Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Japan's declining birth rate and its effects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Japan needs to have more babies. The population of Japan is declining, and the birth rate is a base problem. People just aren’t having enough babies anymore. This will be problematic, as Tomm says “The consequences have had negative effects as fertility rate continues to decline and life expectancy continues to increase”. After the birth rate has been declining for the past four decades, the old far outnumber the young at a ratio of nearly 2:1(“Japan Age structure”). There aren’t enough workers to pay into social security. Social problems like traditional gender roles and stereotypes negatively impact the growth of the population. Because of their work-centric lifestyles, social problems, and child related expenses, Japan’s birth rate is severely declining.
First, the lifestyle of the Japanese is very different to that of Americans. Whereas people in America generally spend lots of time with their families, the people of Japan typically only see each other at certain times such as meals or weekends. This is due to a heavy focus on business and work life, especially since seniority at a company determines your wages and potential for promotion (Huen 2). As part of the seniority aspect of work, many women are reluctant to have children as it forces them to take time away from work in order to have a baby and to raise the child. According to Huen, “The Japanese employment system thus offers workers something close to permanent job security if they are patient about advancement, with predictable pay increases, company housing and several kinds of fringe benefits, all in return for workers’ loyalty and commitment to the company”. This system causes many women not to want children until their careers are well on the way to becoming ...
... middle of paper ...
...r people leaving the workforce. If something doesn’t change, Japan may not even be able to survive.
Works Cited
Harney, Alexandra. “Without Babies, Can Japan Survive.” New York Times. New York Times, 15 Dec. 2012. Web. 6 Feb. 2014.
Huen, Yuki W.P. “Policy Response to Declining Birth Rate in Japan: Formation of a ‘Gender-Equal’ Society.” San Francisco State University. online.sfsu.edu, 11 Sep. 2007. Web. 1 Mar. 2014.
“Japan Age structure” IndexMundi. IndexMundi, 6 Dec. 2013. Web. 1 Mar. 2014.
Mizuochi, Masaki. “The Effect of the work-family policy on fertility in Japan.” Princeton. Princeton.edu, n.d., Web. 1 Mar. 2014
Teitelbaum, Michael S., Jay Winter. “Low Fertility Rates - Just a Phase?” YaleGlobal Online. Yale Global, 9 Jul. 2013. Web. 1 Mar. 2014.
Tomm, Daniel. “Impact of Japan’s Declining Fertility” Econ 272. Econ272.academic.wlu.edu, n.d.,
1 Mar. 2014.
Feng Wang and Cai Yong stated that the fertility rate was already declining and the policy wasn’t necessary for the Chinese people, especially because of the enormous costs. The fertility rate, which is the number of children the average woman has in her lifetime, in China started at 2.7 in 1979 and decreased to 1.7 in 2008. The article “China’s One Child Policy at 30” argued that the policy did not need to be introduced in China because the rates were already lower than Brazil at 4.2 and Thailand at 3.6.
Document F examines the lives of 2 children effected by the OCP. They both felt it helped them in the long run, but all of the attention and pressure to do well was on them. This leads to the creation of the “Little Emperors.” This can lead to a poor ability of cooperation in the next generation. The amount of pressure on a single-child to do well can also lead to an increase of depression and suicide among the new generation, which is not the correct way to decrease population. Document B dives into the issue of fertility rates before and after the OCP takes effect. A year before the Policy takes effect China’s fertility rate is 2.7; in 2008 it is 1.7. This change is unnatural and extremely savage. Social issues are only the tip of the iceberg; the One Child Policy also caused a gender gap beyond
..., manga, anime, virtual lives, socializing, vacationing, etc. It’s not that the Japanese people have resolved to avoid sexual contact, but it is the case that many young people are finding gratification elsewhere. Declining birth rates are likely due to the fact that people have more choices now – even in Japan – than they did before the 1970s when this decline first started. Japanese women see the choices open to people in more liberal countries like the US, and are making those choices too. Also, the availability of a broad range of birth control methods that made it simple and easy to defer pregnancy kind of coincides with the start of this decline. I think the decline is more a reflection of the choices a modern society provides, and the consequences of those choices in decisions to focus on career first and family later. We see this in most developed nations.
Japan’s unemployment rate is currently at 4.9%, which is a postwar high for the country. This is due in part to the number of workers losing their jobs. Another big part of the increase in unemployment is due to the increase in the labor force.
In 1979, China decided to establish a one child policy which states that couples are only allowed to have one child, unless they meet certain exceptions[1].In order to understand what social impacts the one child policy has created in China it important to evaluate the history of this law. China’s decision to implement a Child policy has caused possible corruption, an abuse of women’s rights, has led to high rates of female feticide, has created a gender ratio problem for China, and has led to specific problems associated with both the elderly and younger generation. Finally, an assessment of why China’s one child policy is important to the United States allows for a full evaluation of the policy.
With all the different economic opportunities, it is no wonder some Americans see procreation as a supplemental source of monetary income. During the twentieth century, we propagated the American Dream and placed pressure on Americans to settle down and start families. Prior to the twentieth century, many couples would have children, who would often then become labor assets; children would tend the fields or do various jobs around the home to save the family money by avoiding outsourcing. As the population grew, the laws of supply and demand triggered a need for new technology; this technology made it easier to sustain the population but also made the need for the extra children obsolete. This did not stop Americans from breeding.
Friedman, Seth. "The Changing Roles of Women in Japanese Society." The Changing Roles of Women in Japanese Society.N.p., Dec. 1992. Web. 27 Apr. 2014.
N. Gleicher, D. Barad, Does gender selection devalue women?, Fertility and Sterility, Volume 88, Supplement 1, September 2007, Page S260, ISSN 0015-0282, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.887.
News, S. "Japan's Gender Roles." Teacher Bien. FourHalf Inc, 12 July 2012. Web. 17 Dec. 2013
7) Richards, Lucinda. “Controlling China’s Baby Boom.” Contemporary Review Jan. 1996: 5-9. Wilson Select Plus.
In the article, “A Small Town in Japan Doubles it’s Fertility Rate,” the author talks about why the fertility rates in the small town of Nagicho are increasing, and the effects that it has had on the town. The author explains the reasoning behind what has happened to make the fertility rates grow, in relation to why it is necessary. The author uses a woman that lives in the town to better convey why the fertility rates are growing, stating that she will receive rewards such as a “celebratory gift, of ¥300,000 ($3,530) for having a child,” and “¥90,000 a year for each child she has in school.” This article conveys the events that take place in order to increase a certain populations fertility rates, and the positive and negative outcomes that
Gender inequality involves ideological preference and physical loss of equal opportunities to gain. The five articles examined the indirect effort of One Child policy on...
The cause of this is the way that gender roles are now being protrayed in their country. For Japanese woman, they are currently not being displayed as the...
A contributing factor to this, according to Mary Brinton, sociology professor at Harvard University, is that women continue to balance family with the demand of work and being available all the time (Gender Inequality and Women in the Workplace, 2016). As a result, women take on a “second shift” when they get home from work and in choosing to progress professionally many are having less children or waiting longer to have children. There seems to be a correlation between gender equality at home and the workplace with lower birth
Rosenberg, M. (2010, 11 17). China's one child policy. Retrieved 01 31, 2011, from About.com: