Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How did new technology affect warfare
Technology that was invented in the American civil war
Weaponry developments in american civil war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How did new technology affect warfare
A-Plan of the Investigation
The focus of this investigation will be on the answering of the question “To what extent did the invention and innovation of new weaponry during the 19th century affected the American Civil War?”. The most prevalent weapons of the time will be described, along with the major weapons manufacturers of the period leading to the Civil War. Multiple military innovations will be looked at and their implications on warfare will be discussed, considering how many weapons were improved and how this affected their efficiency in battle. The number of casualties in the American Civil War will also be displayed and it will be explained as to why the amount of fatalities was so high.
B-Summary of Evidence
The years leading up to the Civil War caused a furious race between weapon manufacturers, as they could sense a conflict on the horizon. In the 1840s, Claude Étienne Minié, a Frenchman, perfected the design of a muzzle-loading rifle and ball that fired with more accuracy and 8 times the effective range of older weapons (Boot 127). Other innovators such as Samuel Colt, Oliver Winchester, and Richard Gatling were active as well in designing their own weapons. Many inventors received much attention when the war began. The Spencer repeating rifle, patented in 1861 by Christopher Spencer, was shown to be quite the innovation during the war by Wilder’s “Lightning Brigade”, who used the 7-shot rifle in the West against the Confederates (Boot 128-129). The Spencer repeating rifle was also seen in Sherman’s March, where General Paul Sheridan was given 10,000 troops wielding the rifle (Roberts). Another inventor that came to the forefront of weapons’ manufacturing during the war was Samuel Colt with his model 1860 Colt rev...
... middle of paper ...
...ence to Casualty and Other Figures, 1500-2000. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2002. Print.
Downey, Fairfax. The Guns at Gettysburg. New York: D. McKay, 1958. Print.
Ellis, John. The Social History of the Machine Gun. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1986. Print.
Gugliotta, Guy. "New Estimate Raises Civil War Death Toll." The New York Times. The New York Times, 02 Apr. 2012. Web. 30 Mar. 2014.
Roberts, William L. "U.S. Spencer Lever Action Repeating Carbine." The National Firearms Museum. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Mar. 2014.
Schneller, Robert J., Jr. "Rear Admiral Dahlgren." Rear Admiral Dahlgren. Dahlgren Museum, n.d. Web. 14 Apr. 2014.
Singer, Peter W. "War Made New: The History and Future of Technology and Warfare." The Brookings Institution. N.p., 26 Oct. 2006. Web. 15 Apr. 2014.
Williamson, Harold F. Winchester, the Gun That Won the West. Washington: Combat Forces, 1952. Print.
Some errors that could arise from this type of source include biases and limited points of views that lead to misinformation. However, using secondary sources does not detract from Chase’s ability to construct a general theory about firearms development, because a general theory does not require absolute accuracy. Chase also uses many paintings to show military formations in past societies and what weapons they possessed. The conclusions he makes are rational and the inclusion of the paintings provides visually engaging primary sources that further justify Chase’s thesis. Using more primary sources would strengthen the credibility of his descriptions of firearms development in the world, but his construction of a rational theory based on known facts is enough to give this work acceptable credibility.
Carter, Gregg. Guns in American Society: An Encyclopedia of History, Politics, Culture, and the Law. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO, 2012. Print.
Osprey Publishing Ltd 2007 6-185 print Meyerson, Joel D. “Machine Gun.” World Book Advanced. World Book, 2014 Web. 3 Feb. 2014.
In addition to the Model 1861, the Spencer rifle also contributed to the success of the Union forces. The most substantial amenity to this weapon was the rate of fire. Most Southern soldiers could fire their muzzleloaders at three rounds per minute. The Spencer shattered the Confederate weapon and boosted the fire rate to 14 rounds per minute with the weapons built in primer. In addition to being such a powerful asset when in control by th...
Mintz, Steven, and Sara McNeil. "The War's Consequences." Digital History. Ed. John Lienhard, Grace Lin, and Micharl Rapp. Digital History, 2013. Web. 6 May 2014.
IntroI am doing this report on the M1 Garand for Mr.Walker 182's History Class. The Garand is a fascinating World War II semi-automatic rifle. In the sub-sections below I will describe the developement history of the gun, the service history, and info on different versions. I wanted to add diagrams of the M1 rifle but the pictures are copyrighted and I was not able to download but the diagrams could be found at <a href="http://www.chestnutridge.com/gchart.asp">http://www.chestnutridge.com/gchart.aspDevelopment HistoryThe origins of the United States Rifle, Caliber .30, M1 begin around August, 1900, when Captain O.B.
A popular weapon used by both sides was the rifle. Rifles were invented before the Civil War and were greatly used in the War of 1812. However, more types were built and a larger amount was used during the Civil War. Rifles added a spin to bullets for a greater accuracy at longer ranges. Using this weapon, soldiers could fire 400 yards away, as opposed to the average 80 yards (Robertson 50). Rifles were the fastest and hardest weapon of the time. Rifles allowed their bullets to be shot harder and faster towards its target. New inventions, used by the Union more than the Confederate, included Parrott rifles. They were composed of iron. Robert Parker Parrott, an American soldier and inventor, created these weapons, hence the name Parrott rifles. Despite its name, the Parrott rifle was actually a cannon. Its size ranged from 10 to 300 pounders. It was not favored by most because it was considered unsafe (“Civil War Artillery”). Because of its bulkiness and heaviness, it seldom led soldiers to inaccuratel...
Cornell, Saul. A Well-regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2006. Print.
Lee, Robert W. "Gun Report: The Buford Furrow Tragedy." The New American 15 (1999): 33
Ring, Ray. “Guns R Us.” High Country News (Paonia, Co) Vol. 39, No. 14 Aug. 6 2007:10-17. Sirs Issues Researcher. Web. 6 Oct. 2015.
Williamson Murray and Allan R. Millett, Military Innovation in the Interwar Period,: Cambridge Press, 1996, 195
The objective of this paper is to discuss the article: Gunsmithing AR-7 Rifles; American Gunsmith, By Gary Yee. I will cover my thoughts on this article, and briefly go over it. I believe there was a good amount of useful knowledge written in this article. I personally don’t like AR-7 rifles all that much, but knowing that a growing number of people are getting into the “survival” scene…I suppose it’s a good platform to get familiarized with.
With the dawn of World War One, a new and terrifying weapon soon dominated the shell-shocked landscape. That weapon was the machine gun. From its humble origins of rejection to its eventual widespread use, the machine gun has become a staple of warfare from its inception. While this weapon has taken many forms in recent years, the focus here will remain on the pivotal role it played during “the war to end all wars.”
“Volley Guns” (Chivers, 2010, p.26) or also known as “Organ Guns” (Ellis, 1975, p.10) were first attempts at increasing firepower by adding several barrels at the firing itself, rather than simply attempting to increase the rate of fire. “Gunsmiths had long ago learned to place barrels side by side on frames to create firearms capable of discharging projectiles in rapid succession. These unwieldy devices, or volley guns, were capable in theory of blasting a hole in a line of advancing soldiers” (Chivers, 2010, p.26). An example of such weapons can be seen on July 28, 1835 when Giuseppe Fieshi unleashed terror on King Louis-Phillipe in Paris, France. He fired his 25 barrel “volley gun”, killing 18 of the king's entourage and grazing the King's skull. The weapon was ineffective however. Four of the barrels failed and another four ruptured. Two other barrels had exploded inside, grievously wounding Giuseppe. (Chivers, 2010, p. 27)
To continue, the Industrial Revolution experienced during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries not only opened the doors to a vast number conflicts, but it also revolutionized the world in a positive way. By transforming agrarian and handicraft-centered economies into economies distinguished by industry and machine manufacture, it was just a matter of time that technological advancements would reach a whole new level of improvement. In the case of World War I, a new kind of warfare would emerge and changed the way in which wars would be fought, and unprecedented outcomes would occur. “The unexpected development of trench warfare on the western front baffled military leaders, who had been trained to fight wars of movement and maneuver.” (William J. Duiker and Jackson J. Spielvogel, World History, vol. 2, 667). This new trench warfare soon led to the radical need for technological developments, new defensive tactics, and stalemate. As a result, new weapons and skills were introduced to the battlefield.