More handpicked essays just for you.
Argument on the existence of God
Key strengths to the divine command theory
Key strengths to the divine command theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Argument on the existence of God
My disclaimer in answering this question must start with the elimination of the word “if.” There is no doubt in mind that God exists. My answer would have to begin with God exists and murder is immoral. Cahn (2014) argues that “what is right is independent of what God commands” (p.52). The word of God is absolute and is the beginning and end. The Commandments are not a belief as Cahn (2014) suggests, but it is the direct word of God. It is not merely a social norm but God’s law. He is the creator so it is irrelevant in the argument that Cahn (2014) makes when he asks if murder is wrong because God says it is wrong or is wrong because it is wrong. I am not a person who has blind faith without any thought to reason, however true believers in
Despite finding Harley’s article easier to absorb, I will be providing insight and knowledge of Scannell’s article “Dailiness” as I drew interest into his concepts and ideas behind the notion of temporality of everyday life. After Scannell’s reading, I could see myself reflecting different notions of time and ‘media time’, through his concepts of routinisation and the ‘care structures’ of dailiness I became exposed to the recurring cycle we live in.
Shlomo Yitzchaki is one of the most influential rabbis in Jewish history. Born in Troyes, France in 1040, Shlomo Yitzchaki grew up Jewish and learned from his father. When his father died in 1046, Shlomo Yitzchaki lived with his mother until 1057 when he married his wife and joined the Yeshiva of Yaakov Ben-Yakar. Since then he has become a staple in Jewish learning and Jewish history. Today we know him as Rashi. Rashi was and is very influential to Jewish scholars because of the way his commentary spread, the simplicity and variation of his commentary, and the controversy of his method that is still discussed in modern times.
First, Murder goes against religion. The Bible states in Matthew 5:21 that “You shall not murder”, it also says in 1 John 3:15 that “Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer”.
As Twenge continues her argument she compares it back to her own experiences which ties up this argument in the successfulness of it. She uses these comparisons to help emphasize important parts of her argument. Beginning with “they think we like our phones more than we like actual people.” This state of unhappiness around teens forms her bigger argument that this is a main reason smartphones have destroyed a generation, “It was exactly the moment where the proportion of Americans who owned a smartphone surpassed 50%”. The owning of smartphones “placed in the young people’s hands are having profound effect on their lives -- and making them seriously unhappy.” Their social interactions decrease and their screen time increases as the years go
Anthropocentrism has been a central belief upon which modern human society has been constructed. The current state of the world, particularly the aspects that are negative, are reflective of humans continuously acting in ways that are in the interest of our own species. As environmental issues have worsened in recent decades, a great number of environmentalists are turning away from anthropocentric viewpoints, and instead adopting more ecocentric philosophies. Although anthropocentrism seems to be decreasing in popularity due to a widespread shift in understanding the natural world, philosopher William Murdy puts forth the argument that anthropocentrism still has relevancy in the context of modern environmental thought. In the following essay, I will explain Murdy’s interpretation of anthropocentrism and why he believes it to be an acceptable point of
Have a minute or two? Good, sit down and relax, because while reading this it may take a few minutes to change your opinion about competition. Competition could build character, but on the downside, it could leave someone with low self-esteem. This paper will discuss how competition is not always the best in certain situations. It will provide different types of examples and different types of scenarios where competition is harmful.
belief is not to produce true belief. Instead theistic belief allows the believer to avoid
My English 1310 course was taught by Professor Daniel Stuart. He taught us the concept of academic writing and why it is important. Academic writing is the process of down ideas, using a formal tone, deductive reasoning and third person. Writing done to carry out the requirements of a college or university on a research based level. It requires a starting point or introduction, followed by a thesis on the preferred topic, then comes proving and disproving of the evidence based arguments. Learning academic writing is important because it is a way to communicate our thoughts clearly and originality. It helps us think and see what evidence we can come up to contribute to that thinking. This course approached this idea of academic writing by
I agree with Strawson in saying that we are not truly morally responsible for what we do, in a mental respect at least. Though it suffers from many faults, there are also ways to even more clarify his argument, as I will hope to do so in the following. First off, Strawson states that for someone to be truly morally responsible, we have to understand the points that he has given. The first being that we do what we do because of the way we are. These just states that the things we do and decide are based upon how we are in that moment, in mental respects. For example, when it comes to choosing what to eat between options A or B, I will choose option A because of how I am. But if you were to choose, it would be dependent on the way that you are
An explanation is a set of statements constructed to describe a set of facts which clarifies the causes, contexts, and consequences of those facts. This description may establish rules or laws, and may clarify the existing ones in relation to any objects, or phenomena examined. The first piece Bush Remarks Roil Debate over Teaching of Evolution written by Elizabeth Bumiller, is an explanation. Bumiller addresses her points using facts rather than opinions, she also says, “Recalling his days as Texas governor, Mr. Bush said in the interview, according to a transcript, “I felt like both sides ought to be properly taught.”(2), this signifies that this is an explanation and not an argument since he sees both sides instead of choosing one. For
Héctor L Carral, a multimedia engineer wrote an article titled Stop Saying Technology is causing Social Isolation for The Huffington Post. The author of the article has a biased option, therefore does not include any research that would refute his argument. Carral states “it’s only obvious to blame them [technology] for some of society’s problems. Carral also states I believe that accusing technology (and, again, especially smartphones) of ruining social interaction and even all kinds of experiences is, to say the least, quite wrong and misguided. There was an obvious division between the commenters who agree with Carral and those who disagree with his argument. The demographics of commentators. From observing the occupations that the commenters listed, it was apparent the people who were against Hector Carral’s article were parents and educators while the people who agreed with his
On December 2,2015 I went to to the Lynnhaven building to receive some feedback on my agreement paper for English 111. It was a very rainy day after running through the rain when I reached the writing center room. There was a yellow note saying that the writing center was in the student center until December 4,2015. After reading the note I ran back in the rain to my car.It was to cold to walk it was raining. As I approached the student center I was told by a security guard that the tutoring lab was located on the third floor. I had walked up three flights of stairs. When I had finally reached the third floor,I walk into the tutoring lab. There were about eight tables, but only four staff members and one student. Amen had approached me asking what did I need help with today. I replied saying that I would like some feedback on my paper for English. He then pointed to the writing table and said “she can assist you with your paper”.
Even with punishments such as the flood, humans still sinned. (Genesis 4:24, 6:5, 18:20) Superficially, it appears to support Nature winning over Nurture. On the other hand, if we do not assume that God is entirely perfect (1), God was maybe too tolerant or inconsistent in his punishments, resulting in nurturing the wrong values. God protected Cain after killing Abel (Genesis 4:15), which resulted in Lamech considering himself right for killing 2 people and that he should be protected even more than Cain (Genesis 4:23-24). And god did not stop this, nor did he tell Lamech that this was wrong. Thus, god's inaction seems to reinforce that murder might be a good thing. As a result, the nurture of implicitly allowing murder was what contributed to the sin of humans. This implies that Nurture may actually be stronger than
God has commanded that we are not to commit murder, there is no gray area. Morals come from God just as this command did, if one murders through means of abortion or euthanasia it is morally wrong.