Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Leadership in self-reflection
Leadership in self-reflection
Critically analysis the character robinson crusoe
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Leadership in self-reflection
Understanding oneself is as universal question for humanity as why we are here and where do we come from. This universal question is so prominent that it even underpins itself deep into literature itself, with many novels featuring characters on personal quests of self-realization. These quests for self-realization are portrayed in numerous forms. In Daniel Defoe’s novel Robinson Crusoe, Crusoe takes off on an overseas journey in order to discover himself. In Leo Tolstoy’s novel The death of Ivan Ilyich, Ivan Ilyich’s quest for self-realization begins initially as an attempt to achieve a high social status, wealth, and other aspects of life that society deems admirable. In Albert Camus’s the fall, Jean-Baptiste Clamence believes he has gained …show more content…
Ilyich deems that one’s self worth can be determined by how respected a member of society you are. Because of this, his sole focus in life is on improving his social status and obtaining wealth in order to be viewed as this highly respected member of society. This strict structure, however, only leads him to a life surrounded with artificiality and materialism; it is ironic that the materialistic act of hanging up curtains also is the cause of Ilyich’s death. Only after Ilyich learns of his impending death is he able to fully take a step back and evaluate his life. “[he] saw clearly that it was not real at all, but a terrible and huge deception which had hidden both life and death. This consciousness intensified his physical suffering tenfold.”(Tolstoy 11.14) He learns that the true meaning of life is an authentic life marked by compassion and sympathy, not the artificial life he had been living full of self-interest. It is only after he makes this conclusion that his quest for self-realization is truly …show more content…
This illusion is very similar to that of Robinson Crusoe who initially believed that it was in his moral encompass to kill the savages for their moral injustices. Clamence’s belief that his morals were the perfect display for others to follow, however, is removed from his own view when one night he was walking on a crossing bridge over the Seine River and passed a Woman who shortly after fell into the water below. Rather than turn around to save her, Jean-Baptiste did nothing because he did not want to endanger his own life and decided to let this woman drown. It is only after Jean-Baptiste realizes his own hypocrisy that he begins to truly gain self-realization. Jean-Baptiste realized that what at first he considered acts displaying his high moral character, such as helping the blind cross the street or defending Widows and Orphans as a lawyer were merely selfish acts to appease his own ego. Only after Jean-Baptiste realized his own hypocrisy was he able to discover his true path to gain self-realization; this method is through his practice of being a judge-penitent, confessing his own sins so he has the right to judge you as
The Death of Ivan Ilyich by Leo Tolstoy tells the story of Ivan Ilyich, a man who deals with a mysterious illness through introspection. Until his illness, he lived the life he thought he was supposed to live. Like Candide, he was living in blind optimism. He assumed that what he was doing was the right thing because he was told as much. He had a respectable job and a family. Happiness, if it did occur to him, was fulfilling his duties as a husband and father. It was his sudden illness that allowed him to reflect on his choices, concluding that those choices did not make him happy. “Maybe I have lived not as I should have… But how so when I did everything in the proper way” (Tolstoy 1474)? Ilyich had been in a bubble for his entire life, the bubble only popping when he realizes his own mortality. This puts his marriage, his career, and his life choices into perspective. Realizing that he does not get to redo these choices, he distances himself from his old life: his wife, his children, and his career. All that is left is to reflect. This reflection is his personal enlightenment. He had been living in the dark, blind to his true feelings for his entire life. Mortality creates a space in which he can question himself as to why he made the choices he made, and how those choices created the unsatisfactory life he finds himself in
What exactly is dysfunctional? Who wrote the rules to proper family or societal behavior? How does one know exactly what the proper reaction is? Every family has its crazy members and every city it’s insane citizens, but many do a great job of covering it up. Especially when it comes to high in social standing. Many are very careful not to air their dirty laundry in public. There are times when it can get out of hand and the unthinkable may happen. Is it right for one person to automatically appoint themselves as head of the household such as, Orgon in Tartuffe? What about Ivan Ilyich? Would he have been considered the head of the house, because he allowed his wife’s attitude to predict the family’s social standing? These two stories are classic of situational irony not only from families, but in human nature. To analyze Tartuffe and The Death of Ivan Ilyich and then compare them, one must have an open mind to all sorts of behavior and believe that these situations are indeed a reality.
Aristotle, an ancient Greek philosopher and scientist, conveys, “Knowing yourself is the beginning of all wisdom”. In other words, Aristotle states that the gaining of self-knowledge provides an individual with the ability to know one’s personal gifts and accountabilities. To start one’s adult life a person must pursue the journey of self-discovery to learn in depth about their skills and weaknesses. Individuals must find themselves through the limitations and ordeals that they face during their voyage for self-awareness. For example, in Tim O’Brien’s short story, “On the Rainy River”, the narrator shares his story about self-discovery.
It is important that everyone lives their lives according to God’s purpose for them. Many people in today’s society fear death. Those who fear death have little to no knowledge about what God has planned for all of his children. On the other hand, some people fear death because they feel as though they have not fully completed their life’s purpose; or lived accordingly. This work brings about many real-life situations. There will always be people who use others to advance their own lives. Then there will be people who want the best for others. Continuing a study of this work will allow readers to make a connection to his or her current society. The Death of Ivan Ilyich is an easy read, that will automatically catch the reader’s
The main way that Jean-Baptiste exerts his need for power over others is by judging them. He does this in a variety of ways but the motivation behind it is that he in turn does not want to be judged himself. However, he believes that if he is judging himself first than that gives him the right to do the same to others without it being wrong. He also seems to believe that others will not be able to judge him if he judges himself before they can. This reasoning goes on to explains why he calls himself a judge-penitent. He labels himself this so he can tell about his own sins and wrongdoings th...
The story of In "The Death of Ivan Ilych", was written by Leo Tolstoy around who examines the life of a man, Ivan Ilyich, who would seem to have lived an exemplary life with moderate wealth, high station, and family. By story's end, however, Ivan's life will be shown to be devoid of passion -- a life of duties, responsibilities, respect, work, and cold objectivity to everything and everyone around Ivan. It is not until Ivan is on his death bed in his final moments that he realizes that materialism had brought to his life only envy, possessiveness, and non-generosity and that the personal relationships we forge are more important than who we are or what we own.
Tolstoy’s The Death of Ivan Ilyich is a reminder that books can provide answers to questions we never asked, but yearned to know. For that reason alone, The Death of Ivan Ilyich should be considered a work of art. However due to the many subtle hints and clues pointing at the underlying Christian nature of the book, it deserves to be added to the list of great modern Christian literature.
Ivan has a strong disconnect with his family and begins feel like he is always suffering, while beginning to question if his life has been a lie. An example of this for prompt number three is when we are giving the quote "Ivan Ilych's life had been most simple and most ordinary and therefore most terrible." Leo Tolstoy implies through the quote that even though he lives an ordinary
Ivan Ilych was a member of the Court of Justice who was "neither as cold and formal as his elder brother nor as wild as the younger, but was a happy mean between them—an intelligent, polished, lively, and agreeable man” (Tolstoy 102). He lived an unexceptionally ordinary life and strived for averageness. As the story progresses, he begins to contemplate his life choices and the reason for his agonizing illness and inevitable death. “Maybe I did not live as I ought to have done, but how could that be, when I did everything properly?” (Tolstoy
To many individuals the word “progress” has a positive meaning behind it. It suggests improvement, something humans have been obsessed with since the dawn of society. However, if closely examined, progress can also have a negative connotation as well. While bringing improvement, progress can simultaneously spark conformity, dependency, and the obsession of perfection within the individuals caught in its midst. It is this aspect of progress within modern society that negatively affects Ivan Ilych, Leo Tolstoy’s main character in The Death of Ivan Ilych. Ivan’s attempt to conform to modern society’s view of perfection takes away his life long before he dies. Furthermore, his fear of death and reactions towards it reflects modern society’s inability to cope with the ever present reminder that humans still suffer and die, despite all attempts to make life painless, perfect, and immortal.
However, through the enlightenment provided by Tolstoy, and the lessons taught, I now see that I am less satisfied with my existence and more deceivingly complacent with it. To expand on this, I have not done anything of true significance and have lived only to appear content, fooling even myself, while hiding behind a stoic facade. I have lived in an inauthentic way, preoccupied with my superficial social portrayal instead of true inner delineation. Just as I did, I feel as though the protagonist, Ivan Ilyich, would have claimed to have been happy, genuinely believing himself. I see a lot of myself in Ivan, and it makes me fearful. I would seek only what was pleasant and shy away from what is unpleasant. I now see I must be willing to accept my own transience and live genuinely if I want to live a blissful
Karl Marx once stated, “The workers have nothing to lose but their chains.” Leo Tolstoy’s The Death of Ivan Ilyich focuses on the middle class struggles in Russia during the 1800s and how materialism has negative impacts on people in society. Tolstoy uses the novella to demonstrate how Russian society was imperfect in the 1800s and Tolstoy portrayed ideals similar to Marxism in the book. Marxism is the ideology that everyone should be equal in regards to class, education, economics and politics. Marxism was created by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels during the 1840s. Their ideology was to establish a classless society where property and resources are owned by the community and not the individuals themselves. Tolstoy used the novella to contrast his ideals of a classless society and anti-materialism to show how negative the caste system and the materialistic lifestyle of the Russian middle class was.
Upon reading more closely, the story is revealed to present a tragic journey of a man who has lost his sanity but seeks solace in the materialistic comforts of his old life. The story succeeds in making a number of statements about human nature: that wealth is the most powerful measure of social status and anyone without it will face ostracization; that denial of one 's mistakes and unfortunate circumstances only leads to more pain; that even the most optimistic people can hold dark secrets and emotional turmoil inside them. All of these themes compel the reader to ponder their real-life implications long after the story is
The justification of self-worth is often a product of others consciousness’. In the face of mortality, it is not uncommon to want to be noticed by other people when we are gone. Wanting to extend the presence of being known past physical presence, whether in a certain place or in life in general, is important to many people. To be able to matter to someone on a deep level reinforces the pride a person has in their self-value. While Icarus did not have the luxury of being noticed by society, Breugal utilizes this character as a cautionary tale of how even great people can slip away into the abyss of death.
Jean-Baptiste Clamence is an interesting character. He was a lawyer from Paris who would do many kind acts for no payment. He does lawyer work for the poor for free and helps blind people cross the street. At first, he talks about all these great things that he has done and even says “Don’t think for a moment ,cher monsieur, that I am bragging.”(Camus 20). He talks about how above he is compared to everyone else but he defends a killer and he tells the reader that he especially enjoyed that defence (Camus 19). Why would a virtuous man like Clamence defend a murderer and enjoy helping him? He also says that seeing a beggar approach is worse for him than it is for most others (Camus 21). The defending of a murderer and disliking beggars