Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on Machiavelli and his principalities
Relevance of machiavelli
Essay on Machiavelli and his principalities
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on Machiavelli and his principalities
Enshrouded by manipulation, filled with deceit, and laced with ominous intentions, William Shakespeare's Hamlet, is a compelling and renowned tragic tale of the competition for control. The main characters, most notably Prince Hamlet and Claudius, King of Denmark, provide quintessential examples of the struggle to attaining and maintaining power, and the disparity between appearances versus reality. Provided within the context of Machiavelli's controversial The Prince, their characteristics make them worthy of comparison to Machiavelli's ideas to the ideal Prince. The mind of Machiavelli's Prince is calculating and cunning, in all actions concerned foremost with the ends rather than means. Therefore, as compared to Machiavelli's ideas for successful ruling, it is Claudius who meets these standards to the fullest.
Highest among the principles Machiavelli holds for being a successful ruler, he claims, "there may be a line of conduct having the appearance of virtue, to follow which would be his ruin, and that there may be another course having the appearance of vice, by following which his safety and well-being are secured" (Machiavelli 40). He also states, "It is essential, therefore, for a Prince who desires to maintain his position, to have learned how to be other than good… as necessity requires."(Machiavelli 40). Here Claudius is an excellent example as capable of being "other than good" to secure his situation. While Claudius appears kind and caring to the court and to Gertrude, he is ruthless in his actions to maintaining his position. He uses pawns, including Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, Polonius, and Ophelia, to uncover the guise of Hamlet's madness, a tactic Machiavelli would approve. Finally when he realizes that Hamle...
... middle of paper ...
...d also approve of Hamlet's use of the play to confirm the guilt of Claudius, as "if constrained to put any to death, he should do so only when there is manifest cause or reasonable justification." (Machiavelli 44).
When compared against Machiavelli's qualities for a successful Prince, Claudius is the embodiment of the most characteristics. His methods were dexterous, delusive, and strategic, and through them he displayed directness and practically in his struggle to maintain his political power. Although in the end Claudius fails in maintaining his throne against Hamlet's plot, his actions are such that he is clearly more an ideal Machiavellian Prince than Hamlet. In his conquest for vengeance, Hamlet proves himself to be an equal adversary in the art of deception, yet because he lacked the mark of a true Prince according to Machiavelli's standards, he too failed.
... of treachery and, luckily, Hamlet realizes the king’s subterfuge, crushing the plot and flipping it back on him. Claudius remains steadfast in his efforts to remove Hamlet, going so far as to set up a false fencing competition and foolishly pushing the poisoned wine without considering the suspiciousness of the action. In his short-sighted and rash decision making, Claudius shows that he allows his inflated sense of regality and self-worth to cloud his judgment.
Machiavelli states that "it is necessary for a prince, who wishes to maintain himself, to learn how not to be good, and use this knowledge and not use it, according to the necessity of the case." Machiavelli's ideas both compare and contrast to the methods used by Hamlet. Hamlet's desire to drive the king mad and eventually kill him, is what he thinks he must do in order to set things right. Hamlet struggles to maintain his position as prince. Perhaps he lacks the essential qualities of a prince outlined by Machiavelli.
Let us look at Claudius. Claudius is devious and intelligent, but also selfish. Claudius kills his brother, the King, to gain social, political, and economic power. “Of those effects for which I did the murder: My crown, mine own ambition, and my queen.” (3.3.Lines) Claudius from a Marxist point of view would be looked at as a figure who was been corrupted in his craving for political power. In fear and to protect his power, Claudius convinces Hamlets friends, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, to spy on Hamlet to make sure he goes to England. “By letters congruing to that effect, The present death of Hamlet. Do it, England, For like the hectic in my blood he
[4, 1, 40] These idiosyncrasies are observed in the play when Claudius becomes concerned he will lose power as King and the likelihood Hamlet will murder him to avenge his father’s death. This is apparent when Gertrude informs Claudius that Hamlet is, “Mad as the sea and wind, when both contend which is mightier”. [4,1,6] With these thoughts daunting Claudius, he approaches Laertes in a Machiavellian manner to convince him to murder Hamlet, for he knows Laertes is angry, deranged and “Vows to the blackest devil” [4,5,131] after the death of his father. In doing so, Claudius has the intent to use Machiavellian powers over Laertes who is currently mentally unstable, with the objective being that Laertes will murder Hamlet to avenge his own father’s (Polonius) death. Claudius is able to successfully persuade Laertes in a manipulative speech, especially with his snide comment, “Not that I think you did not love your father, but that I know love is begun by time, and that I see a passage of proof.” [4,7,96] Claudius’ malicious comment indicates he is using his power over Laertes, so that the burden and repercussions do not rest on him, so that he may retain his authority as King. By utilizing his power over Laertes, Claudius is successful, as Hamlet is slain, however, as reflected in Claudius’
Claudius messed up Hamlet's life terribly, but by doing that he became a worthy opponent. He showed all the skills that he had to use against Hamlet at every chance he got. There are many minor details that add up when comparing Claudius with Hamlet. Claudius was a smart man who did not get as much credit as he deserved.
Throughout Shakespeare’s play Hamlet, the revelation of Claudius’ betrayal of the late King Hamlet becomes the causation of a slippery slope of events that revolve around a revenge on Claudius for his betrayal against the late King. Consequently, this key act of betrayal forms the plays overall theme of revenge while also showing the connection between power and corruption and the idea that ‘”what goes around, comes around.”
is revealed in conversation with his mother, is a negative one and that is anger.
Hamlet’s dogged attempts at convincing himself and those around him of Claudius’ evil, end up being Claudius’ best moments. The audience doesn’t have just one view of Claudius; the other characters favorable ideas of Claudius as king and person lets them see the humanity, good and bad, in Claudius. An allegory for the human soul, Claudius is many things: a father, a brother, a husband, and a king. He, like anyone else, has to play the role to the best of his ability, but is still very human and susceptible to the evils of human emotion ranging from concern to jealousy, all of which could have easily fueled his decisions. Page 1 of 6 Works Cited Hamlet, Shakespeare.
King Claudius, as illustrated in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, displays both charm and eloquence. Claudius is an intelligent person and is able to deceive people into believing he is innocent and morally guided. He is adept at manipulating people in order to advance and maintain his own power and fails to show any remorse for his actions. Claudius utilizes his linguistic skills to portray himself as an innocent and prudent leader; however, upon further inspection his diction is a mere smoke screen that hides his manipulative and cunning nature.
It is without question that William Shakespeare’s Hamlet teaches us the truth about power and social status and how it can destroy one’s character and current status on the social scale. People are in constant battle and competition with each other, aiming to reach the highest of the highest. In Shakespeare’s Hamlet, there are many scandals that happen all at once. One scandal that happens in Hamlet is the unexpected and rapid marriage of King Claudius and Queen Gertrude.
Seen from the early scenes of the play until Claudius’ last breath, Claudius’ only concern is gaining and maintaining power by any means necessary. His introduction into power begins with his own manipulative plot—that succeeds—to kill his brother, which the ghost tells Hamlet within the first act of the play (Shakespeare 59, 61). Claudius’ entrance into the position of king is centered around crime, murder, and manipulation, which in return is the basis of his reign. Further along into the play, readers notice that majority of the men portrayed in the play are concerned about justice or moral balance. However, the man in the position of absolute power is preoccupied with lust and schemes. As the play progresses, Claudius’ malfeasances become more apparent once Hamlet’s “insanity” reaches its peak and kills Polonius (171). More concerned with preserving his seat in the court, Claudius resorts to a plan
Hamlet is a scholar, speaker, actor, and prince. For some reason, Hamlet is not able to avenge his father's death without considerable delay. There is one major flaw in Hamlet's character which causes him to postpone the murder of Claudius. I believe that this flaw is Hamlet's idealism. While his idealism is a good trait, in this case, Hamlet's environment and his...
William Shakespeare brought to life an interesting character in King Claudius. On one side you see a kind and affectionate man toward the Queen. Yet on the other side you see a character that Shakespeare would have you believe is truly diabolic and will kill to get what he wants. I believe Claudius is not the bad person that most critiques would have you believe; rather he was a man who loved his country deeply enough to kill his own brother King Hamlet for it.
The Complex Character of Shakespeare's Hamlet. Upon examining Shakespeare's characters in this play, Hamlet proves to be a very complex character, and functions as the key element to the development of the play. Throughout the play we see the many different aspects of Hamlet's personality by observing his actions and responses to certain situations. Hamlet takes on the role of a strong character, but through his internal weaknesses we witness his destruction.
Claudius “is the most modern character” that “has no reservations” (Hamlet, Tragedy) when he murders his own brother so that he may gain the crown and the queen. He removes of a great and honorable king to please his greed. He removes his brother, the good of the country, and the pleasure of many to satisfy his own ambition. Claudius only cares about himself. Realizing it or not, most individuals, at one point or another, will be motivated by gluttony. Most, however, will not have the willpower and anxiety that Claudius shows. This is partially because of the alterations of the times. In the historical time that Shakespeare wrote the play, killing was profoundly ...