Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
World history 9 the russian revolution
Russian revolution short note
Russian revolution short note
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Collapse of the Autocracy The collapse of the autocracy in February 1917 signified the end
product of the interaction of multiple factors relating to both
domestic and foreign issues. The traditional historiographical view of
a rapid insurrection catching the autocracy by surprise is
increasingly called into question - Hasegawa sees the abdication of
Nicholas II as the product of disillusionment with the war being
translated into popular protest[1]. The experience of 1905 left
workers and soldiers more prepared for rebellion and the long - term
factor of war accentuated the domestic problems in Russia. The
pressure created by the war rendered the autocracy vulnerable, hence
the unrest from the 23rd of February onwards had such an impact. It
was ultimately however the loss of military discipline and loyalty in
Petrograd, coupled with liberals' decisions and autocratic choice,
which caused the regime to fall, not as a result of previous unrest,
but a fear of what rebellion may be still to come. This fear was what
dictated the nature of the revolution. It was this combination of long
and short - term factors that caused the Russian autocracy to fall. It
is pertinent to tackle this issue in a chronological form, beginning
in 1915 / '16. One must however bear in mind that unrest in Petrograd,
almost irrespective of the rest of Russia, was enough to cause the
collapse of autocracy. One cannot see the unrest in the capital as
symptomatic of a wider national movement. The movement was of a unique
scale and extremism in Petrograd.
By the end of 1915 popular fervour f...
... middle of paper ...
...2 -
1992, 4th ed., 1993, Oxford, p.226 - 227
[7] Burzhalov, Russia's Second Revolution, p.72 - 73
[8] Read, C, From Tsar to Soviets, the Russian People and Their
Revolution, 1996, London, p.35
[9] Diakin, VS, 'The Leadership Crisis in Russia on the Eve of the
February Revolution', in Soviet Studies in History, 1984;23, (1), p.13
10 ibid., p.12
[11] Hasegawa, p.613
[12] Smith, SA, 'Petersburg in 1917: The View from Below, in Kaiser,
DH (ed.), revolution in russia, 1917 The View from Below, 1987,
Cambridge p.62
13Longley, DA, 'The Mezhraionka, The Bolsheviks and International
Women's Day. In Response to Michael Melancon', in Soviet Studies 1989;
41 p.632 - 633
14Hasegawa, p.613
[15] Kerensky, A, 'Why the Russian Monarchy Fell', in Slavonic and
East European Review, 1930; 8 (24) p.497
In February of 1917 a group of female factory workers and led a revolt in which the Tsar was dethroned, only to be replaced by a provisionary government composed of the Russian elite. When this government did not live up to its promises of an end to Russian involvement in World War I, the Bolsheviks (“majority”), a revolutionary movement led by Vladimir Lenin, overthrew the provisionary government in what bacame known as the October revolution.
"With the Gracchi, all the consequences of empire - social, economic and political - broke loose in the Roman state, inaugurating a century of revolution." (The Roman Revolution, Ronald Syme, p16).
The Aristotelian view of democracy showed democracy as a supreme state of being, promoting equality more than anything. It allowed every person to have as much say in a government as any other person, and yet still allowed individuality to reign. To follow this path of "true" democracy is to follow the path to a perfect country. Yet America, which prides itself on being a truly democratic nation, is filled with corruption and extortion, nothing like the Utopia Aristotle portrayed.
Lenin’s pragmatic leadership was the most considerable factor in helping to fortify Bolshevik power. His willingness to take power in October/November 1917 and the successes of the move, through his right-hand man, Trotsky, was critical as it helped give him unquestioned authority within the party despite members of the Central Committee i.e. Zinoviev and Kamenev who suggested industrialisation needed to occur first. This highlighted Lenin’s communist ideology in practice which was essential to the Bolsheviks maintaining power. Following the failure of the Provisional Government, Lenin recognised that it was the Bolshevik’s priority to legitimise their government. As a result, issues of ‘Peace, Bread and Land’ were addressed through the issuing of a number of decrees in late 1917 including decrees on land, peace, Workers’ Rights as well as reforms to marriage and religion. ...
there were still many people who were not free from our rule. One group of
In 1905 , Russia had a prerevolution that was put down of the Czar. Instead of learning from this prerevolution, Czar Nicholas II, made a very big mistake by in not introducing some reforms to correct the problems. So because of his actions, the situation grew worse. In 1917, the Russians were fighting in World War I. A good majority of the Russian people were weary and uncontent with the way the war was going and with the Czar's rule. This uncontent along with economic hardships caused riots and demonstrations to break out. The Czar called for the army to put down the revolution as they did in 1905. But the army joined the revolt and the Czar was kicked out of power soon afterwards. A temporary government was set up to decide on what kind of government Russia was gonna set up. Two political parties were set up. The Bolsheviks were one of the two. The leader of the Bolshevik party was a man named Lenin. Lenin was a firm believer of the theories and ideas of Karl Marx. So with his slogan of "Bread, Peace and Land", Lenin gained the support of the peasants and gained control of Russia and setup a communist state.
The Russian revolution of February 1917 was a momentous event in the course of Russian history. The causes of the revolution were very critical and even today historians debate on what was the primary cause of the revolution. The revolution began in Petrograd as “a workers’ revolt” in response to bread shortages. It removed Russia from the war and brought about the transformation of the Russian Empire into the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic, replacing Russia’s monarchy with the world’s first Communist state. The revolution opened the door for Russia to fully enter the industrial age. Before 1917, Russia was a mostly agrarian nation. The Russian working class had been for many years fed up with the ways they had to live and work and it was only a matter of time before they had to take a stand. Peasants worked many hours for low wages and no land, which caused many families to lose their lives. Some would argue that World War I led to the intense downfall of Russia, while others believe that the main cause was the peasant unrest because of harsh living conditions. Although World War I cost Russia many resources and much land, the primary cause of the Russian Revolution was the peasant unrest due to living conditions because even before the war began in Russia there were outbreaks from peasants due to the lack of food and land that were only going to get worse with time.
Autocracy-A government system, where a person or group has total power over a country. The Russian autocrat at the time of the emancipation of the serfs was Alexander the Second who was assassinated.
For Americans, the word “democracy” itself is strong enough to conjure up notions of a nation unhindered by an oppressive government where citizens are able to engage in the freedom of speech, press, and religious choice and practice. So powerful are American pro-Democratic sentiments that it is a common thought that any other country that does not prescribe to a liberal democracy is somehow inferior. Yet as time marches on, the feelings of superiority by American citizens become more and more unfounded. For, right before our eyes, the very notion of democracy, that Americans become braggarts about, is disappearing. While the U.S. government boasts of the freedoms it affords its citizens, it corrupts such an image through repeated non-democratic actions. While citizens cherish the affordances of a liberal democracy, many do not make the effort to support such a system; taking it for granted that no matter what, a democracy is a self perpetuating entity. In this paper I will argue that the liberal democracy that supposedly defines American government is a declining entity due to overt acts against the principles of democracy by the United States government and also due to the decline of civic engagement by United States citizens. The fact is, no system of government can be perpetuated if the government and its citizens do not work to keep their ideals alive and in practice.
"United States can be seen as the first liberal democracy. The United States Constitution, adopted in 1788, provided for an elected government and protected civil rights and liberties. On the American frontier, democracy became a way of life, with widespread social, economic and political equality. The system gradually evolved, from Jeffersonian Democracy or the First Party System to Jacksonian Democracy or the Second Party System and later to the Third Party System. In Reconstruction after the Civil War (late 1860s) the newly freed slaves became citizens, and they were given the vote as well." (Web, 1)
Legitimation, Repression and Co-optation are the three pillars in an autocratic regime. These pillars are known to somewhat keep stability throughout an autocratic regime. Through what is known as these three pillars, I will discuss the similarities and differences between the durability of regimes in China and Iran. China is under rule by the Chinese Communist Party and Iran is ruled by Ali Khamenei who came into power after the Iranian Revolution.
Over the next few years, Russia went through a traumatic time of civil war and turmoil. The Bolsheviks’ Red Army fought the white army of farmers, etc. against Lenin and his ways. Lenin and the Bolsheviks won and began to wean Russia of non-conforming parties eventually banning all non-communist as well as removing an assembly elected shortly after the Bolshevik’s gain of power. Lenin’s strict government, however, was about to get a lot stricter with his death in 1924.
The United States of America is the oldest republic in the world. We were established in 1776. Many people in the U.S. take your freedoms for granted; however, in some countries the people have no freedoms. One government system that it very different than the U.S. is authoritarian governments. Authoritarian governments have unlimited control and can inherit or take their power.
While the government was being developed, citizens feared that a army ran by a strong central government would leave
The rise of illiberal democracy is about how democracy for some countries has become illiberal democracy. Free and fair elections have become the majority and so what happens is the majority gains power and the citizen’s natural rights are completely abuse and ignore. Zakaria mentions that “Leaders in these countries have argued that they need the authority to break down feudalism, split entrenched coalitions, override vested interests, and bring order to chaotic societies” ( Zakaria 32). Illiberal democracy is on the rise is growing fast especially in the third world countries where leaders feel having more power would actually aid in changing its countries into a more liberal democracy. Today more than half of the countries in the world are illiberal democracies. Illiberalism is nowhere near going away it’s actually a mixed of democracy and illiberalism. So what happening is the majority are electing these dictators into office which are going as extreme as restrictions on speech, assembly and etc. Zakaria believed that in order to truly have a liberal democracy they should be strong base for checks on the power of each branch of government, equality under the law, impartial courts and tribunals and the separation of church and state. The truth is that an illiberal democracy doesn’t cater to all races, to which really cause more problems. Zakaria also mentions to democracy, but democracy does not seem to bring constitutional liberalism. In contrast to the Western and East Asian paths, during the last two decades in Latin America, Africa and parts of Asia dictatorship with little black ground in “Constitutional liberalism have given way to democracy.( Zakaria 28)”. Most countries today are in face democratic, but actually have s...