Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of tourism on local communities
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of tourism on local communities
In my opinion, the question whether Times Square become a better place as a result of its redevelopment or not depends on the person that being affected by it. I think it had been a ‘better’ place for people who spend enormous times in redeveloping Times Square, but not for the people who had been ‘wiped out’ from Times Square because their activities seems threatening to the people with power. People who redeveloping Times Square find Times Square had become a better place because they think they helped with the economy. They also cleaned up people who make the street sleazy, such as the hookers and junkies. Plus, they think that they helped to reduce tawdry and any illegal street activities that they think as threatening, as they have the
When people think of Bedford Stuyvesant, Brooklyn, they think of crime and violence within the neighborhood. I myself have thought this about Bedford Stuyvesant before I did research and actually visited the neighborhood for myself. Bedford Stuyvesant in my opinion, has two different sides. The side the media portrays to us, the people, and the side people who actually visit/live in the neighborhood see for themselves. My visual representation above shows the two different sides of Bedford Stuyvesant. The first image shows the typical view of what people think of when they think of Bedford Stuyvesant, the projects. When people think of this neighborhood, they think of project buildings housing low income black families. The media portrays Bedford Stuyvesant as a
Chicago’s Cabrini-Green public housing project is notorious in the United States for being the most impoverished and crime-ridden public housing development ever established. Originally established as inexpensive housing in the 1940’s, it soon became a vast complex of unsightly concrete low and high-rise apartment structures. Originally touted as a giant step forward in the development of public housing, it quickly changed from a racially and economically diverse housing complex to a predominantly black, extremely poor ghetto. As it was left to rot, so to speak, Cabrini-Green harbored drug dealers, gangs and prostitution. It continued its downward spiral of despair until the mid 1990’s when the Federal Government assumed control the Chicago Housing Authority, the organization responsible for this abomination. Cabrini-Green has slowly been recovering from its dismal state of affairs recently, with developers building mixed-income and subsidized housing. The Chicago Housing Authority has also been demolishing the monolithic concrete high-rise slums, replacing them with public housing aimed at not repeating the mistakes of the past. Fortunately, a new era of public housing has dawned from the mistakes that were made, and the lessons that were learned from the things that went on for half a century in Cabrini-Green.
Jackson Heights is a neighborhood with a plethora of diversity and multiculturalism, hence there’s wide coverage of Gentrification in the media and literature. Jackson Heights is skyrocketing economically like many other local neighborhoods, with the looming possibility of becoming out of reach for the average American family. Redevelopments of infrastructure have rapidly progressed causing a rise in house price and rent, this ultimately resulting in the neighborhood to become financially unreachable for most. This is an example of the term that was first coined in 1964 by German-British sociologist Ruth Glass as ‘gentrification’. Ruth Glass wrote, "Once this process of 'gentrification' starts in a district, it goes on rapidly
There are many examples of cities reforming itself over time, one significant example is Vancouver's Downtown Eastside. More than a hundred years after the discovery of gold that drew thousands of migrants to Vancouver, the city has changed a lot, and so does one of its oldest community: Downtown Eastside. Began as a small town for workers that migrants frequently, after these workers moved away with all the money they have made, Downtown Eastside faced many hardships and changes. As a city, Vancouver gave much support to improve the area’s living quality and economics, known as a process called gentrification. But is this process really benefiting everyone living in Downtown Eastside? The answer is no. Gentrification towards DTES(Downtown Eastside) did not benefit the all the inhabitants of the area. Reasons are the new rent price of the area is much higher than before the gentrification, new businesses are not community-minded, and the old culture and lifestyle of the DTES is getting erased by the new residents.
Echo Park, one of Los Angeles’s most well-known neighborhoods, was once associated with gang violence in the 80’s and 90’s. The crime rate in the area was to the point that many people would not dare being caught walking out after dark. Nowadays, people do not fear walking in the streets of Echo Park after dark. This new sense of safety in Echo park can be contributed to its nightlife scene characterized by Indie music venues and trendy bars. You may ask yourself how this change came about?
New York City’s population is a little over 8.3 million people. 8.3 million people are spread out among five boroughs and each have their own set routine. Each one of those 8.3 million see New York in a different way becuase “You start building your private New York the first time you lay eyes on it” (“City Limits” 4). Some people are like Colson Whitehead who “was born here and thus ruined for anywhere else” (“City Limits” 3). Others may have “moved here a couple years ago for a job. Maybe [they] came here for school” (“City Limits” 3). Different reasons have brought these people together. They are grouped as New Yorkers, but many times, living in New York is their only bond. With on going changes and never ending commotion, it is hard to define New York and its inhabitants in simple terms.
First of all, gentrification improves the local infrastructure and bring the brand-new look to local residents. Therefore, gentrification stimulates the fast economic development of low-income people and families because many of business services access to the local community along with a substantial financial investment. Local residents could also buy affordable and healthy food from the local grocery store without worry about the quality problems. With the help of gentrification on Englewood community, I believe that it will be one of the most beautiful and most affluent communities in the
Every culture left a mark of its quality on New York’s buildings that change over time: some are old, some are new, some are tall, and some are small. They might have a lot in common, but not one building is like the other. Diversity is what makes New York.
To simply say gentrification is good or bad would ignore the intricacies of this complicated issue. This essay will explore both the positive and negative consequences of gentrification, as well as how policymakers can balance the pros and cons of the process through public policy and further research. Lees et al. (2008, p. xv) define gentrification as “the transformation of a working-class or vacant area of the central city into middle-class residential and/or commercial use.” This essay will focus on gentrified areas that transform from working-class to middle-to-upper class, since these transformations are more commonly accepted as gentrification and have more impact overall. It is debated whether transformation of vacant areas is gentrification
Gentrification is the keystone for the progression of the basic standards of living in urban environments. A prerequisite for the advancement of urban areas is an improvement of housing, dining, and general social services. One of the most revered and illustrious examples of gentrification in an urban setting is New York City. New York City’s gentrification projects are seen as a model for gentrification for not only America, but also the rest of the world. Gentrification in an urban setting is much more complex and has deeper ramifications than seen at face value. With changes in housing, modifications to the quality of life in the surrounding area must be considered as well. Constant lifestyle changes in a community can push out life-time
Hipsters are persons who follows the latest trends and fashions. Old residents, usually minorities, get annoyed at hipsters because they replace old businesses with the new modern trends, which are usually more expensive.¨However, annoying they may be, hipsters help the poor. Their vintage shops and craft-beer bars generate jobs and taxes¨ (¨Bring on the hipsters¨). In addition to creating jobs, gentrifying a city also creates diversity both in the city and in the local schools. ¨Ultimately, while some residents were displaced from 1970 to 2000, gentrifying neighborhoods were generally more diverse when it came to income, race, and education as opposed to non-gentrifying neighborhoods¨(Florida). As shown, gentrification brings in more progress than
Everything dealing with gentrification is controversial including its own definition. Originally formulated by Ruth Glass in 1964, to enlighten the forced displacement of low-income groups from inner city areas (Lees et.al, 2008), gentrification has been one of the most popular theories discussed among urban specialists and some socialist. questionably There must be good to this, right? If not, then why would it still be taking place to this day? but then again rape and child molestation continue to be prevalent and they certainly are the most horrendous that one can do or be forced to experience next murder. That being said the big question is, what are these Theories and hypothesis? and what parts are bad and or good for new
Imagine walking through a park and your eye catches something bright, and your turn to look and its steel gates wrapping through a park. If you decide to walk through Central Park you will pass under vibrant orange steel gates with matching fabrics draping in the wind.The beautiful oranges screamed out against the soft white snow creating a beautiful piece. Some people felt like this brought life back into New York since 9/11, giving the city a feeling of warmth and security, while others felt it was a nuisance and a disruption to the natural beauty of the park, even though the park is anything but natural. It is infact all man
gentrification is not only changing the face of the city and also help people in their daily lives. They can enjoy many preferential policies such as the street is extended facilitate traffic, the disease is equipped with modern equipment in service for healing, their children are studying in good schools than before
There is no such thing as silence here. Everything jumps out at once, like the feathers on a peacock, immediately catching your attention. There are uncountable masses of colorful blobs moving, but within that great glob, there are many people, each person moving with the powerful confidence of a lion. The buildings all loom over the people, a grand oak tree above thousands of ants, tying together this concrete landscape. There is a tangible atmosphere of wonder, and you are left in awe of such an astonishing place. This magnificent place is none other than Times Square in New York City.