Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What was the impact of the no child left behind act
Review of the no child left behind act
Negative effects of the no child left behind act 2001 webpage
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What was the impact of the no child left behind act
Year after year students put themselves through large amounts of stress, attempts to prepare themselves mentally, and spend majority of their waking hours studying for standardized testing required through the No child left behind act (NCLB). An act put in place by the Bush Administration in hopes and efforts for student around the country to excel in education. However, the No Child Left behind Act is hindering a student’s ability to perform in the classroom rather than the student to excel as planned. Amongst other countries around the world, the United States performs significantly lower in education. Overall, the act had good intentions, but does it really raise achievement and close the achievement gap? Improving education has always been a top priority in the white house. Many laws have been passed but how many have succeed? NCLB is one of the biggest social engineering projects of our time, but shows very little progress in our children’s education. The No Child Left behind Act causes more of a negative outcome by being ineffective at achieving academic improvement, closing the education gap, limiting the teaching material for instructors, and causes a harmful repercussion on children and adolescents mentally and emotionally.
The No Child Left Behind act is the most recent restatement of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 put in place by President Johnson to assist with the War on Poverty campaign. Originally, the law was meant to improve educational equity to lower income families, which still remains today. However, since the bill was passed in 1965, it has been reauthorized several times. The most recent being January of 2002 with the “No Child Left behind Act.” Despite the numerous amount of changes the...
... middle of paper ...
...reating them as a handicap or a burden.
Conclusively, “No Child Left Behind” has done very little at closing the achievement gap, and did a better job at broadcasting it. It gave very little criteria for teachers to work with when attempting to educate students. And many teachers can agree that the practice test, and testing style of curriculum does not provide a meaningful education to children. Also, the rigorous strategy of teaching has been proven to be unproductive at closing the education gap. NCLB causes students to suffer mentally and emotionally, which could lead to long term affects such as dropping out of school. The law also isolates students by their race regardless of academic performance or upbringing. “No Child Left Behind” was a good attempt by the Bush Administration to improve education in American but did not turnout the way it was planned to.
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001’s main purpose was to enhance the education system and hold schools accountable in its attempt to bring equality in the fight against poverty for poor and minority groups. Once this Act was signed into law the American public expected an overhaul of the education system with only good outcomes. The public assumed our children would be receiving the best education available and the economic issues that plagued schools would no longer be a problem. In the beginning of its implementation No Child Left Behind was expected to bring America up to standards with other nations, this was something that America has struggled to do for many years. Our children were now being put first according to Act and the public and many political figures were ecstatic over the possibilities.
The implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act applied a market approach to school reform as a way of improving the school system. This new law promised an era of high standards, testing, and accountability in
Neill, Monty. "The No Child Left Behind Act Is Not Improving Education." Education: Opposing Viewpoints. New York: Greenhaven, 2005. 162-68. Print.
The law was supposed to make sure that poor children weren’t being left behind. To make sure kids were learning the federal government placed a heavy emphasis on standardized tests. According to chukka the law didn’t do much to close the educational gap between poor students and students who weren’t poor. However the law did force many urban schools to close because they were not meeting federal educational guidelines . Chukka also said “Instead of teaching students to learn the No Child Left Behind law forced teachers to teach to a test because they were being evaluated along with the students”. They wants us to believe everyone has the same opportunity, but the law in my eyes did nothing to fix our unbalanced educational system. When you know and understand all the problems poverty causes on children’s education it 's no surprise when you find out gut wrenching statistics. Cook says” I learned that African American students entering kindergarten for the first time score lower than their white counterparts in reading, mathematics, science, cognitive flexibility and approaches to learning in every category tested. Also African American children are more likely to be held behind in kindergarten. Once a kid things he/she can 't compete with others because they are not smarter, he/she will
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is an education policy originally proposed by President George Bush in 2001. Since then President Barrack Obama has added modifications in order to better educate the students of our Nation. The purpose of the NCLB is to enable all children to the same rights for education. Each child, regardless of race, gender or location should be able to obtain equal education. The policy requires highly educated teachers and annual state testing that is submitted to the government.
Funding, depending on the status of the school can be convenient or it may cause misfortune. On January 8, 2002 president George W. Bush signed a new law reform that is still presently known as “No Child Left Behind”. The law contained standards that were necessary to be met by school districts. The Educational Standards explains that the law received bipartisan support but even so the funding was not just.
D. Hold schools and local educational agencies accountable for improving the academic achievement of all students.
The No Child Left Behind Act was implemented by Former United States President George W. Bush to escalate the success of students’ academic achievement. The No Child Left Behind Act reauthorized the Elementary and Secondary Education Act which was initially created by Former United States President Lyndon B. Johnson as part of the War on Poverty. In attempt to revise the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, Former President George W. Bush executed several amendments to the policy which received a backlash of conflicting viewpoints. The No Child Left Behind Act has had adverse effect on the education of students, educators and their families. In theory, NCLB was designed to improve student outcome, however studies have proven that their
In society, education can be seen as a foundation for success. Education prepares people for their careers and allows them to contribute to society efficiently. However, there is an achievement gap in education, especially between Hispanics and Blacks. In other words, there is education inequality between these minorities and white students. This achievement gap is a social problem in the education system since this is affecting many schools in the United States. As a response to this social problem, the No Child Left Behind Act was passed to assist in closing this achievement gap by holding schools more accountable for the students’ progress. Unsuccessful, the No Child Left Behind Act was ineffective as a social response since schools were pushed to produce high test scores in order to show a student’s academic progress which in turn, pressured teachers and students even more to do well on these tests.
The No Child Left Behind Act, a federal social program that tries to encourages after school programs should be eliminated and the extra funds given to schools to decide where it goes.
No one can argue that the education of today’s students is not important to our country, but many can argue against ideas that don’t quite support this idea correctly. There is no doubt that the ideas and goals backing No Child Left Behind are credible and relevant, but the steps taken to achieve these ideas could have been thought through more meticulously and carried out in a different manner. Overall, No Child Left Behind has failed to improve national public education by lowering the quality of classroom education through an emphasis on standardized testing and common core ideas.
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) deals with student achievement standards by holding schools accountable for the achievement of their students (Implementation 11). The NCLBA uses standardized tests to chart the success of students. If students are not meeting standards, the school is required to offer tutoring, which is funded by the state with Title I, the education mandate passed in which granted all public schools access to federal grants, money (No Subject 7). The Act itself is not the problem; the problem is that the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) standard which is a big part of the NCLBA is not being met. The AYP standard is not being met because schools are not changing their methods quickly enough. It was said in the NCLBA that schools nationwide were to have 100% proficiency of the AYP standard within 12 years (Implementation 9). Since the passing of the NCLBA in 2001, most public schools, nationwide have not improved at all.
For years, the No Child Left Behind program and parents have gone head to head. Some parents believe that their children are not ready to advance, while the NCLB believes the students are ready to progress. The law does not care if the students does not understand the curriculum, just as long the child is meeting deadlines and passing the states standardized tests. This type of learning system only causes stress for teachers, students, and can be very unreliable.
The No Child Left Behind Act was set into place with the goal to improve student performance in school, and close the achievement gap between students; as Stecher, Vernez, and Steinburg state, “When congress passed the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), it established an ambitious goal for the nation’s states, districts, and schools: All children will be proficient in reading and mathematics by the 2013-2014 school year” (1). While the No Child Left Behind Act was implemented with good intentions, the act itself is one of the main reasons the United States is falling behind in educational rankings. One of the most common complaints of parents surrounding the No Child Left Behind Act is the weakest link factor: the weakest student sets the pace in the classroom. The weakest student...
As Rodney Paige, former Secretary of Education, said, “We have an educational emergency in the United States of America” (Hursh, 2007). The American ideal of egalitarianism essentially states that individuals should have an equal opportunity to pursue their dreams, and an important part of being able to achieve this is attaining a quality education. Students of differing racial, cultural, socioeconomic, and ability levels should all have the same opportunities in receiving a high-quality education. Unfortunately, this is not the case. The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is seeking to change this. The NCLB is the current authorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) (Houston, 2007), which was passed during President Lyndon B. Johnson’s administration. Every five years the ESEA is renewed. It is currently due for renewal in 2014.