Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Imperialism in burma
Political issues in burma conclusion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Imperialism in burma
While looking online through different websites that contained articles and history involving the freedom to assemble, I found out about the Peace Protests in Burma. The country has a history of fighting for their rights, but there has been an uproar in recent months regarding the people peacefully protesting for changes in land and education in their country. Although their country rules are different from the United States, they still have the right to assemble peacefully if they get permission from the government five days in advance before they protest. The people of Burma should not get expensive fines or long jail time for peacefully protesting. In this paper I will break down what the freedom of assembly law means then I will connect the law of the United States to the Burma laws and I will explain how the people are being treated unfairly by the government. I will briefly discuss a harsh part of their history called the 8888 uprising where thousands of people were killed for peacefully protesting. . I will also connect the Burma situation with history in the United States during the Civil Rights Movement, when Martin Luther King preached equality by using the freedom to assemble. Although the Civil Rights Movement was more motivated by racism Dr. King still preached for equality and ability of the people to fight for what they want. My goal in this paper is to prove that the people in Burma do have a right to peacefully protest for what they want without any penalties.
The First Amendment, Freedom of Assembly. The first amendment of the U.S Constitution states that “Congress shall make no law going against establishment of religion, or prohibiting the exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...
... middle of paper ...
...ership Conference. In this group, King traveled the country giving lectures on nonviolent protest and civil rights along with meeting other activist and political leaders. All of these events led up to the March on Washington which was the biggest event ,where around 300,000 people assembled for Jobs, freedom and equality for African Americans across the country. At the march Dr. King gave his most famous ‘I have a dream’ speech which called for peace and equality and also won the 1964 Nobel Peace prize. (A&E Television Networks) Although there were lots of hardships King didn’t give up and he used the freedom of assembly to bring the people together and allow black people to be treated fairly. Just as Dr. King did, the people of Burma can use their assembly law to fight for what they feel should be changed in their country as they have to live under the conditions.
Through King’s peaceful protest, he works to find his definition of good life in equality, where peaceful protest can “create a situation. [and] inevitably open the door to negotiation,” (King). However, King’s attempt to overwrite centuries of oppression and rise against unjust laws doesn’t come without its own set of consequences and benefits.... ... middle of paper ...
The first Amendment of the United States Constitution says; “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”[1] Our fore fathers felt that this statement was plain enough for all to understand, however quite often the United States government deems it necessary to make laws to better define those rights that are stated in the Constitution. Today the framers would be both encouraged and discouraged by our modern interpretation the First Amendment the United States Constitution.
applies the principles of civil disobedience in his procedure of a nonviolent campaign. According to him, “In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self-purification; and direct action” (King 262). The first step, which is “collection of the facts,” clarify whether the matter requires civil disobedience from the society (King 262). The second step, “negotiation,” is the step where civil disobedience is practiced in a formal way; to change an unjust law, both sides come to an agreement that respects each other’s demand, (King 262). Should the second step fail, comes the “self-purification,” in which the nonconformists question their willingness to endure the consequences without any retaliation that follow enactment of civil disobedience (King 262). The fourth and the last step, “direct action,” is to execute it; coordinated actions such as protests or strikes to pressure no one, but the inexpedient government to conform to them, and advocate their movement, and thus persuade others to promote the same belief (King 262). This procedure along with principles of civil disobedience is one justifiable campaign that systematically attains its objective. King not only presents, but inspires one of the most peaceful ways to void unjust
In The Quest of Democracy, Kyi argues that human rights is what democracy is and that democracy was always in Buddhist traditions. Once democracy became known in Burma, people got interested to know what democracy more in depth. It got people wanting to learn about modern politics and the nature of democracy. The idea of democracy was getting a good response due to a guarantee for privileges and freedom. However, it was also being questioned because how can they be sure that the system will always work. The burmese people became knowledgeable through Buddha. They had gone undergone through many
In the first amendment, it is stated that all people have the Freedom of speech, religion,
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution includes the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. These clauses instruct that legislature shall neither establish an official religion nor unnecessarily restrict the practice of any religion. U.S. Const. amend. I.
Gandhi once said “An eye for an eye and the whole world is blind.” This is true in most circumstances but there are exceptions. By comparing acts of nonviolent civil disobedience with acts of violent civil disobedience it is apparent that force or violence is only necessary to combat violence but never if it effects the lives of the innocent. A recurrent theme in each of these examples is that there is a genuine desire to achieve equality and liberty. However, one cannot take away the liberties of others in order to gain their own. Martin Luther King Jr. believed that political change would come faster through nonviolent methods and one can not argue his results as many of the Jim Crow laws were repealed. Similarly, through nonviolent resistance Gandhi was able to eventually free India from the rule of Britain. It is true that sometimes the only way to fight violence is through violence, but as is apparent, much can be said of peaceful demonstrations in order to enact change. Thus, it is the responsibility of we as individuals to understand that nonviolence is often a more viable means to an end than violence.
First Amendment: Freedom of Religion, of Speech, of the Press, of Peaceful Assembly, and the Right to Petition
The Amendment I of the Bill of Rights is often called “the freedom of speech.” It provides a multitude of freedoms: of religion, of speech, of the press, to peacefully assemble, to petition the government. Religious freedom is vitally important to this day because it eliminates the problem of religious conflicts. Historically, many people died for their beliefs because their government only allowed and permitted one religion. T...
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” (First Amendment Center, 2008)
Through this we see that the author’s point of view is someone who understands that the events that took place that morning in Burma, were not humane and degrading.
The First Amendment of the Constitution is the most important and debatable of them all. The First Amendment states; “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, of prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
There are two parts to the freedom of religion that the First Amendment refers to: the establishment clause and the free exercise clause. The establishment clause forbids the government from declaring a specific religion for the state and supporting any laws that are biased regarding a religion. Every law or clause has standards and this specific clause has been challenged in court numerous times. This clause implicates a div...
Pugh, C.L. (2013) 'Is Citizenship the Answer? Constructions of belonging and exclusion for the stateless Rohingya of Burma.', p. 3.
Because of the Burma Road Riot, black were encouraged to fight for equal rights. When they rioted they were not just smashing store windows, but, in the process, they were tearing down a social and political wall that was deeply rooted on oppression, racism, and exploitation. The riot was an important first step in the popular movement that would develop The Bahamas in decades to come.