Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Business Ethics in Today's Corporate World
Business ethics practices
Business ethics case study
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Business Ethics in Today's Corporate World
Cheaper Product Costs Can Sometimes Come with a Higher Price Apple is a large multinational corporation with a well-known reputation as the world’s second-largest information technology company. They are one of the top 10 American companies and one of the most valuable brands in the world. Apple has several different suppliers throughout the world that they partner with for their supply chain. As a well-known company, you might think that they are cautious about who they choose to do business with. Apple recently admitted that they were doing business with several suppliers that have been using child labor. Apple’s 2013 Supplier Responsibility report exposed that there were over 100 cases of children employed by several of their technology suppliers during 2012. One of the suppliers, Foxconn, is a Taiwanese company that assembles iPad and iPhone products. While is based out of Taiwan, many of its operations are in China. The company was hiring interns who were as young as 14 and were well under China’s legal working age .China’s labor law requires a person to be at least 16 years of age to be working. Foxconn has also had several employees commit suicide due to the horrible working conditions and long working hours there. Apple has recently attempted to sell their iPhones to different markets who may not be able to afford a $500 cell phone. They have been seeking to find suppliers that were cheaper in order to be able to sell their phones at a more affordable cost. Child labor and poor working conditions were some of the main variables in keeping the costs low with some of these suppliers. Foxconn reported that hiring the underage interns was an “accident” because they weren’t thorough in checking the students IDs and confirmi... ... middle of paper ... ...ny in order to sustain a good reputation and ensure ethical business practices. A company’s character traits can enable them to act in accordance with reason. Possessing good virtues is what makes a company or person moral and actions taken reflect those virtues. Apple has possessed some unmoral virtues that have caused them to do business with an unethical company. These traits can hurt their business and could cause the public to no longer purchase from them. Walmart is prime example, when people found out about how they were treating their employees. There are several people who choose not give them business. Apple is attempting to earn trust back from the public by doing what is necessary to turn things around with their suppliers. They have stated that will not tolerate inhumane working conditions or the use of child labor and are becoming more accountable.
In today’s world, increasing big companies open factories in developing countries but many people said it is unethical and the factories are sweatshops. Most of the sweatshops were opened in east Asia and third-world countries and regions. The companies open the sweatshops in order to get more benefits is a kind of very irresponsible behavior. For example, Apple's factories in China are not good and unethical. Audit finds
Garside, Juliette. "Child labour uncovered in Apple's supply chain." The Guardian. The Guardian, 25 Jan 2013. Web. 7 Apr 2014. .
Apple Inc. is one of the world’s most successful companies when it comes to supply chain management. In its early years the company struggled forecasting demand and managing inventory causing many issues in supply chain including stock-outs. As years went on Apple began investing heavily in their supply chain, controlling many aspects such as overseas production, assembly and logistics. While Apple still faces some challenges including things such as technology, competition, global market share, and leadership, it is still ranked as a master company in supply chain according to Gartner Inc, making a great company to invest in.
Apple is dedicated to above average standards of social and environmental responsibility and ethical conduct. It is also necessary that Apple’s suppliers handle workers with dignity and respect, provide safe working conditions, act fairly and ethically, and use environmentally responsible practices wherever they make products or perform services for Apple. Apple requires employees to function and adhere within the principles of the Apple Code, Credo and comply with all pertinent laws and regulations. Apple goes above and beyond—instead of just being compliant with the law they also make it a point to draw upon internationally recognized standards to advance social
Apple is the world's second-largest information technology company by revenue and the world's third-largest mobile phone maker. “Fortune” magazine named Apple the most admired company in the United States in 2008, and in the world from 2008 to 2012.
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd which trades as Foxconn Technology group or as the media calls it Foxconn has been in media limelight recently due to labor problems that have surfaced from the organization. Foxconn is a major equipment manufacturer supplier to electronics giants like Blackberry, Apple, Microsoft Xbox, Sony PlayStation and the Nintendo Wii. The internet has several articles and controversies regarding the deplorable worker conditions and cases of suicides by the workers.
Another area of concern is the discrepancy of differences in East Asian worker regulations and wages compared to the North American standards. Much speculation has gone toward attacking Nike for their blatant disregard of American labour ethics, but Nike is having difficulty explaining their justification of meeting offshore requirements. For example, the legal age in Indonesia was 14, an age at which compulsory Schooling has ended. Nike was criticized for apparently having girls at this age working in their factories (which wasn’t true), and was shunned for inhuman labour practices according to American standards.
The Apple brand name is a household name, the brand value of Apple, Inc. improved to $13,724 million in 2008 from $11,037 million in 2007 (Datamonitor PLC, 2009). Apple is different from its competitors because it produces high quality products, its products are also unique and attractive and this has helped to increase its market shares. Since Apple is known globally, 54% profits come from foreign markets (Datamonitor PLC, 2009). Apple products are easy to use and carry around, majority of its products are light, small and very easy to carry around and it has a major advantage of product diversity, there is something for every one of all ages.
Apple incorporated has been in business for a long 39 years, originally founded by Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, and Ronald Wayne. Apple started off designing and selling handbuilt computers. Apple had some success selling computers for a while after they were first founded. Their popularity declined in the early nineties and they almost went bankrupt because of their unprofitable product mistakes and the fact that steve jobs was no longer working there. Apple started to gain popularity in the late nineties and really in the early 2000’s with Job’s return to the company as an advisor. I believe apple is a very bad company with how they treat consumers and generally conduct business.
Ethic are the foundation that many businesses should build upon. Apple has taken a stance to be more transparent with the public as well as their shareholders, although not on every occasion. Apple uses their vision statement, along with their philosophy in conducting day to day business at home as well as globally in the electronics industry. Electronics are an integral part of our everyday life and will continue to improve and become even more important. Our dependence on electronics helps keep the market relevant and very competitive for the businesses in that market. Competition is healthy for any industry but can entice corporations to take risks that could jeopardize their ethics. Apple has seen its share of scandals throughout the years
One of Apple’s major ethical issues is the problem of labor. This is a very important problem in today’s world because businesses have a tendency to ignore basic human rights in their never ending competition to make as much money as possible. Outsourcing, using child labor, and overworking employees are all major ethical and legal violations committed all the time by many high profile companies, and often unjustly ignored as it is unfair to the people forced to work in such terrible conditions.
Apple Inc. was established by Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak on April 1, 1976 as a computer designer, developer and seller company. However, the company shifted its focus from only personal computer to include other consumer electronics such as portable media player and mobile phone in 2007. Apple Inc becomes one of the most popular makers in its field since it seems that its popularity has increased according to a report on www.statista.com that Apple Inc’s products sales was generally increasing throughout the first quarter of 2006 to the first quarter of 2014. On the one hand, it has increased its revenue from about 14 billion US dollars to more than 170 billion US dollars in 2013. All in all, the company is highly successful corresponding to its products’ development and their sales growth in world’s market.
Having poor working conditions impacts the society in such a way that workers are depressed and do not work in peace. Apple should look for ways in which their suppliers can offer working conditions that are humane. If the current suppliers do not improve their working conditions, then Apple should consider looking for other suppliers since the working conditions of their workers should be of most priority (Apple Inc. 2016). Moreover, having good working conditions will attract more qualified personnel into the company, thus increasing the quality of their products. However, the main problem in Apple making sure that their suppliers offer better working conditions is that Apple has no legal liability in any operation that happens in China factories since their ownership is by separate manufacturers. It, therefore, gives Apple the dilemma of choosing between what is correct morally and what is correct legally. It also represents situations that are unfortunate since an action of being socially responsible is not what is best for the running of the business as using cheap labour to minimise cost has led to Apple to achieve margins that are spectacular and profits on its products (Dhaliwal 2011, 59-100). Apple should keep in mind that the aim of business is not always based on making profits since long-term goals are
Further investigations revealed Foxconn had been guilty of unsafe and unfair working environments long before the incidents, which included the employment of extended working hours, discrimination, and military management techniques (Xu & Li, 2013). Due to Foxconn’s sole focus on maintaining businesses relationships by fulfilling Apple’s demand of technical products, their subsequent mistreatment of employees was exacerbated and generated 80-100 hours of forced overtime per week (Xu & Li, 2013). However, in an attempt to combat the negative publicity, each firm denied responsibility for the incidents, which ultimately added fuel to the media fire (Xu & Li, 2013). Since then, each firm has enacted superior regulations designed to maintain efficiency while recognizing limitations on labor hours and increased spending on compliance audits (Chandler & Werther, 2014). Yet, as Foxconn continues to sustain their global leadership and Apple’s profits remain unaffected, the disadvantages associated with the incidents at Foxconn have not transcended the outcomes. From a profit standpoint, the increase in spending and subsequent alterations of labor methods serve as the biggest disadvantage to each company’s bottom line. However, after both companies attempted to negate blame, their ensuing developments indicate assuming responsibility was the best avenue to recoup reputation issues and focus on long-term growth. Therefore, the greatest advantage for both companies was their heightened reputation resulting from increased transparency and the employment of business models focused on the welfare of all supply chain
Further investigations revealed that Foxconn had been guilty of unsafe and unfair working environments long before the incidents, which included the employment of extended working hours, discrimination, and military management techniques (Xu & Li, 2013). Due to Foxconn’s sole focus on maintaining businesses relationships by fulfilling Apple’s demand of technical products, their subsequent mistreatment of employees was exacerbated and generated 80-100 hours of forced overtime (Xu & Li, 2013). However, in an attempt to combat the negative publicity, each firm denied responsibility to the incidents, which ultimately added fuel to the media fire (Xu & Li, 2013). Since then, each firm has enacted superior regulations designed to maintain efficiency while recognizing limitations on labor hours and increased spending on compliance audits (Chandler & Werther, 2014). Yet, as Foxconn continues to sustain their global leadership and Apple’s profits remain unaffected, the disadvantages associated with the incidents at Foxconn have not transcended the outcomes. From a profit standpoint, the increase in spending and subsequent alterations of labor methods serve as the biggest disadvantage to each company’s