The Dukes of Hazzard: A Critique of Jay Chandrasekhar’s Remake The Dukes of Hazzard is a 1979 action-packed television show that featured two daredevil Duke cousins (Bo and Luke), kind-hearted Uncle Jessie, and one sexy Daisy Duke. This seven season long smash hit is based upon a simple idea, Boss Hog and Roscoe P. Coltrane come up with different ideas to get rid of the Dukes and take the Duke farm. The Duke family along with friends must find different ways to keep their farm. This television show also featured another automotive character … The General Lee. The General Lee is a 1969 Dodge Charger owned by Bo and Luke Duke. General Lee is orange in color and has “01” painted on each door. The General Lee also has a conferate flag painted …show more content…
on the roof of the car. The car refers to Civil War Confederate Robert E. Lee. But I am not writing this to talk about the amazing hit series. I am here to talk about the 2005’s unrated widescreen edition of The Dukes of Hazzard. The movie tells the story of Bo and Luke Duke two cousins from Hazzard County, Georgia.
The cousins work together to save Hazzard County from something that will ruin their county. This is very similar to the backstory of the original Dukes of Hazzard. This film is directed Jay Chandrasekhar, you might recognize this name … he also directed the hilarious film “The Super Troopers.” So, let’s just jump right into this movie and see if it’s worth your time or if you should go back and watch the original series. The movie starts with the balladeer giving a speech similar to how the shows would start. I think this is a nice touch because it gives praise to the episodes. We are then introduced to the two actors that play Bo (Seann William Scott) and Luke (Johnny Knoxville). However, I don’t think that casting Seann William Scott as Bo was a good choice. To me, Scott has that city-boy look to him and is not good-looking enough to play Bo. I like Johnny Knoxville as Luke, I appreciate Knoxville acting in an actual movie instead of him trying to kill himself in Jackass. I feel this shows he is trying to mature and not be a 46 year -old acting like a …show more content…
20-year-old. Next, we are introduced to the sexy Daisy who is played by Jessica Simpson. She has a great body and is tough and feisty just like Daisy should be. This was the best casting choice by far. The only downfall to this choice is she is a blonde. In the next scene, a man flirts with Daisy … she basically tells him to get lost and throws him down. We are then introduced to Billy Cricket played by James Roday who tells him to leave. The cousins then get into a bar fight which is one of the best scenes in the movie. It looks like they took the scene straight out of one of the episodes. We are then introduced to Roscoe and Boss Hogg.
This is where they fucked up. Boss Hogg is known for his hatred of the Dukes, greediness and large physique. Well, they cast a skinny Burt Reynolds? Are they crazy they basically cut the character in half. Roscoe is played by M.C Gainey and his role was … not much to watch. We then cut to Cooter’s garage and here is where another problem with the movie arises. Cooter’s part in the movie is he fix’s the car, perves on daisy and that’s it. Whereas Cooter’s character is a well-rounded, respectable guy that wants to help his friends. In the movie, he is a hillbilly that’s really perverted and has maybe 4 minutes of
screenplay. We then jump to the farm and are introduced to Uncle Jessie played by Willie Nelson. On the farm, the Dukes are told to leave because Boss and Roscoe found moonshine that they planted, Boss then takes the Duke farm. The Duke cousins in an effort to find out what Boss is doing with all the farm property end up stealing a safe. However, the boys can’t open the safe so they go to Sheev’s. Who the hell is Sheev? Turns out he is a friend of the boys that was never in the original episodes and he has a bigger role than Cooter. Once again, another problem that I have with this movie. They get the safe open and are surprised to find that they are core samples for mining. The cousins then head to Atlanta to get the core sample identified. It turns out that it is a coal core sample. The cousins are then arrested of being racist (Confederate flag on roof of the car). Boss Hogg then goes to the jail to explain the plan to strip mine Hazzard. He also explains the he has to hold a hearing and is going too when the race that Billy Cricket will be in is occurring. Therefore, everyone will be at the race instead of objecting to turn Hazzard into a strip mine. The cousins with the help of Daisy escape jail and haul ass to Hazzard. Just before the judge says that Hogg can strip mine Hazzard, the Dukes and the rest of the town barge in to object to everything. Once again the town is safe and that sums up The Dukes of Hazzard. The Dukes of Hazzard was a catastrophe. I want to start off with what I like in the movie. Johnny Knoxville and Jessica Simpson were fine in this movie considering the script that was given. I also like how the movie captured the western feel and it had great scenery. I will even give that it had a good pretrial of the General Lee. However, the original Dukes of Hazzard is a family friendly show that featured the Dukes helping people. The movie was the exact opposite, it had raunchy comedy and the Dukes were out to only help themselves. I hate how they sidelined classic characters like Cooter and Jessie and replaced them with characters that nobody gives two shits about like Sheev and Billy Cricket. I also think the choice to make Boss Hogg Burt Reynolds was one of the stupidest thing ever. Why was he cast … was he the friend of the director, was he paided a lot… I mean was there not any other fat guys in all of Hollywood? You can say that I am being to critical of this movie but I am just defending one of my favorite childhood shows. Overall, I think this movie was a gigantic failure and is not worth your time if I were you stick to the episodes.
The UR International Theatre Program opens its 2016 fall semester by sending audiences back to the 1970s with Obie Award winning When You Comin’ Back, Red Ryder?. Premiered in 1974, Mark Madoff’s the time period’s ideologies through one man’s torture for amusement in a grim New Mexico diner. A diverse University of Rochester cast will present themes of menace and escape opening October 6, 2016.
The movie begins with self-centered, materialistic Charlie Babbitt (Tom Cruise), learning the death of his father. To settle his dad’s estate, he and his business partner/girlfriend, Susanna (Valeria Golino) travel to his home town Cincinnati. While he was hoping to inherit all of his dad’s estate, all he got was a car and a collection of rosebushes that he simply has no use for. The remaining $3 million fortune was put into a trust for an unnamed beneficiary. Charlie demands to know the identity of the beneficiary and finds out that it is a mental hospital where his long-lost autistic brother, Raymond (Dustin Hoffman) resides with a caretaker, Dr. Bruner (Gerald R. Molen).
3. Throughout the movie, it was apparent that Dr. Francis and Dr. Gallo, displayed the same objective of wanting to discover the cause of AIDS; however, in terms of critical thinking, it’s obvious that they utilize different styles of critical thinking. To further explain, in one segment of the movie, Francis compares and correlates already known viruses that cause cancer, damage t-cells, and exhibit the same symptoms with what he thinks might be the cause of AIDS. However, Francis is comparing his fields of expertise in which he already knows and thinks might be true, not with what has been scientifically proven; therefore, he is using wishful thinking, a speed bump of critical thinking. There are also times in the movie, where Francis thinks
Meeting the Patels is a 2014 romantic, comedy documentary directed by Geeta V. Patel. The film depicts the journey of Ravi V. Patel on the search for an adequate Indian wife that meets the criteria of his family, and who he can also feel a personal connection with. In the film the depiction of two countries: United States and India played a role on Ravi’s decision on finding a wife, and how each country portrays the role of marriage and the laws surrounding it.
For a directorial debut, I must say Zack Braff has given me a completely different impression than from his regular role in the "Scrubs" TV series. One might think that for a directorial debut coming from a TV actor would be uneven and at best, formulaic and uninspired. That's not the case here with "Garden State." Braff shows he knows how to handle directing and storytelling yet at the same time, showing a vision that clearly establishes himself as an auteur. Examples of this are the tense moments when Andrew is around his father. A lesser film would go for theatrics and end up being very talky in dialogue, but instead, Andrew and his father's moments together are more subtle. Whenever we see both of them together, they talk but when they talk, their relationship is forced. There's a sense of silence at times, which shows they feel uncomfortable seeing each other after the lack of good communication for about a decade.
The plot of this movie is about the struggle between the farmers and the cowboys. The farmers all want to start up crops, but the cowboys want to run their cattle through the open space so they can feed. Obviously, the two sides don’t agree. The cowboys end up attempting to use strong-arm tactics to get their way. They even try to scare the farmers off the land by burning down one of the homes of the farmers. Eventually, Shane, a former gunfight, realizes what he must do. He rides into town and kills all of the cowboys, including Wilson, the hired gun.
Having read the avalanche of outraged articles in the UK press that preceded the UK launch of “The Patriot”, I readily admit that I was expecting to see a distinctly anti-British Movie. One such headline complains for example about a “blood libel on the British People”.
In 2012, Scott Thurman published The Revisionaries, a film that illustrates how the Texas edification organization has settled into a modern rise of outmoded, religious, and ideological wiles, with each associate fostering their dogmata’s of both ontological and theological complications in Texas education. Additionally, Thurman’s film also highlights how their programs have had the consequence of retelling critical creeds of America, and how that affects scholastic processes nationwide, for an ample aggregate of people to befall on. Likewise, The Revisionaries congregates on concerns that various scholars acquire conception of in their Texas Government lecture, such as, constituent turnout in Texas, politicization, the Texas learning structure,
Melvin Udall is a successful novelist living in New York City. In the beginning of the movie he is an irritable, obsessive-compulsive man who alienates himself from those around him. To add to his alienation, he works from home and does not allow anyone in his apartment. His routine consists of going to the same restaurant, being served by the same waitress and eating at the same table every day. His mental disorder is also displayed in several different obsessive-compulsive actions such as turning the locks five times and doing the same for the lights in his home. One day, Melvin’s homosexual neighbor is assaulted and put into the hospital. Due to the misfortune, Melvin is forced to watch the neighbor’s dog while he recovers from the assault. At this point in the movie, Melvin develops an emotional attachment to the dog and his attitude begins to change for the better. Melvin decides to help the waitress from the restaurant by paying for her son’s medical bills. This gesture comes after him having a meltdown when she did not show up to work to serve him. Near the end of the movie, Melvin makes a trip to help the neighbor and invites the waitress to come along. The trip does not go as planned, but the experience helps him to learn to communicate and have better relationships with people. In the end, Melvin falls in love with the waitress and is willing to learn to overcome his obsessive-compulsive lifestyle to be with her.
The musical Rent is a representation of the Bohemian lifestyle of being different and being able to explore and be unique. What makes this musical so unique is its revolutionary musical style and a plot like no other. The lyricist and composer of the musical Jonathan Larson did something no one would ever imagine and go outside of the box. Who would have thought of putting lesbians, gays, HIV and AIDS victims, and the life of a Bohemian into one rock and pop based musical? This struggle to survive and accomplish things makes Rent amazing.
Whilst making their way to a British Fort, Major Heywood and his party are attacked by Indians. Three men come to their rescue, two of them Indians, and another is a white man whom was raised by the eldest Indian. This man, Hawkeye, his brother and father rescue the Major and the two women that are in his party.
Through life, one must make choices in their personal and professional lives in order to maintain a healthy work-life balance. Through the plays Bull, Waste, Little Eyolf, The Homecoming, and the musical Kinky Boots, it is evident that creating a distinction between one’s personal and one’s professional life is essential to living a healthy life. When one’s personal life and professional life overlap completely, trouble ensues.
Every film can be related back to socially significant issues that occurred during the time it was released. It’s a snapshot of the issues during that time period. Film is not created in a vacuum. As described in our textbook, film “Conveys “the temper of an age of a nation” as well as that of the artists who produces it” (Belton 22). Films tend to reflect current society, country ideals or beliefs in order for the audience to relate. Some of those techniques used include, the American dream, family, corruption, divorce, and crime. If a director decides not include current social issues than it becomes harder for an audience to relate to the film because they will not be able to connect to the characters and get into their shoes. One film that encompasses all of these current social issues is American Hustle (David O. Russell, 2013). This film is a melodrama because of the context and social issues this film deals with. American Hustle has a social significance to today’s current culture, society, beliefs and social issues through the use of the American dream, corruption, divorce, crime and family.
In having Coach Carter be one of the best critically acclaimed movies of 2005, it also portrayed a sense of emotion to the viewer. It transcends a type of mood in every type of scene in the movie. Coach Carter is about Ken Carter coming into the world of his old high school, Richmond High in a new role. Known for his high school basketball career, he is asked to be the new coach of a broken basketball team with troubled athletes. As Coach Carter, he holds practice after practice. For Coach Carter, sports are a commitment and with that, comes responsibility. So Coach gives the players all a contract to sign to solidify their commitment. All of us know that to participate in sports, you have to have certain grades, and with this contract comes
Perhaps the most impressive aspect of this rather old fashioned romance is how funny it actually is, while still maintaining a sense of subtlety throughout. This is not a story driven plot, but rather, a collection of charming and amusing moments that, when added up for the duration, becomes something quite substantial. The character development involved is flawless, as we grow to like, and in some senses love, the main players, thanks in large part to the terrific Academy Award winning screenplay by Dalton Trumbo here credited as Ian McLellan Hunter due to a blacklisting that forced him to write under a pseudonym. Even with the quality writing, none of this could have worked if overplayed by the director or if stars were cast who weren't as likeable, and on all fronts,