Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
First amendment analysis
First amendment in modern law
Surveillance in the united states
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: First amendment analysis
The free press plays a very pivotal role in society. Through the First Amendment, the press is allowed complete and total control over what it publishes or broadcasts, so far as it does not publish a false story that invades ones privacy. In order for members to be aware of what’s going on in society especially in a democracy, they must be informed. With the help of our free press, Americans are guaranteed constant access to critical and noteworthy news protected by the First Amendment. The First Amendment became adopted on December 15, 1971. This amendment along with nine others helped make up the Bill of Rights. In its text the First Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…” (Cornell). The First Amendment is important because it not only allows the public to become well informed but it allows the public help to govern themselves. In …show more content…
Bruce Sanford and Jane Kirtley’s article, The Press, they state “first amendment freedoms are valuable because they help society find truth in the “market” of ideas” (266). This saying is also known as Holmes marketplace model. The First Amendment is so much more than just a ratification to the constitution, it’s a main reason why Democracy is so important in this country. The First Amendment helps our society be responsible and powerful. The press serves as our spy, our watchdog and of course as our reporters. They stay on top of government happenings, business transactions and local events occurring near you. There are many important roles that the press plays. The press is not only in charge of educating and reporting to its viewers and listeners on what’s going on but the press has the power to talk to those of higher importance, inspire change in the world and provide information on major events taking place around the world. It is because of the press that we, the audience have the ability to take a stance on important events occurring as well as making our voice heard. Thanks to the many different media outlets considered press, getting a message out to the public has never been easier. The media’s role can be classified into three main things. These three roles are surveillance, socialization and interpretation. Under surveillance, the media serves both the needs of the society and of the individual. The media gets to set the agenda and how they go about it but their goal is to provide the information to those watching and listening. This leads us into interpretation, which is a major concept for the media. They have to be able to interpret the events and put them into a larger framework. They must be able to communicate and analyze the events in a way that their viewers understand and comprehend enough to know what is occurring. Lastly, comes socialization, which helps the public learn the values of society and what is expected of a citizen. Socialization helps viewers communicate with one another about the topics discussed on the news. For these reasons the media does play an influential role in our society. Without these roles, the media would have no grounds to follow and thus be in complete power of what news they offer to us. The role that the media is supposed to play in society however has consistently been blurred. Today more people tend to believe local news over national news. The reason for that is because news today is referred to as “infotainment” meaning it is more about the entertainment of the story rather than the facts. There are multiple problems with this blurred line. The first and probably the biggest problem is that the news can often be seen as biased. In today’s society we depend on the media for a lot and that is certainly true about politics. In Making Sense of Media & Politics by Gadi Wolfsfeld, a part reads, “this need for journalists to embarrass candidates is a perfect demonstration of the price modern democracies pay for having such an entertainment oriented press” (75). The news is in constant need for drama and immediacy meaning that if the article or show isn’t grasping its viewer’s attention, that person will continue to search until they find something that does. Therefore the news has to be bias to keep the attention of its viewers as well as being more about the drama than the content. The other issue with the news is that it reports what it wants. That being said if they find something isn’t important they can choose not to report it and we would never know. They can turn heads away from the governmental debates or crisis’s going on in a different country. They have the power to do what they wish and that is kind of scary. We expect the news to be unbiased and reporting everything that we, as citizens should know but that’s certainly not the case. However the problem with the media and what they portray isn’t necessarily just the media’s doing. In today’s society, the politically powered, the people that the media chase, want to control more of what the media shows and analyzes. Political figures want to monopolize the media to their advantage in order to gain support. Because of the First Amendment, reporters are protected from state sanction for unpopular speech, however private institutions as well as individuals still have the right to sue for libel and unlawfully invading someone’s privacy. In regards to privacy, I believe that by the media and journalists reporting private and secret information they are benefitting the public. The media’s job is supposed to be to find the truth and because of the First Amendment they are allowed to do that job. The issue is that with the government come certain restrictions such as limits on information given by the government. The press has the right to attend both court and the jury hearings however that right is not guaranteed; therefore the jury hearing can actually be conducted in private if the Judge wishes allowing the secrecy and limits on information to continue. A classic example of why the press reporting secret and private news as a good thing is Edward Snowden otherwise known as Verax.
Edward Snowden was a former CIA employee and government contractor. In 2013, Snowden released numerous classified documents from the United States, National Security Agency. He leaked these documents to The Guardian, The Washington Post and The New York Times. While some officials view him as a fraud, I commend not only him but the press as well. They uncovered a story so riveting and important that it caused people to second guess whether the government could actually be trusted. The information he leaked revealed numerous global surveillance programs run by both the NSA and governments in Europe. Many journalists view Snowden as a hero because he helped them not only get their job done but reveal that government isn’t always honest with it’s country. I am a firm believer that is always better knowing than having to wonder what may be or what could have
occurred. Journalists who publish private information are doing our country a favor. They are letting us in the know of everything that the government does not. While it may not always be for the better, it helps us as individuals have a say in what occurs in our country. It helps us be well informed and educated citizens, allowing us to express our opinions and let our voices be heard with the information we have. That is how a Democracy is supposed to be run and with the press they help to keep that going. While the press may not always be an unbiased outlet, they are a source of news for us: locally, nationally and globally. They provide us with the information we need to help govern our lives individually and as a society. Publishing secret information only benefits our citizens because we should be in the know of events that take place within this country.
In America the Amendment 1 of the U.S. Constitution gives the American people the right to peaceably assemble and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Most notably Amendment 1 is known for and most often cited as giving the Freedom of Speech. Even before this amendment was ratified people in the U.S. were protesting, as in the Boston Tea Party. Protesting has been a way to effect change in America. A question to ask is this: is there a right way or wrong way to protest.
The origins of the first Amendment date back to when the Constitution and Bill of rights were first being debated and written down. Thomas Jefferson once said, “A democracy cannot be both ignorant and free.” The American settlers desired freedom and a sense of sincerity, or openness. The harsh oppression the British placed on the settlers left lasting a lasting impression on the settlers’ minds. They used their familiarity and experiences with the oppression to form the ideals of the Constitution and the Amendments. According civilliberty.about.com, the father of the Constitution, Thomas Jefferson, was somewhat captivated with the concepts of freedom of...
The first Amendment of the United States Constitution says; “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”[1] Our fore fathers felt that this statement was plain enough for all to understand, however quite often the United States government deems it necessary to make laws to better define those rights that are stated in the Constitution. Today the framers would be both encouraged and discouraged by our modern interpretation the First Amendment the United States Constitution.
One key to the first amendment of the United states constitution is the right to free speech. Freedom of speech is what separates America than other countries around the world that forbid freedom of speech rights. Freedom of speech has been in our constitution since the year 1791. When James Madison “the father of the constitution” wrote the bill of rights he saw potential and that it would make the country more freedom filled than other countries. The land of the free is what the United States is nicknamed and it 's because of our rights to express ourselves as freely as we desire.
It is 1776, the United States had just declared it’s Independence from England and one of those reasons for departing was the requirement to house British soldiers at anytime. After the French and Indian War England felt the need to thousands of soldiers in the colonies and an colonial quartering act was passed in 1765.When the British required the quartering of soldiers in the colonies it had passed in England that quartering of soldiers was not required. This quartering act on the colonies along with overtaxing lead to the start of the Revolution.Once the Americans won the war and had need to draft a constitution for the newly formed country, the exclusion of this requirement had to be added to the Bills of Rights.
we had no legally protected rights of free speech in anything like the form we
The First Amendment was written because at America's inceptions, many citizens demanded a guarantee of their basic freedoms. The First Amendment protects five basic rights. The First Amendment protects the freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of religion,
The first amendment is the cornerstone of our American society founded years ago by our forefathers. Without the first amendment many ideas, beliefs, and groups could not exist today. The first amendment guaranteed the people of the United States the freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, and freedom of petition. Although the first amendment guarantees us, Americans the freedom of speech, we cannot use it to cause others harm. This amendment has helped shaped Americans into what we are today, because of our right to assemble, speak freely, and worship as we please.
Edward Snowden. This is a name that will be in the history books for ages. He will be branded a traitor or a whistleblower, depending on where you look. Many Americans feel that Edward Snowden is a traitor who sold the United States’ secrets, aiming to harm the nation. Others believe that he was simply a citizen of the United States who exercised his right to expose the government for their unconstitutional actions.
Before all of the top secret NSA (National Security Agency) documents on which details of a global surveillance system run by NSA were breached, Edward Snowden was an American computer specialist, a CIA member, and an NSA contractor. Edward Snowden was a regular, wealthy, government employee with some great positions and credentials. He was an American born man and was serving his country. He won the Sam Adams award which is given once a year to an intelligence professional who shows great integrity to the CIA. Many other recipients of this award have also been whistle blowers like Snowden. Before all the leaking and background information is given keep the question of hero or villain in your mind.
Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency (N.S.A) subcontractor turned whistle-blower is nothing short of a hero. His controversial decision to release information detailing the highly illegal ‘data mining’ practices of the N.S.A have caused shockwaves throughout the world and have raised important questions concerning how much the government actually monitors its people without their consent or knowledge. Comparable to Mark Felt in the Watergate scandals, Daniel Ellsberg with the Pentagon Papers, Edward Snowden joins the rank of infamous whistleblowers who gave up their jobs, livelihood, and forever will live under scrutiny of the public all in the service to the American people. Edward Snowden released information detailing the extent of the N.S.A breaches of American privacy and in doing so, became ostracized by the media and barred from freely reentering America, his home country.
The First Amendment of the Constitution is the most important and debatable of them all. The First Amendment states; “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, of prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
It is reasonable to argue that, governmental institutions or people with authority are subject to withhold a great deal of information from society. Many may argue that secrets are kept to ensure the safety of the nation. Thus, upholding the governmental duty of protecting the nation against possible threats. On the other hand, many believe that secrets may exist which violate our constitutional rights. Over the last year, Edward Snowden, has made headline news for leaking sensitive governmental information to the press. Edward Snowden is a 29-year-old high school drop-out, who was a tech specialist for the National Security Association. Snowden had discovered and later exposed the NSA for monitoring the nations e-mails, phone calls, and internet searches. As the allegations spread like wild fire, Edward Snowden sought asylum in Russia for one year. Snowden had a valid and justifiable reason to expose the NSA to the world because they were in violation of our fourth Amendment rights to unreasonable searches and seizures. The government called him a traitor, while others viewed him as a hero for exposing the government. Edward Snowden is a whistle blower because he felt that it is up to society to decide if governmental practices are just or unjust. Snowden does “express the highest respect for the law”, and he wanted to protect the right of privacy for American citizens.
...ard Snowden to me is a Hero who put his life at risk in saving the privacy of millions of people.
Americans look to the press to provide the information they need to make informed political choices. How well the press lives up to its responsibility to provide this information has a direct impact upon Americans: how they think about and act upon the issues that confront them.