Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Exposure therapy term paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Exposure therapy term paper
Exposure therapy has garnered attention for its effectiveness and timeliness to cure diagnoses like posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), obsessive-compulsive disorder, phobias, and other anxiety disorders. Manuals have been created, self-help books have been published, and online support groups have been developed all for the purpose of establishing an exposure therapy community. Most of the literature around the ethics of it focuses on intentionally causing anxiety and causing harm for the client. In response to this, proponents and advocates of exposure therapy have published numerous articles on the importance of using this therapy for anxiety disorders; and how unethical it is not to use exposure therapy. After a year of an undergraduate internship working with adults who had had traumatic psychological injuries, I was given the privileged position of hearing a client’s perspective on exposure therapy. Some loved it, some hated it but felt compelled to complete, and some refused to do portions of it. Without having a knowledge base in ethical practices, I continued my participation in it: relaxation training. Unbeknownst to me, one of the clinicians who had been conducting exposure therapy with one of our mutual clients was suddenly fired. The client, after finding this out, terminated his treatment with all services. After an internal investigation was conducted, we learned the clinician had a sexual relationship with the client. It should be noted that this clinician was not a psychologist, and the client was referred to another clinic for treatment. However, as an undergraduate student keen to continue her education in counselling, I was became alerted to the detriments of exposure therapy.
I believe exposure therapy can...
... middle of paper ...
....
Leo, R. J. (1999). Competency and the capacity to make treatment decisions: A primer for primary care physicians. Primary Care Companion to the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 1. 131–141.
Olatunji, B. O., Deacon, B. J., Abramowitz, J. S. (2009). The cruelest cure? Ethical issues in the implementation of exposure-based treatments. Cognitive and Behavioural Practice, 16, 172-180.
Strasburger, L. H., Jorgenson, L., & Sutherland, P. (1992). The prevention of psychotherapist sexual misconduct: avoiding the slippery slope. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 46(4), 544-555.
Wolitzky-Taylor, K. B., Viar-Paxton, M. A., Olatunji, B. (2012). Ethical issues when considering exposure. In T. E. Davis III et al. (Eds.), Intensive One-Session Treatment of Specific Phobias, Autism and Child Psychopathology Series (p. 195- 208). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
Those who were affected by the testing in hospitals, prisons, and mental health institutions were the patients/inmates as well as their families, Henrietta Lacks, the doctors performing the research and procedures, the actual institutions in which research was being held, and the human/health sciences field as a whole. Many ethical principles can be applied to these dilemmas: Reliance on Scientific Knowledge (1.01), Boundaries of Competence (1.02), Integrity (1.04), Professional and Scientific Relationships (1.05), Exploitative Relationships (1.07, a), Responsibility (2.02), Rights and Prerogatives of Clients (2.05), Maintaining Confidentiality (2.06), Maintaining Records (2.07), Disclosures (2.08), Treatment/Intervention Efficacy (2.09), Involving Clients in Planning and Consent (4.02), Promoting an Ethical Culture (7.01), Ethical Violations by Others and Risk of Harm (7.02), Avoiding False or Deceptive Statements (8.01), Conforming with Laws and Regulations (9.01), Characteristics of Responsible Research (9.02), Informed Consent (9.03), and Using Confidential Information for Didactic or Instructive Purposes (9.04), and Debriefing (9.05). These particular dilemmas were not really handled until much later when laws were passed that regulated the way human subjects could be used for research. Patients
A physician has an unenviable position; he is closest to man approaching a god-like stature. And despite the demise of 'doctor knows best', we still need to trust his diagnosis-something that is increasingly difficult in a world where information is widely available, and Google substitutes for a doctor. In the case of psychiatry the issue of trust is amplified since diagnosis is based on a patient's expressed thoughts and overt behaviours rather than solely on biological phenomena. And these thoughts and behaviours are influenced by the patient's environment-a mix of his social, cultural and technological experiences.
The study took advantage of an oppressed and vulnerable population that was in need of medical care. Some of the many ethical concerns of this experiment were the lack of informed consent, invasion of privacy, deception of participants, physical harm, mental harm, and a lack of gain versus harm. One ethical problem in this experiment was that the benefits did not outweigh the harm to participants. At the conclusion of the study there were virtually no benefits for the participants or to the treatment of syphilis. We now have
The Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) is funding this psychosexual deviancy evaluation and the referring Social Worker is George Nelson. This evaluation has been requested to determine Mr. Victor Schorr’s current risk of sexual misconduct. It is alleged that Mr. Schorr engaged in child molest behaviors with his children from his third wife, Jennifer Schorr, and one daughter from his second marriage. Mr. Schorr denies these allegations.
...rt of the medical profession, the therapists are expected to maintain the confidentiality of their clients. A psychologist must be able to acquire a client’s trust in order to keep quality confidentiality amongst the two parties. Only on seriously occasions should the patient’s records be shared, under certain other conditions the psychotherapy records of a minor can be reviewed by others without prior written consent. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), psychologists can usually give way the patient records to parents or legal guardians. Some of the ethical rules that apply to the practice of child and adolescent psychiatry are clear and generally agreed upon For example, rules against sexual contact or harsh or abusive treatment are encoded as boundary violations. A psychotherapist must be able to respect the boundaries of the client.
Over the course of their therapeutic relationship, Dr. Davenport violates client confidentiality as it is described by the American Counseling
...lin, and Kevin Grumbach. "Screening and Intervention for Intimate Partner Abuse Practices and Attitudes of Primary Care Physicians." The Journal of American Medical Association 282.5 (1999): 468-474. JAMA. Web. 25 Nov. 2013.
Mandatory ethics is the level of functioning where the counselor is abiding by the basic “do’s and don’ts” of professional counseling. These are definitive codes that will protect a counselor from legal action and professional censure. All mental health professionals will be held accountable by the minimum standards set by state licensure boards and courts of law. Issues addressed by the Code of Conduct of the American Psychological Association (APA) include, but are not limited to, competence, human relations, confidentiality and fees. (American Psychological Association, 2002)
In the United States, the basis for ethical protection for human research subjects in clinical research trials are outlined by the Belmont Report developed in the late 1970’s. This document, published by the Nation Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, highlights three important basic principles that are to be considered when any clinical trial will involve human research subjects. They are; respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. (Chadwick & Gunn, 2004)
The Belmont Report distinguishes three center moral standards in regards to all human subject experimentation: autonomy, respect for persons, beneficence and justice. Autonomy alludes to the right of an individual to determine what they will or will not partake in. Respect for persons requires medical researchers to obtain informed consent from their subjects, which means that participants must be given precise information about their circumstances and treatment options so that they can decide what is best for them. Beneficence means that all test subjects must be informed about the advantages as well as all the possible risks of the treatment(s) they consent to participate in. The principle of justice includes individual and societal justice.
The article “Managing boundaries under pressure: A qualitative study of therapists’ experiences of sexual attraction in therapy” states that throughout a lifetime of practice, many therapists don’t cross boundaries and the relationship is strictly professional. That leads to the questions about what strategies they use to help them during difficult situations where boundaries could be crosses. (Martin, Godfrey, Meekums, & Madill
This balance is quite important as the well being of participants is at risk. Over the last twentieth century, there have been numerous examples in which ethical principles have not been considered in research leading to ethical breaches that have negative implications on study participants.1 One US human experimentation study which breached ethical conduct was the US Public Health Service Syphilis Study, more commonly known as the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, which was conducted from 1932 through 1972.2 The study recruited 399 African-American male subjects diagnosed with syphilis. The recruited men came from poor, rural counties around Tuskegee, Alabama. The stated purpose of the study was to obtain information about the course of untreated syphilis. The study was initially meant to be for 6 months, however the study was modified into a “death as end-point study”.
If I were a psychotherapy researcher planning to study the effectiveness of a new approach to psychotherapy for people with severe depression, I would have to address several ethical issues. I would have to first and foremost address the issue of possible harm to the participants. As a psychotherapist according the APA ethics code 3.4 I must take reasonable steps to avoid harming the participants and to minimize harm where it is foreseeable and
Sexual relationships between counselors and clients should never ben permitted due to the power associated with the counselor’s role with clients. While ethical guidelines vary between different counseling associations as to whether it is acceptable for counselors to have sexual relationships with clients after the professional relationship has ended, in many cases these relationships continue to be prohibited. This standard is held because some believe that the powe...
First, the participants should be given the chance to decide if they want to partake in the experiment. The participants could be under age or concerned for their safety which are valid reasons for them not to participate in the study. It does not matter if the study was single blinded, it was vital to tell the participants that they are being studied (Cicarelli and White, 2015, p. 33). Second, participants are not allowed to withdraw from the study. Due to the participants not being informed of the study they are unable to withdraw. Third, investigators do not inform the participants of any risks. While the researchers do not use equipment that could cause bodily harm the participants can suffer a greater risk that involves their privacy. Privacy helps people maintain who they are as an induvial and when that is violated they lose the ability to trust not only others, but themselves in certain situations. Lastly, the investigators do not debrief participants. Debriefing is a critical part of any experience because it not only allows the experimenter to share their findings, but it gives participants the opportunity to ask questions. Due to the importance of ethics in an experiment I would correct the four violations that were discussed