Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Personal essays on deaf culture
Personal essays on deaf culture
Personal essays on deaf culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Personal essays on deaf culture
The Deaf President Now movement occurred at Gallaudet University, a deaf university in the United States. The university was established by congress in 1864 to serve the deaf and the hard of hearing. The university can also be used for graduate students who are hearing and want to pursue an education in the language through immersion and a bilingual education. The university plays an important role in the Deaf culture. A main reason it plays such an important role is due to the fact that it was the first deaf university established in the United States. Which makes Gallaudet University the heart of deaf culture.
In March of 1988, Gallaudet University students created a crucial movement that changed the university and changed the way people
…show more content…
looked at the university forever. The movement was called Deaf President Now. It was sparked due to the university electing a hearing person to be president. The students believed it was time to elect a deaf person as president, and were extremely confident that a deaf person would be the next president due to two of the three candidates being deaf. But, when Elisabeth Zinser won, the hearing person, the students were outraged which sparked the student protest Deaf President Now. Deaf President Now became the most influential student protest that the university has ever faced.
According to the videos I watched, not only were the students involved in the protests, but so were some of the faculty and alumni of Gallaudet University. The students demanded four things from the board:
Elisabeth Zinser must resign and a deaf person selected as president, Jane Spilman must step down as chairperson of the Board of Trustees, deaf people must constitute of 51% majority on the Board, and there would no reprisals against any student or employee involved in the protest (“History Behind DPN”).
The video also included actress, Marlee Matlin. She received an honorary Doctorate of Humane Letters degree from Gallaudet University. She was also assigned to the Board of Trustees of the university. In the video, I was surprised to see that she was embarrassed of saying she had an honorary degree from Gallaudet University. However, I began to understand why she might have had shame and the feeling of embarrassment. That is because the protest was rightful in wanting a deaf president and she supported the students in the protest. Before Deaf President Now, Gallaudet University always had a hearing person as president. Therefore, Marlee Matlin agreed it was time for a
…show more content…
change. Nobody held back when it was time for the protesting.
The people were appalled by the idea of another hearing person as president again for many reasons. According to Nick Anderson of The Washington Post, “The ranks of deaf scholars who held doctorates had grown to more than 100, according to a history of the movement on the Gallaudet Web site, and there were numerous deaf people in senior administrative posts at various educational institutions.” So that begged the question amongst the people, why can’t the university be ran by someone who was deaf? Students blockaded the campus, rallied, marched, boycotted and then quickly grew supporters from all over the country. All of this attention from the media and the country led Elisabeth Zinser to resign. Ultimately, the students and deaf people won. That was a turning moment in the history of the deaf community for everyone. Everyone now saw deaf people as more capable and able to be equal to hearing
people. The videos made me feel very emotional due to the passion of the students, faculty, and alumni. It impacted the way I look at the deaf community and deafness itself. I am ashamed to admit it, but I had always believed that deafness was a sad or bad thing and unfortunately, I believe that most of the hearing world also looks at it that way. Nonetheless, the videos and articles showed me the deaf community in a way I’ve never seen before. I saw hundreds of deaf people protesting together for their rights. I saw true love, passion, and desire in everyone in the videos. I could almost feel the frustration of the students and people protesting for a deaf president. The university is the number one deaf university in the country, yet they had always had a hearing president. The contradiction and unfairness of that was immense. But, because of the protest and movement, history was made and the first deaf person became president. I see in today’s world, for example the Black Lives Matter movement, a striking similarity. It started as a small movement that gained media attention and impacted the entire country. The entire country started to boycott and protest. Which has ultimately been creating a change. The power of the people willing to come together for a change can be extremely influential in the world and can be seen through many examples throughout history. If everyone wants a change, comes together, then a change will come.
...eople of all over were coming together and making a difference, including in the hearing world too. The hearing president resigned, so a deaf president was elected for the university. Deaf pride surged through the entire world as the deaf community had been noticed, and acknowledged, worldwide.
In the following chapters, there is an extensive amount of knowledge to learn about how Deaf culture is involved in our modern world. The pages assigned give us an outlook of how Deaf people are treated in our daily life, and how we should learn from it. Its gives a clear line between what are myths and what are facts, to those who are curious about the Deaf community or have specific questions. This book has definitely taught me new things that I could put to good use in the near future. In specific chapters, my mind really opened up to new ideas and made me think hard about questions, like “why don’t some Deaf people trust hearing people,” or “do we need another ‘Deaf president now’ revolution?” I realized many new things in the course of reading this book, and have recommended this to my family.
He was very instrumental in developing the French Sign Language (Langue des Signes Francaise, LSF). Epee's sign language class grew from 2 students in the late 1760's, to 6 students, and ten years later there were 30 students in the class. By his death in 1789 there were over 60 students. Thomas Gallaudet, a Protestant minister, was sent by philanthropists to learn the art of teaching Deaf people. The Connecticut Asylum for the Education and Instruction of Deaf and Dumb Persons opened in April of 1817.Laurent Clerc, a student of Epee, was the head teacher. Toward the middle of the 19th century, deaf children were beginning to be more accepted. Most deaf children completed and elementary education and some even went on to "higher" education. An oral school for the Deaf was organized in Massachusetts in the late 1860's. by Samuel Gridley Howe, an American educator. In 1867 there were 26 American institutions for the education of Deaf children and all of them taught ASL, by 1907 there were 139 institutions and NONE of them taught ASL. It was banned by a special congress and only oral teaching was allowed. Even today, ASL still struggles as the main language of the Deaf because of the decisions of those in the late 1800's and early
What I found most interesting about Jarashow’s presentation were the two opposing views: Deaf culture versus medical professionals. Within the Deaf culture, they want to preserve their language and identity. The Deaf community wants to flourish and grow and do not view being deaf as a disability or being wrong. Jarashow stated that the medical field labels Deaf people as having a handicap or being disabled because they cannot hear. Those who are Deaf feel as though medical professionals are trying to eliminate them and relate it to eugenics. It is perceived that those in that field are trying to fix those who are Deaf and eliminate them by making them conform to a hearing world. Those within the Deaf community seem to be unhappy with devices such
Throughout the ITP program and the lower level ASL classes the name Gallaudet is driven into our heads. We know of the University named after him and how he was the man to bring education to the Deaf in America. What was not before mentioned is that there were two Gallaudets. The first thing I learned from this book is the importance of Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet and his son Edward Miner Gallaudet. I fact I had believed for some time now that E.M. Gallaudet was this extraordinary man that everyone loved and the named a university after him. It is unfortunate that this was not made clearer in the past. Now all I see is a man who took the only path that he knew how to take.
Even though the school has been through tough situations, Gallaudet University is still standing strong. Deaf people dream about going to school there and are honored to have a way for them to get a good education even though they have a disability. Many students go on to have good jobs, and they change the deaf community. They inspire younger deaf people, and prove to the world that even though they cannot normal people they can still make a difference. Normal is overrated, anyways.
Many people never realize or take much notice on what deaf people go through in life, but by watching the movie "Love is Never Silent", hearing people are able to have a clear view of what it is like to be deaf in the hearing world. Many different perspectives towards how deaf people live, socialize, party or work are built by many distinctive types of people. As the movie "Love is Never Silent" shows, Margaret and her family are isolated from their community. They aren 't allowed to sign in front of the hearing because it 's strange and abnormal. Seeing a deaf person sign during a time where being different can make a person look like an outcast makes hearing people pity the deaf and end up treating them as ignorant people. Although deaf
Marie’s life long advocacy and work in the deaf community earned her the place as an icon in the deaf community. Her efforts to legitimize ASL as language and bridge the deaf and hearing communities, have had a lasting impact. To this day she remains a respected and revered figure, and a pioneer in the bilingual-bicultural movement.
In the book Seeing Voices, the author describes the world of the deaf, which he explores with extreme passion. The book begins with the history of deaf people in the United States of America, the horrible ways in which they had been seen and treated, and their continuing struggle to gain hospitality in the hearing world. Seeing Voices also examines the visual language of the deaf, sign language, which is as expressive and as rich as any spoken language. This book covers a variety of topics in deaf studies, which includes sign language, the neurology of deafness, the treatment of Deaf American citizens in history, and the linguistic and social challenges that the deaf community face. In this book, Oliver Sacks does not view the deaf as people having a condition that can be treated, instead he sees the deaf more like a racial group. This book is divided into three parts. In the first part, Oliver Sacks states a strong case for sign language, saying it is in fact a complete language and that it is as comprehensive as English, French, Chinese, and any other spoken language. He also describes the unhappy story of oralism (this is the education of deaf students through oral language by using lip reading, speech, and mimicking the mouth shapes and breathing patterns of speech)) in deaf children’s education. In addition, the first part is about the history of deaf people as well as information about deafness. It also includes the author’s own introduction to the world of the deaf.
Jankowski, Katherine A. (1997). Deaf Empowerment: Emergence, Strugge, and Rhetoric. Gallaudet University Press, Washington DC.
Christiansen, J. B. Barnartt, S. N. (1995). Deaf President Now! : The 1988 Revolution at
Deaf President Now is the protest movement that happened in 1988. This protest was labeled as the “ Civil Rights Movement of the Deaf.” The DPN movement was and still is a huge monumental mark at Gaulladet. Leaders and supporters of the Deaf community urged the Board Of Trustees to elect the first deaf president.What really enraged the students is the message behind the board’s selection “ no deaf person was qualified enough to head their own school.” Spilman also stated “Deaf people aren’t able to function in a hearing world.” On March 6,1988 is when it all began.
“It would have been difficult to find a happier child than I was as I lay in my crib at the close of that eventful day and lived over the joys it had brought me, and for the first time longed for a new day to come. I had now the key to all language, and I was eager to learn to use it” (Keller 146). The ability to actually comprehend words and associate those words to thoughts and feelings rejuvenated her. Keller was reborn that day, with a new ‘vision’ and a new direction. What started that day, culminated into Keller becoming the first deaf person to earn a bachelors degree.
With the deaf community having a signed language that is natural and practical to them, they were able to learn and communicate with others. So it boggles my mind to have someone like Alexander Graham Bell, who had a deaf mother and wife, and a Scottish immigrant would want to stifle and change the deaf community to fit in with everyone and not have the tools to make them who they are. I see it as Bell saying that you cannot get anywhere in life by being different yet Bell was different himself. Having them
Hearing people can have a place in the Deaf community. Each minority group tends to welcome genuine allies and the Deaf community is no exception. But it is important for people who hear to remember our role as allies. We join the community to show our support, not to lead. We can help educate other hearing people, but we are not missionaries to bring Deaf people into the mainstream. Deaf people are the appropriate leaders of their own civil rights movement and teachers of their children. Our role is not to give Deaf people a voice; it is to make sure that the voice already present is heard. And we can do that. We can teach other hearing people to listen.