Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Arguments for the existence of god
Proofs for God's existence
Proofs for God's existence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Arguments for the existence of god
The Design Argument for the Existence of God
While theology may take God's existence as absolutely necessary on the
basis of authority, faith, or discovery, many philosophers have
thought it possible to demonstrate by reason that there must be a God.
The teleological argument, also known as the argument from design
quite simply states that a designer must exist since the universe and
living things display elements of design in their order, consistency,
unity and pattern. The argument says that things in the world move
towards goals, just as the arrow does not move toward its goal except
by the archer's directing it. Consequently there must be an
intelligent designer who directs all things to their own goals, this
being God.
William Paley continued the argument of Socrates, Plato, and Aquinas,
e said that if one found a watch in a field, one would automatically
conclude that it was made by a watchmaker because of its obvious
design.The complex design of the world also points to a grand
designer.(God)
When we look at life and the universes, it is natural to conclude
there is a designer when we see how perfectly the universe and living
organisms operate. The eye is typically used as an example of design,
in order for it to work there must be many different parts compacted
together that individually have no function but have value only in a
designed whole. Everything has to be complete in regularity and order
for it to function, this function is therefore implied by design.
The design argument claims that animals, plants and planets show clear
signs of being designed for specific purposes therefore there must
have been a de...
... middle of paper ...
... and nothing more is a personally
unsatisfactory one due to the extraordinary nature of the universe and
so whilst the Teleological Argument may not conclusively prove the
existence of God it suggests that the existence of a Designer, who we
know as God, is a more probable likelihood than not.
Personally, I would like to believe that there is a God, unfortunately
it is clear to me that an existence based upon true faith is no longer
an acceptable tradition to follow. The topic remains highly
controversial as the argument can not fully grant us a link between
the observed world with a God beyond. The teleological argument is
aposteori; formulated by unfounded conclusions from analogies of
empirical observation and who is there to say that they have had
enough worldly experience and knowledge to make these conjectures.
begin with. This we call God, so we call God the prime mover i.e. the
belief is not to produce true belief. Instead theistic belief allows the believer to avoid
The controversial topic involving the existence of God has been the pinnacle of endless discourse surrounding the concept of religion in the field of philosophy. However, two arguments proclaim themselves to be the “better” way of justifying the existence of God: The Cosmological Argument and the Mystical Argument. While both arguments attempt to enforce strict modus operandi of solidified reasoning, neither prove to be a better way of explaining the existence of God. The downfall of both these arguments rests on commitment of fallacies and lack of sufficient evidence, as a result sabotaging their validity in the field of philosophy and faith.
The question of God’s existence has been debated through the history of man, with every philosopher from Socrates to Immanuel Kant weighing in on the debate. So great has this topic become that numerous proofs have been invented and utilized to prove or disprove God’s existence. Yet no answer still has been reached, leaving me to wonder if any answer at all is possible. So I will try in this paper to see if it is possible to philosophically prove God’s existence.
existence to those who could not accept or believe God on faith alone. Aquinas’ first way
Roger White presents an interesting argument for why God must exist. In his argument, White states that everything in the world is finely tuned to live its life accordingly. In order for this to be possible, God must have finely tuned all beings so that they were well fit for life. In depth, this argument is, “If a fact stands in need of an explanation, and a hypothesis explains this fact better than anything else, then they support each other. Our universe being so perfect for life is a fact in need of explanation. The hypothesis that God has finely tuned everything to be where all living beings can exist in this universe is an explanation to this fact. No other hypothesis compares to such a standard as this one. Therefore, the fact that our
Religion, which is meant to enhance the faith of it followers, has done the opposite. The practices of religion have become overwhelmingly factual that the faith component of religion has vanished. In order to be a genuine beliver one must comprise an authentic faith. Both religious leaders and followers must realize that their religion is not factual, but sustained through faith. The key to the gates of heaven is faith, not facts.
forgiven, so there is no need to ‘force’ yourself to believe. This argument is far from proving the existence of God, it argues more for. the purpose of believing in him rather than whether he actually exists. The.. In conclusion, all the arguments bar one that have been covered have. been strongly criticised, questioning their validity.
The Moral Argument for the Existence of God Kant did NOT put forward a moral argument and anyone who said he does is wrong!!!! Kant rejected all attempts to argue from the world to God, he regarded such an exercise as impossible. However he thought that God was a POSTULATE of practical reason. If you share Kant’s assumptions, then it becomes necessary to assume that there is a God.
Truth, what is truth? This question itself has a thousand answers, no person can ever be sure of what truth is rather, truth can be justified, it can checked for reliability with strong evidences and logic. If the evidence proves to be accurate then it can be established that a certain answer is the truth. However, have we ever tried to think about what intrigues us to seek the truth? To think about a question and set foot firmly on the path of knowledge. Definitely it has! That was the very cause itself which is why this world has witnessed some of the greatest philosophers like Aristotle, Plato and Socrates etc. along with the school of thought. The ability to think and reason is one of the greatest ability humans have, it is what distinguishes us from the animals. It is what gives us free will, the ability to control our own outcomes. However, it is that ability to ‘think’ itself which has caused men to rebel with the myths and statements established about the unseen and natural forces since the beginning of time. It gave rise to questions such as: Do aliens exist? Is there a world of the unseen? Life after Death and the most popular question since the beginning of times, Does God exists? And the answer is ‘yes’. Here is how I will justify my stance.
The Design Argument For The Existence Of God This argument is also called the teleological argument, it argues that the universe did not come around by mere chance, but some one or something designed it. This thing was God. This argument is a prosteriori because the observation of the natural world is taken into the mind to conclude that there is a designer. The belief that the universe was designed by God was triggered by things like the four seasons; summer, spring, autumn and winter, that change through the year.
The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God The ontological argument is an a priori argument. The arguments attempt to prove God's existence from the meaning of the word God. The ontological argument was introduced by Anselm of Canterbury in his book Proslogion. Anselm's classical argument was based on two principals and the two most involved in this is St Anselm of Canterbury as previously mentioned and Rene Descartes.
I am not a person who has blind faith without any thought to reason, however true believers in
and so is your faith." This is why opponents of the Christian faith have tried
God can be defined as a being conceived as the perfect, omnipotent, omniscient originator and ruler of the universe, the principal object of faith and worship in monotheistic religions (1). There are many people that do not believe in any religion. People who do not believe in a religion have no reason for believing in a God. People who do not believe in a God and argue against the existence of God are proving something that is completely false. There is a God for numerous reasons.