Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Responsibility to protect the environment
Negative impact humans have on an ecosystem
Negative impact humans have on an ecosystem
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Responsibility to protect the environment
A majestic and ancient sentinel encompasses the horizon. It began its ascertainments before the dawn of time. From the first creature to scale its eminence to the now senescent thickets spanning its plateau, it mutely observes the delicate world born upon itself. Eons of wisdom and antiquity have entrenched its vista. An unspoken understanding of a simple balance ensconced within its acclivity still eludes the human mind. Humans capable of creating such magnificent, beautiful works of art, prose of thought, and music defying description are also capable of pure devastation and destruction of this very delicate and life sustaining balance of the planet. If the human mind were as evolved and experienced as the mountain in its understanding of …show more content…
In order to understand the process of critical thinking we must first define it. The website of The Critical Thinking Community, defines it as: “ The intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action” (Defining Critical Thinking). By this definition, a mountain can emulate most of the more important elements of critical thinking. The information gathered within its sedimentary memory layers reside experiences of water erosion, nutrient rich skeletal remains, and other unique deposits, which are the evidence of its accumulated knowledge and keeper of its history. The dense foliage that disappears when consumed by the wildlife inhabitants leaves it barren and aged. The time spent in reflection of the wildfires and floods that have transformed it into a well-balanced ecosystem capable of self-renewal and revaluation. The mountain is unconsciously reactive to the surrounding stimuli and does not interfere the actions of its inhabitants. It merely co-exists with them without the interference of emotions. Simple natural logic placed into action. This is the very essence of critical …show more content…
In the book entitled A Sand County Almanac, the author infers that men should think like mountains and gives this example: “And perhaps with better cause, for while a buck pulled down by wolfs can be replaced in two or three years, a range pulled down by too many deer may fail of replacement in as many decades” (Leopold 132). The interference of human emotions upsets the balance of this eco-system and hence is not included in the elements of critical
He is unable to understand why they can’t leave nature alone. His frustration stems from the fact that so much valuable land is being destroyed, to accommodate the ways of the lazy. It seems as though he believes that people who are unwilling to enjoy nature as is don’t deserve to experience it at all. He’s indirectly conveying the idea that humans who destroy nature are destroying themselves, as nature is only a mechanism that aids the society. In Desert Solitaire Abbey reminds the audience, of any age and year of the significance of the wild, enlightening and cautioning the human population into consciousness and liability through the use of isolation as material to ponder upon and presenting judgments to aid sheltering of the nature he
Aldo Leopold’s essay, “Thinking Like a Mountain” shines light on a prominent issue amongst the ecosystem concerning the importance of a single organism. Leopold attempts to help the reader understand the importance of all animals in the ecosystem by allowing a wolf, deer, and a mountain to represent the ecosystem and how changes amongst them cause adverse effects on each other. Leopold recounts of the killing of a wolf and seeing a "fierce green fire" die in its eyes, this became a transformational moment in his life causing him to rethink the beliefs he had grown up with. By connecting the wolf’s death to the health of the mountain he was inspired to promote the idea that all predators matter to the ecosystem. He believed then that all native organisms are critical to the health of the land, if any change occurs in one part of the circuit, many parts will have to adjust to it and if something is removed the consequence can be detrimental. The essay highlights the idea that all living things on earth have a purpose and that everything is interdependent of each other.
Second Paper “I shall briefly explain how I conceive of this matter. Look round the world: Contemplate the whole and every part of it: You will find it to be nothing but one great machine, subdivided into an infinite number of lesser machines, which again admit subdivisions, to a degree beyond what human senses and faculties can trace and explain. All these various machines, and even their most minute parts, are adjusted to each other with an accuracy, which ravishes into admiration all men, who have ever contemplated them. The curious adapting of means to ends, throughout all nature, resembles, though it much exceeds, the production of human contrivance; of human design, thought, wisdom, and intelligence. Since therefore the effects resemble each other, we are led to infer, by all the rules of analogy, that the causes also resemble; and that the author of nature is somewhat similar to the mind of man; though possessed of much larger faculties, proportioned to the grandeur of the work, which he has executed.
...rstly, the relationship between the protagonist and the wolves demonstrates man’s ability to become accustomed to nature and then to be rejected from it by their own natural human attributes and qualities. Secondly, man’s own human nature will stop him from fully merging with nature, which is explored through Ootek’s descriptions and explanations. Lastly, the symbol of the Eskimos reveals that because man has been isolated from nature for so long, they will never fully become a part of nature. As a matter of fact, humans were once a part of nature, but they have decided to detach themselves from it to create and follow a new role in the world. Now, humans are destroying nature, rather than preserving and respecting it. With the natural and human qualities that humans have, it is no wonder why humans are not able to fully rejoin the world of nature once again.
Men are strong and powerful human being’s, but does nature defeat them? In all through these three pieces that Edgar Allen Poe and Herman Melville wrote it is proven that nature is stronger than man. It is shown that in every aspect that nature is too over powering for man to handle. The factor of nature being strong, dangerous and unpredictable at the same time is too much for any man or any manmade object to overcome. The power of nature does defeat man in every way; it cannot be stopped or slowed down no matter what is done to prepare for it. When people think of man, they think of carefree living with no problems other than other human beings, but truth to be told, the power of nature is what is in control and will always be in control as long as man remains alive on this powerful and unpredictable planet.
“Modern man does not experience himself as a part of nature but as an outside force destined to dominate and conquer it. He even talks of a battle with nature, forgetting that if he won the battle he would find himself on the losing side” (E.F. Schumacher, 1974).
The author Vincent Ruggiero defines critical thinking in his book Beyond Feelings: A Guide to Critical Thinking, as a “search for answers, a quest.” It is the idea that one does not accept claims, ideas, and arguments blindly, but questions and researches these things before making a decision on them. From what I learned in class, critical thinking is the concept of accepting that there are other people and cultures in this world that may have different opinions. It is being able to react rationally to these different opinions.
In Thinking Like a Mountain, the author, Aldo Leopold, writes of the importance of wildlife preservation through examples of the symbiotic relationship of animals and plant-life with a mountain. He asks the reader to perceive the processes of a mountainous environment in an unusual way. Aldo Leopold wants the reader to "think" like a mountain instead of thinking of only the immediate, or as the hunter did. Taking away one feature of an ecosystem may eventually destroy everything else that that environment is composed of. Nature and wildness is essential for the well being of life on this earth.
From all this reading, it’s just the author explaining the viewers how we can contribute to the environment. He’s just telling his stories about previous incidents and the interactions with nature. To “think like a mountain” defines how we can connect and appreciate all the living and non-living things in the ecosystem. Leopold experience of his adventure of a wolf den. He thought who can pass up killing a wolf. The more we eliminate wolves, the more deers we have and greater hunting expedition. But, he saw something that changes his mind. “We reach the old wolf in time to watch a fierce green fire dying in
Told from the perspective of sentient grass, Carl Sandburg’s poem brings forth an almost eerie feeling of the perseverance of nature. Whilst humanity has been battling out wars ever since the dawn of time, rapidly increasing in both strength and resulting casualties, a subject further proven by the second poem, William E. Stafford’s At the Bomb Testing Site. How great of an impact has the presence of mankind had on a planet, otherwise so rich in life? Will we ultimately end up victims of our own destructive ways?
Chris had just been promoted as an Executive Assistant for Pat the CEO, Chief Executive Officer, of Faith Community Hospital. Pat had given Chris her very first assignment on her first day of work as an executive assistant and that was to gather information so that Pat can present the issues to the board of directors. Faith Hospital is faced with issues that needed attention and the board of directors must be notified of the issues so that a solution can be remedy to help the hospital stay in business.
In his essay Critical Thinking: What Is It Good For? (In Fact, What Is It), Howard Gabennesch explains the importance of critical thinking by drawing attention to how its absence is responsible for societies many ills including, but not limited to, the calamity in Vietnam. Yet, at the end of his essay, Gabennesch also mentions that, despite “the societal benefits of critical thinking, at the individual level, uncritical thinking offers social and psychological rewards of its own.”(14). Similarly, it is these rewards that, like the bait on a fishhook, often make individuals hesitant to engage in critical thinking despite the resulting harm to both them and society.
What is critical thinking? Encarta Pocket Dictionary defines critical thinking as a type of critical analysis. Encarta Pocket Dictionary defines a decision as firmness in choosing something. The authors of Whatever It Takes suggest that decision-making material and literature tend to emphasize the product of decision-making but does not emphasize the actual process of decision-making. Critical thinking is the mechanical process by which problems are perceived, alternative solutions weighed, and rational decisions are made and decision-making is streams of choices (McCall, Kaplan, xv).
Critical thinking means accurate thinking in the search of appropriate and dependable knowledge about the world. Another way to describe it is sensible, insightful, responsible, and skillful thinking that is focused on deciding what to believe or do. Critical thinking is not being able to process information well enough to know to stop for red lights or whether you established the right change at the supermarket.
Because of international development in the top, the social space in the mountain disadvantages individuals at the bottom. The World Bank Development Report for 2009, social space is conceptualized as the mountain, which represents individuals networked within space. The people within the social space contribute to the system by providing human capital to sustain the mountain, which represents the center of the network. However, the poor individuals networked in the social space are ostracized, underpaid, and overworked. The lives of the colonized individuals networked in the social space are equally importance as the colonizers. Understanding who controls the social space in the mountain is significant to recognize barriers and boundaries for