as a whole. King speaks about the issues of racism and segregation in America during the 1960’s. He encourages the use of non-violent protests and to fight for equality to help America solve the issue. King begins his speech by referencing important historical documents such as the Constitution of the United States and the Emancipation Proclamation. This is emphasized when he states, ”Five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand today, signed the Emancipation Proclamation.