Narrow Supervision: The Essential Dimensions Of Classical Management

469 Words1 Page

The essential dimensions of classical management were based on a closed system view of organisation; that is, essential dimensions emphasised on a mechanical structure of control. So the essential dimensions of classical management break down to a set of four rigid and formal guidelines:
 Bureaucratic forms of control
 Narrow supervisory span
 Closely prescribed roles
 Clear and formal definitions of procedures, which means areas of specialisation and hierarchical relationship.

These essential dimensions of classical management promote formality, symmetry and rigidity. By maintaining these essential dimensions, the goal is that control and compliance exists so as efficiency and productivity is maximised.

Bureaucratic forms of control create standardisation and this is bound with centralised power. These are the attributes wanted by those who are in command. By having strict bureaucratic control, those who are at the top of the hierarchy have much power, while those who are at the bottom have strictly little or no control.

Narrow supervision is an essential dimension to classical management. By maintaining narrow supervision the effectiveness of work is maximised, so as to increase yield and profit. Narrow supervision …show more content…

This essential aspect of classical management originated from Taylor’s methods and his foundation of scientific management. It recognises that specialisation maximises the efficiency of a worker. This essential dimension of classical management has influenced the efficiency of the manufacture of goods in large factories, such as Mitsubishi Australia, and the effects of this methodology can be seen throughout the industrial revolution. Specialisation creates a mechanistic structure to an organisation and is a method of scientific management that hasn’t changed much from when it first

Open Document