The Employment-At-Will Doctrine

1288 Words3 Pages

You may ask yourself what is the Employment-At-Will doctrine. Well Google gives the meaning, “This refers to the presumption that employment is for an indefinite period of time and may be terminated either by employer or employee. This is the historical approach that courts have taken in interpreting employment relationships”. To illustrate this into simple terms, it simply means he or she can get laid off or fired or can just leave dependent upon the circumstances of the business. Do we see this in society daily? Yes we do, for example Schaefer Systems International will hire an employee through a temp service but whenever there time is up Schaefer simply lets them go. Simply because they are temp (temporary) workers. Throughout this paper …show more content…

We all know that one cannot miss jury duty unless it is medical related, but in another since nothing probably want happen since The Daily Dot states, “The longer answer is probably nothing, but it depends. The reality is that it’s generally not in the court’s best interests to spend time and resources tracking down people who didn’t respond to their summons” which I find to be good because the government should force people to do this. If we closely look back in this case and as an exception to the employment-at-will doctrine, no employer cannot legally fire Anna for the following reason. Jury duty is an important obligation of all citizens to help courts find a guilty or non-guilty verdict. Of course an employer who is notified in advance of a jury duty may not fire. Anna’s jury duty is a protected act because it constitutes an engaging act that are in the public …show more content…

1-13-10 et seq.).” If an employer was to discharge an individual due to discrimination they could face hefty lawsuits and be presented with a bad reputation.
Wrongful discharge, “As a general rule, if a federal, state, or local law grants employees the right to engage in an activity or to enjoy a benefit, employees should never be disciplined, discharged, or otherwise retaliated against for requesting or attempting to do so.” As the example of health an employer cannot. Discharge or discriminate against him or her because they file a complaint. If this action is take place an employee has obligations to sue a

More about The Employment-At-Will Doctrine

Open Document