Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Repealing the Sixteenth Amendment and its implications
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Would you like to have more money in your pocket? Most people believe that there will be more money in the packet if the worker’s paycheck is larger. Some people believe the solution is found in regulating the minimum wages paid to employees. There is a good reason you are earning more money, spending more money, but retaining less for personal use. There have been eleven recessions since the decade of the Great Depression beginning in 1929. We must do something about this national financial problem before it becomes a crisis. We may not recover from the next recession. This essay describes the attributes of the “Fair Tax” system, which many informed analysts will be in the best interest of the government of this country, and the people , who live here, especially you and your family. In this essay you will discover how we can alleviate the country’s major issues in financial management, enhance enforcement of immigration laws and improve the financial support of our education system. All this is proposed with change to just one government agency.
First, let’s define this proposal. The Fair Tax is a comprehensive proposal that replaces all federal income and payroll base taxes with an integrated three-fold approach: (1) a progressive national retail sales tax, (2) a “prebate” to ensure no American pays federal taxes on spending up to the poverty level, and (3) the repeal of the 16th Amendment (our current tax amendment). This proposal abolishes all federal personal and corporate income taxes, gifts, estate, capital gains, Social Security, Medicare, and self-employment taxes and replaces them with one simple federal retail sales tax that will be administered primarily by existing state sales tax authorities. The Internal Revenu...
... middle of paper ...
...g the deficit. As you can see, it would also cause our immigration problem to either go away or make it harder for employers to employ undocumented workers. It could even make illegals leave the country all together. This great tax proposal would make our education system stronger and the future of our youth stronger. So when is this tax proposal going to make it to the congressional floor? Well, to answer that, maybe never or maybe when our representatives’ congress gets out of the old way of thinking and are open to trying new things. Maybe or maybe it is when it does not hurt their wallets as much. Maybe it is when we the people of the United States of America stand up and say with a united voice, it is time for a change, because we are tired of having a recession every ten years or less. What do you think? Here is the real question: What will you do about it?
Leading up to the year 1981, America had fallen into a period of “stagflation”, a portmanteau for ‘stagnant economy’ and ‘high inflation’. Characterized by high taxes, high unemployment, high interest rates, and low national spirit, America needed to look to something other than Keynesian economics to pull itself out of this low. During the election of 1980, Ronald Reagan’s campaign focused on a new stream of economic policy. His objective was to turn the economy into “a healthy, vigorous, growing economy [which would provide] equal opportunities for all Americans, with no barriers born of bigotry or discrimination.” Reagan’s policy, later known as ‘Reaganomics’, entailed a four-point plan which cut taxes, reduced government spending, created anti-inflationary policy, and deregulated certain products. Though ‘Reaganomics’ was successful both at controlling “stagflation” and promoting economic growth, it has and always will be an extremely controversial topic regarding the redistribution of wealth.
Whether or not to keep or discard the Bush era tax cuts for the wealthy, give tax breaks to the lowest tax bracket, and even throwing out the entire current tax code and replacing it with a simpler version, tax code and tax law has been a very controversial topic for the past few years. As it stands, the current tax code has over seventy two thousand pages, compared to the four hundred pages it had in 1913. There are many different stakeholders in this debate including taxpayers, corporations, businesses, etc. Americans for Tax Reform (ATR) is an organization that was “founded in 1985 by Grover Norquist at the request of President Reagan”(.N.p.). Their goal is to create and advocate for a simple flat tax,“...on the belief that they will provide a strong stimulus to investment, employment, and output” (Stokey 1). They promote their organization and represent taxpayers in all fifty states. Along with tax reform, ATR also advocates for individual health care, free trade, and spending transparency (.N.p.). Using very simple and easy to understand images, ATR is able to convey their goals and get information across to the general audience that visits their website.
I. You might have heard politicians in the news, talk about overhauling our tax system with a new fix-all idea, the flat-tax. This would simplify our overly complicated tax system and might seem appealing at first glance, however there are serious problems with it.
In “The Way to Wealth” Benjamin Franklin writes, “We are taxed twice as much by our idleness, three times as much by our pride, and four times as much by our folly” trying to prove a point that frequently people are being taxed an outrageous amount and are taxing themselves extra by actions like spending excessive amounts of money (Franklin 237). Throughout Franklin’s “The Way to Wealth,” he explains how an American economy should work and maintain a stabilized economy for themselves. In the American realm today, about 5.0% of people find themselves facing unemployment, a time of stress and conflict (“Databases, Calculators & Tables by Subject”). With the unemployment rates rising for the first time since February of 2015, the American economy is also facing an increase in debt levels throughout personal households
What does every employee constantly complain about every single paid day? What is one of the main topics that the presidential candidates stressed while campaigning? How come people like drug dealers get a big advantage in this world when it comes to pay taxes? And again, what consistently holds down the hard working American? I have found a way to answer all those questions? This concept has actually found a way to tax everybody, not just the working ones. This concept also makes it fair and economical to our federal government, not just the individual taxpayer. Under the implementation of this concept an individual could receive a paycheck and have virtually no taxes taken from it. This 15% sales tax eliminates confusion, taxes everybody, and organizes the government in a way that has never been done.
...h; they have to think about the cause and effect of the situation. Most people are just very concerned that this tax is going to break them, which may be true because the dollar they pay everyday for a month could add up to 60 dollars; that 60 dollars can go towards groceries, or gas.
For the past eleven years, opponents from the left and right side of the political spectrum have lambasted the FairTax. Politicians who don’t want to relinquish the power given them by the current tax system are the proposal’s biggest opposition. They don’t want to give up the withholding system. They don’t want to give up the sixteenth amendment. They don’t want to lower taxes. They oppose the FairTax for the sake of their own greed and agendas. Despite all their baseless criticism, the FairTax is continuing to gain support on the grass roots and political levels. The statistical data and scientific analysis, compiled over the last eleven years, is overwhelming proof of the FairTax’s ability to bring transparency to the tax system, broaden the tax base and to fix the U.S. economy.
After about twelve years of the DREAM Act floating around in congress, many people on both sides of the issue are unsure of what will happen. For some, the fact that it has been around for long without much progress means that the DREAM Act will not pass. On the other side of this issue, the dreamers, continue fighting to keep the DREAM Act alive, so that all the immigrant students can continue to post secondary education, and not have to stop their education at the end of 12th grade. These young immigrants were brought here when they were younger and have lived in the United States most of their life. They are known as dreamers because many of them cannot continue their education due to the barriers placed on them because of their undocumented status. Those who wish to continue to a post secondary education have to pay higher out-of-state tuition rates. The passing of the DREAM Act will provide a path to legalization for educated and dedicated individuals who will continue to contribute a lot to the U.S. economy and in many other ways. The majority of undocumented students were brought to the U.S. when they were small children, and they “should be allowed to have the chance to stay in the country call home” (Bennion).
Income inequality has affected American citizens ever since the American Dream came to existence. The American Dream is centered around the concept of working hard and earning enough money to support a family, own a home, send children to college, and invest for retirement. Economic gains in income are one of the only possible ways to achieve enough wealth to fulfill the dream. Unfortunately, many people cannot achieve this dream due to low income. Income inequality refers to the uneven distribution of income and wealth between the social classes of American citizens. The United States has often experienced a rise in inequality as the rich become richer and the poor become poorer, increasing the unstable gap between the two classes. The income gap in America has been increasing steadily since the late 1970’s, and has now reached historic highs not seen since the 1920’s (Desilver). UC Berkeley economics professor, Emmanuel Saez conducted extensive research on past and present income inequality statistics and published them in his report “Striking it Richer.” Saez claims that changes in technology, tax policies, labor unions, corporate benefits, and social norms have caused income inequality. He stands to advocate a change in American economic policies that will help close this inequality gap and considers institutional and tax reforms that should be developed to counter it. Although Saez’s provides legitimate causes of income inequality, I highly disagree with the thought of making changes to end income inequality. In any diverse economic environment, income inequality will exist due to the rise of some economically successful people and the further development of factors that push people into poverty. I believe income inequality e...
The flat tax will make taxes fair for all people. No matter what race a person is, what social class a person is in, or who they’re friends with, they will end up paying the same rate. Every single taxpayer will have to sacrifice just as much of his or her life as the next person down the road. One of the three main reasons for taxes is to maintain fairness. This is most reasonable ways to maintain fairness. The wealthy will still be paying more money than the poor person, but they both have the same tax burden.
With the federal taxes lowered, everyone gains. We see an increase in pay, which is desperately needed in today’s economy. We see an increase in the federal revenue funds. We see the national debt being lowered. We even see the benefits towards other systems such as the increase of trade and lowered prices in the U.S. in turn giving us more to spend and repeat the cycle. These are the reasons why our taxes should be lowered.
Tax reform has undergone much debate in the political stratosphere recently. The tax system has been stigmatized because of a multitude of reasons that include corruption. Additionally, tax reform is a very complex issue. In addition, there has been an abundance of negotiations in Congress to pass some type of tax reform. Despite these talks, actual action has remained stagnant. This topic clearly reflects the collective action principle and the policy principle due to failed tax reform negotiations and the outcomes of various legislation.
In "Stop Coddling the Super-Rich" Warren Buffett admits that very wealthy people like himself pay lower tax rates than the middle class, thanks to special tax categories for investment income created by our elected officials. Nevertheless, Buffet contends that the wealthy can and should contribute more tax revenue to the federal government. In addition, Buffet offers strong statics. Furthermore, Buffet argues that higher taxes will not slow down job growth.
... alternative minimum taxes. This tax will let the people become more active in government because under this tax they don’t have to pay for it. The FairTax helps create jobs because it gives people more money to spend increasing consumption and creating jobs which are desperately needed now. The repeal of these federal taxes will attract foreign investors to America to spend and help to grow the economy. Although many Americans are getting tax refunds around this time they are only getting the money they should have already had. The simple way to fund the government is much better than the complicated and confusing process of filing taxes. April 15th can just be another normal day for all of us, instead of one of the year’s most stressful days. As the FairTax gains support the United States is getting closer to the day when it says goodbye to April the 15th forever.
As for me, I have been in favor of the "fair tax" initiative since the time I first read about it. The nice thing about the fair tax is that we are, in some ways, already participating in an abridged method, at least those of us who don't live in Texas or Nevada. I'm talking about a sales tax on consumption. Nothing will tick of the Federal government quicker than the realization that they cannot tax your income, savings accounts, inheritance, etc… It forces the lobbyists out of the tax realm, simplifies the notion of how the revenue is gained at the federal level, severely cuts the IRS, and hamstrings the IRS' ability to be weaponized by political parties. The nice thing is that it is a playing field leveler on steroids where everyone has skin in the game and the consumption rate is what is the controlling factor. Therefore, the wealthy will automatically pay more because their rates of consumption are