Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cheating academic dishonesty
Essays on academic cheating
My teaching methods
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cheating academic dishonesty
No Regrets for the Confidence Betrayed
Cheating has been around since the dawn of time. Kids have been writing answers on their hand, arm, small pieces of paper, and using those notes to cheat on tests, quizzes, competitions, etc. The Emperor's Club shows this. In the film, Mr. Hundert is a history teacher at St. Benedick's School for Boys. His class consists of people who want to be there, learn, and achieve the great honor of being Mr. Julius Caesar. Mr. Julius Caesar is a competition that happens annually in their school to show who is the smartest student in their school. Martin Blythe, Deepak Mehta, and Louis Masoudi are three students who want greatly to be in the Mr. Julius Caesar contest, and they definitely know the material because they study at all hours of the day. However, when one student, Sedgewick Bell, joins the class, things take an unexpected turn. Sedgewick Bell is a goof-off, run-of-the-mill class clown. He simply doesn't care about school, the class--all of it. This is where Mr. Hundert gives him a book, and all the time in the world to study, and the best part is Bell chooses to study. By the end of the "finals" to determine who goes into the Mr. Julius
…show more content…
Julius Caesar contest (twenty-five years later). His method is a little more clever, but Mr. Hundert could still identify that he was cheating. One can only imagine how Mr. Hundert felt when he discovered Bell cheating again. People would assume: betrayal, anger, sever disappointment, and perhaps a sense of self blame. Mr. Hundert later calls Bell on his cheating after the contest, and he says, "I failed you. I didn't fail you for a grade, I failed you as a teacher." Bell then responds with that everything should be taken if one is to want it. One would assume if he wanted a rematch it would be to redeem any honor he had left. But, instead, he choses to look like he knows everything; when in reality, he knew little to
In When the Emperor Was Divine by Julie Otsuka, each of the characters – the mother, the daughter, the son, and the father - change because of their time spent in the Japanese-American internment camps. These characters change in not only physical ways, but they also undergo psychic and emotional changes as a result of staying in the camps. These changes weaken their resolve for living and cause the quality of their lives to decline; some of these changes will affect their lives forever. Their reclassification into the internment camps stays with the family long after they are released from the camps.
Julius competition, as his morals are no longer there and when Sedgewick cheats again for the second time, Hundert feels broken and hides himself away from everyone. “The wind and noise could have thrown a man to the ground, and Sedgewick Bell seemed to pull at me like a magnet” (Canin, pg 198). Shows that Hundert was focused on Sedgewick and that from the time at St. Benedict to him leaving was horrible by putting pride into Sedgewick. “How, in fact, had i been so sure of what he’d done? what proof had i at all?” (Canin, pg 197). Manifested in Hundert to become a Mercenary because of Sedgewick donation to the school and to Hundert, which also led him to acquitting his morals into being this sovereign to become stolen from this person that has been stealing power, “he had contrived the entire rematch of “Mr.Julius Caesar” for no reason other than to gather his classmate for donations” (Canin, pg 196) and “He already wielded a potent role in the affairs of our country” (Canin, pg 196). Conspicuous that Hundert was being betrayed and suddenly loss the pride that was once there when he was putting his pride in Sedgewick. By this time Hundert “I felt like a spurned sovereign in this castle tower” (Canin, pg 197). Anticipate that Hundert has been abated with the scars of reality that Sedgewick was testing Hundert’s morals throughout his
The Holocaust has become the worst event in human history but why did it happen? Mein Kampf was written by who many would consider one of the evilest men to walk the earth; a man whose ideas committed one of the worst crimes in all of the man kinds history on this earth. Adolf Hitler with only his voice took the lives of millions of homosexuals, gypsies, blacks, disabled people and most of all Jewish people just for not being a part of what he viewed as the perfect race. Mein Kampf was used as an outline for the Holocaust and used against the already hurting Germany to effectively execute on of the vilest acts in history.
Shakespeare, William. “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”. Elements of Literature. Ed. Deborah Appleman. 4th ed. Texas: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 2009. 843-963.
William Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is a tragic drama, set in Ancient Rome about the horrendous death of Julius Caesar. Brutus, leader of the conspiracy against Caesar, begins as Caesar’s friend. Cassius, instigator of the conspirator, manipulates Brutus into killing Caesar. Brutus agrees to this plan because of his plans for Rome. The bond between these two connects when Brutus agrees to Cassius about killing Caesar for the best of Rome. Cassius, very power hungry, comes up with a plan that will succeed in both of them killing Caesar. They both rely on each other because they want the power that Caesar has been requested to make the best of Rome. This dream of making Rome better was manipulated by Cassius to Brutus. However,
From the late eighteenth century and early nineteenth century major historical events such as the Industrial revolution had occurred. During this period of time Europe was switching into an economy that is focused mostly in the industrial field. From this emerged two social-economic classes, the rich bourgeoisie and the poor proletariats. Furthermore tension brewed from the two groups since the bourgeoisie source of wealth was from the exploitation of the proletariats. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels’ book The Communist Manifesto responded to the situation and created a vision of an equal communist society. The Communist Manifesto was defined by the abolishment of the bourgeois sovereign rule that followed to a revolution against capitalism
The play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare showcases many characters and events that go through many significant changes. One particular character that went through unique changes was Julius Caesar. The 16th century work is a lengthy tragedy about the antagonists Brutus and Cassius fighting with the protagonists Octavius, Antony, and Lepidus over the murder of Julius Caesar. Although the play’s main pushing conflict was the murder of Julius Caesar, he is considered a secondary character, but a protagonist. Throughout the theatrical work Julius Caesar’s actions, alliances, character developments, and internal and external conflicts display his diverse changes.
Allen, Janet. "Julius Caesar." Holt McDougal Literature. Orlando, FL: Holt McDougal/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2012. N. pag. Print.
Greed, ambition, and the possibility of self-gain are always constant in their efforts to influence people’s actions. In Julius Caesar, Marcus Brutus, a venerable politician, becomes a victim of the perpetual conflict between power-hungry politicians and ignorant commoners. He is a man of honor and good intentions who sacrifices his own happiness for the benefit of others. Unfortunately, his honor is strung into a fine balance between oblivion and belief and it is ultimately the cause of his downfall. His apparent obliviousness leads him to his grave as his merciful sparing of Mark Antony’s life, much like Julius Caesar’s ghost, comes back to haunt him. Overall, Brutus is an honest, sincere man who holds the lives of others in high regard while he himself acts as a servant to Rome.
Before Augustus, there was Julius Caesar. Caesar appointed himself as dictator for life in Rome. Caesar declared himself all powerful and had control over the entire government. However, Brutus and Cassius assassinated Caesar because they believed he was becoming too powerful and had created a monarchy. Caesar was the granduncle of Augustus and because of this, Augustus wanted to avoid a connection with Caesar roots in becoming a dictator. Augustus avoided a tyranny and he could eliminate the risk of being assassinated like Caesar. In turn, Augustus put on a facade of seeming as though he was not becoming all-powerful. In order to deceive the government, Augustus denied any attempts that were given to him to take the throne as an authoritarian and continued to do great things for the will of the people, to be seen in a good light. While putting on a disguise for the Senate and the people, he made it seem as though power was in the hands of the Senate, when in actuality, he was consolidating power into his own hands.
Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, is the story of a man trying his best to
Two powerful leaders, one power hungry whose ambitious ideas lead to his downfall, the other mindful of people who deserve their higher positions. A true leader is someone who has a vision, a drive and commitment to achieve what's best. In the play written by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar, Brutus and Caesar are one of the main characters. They demonstrate leadership qualities that are still relevant to today. They are both very ambitious characters; however, they do so for different reasons and differ in their openness to others. There are many similarities and differences that lie between them. Both are noble and great men with loyal followers and neither man questions the rightness of his own path. Both made crucial mistakes that resulted in their death. However, Caesar acts out of love for for himself, his country, and to retain his power as ruler of Rome. Brutus on the other hand acts out of love for freedom of Rome. This essay will discuss and compare their qualities as leaders as well as their styles and how they are effective/ineffective in the play.
An Analysis of the Absolute Monarchy of France in the 17th Century This historical study will define the absolute monarchy as it was defied through the French government in the 17th century. The term ‘absolute” is defined I the monarchy through the absolute control over the people through the king and the royal family. All matters of civic, financial, and political governance was controlled through the king’s sole power as the monarchical ruler of the French people. In France, Louis XIII is an important example of the absolute monarchy, which controlled all facts of military and economic power through a single ruler. Udder Louis XIII’s reign, the consolidation of power away from the Edicts of Nantes to dominant local politics and sovereignty
Alvin B. Kernan. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009. Print.
Julius Caesar is a play written by William Shakespeare. The play tells the tragedy of Julius Caesar. Julius Caesar was one of the greatest leader of Roman history. Caesar had many victorious moments in history and continued to grow more and more powerful. When he had started to govern Rome hatred by some people had grew. He had liberally gave many a spot to hold an important position. Even though he helped the nobility, they had betrayed him. They secretly were planning a way to cause Caesar’s death. Then plan was portrayed by Cassius and he had convinced Brutus to join along with his plan also. On March 15th they had circled around Caesar and stabbed him numerous of times thus, Caesar had fallen to the ground by his last stab by Brutus. Throughout the entire play Caesar and Brutus are notably different. Caesar is very egoistic, while Brutus is very considerate and is mannerly to others. Caesar is an extrovert, while Brutus is an introvert. Caesar is ambitious and Brutus is not ambitious.