The Doctrine Of The Mean Case Study

997 Words2 Pages

Ethics, in any form, provides a detailed verdict on what is considered right or wrong. This means that it provides assertions of what ought to be done and what should not. Ethics is also universal and affects anything in relation to individuals. These matters keep businesses from abusing consumers. Laws have even been enacted to enforce principles set forth by ethics. But, in some cases, scrutiny of the laws or their enforcements may be too loose and ineffective. This is evident in the case of the Japanese manufacturer Takata and their faulty airbags. While in other cases there may not be laws clarifying how to act in a specific setting, as in Todd Rutherford and his online reviewing company. These circumstances depend on personal ethics and …show more content…

With Takata, we see a company attempting to profit from a faulty product. This has lead to the injuries of many people and threatened the lives of countless more. The company was not acting prudently just so they could meet the demands of just-in-time manufacturing. They dove deep into the excess of Aristotle’s mean, depicting the decision makers of the company as greedy and no longer of virtue. Todd Rutherford, the founder of GettingBookReviews.com, can also be labeled the same. He began a company that generated fake reviews of books so as to sway consumers to purchase them. He blatantly went under the guise of an actual consumer and lied in order to generate income. It would be acceptable, under the Doctrine of the Mean, to lie if one’s objective were ultimate happiness. But when one lies in such excess, as Rutherford did, it is not supported. Both of the actions taken by each company were voluntary and not under any external compulsion. The two were acting incontinent with qualification and knowingly making unfair decisions devoid of any rectificatory justice as well. Takata was accepting full price for defective, mishandled and even dangerous products, while Rutherford was taking money for something that is supposed to be a free tool and intended to be made by actual consumers. In addition, Takata took it a step further by vacating distributive justice. When they ran secret tests to determine the safety of certain air bag canisters, Takata immediately became responsible for issuing a recall to all products. But instead, they put consumers in the hands of chance and distributed unequal products to them, even though every customer paid an equal

Open Document