Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What does culture mean to you
What does culture mean to you
What does culture mean to you
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What does culture mean to you
Life is a sequence of experiences. A culture is a compilation of many different individual experiences combined to form one collective experience. Cultures form to match what people experience in their environment. This is why cultures differ between every segment of society. Cities have separate cultures, towns have separate cultures; even households have cultures that separate them from other households. When multiple people live together their collective experience defines who they are as a group. This means outside forces can change the experiences of individuals and therefore change the culture. Malcolm Gladwell in The Power of Context analyzes a collection of studies and events that illustrates changes in culture having to do with changes …show more content…
Gladwell shows through his analysis that the interplay between cultural expectations and experiences is not just an interaction, but a cause and effect relationship; the context of a situation one is in, the environment around a person, is what determines their cultural expectations.
Gladwell starts off by reviewing how New York was able to reduce its crime rate so fast and effectively. Mayor Giuliani and his staff had a key understanding of the crime situation. The environment is what caused people to commit crime, not the people themselves. “Crime is contagious and can start with a broken window and spread to an entire community. The tipping point in this epidemic though is not a particular type of person…its something physical like graffiti. The impetus to engage in a certain kind of behavior is not coming from a certain kind of person but from a feature in the environment.” (Gladwell 152) This is the Broken Window Theory. When there is a broken window that no body fixes people think, “no one cares and no one is in charge. Soon, more windows will be broke and the sense of anarchy will spread from the building to the street, sending a signal that anything goes.”
…show more content…
Japanese people once did not believe depression was a disease, but a collection of emotions felt sometimes physically, through pain in the stomach, or emotionally through sadness. American pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline wanted to change that. “‘The focus was not on medication.’ Kirmayer remembers ‘they were not trying to sell there drugs to us. They were interested in what we knew about how cultures shape the illness experience’” (Watters 515) How does one go about changing a culture? Change the environment; change the behavior. Change the behavior; change the culture. “To get the messages out to the Japanese public, the SSRI makers employed a variety of techniques and avenues…widely disseminating articles in newspapers and magazines mentioning the rise of depression…sponsored the translation of several best-selling books first published in the United States on…the use of anti-depressants.” (Watters 525) The environment around people was suddenly filled with pro-SSRI propaganda. As time went on the culture of japan shifted to match what GlaxoSmithKline wanted it to be. Almost unconsciously the country began to adopt the western style of experiencing depression. No person in Japan ever had to say a word in support; the ability GlaxoSmithKline had to change the environment around the people was all that was needed to change
Culture often means an appreciation of the finer things in life; however, culture brings members of a society together. We have a sense of belonging because we share similar beliefs, values, and attitudes about what’s right and wrong. As a result, culture changes as people adapt to their surroundings. According to Bishop Donald, “let it begin with me and my children and grandchildren” (211). Among other things, culture influences what you eat; how you were raised and will raise your own children? If, when, and whom you will marry; how you make and spend money. Truth is culture is adaptive and always changing over time because
According to Kirmayer, “...every culture has a type of experience that is in some ways parallel to the Western conception of depression…” (Watters 517). He proves this by explaining how a Nigerian man “might experience a peppery feeling in his head” (Smith 517) or how symptoms of depression in an American Indian project as feelings of loneliness. Depending on the location of the country and the language used to describe distress, symptoms of depression varies from region to region. He described this as “explanatory models” that “created the culturally expected experience of the disease in the mind of the sufferer” (Watters 518). In other words, the cause of depression is different for every country and thus each person experiences and describes depression in a way that matches their culture and environment. American researchers and clinicians often overlook culturally distinct symptoms because Americans classify depression in terms that might contradict the standards of other
First and foremost, the theory states that criminal behavior is learned, meaning that the behaviors of an individual are influenced and shaped by those they associate with (Clinard & Meier, 2015). The primary reference point here is the nuclear family. Parents teach their children how to walk and talk, who grow up with siblings or in some cases, elderly relatives. With good reason, it is widely held that these interactions create the foundation of the individual’s conception of societal norms and values. That being said, if the individual is capable of assessing proper behavior in society, they are also capable of learning what is considered
Nature vs. nurture has been one of the oldest and most debated topics among psychologists over the years. This concept discusses whether a child is born into this world with their developmental work cut out for them or if a child is a “blank slate” and their experiences are what shape them into who they are. Over the years and plenty of research, psychologists have all mostly come to agree that it’s a little bit of both. Children are both born with some genetic predispositions while other aspects of the child’s development are strongly influenced by their surrounding environment. This plays into the criminal justice system when discussing where criminal behavior stems from. Is a criminal’s anti-social behavior just part of their DNA or is it a result of their upbringing? The answer to this question is not definite. Looking at research a strong argument can be made that criminals developed their anti-social patterns through the atmosphere in which they were raise, not their DNA.
Trait Theory suggests that the criminal behavior that one may partake in is related to personality traits inherited at birth. “Psychological traits are stable personality patterns that tend to endure throughout the life course and across social and cultural contexts.” (Schmalleger, 2016) This theory also suggests that these traits give criminals “predispositions to respond to a given situation in
Due to an increased surge of criminality in many cities during the 1900s, eugenicists began to focus on the role of genes in determining criminal behavior. Many lived by the motto “culture does not make the man, but man makes the culture.” This essentially stated that the less fortunate tend to create and gravitate towards poverty stricken environments. While scientists did not totally weigh out the environmental influence on criminality, they did believe the main cause of criminal behavior was defective genes.
High crime rates are an ongoing issue through the United States, however the motivation and the cause of crime has yet to be entirely identified. Ronald Akers would say that criminality is a behavior that is learned based on what an individual sees and observes others doing. When an individual commits a crime, he or she is acting on impulse based on actions that they have seen others engage in. Initially during childhood, individuals learn actions and behavior by watching and listening to others, and out of impulse they mimic the behavior that is observed. Theorist Ronald Akers extended Sutherland’s differential association theory with a modern viewpoint known as the social learning theory. The social learning theory states that individuals commit crime through their association with or exposure to others. According to Akers, people learn how to be offenders based on their observations around them and their association with peers. Theorist Akers states that for one, “people can become involved in crime through imitation—that is by modeling criminal conduct. Second, and most significant, Akers contended that definition and imitation are most instrumental in determining initial forays into crime” (Lilly, Cullen, and Ball 2011:57). Although Akers’ theory has been linked to juvenile delinquency in the past, it has also been tested as a possible cause of crime overall. Individuals learn from observation that criminal behavior is justifiable in certain circumstances. In connection with juvenile delinquency and crime, peers and intimate groups have the most effect on individuals when associated with criminal behavior. One is more likely to mimic the behavior of someone who they have close ties with, whether the behavior is justifiable or...
Criminal behavior is adapted through exuded actions of significant others (Schram & Tibbetts, 2014, p.217). Criminals are not born, they are created. Both nonverbal and verbal communication is pivotal within interaction that influences criminal behavior, along with personal groups. Being that adolescents are easily molded, it is very common that individuals can easily be coerced into participating in deviant activities. If individuals see the benefits of their peers stealing without consequences or repercussions, would it be surprising if they began to steal as well? They are persuaded in the direction of motives that seem favorable CITE 4. These principles also correlate with the crime of murder. If the media broadcasts countless stories of people who commit murder with the justification of self-defense, it is logical to assume that individuals will begin to use that claim. Since the George Zimmerman case surfaced, there have been countless killings of unarmed minority teenage
Kelling and Catherine Coles, released the definitive work on the broken windows theory: Fixing Broken Windows - Restoring Order and Reducing Crime in Our Communities. In this work, the authors would go further, and demonstrate the causal relationship between violent crime and the not prosecution to misdemeanors. As the disorder leads to crime, tolerance for petty crimes and misdemeanors, inevitably leads to violent crime. The authors attribute the original “growth of disorder” in the 1960’s due the valorization and combination of decriminalization of public drunkenness and deinstitutionalize the mentally ill. The main window for this backspace in America were vagrancy and loitering laws. These both, opened a gap for the drunks and panhandlers take back the streets second the
The major premise of this is that the development of the unconscious personality early in childhood influences behavior for the rest of a person’s life. Criminals have weak egos and damaged personalities. The main focus of this is mental illness. In regards to social learning theory, one’s criminal behavior is learned through human interactions. Learning theories help explain the role that peers, family, and education play in shaping criminal and conventional behaviors. If crime were a matter of personal traits alone, these elements of socialization would not play such an important a part in determining human behaviors. Mental illness is part of the major crime causation for trait theory. According to some estimates, as much as 50% of the U.S. prison population suffers from some form of mental
In conclusion, offenders are who they are now by nurture. Although some factors of criminals with biological influences make them more likely to commit crime. However, it can clearly be seen that family and media plays a big role in influencing criminal behaviour in this era where it was proven that when violent acts are frequently observed or thought, it will increase the risk factor on normal people and even more on people with aggressive genes to commit a crime. Therefore, it can be clearly seen that the nurture of the offender outweighs their nature to commit deviant crimes.
The foundation of our legal system rest upon the single philosophy that humans hold their own fate. Even though, we perceive in our daily lives the persistence of causation and effect. Even children understand the simplistic principle that every action will have a reaction. Despite this obvious knowledge, we as a society still implanted the belief that our actions are purely our own. Yet, with the comprehension of force that environmental factors impact our development, we continue to sentence people for crimes committed. Moreover, uncontrollable environmental influences are not the only deterministic factors we ignore in our societal view of crime. One’s biological composition can work against any moral motives that they
Shelden, R.G., Brown, W.B., Miller, K.S., & Fritzler, R.B. (2008). Crime and criminal justice in american society. Long Grove, Illinosis: Waveland Press, INC.
There are a number of existing criminological theories and angles, which criminologists develop and study to answer many of the questions raised about the origin of crime. Two major theories have been chosen for discussion in-depth within this paper: the Trait Theory and the Developmental (or life-course) Th...
Criminals come from all walks of life. Some are wealthy business owners while others are poverty-stricken and homeless. Some are 60 years old while others are 16. What makes people decide to become a criminal? Why does one person who gets arrested and faces punishment learn from the mistake and does nothing illegal again while others become prison regulars? Criminological theory seeks to answer these questions in an effort to mold societal influence and implement programs to deter people from committing crimes. One such theory is the classical theory. Even though some believe that crime is based mainly on social influencers like in the differential association theory, the classical theory is more accurate because it suggests that each person makes the choice to commit a crime based on risk versus reward and because most intentional criminal acts pay some sort of benefit, rarely are they seen as not profitable.