Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Examine platos critice of democracy
Plato's critique of democracy
Examine platos critice of democracy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Examine platos critice of democracy
The Divided Line The Divided Line (The Republic , Book VI) Socrates You have to imagine, then, that there are two ruling powers, and that one of them is set over the intellectual world, the other over the visible. I do not say heaven, lest you should fancy that I am playing upon the name. May I suppose that you have this distinction of the visible and intelligible fixed in your mind? Glaucon I have. Socrates Now take a line which has been cut into two unequal parts and divide each of them again in the same proportion, and suppose the two main divisions to answer, one to the visible and the other to the intelligible, and then compare the subdivisions in respect of their clearness and want of clearness, and you will find that the first section in the sphere of the visible consists of images. And by images I mean, in the first place, shadows, and in the second place, reflections in water and in solid, smooth and polished bodies and the like: Do you understand? Glaucon Yes, I understand. Socrates Imagine, now, the other section, of which this is only the resemblance, to include the animals which we see, and everything that grows or is made. Glaucon Very good. Socrates Would you not admit that both the sections of this division have different degrees of truth, and that the copy is to the original as the sphere of opinion is to the sphere of knowledge? 1 Glaucon Most undoubtedly. Socrates Next proceed to consider the manner in which the sphere of the intellectual is to be divided. Glaucon In what manner? Socrates Thus: There are two subdivisions, in the lower of which the soul uses the figures given by thw former division as images; the enquiry can only be hypothetic... ... middle of paper ... ...Whereas if they go to the administration of public affairs, poor and hungering after their own private advantage, thinking that hence they are to snatch the chief good, order there can never be; for they will be fighting about office, and the civil and domestic broils which thus arise will be the ruin of the rulers themselves and of the whole State. Glaucon Most true, he replied. Socrates And the only life which looks down upon the life of political ambition is that of true philosophy. Do you know of any other? Glaucon Indeed, I do not, he said. Socrates And those who govern ought not to be lovers of the task? For, if they are, there will be rival lovers, and they will fight. Glaucon No question. Socrates Who then are those whom we shall compel to be guardians? Surely they will be the men who are wisest about affairs of the state.
For there was an extreme inequality amongst them, and their state was overloaded with a multitude of indigent and necessitous persons, while its whole wealth centered upon a very few. To the end therefore, that he might expel from the state arrogance and envy, luxury and crime, and those yet more inveterate diseases of want and superfluity (Plutarch 9).
The lawyer and scholar believed that there should be one universal government ruling the people, this government would be a led by a mix of all three classes. He states how a monarchy would be the ideal rule, but is extremely unrealistic as all humans reason equally. By instating a mixed form of government, people would feel more of a connection with the laws and more of a personal responsibility to follow them if they had a part in creating them. Additionally, all people would be seen as equal before the law as all have equal capabilities and through effort, a common good can be achieved; the only thing differentiating humans is their variety of gifts, besides this, there is no variation. A person’s economic status by no means defines their ability to lead, by all groups participating in government, there are no idle citizens that are not a part of the
men say we be men of good government, being governed as the sea is, by our novle
But if any one transgresses, and does violence to the laws, or thinks to dictate to his rulers, such an one can win no praise from me. No, whomsoever the city may appoint, that man must be obeyed, in little things and great, in just things and unjust; and I should feel sure that one who thus obeys would be a good ruler no less than a good subject, and in the storm of spears would stand his ground where he was set, loyal and dauntless at his comrade's sid...
" Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith, and of public and personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable, that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties, and that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority."
...st not abuse what is given to them, which in this was power and wealth.
... an entire community can fall apart, by doing his job the ruler ensures his success, “this can be improved only through the equitable treatment of people with property and regard for them, so that their hopes rise, and they have the incentive to start making their capitol bear fruit and grow. This, in turn, increases the ruler’s revenues in taxes” (Khaldun 1734). A ruler must know that subjects have an important role and he does as well; however, he must never confuse this role because it leads to his downfall as well as those who look up to him.
National aspirations must be respected; peoples may now be dominated, and…[may now] be governed only by the...
reasoning than desire. So we see two distinct parts of the soul. The first is
Oligarchy is valued above a democracy although they are both ruled by the appetite of the soul. Those within an oligarchy pursue necessary appetites whereas democratic individuals pursue unnecessary appetites. Rulers are present...
“There are some who lack confidence in the integrity and capacity of the people to govern themselves. To all who entertain such fears I will most respectfully say that I entertain none… If man is not capable, and it not to be trusted with the government of himself, is he to be trusted with the government of others… Who, then, will govern? The answer must be, man – for we have no angels in the shape of men, as yet, who are willing to take charge...
...e the authority of the very thing that gave them their power. In other words, don’t bite the hand that feeds.
the same basic materials, including the same beliefs and the same values, the same EVERYTHING. And together it all appears to be one "reality" (Barry Alfonso, 6)."
In Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together, Isaacs explains how we can do improved than that. Isaacs, who is Director of the Dialogue Project at MIT and a advisor to main corporations, counting AT&T and Intel, believes that business, supporting and individual announcement can be a procedure of philosophy together--as different to philosophy unaided and then tiresome to encourage others of our positions by refusing to believe other opinions, preservation information, and eventually getting annoyed and self-protective. This is not pie-in-the-sky, let's-all-hold-hands-and-sing substance. He offers existing ideas for both listening and dialogue; for avoiding the forces that challenge important discussion; for altering the bodily setting of the discourse to change its excellence. The conclusion, he says, can be fairly dissimilar from the customary winner-loser organization of arguments and debates. Businesses can build more logical decisions and thus make more money. Governments can generate passive resolutions to apparently obdurate problems. (As an instance of this, Isaacs cites covert conversations among Nelson Mandela and F.W. de Klerk in South Africa, which o...
... of the majority, the minority endures oppression. The quality of government suffers when it has been mixed too much with religion, and the quality of religious motives suffer when they have been polluted by political motives.