The Differences between Logical, Ethical and Dialectical Reasoning

1670 Words4 Pages

The Differences Between Logical, Ethical, and Dialectical Reasoning The ways human think are one of the most distinct differences amongst us all. No single person entire thought process is the same as someone else because every one comprehends differently. The way we think makes us who we are and the decisions we make are based off our thought process. We reason logically, ethically, or dialectically to come to a final decision. Logical, ethical, and dialectical reasoning all serve a different purpose to help us reason the world around us. Logical is a Greek word “logos” which means reason. Logical reasoning is defined as the logic “relating to the formal processes used in thinking and reasoning .” It is an ability to think rationally with supporting evidence. When we think logically we must have a clear reason for our actions. For example, if there were a fire ideally some one would run, grab an extinguisher, or throw water to put out the fire. Those decisions would be logical. We do not contemplate as much when we think logically because it is based off the existing knowledge we have about the situation or the possibilities we can clearly see. We have all heard before “think logical” which means there is no need to think of any other possible outcome then the one that has been presented before. In order to arrive at the best decision inductive, deductive, and abductive reasoning is used. Inductive reasoning presents a conclusion based off the information presented. Inductive reasoning can be risky when the information given is based only off the group being tested. For example some one can say all zebras have stripes with out seeing every zebra. Although this would sound logical, it would be impossible to... ... middle of paper ... ... Fibonicci. (2011, January 1). Logical Reasoning - Fibonicci. Fibonicci RSS. Retrieved January 1, 2011, from http://www.fibonicci.com/logical-reasoning/ Gadamer, H. (1991). Plato's dialectical ethics: phenomenological interpretations relating to the Philebus. New Haven: Yale University Press. Harvey, C. P., & Allard, M. J. (2008). Understanding and managing diversity (4th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). The thinker's guide to understanding the foundations of ethical reasoning (2nd ed.). Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking. Webster, I. (2003). Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary (11th ed.). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, Inc. Zalta, E. N. (2002). Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, Calif.: Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University..

Open Document