The Evolution of the American Democracy "United States can be seen as the first liberal democracy. The United States Constitution, adopted in 1788, provided for an elected government and protected civil rights and liberties. On the American frontier, democracy became a way of life, with widespread social, economic and political equality. The system gradually evolved, from Jeffersonian Democracy or the First Party System to Jacksonian Democracy or the Second Party System and later to the Third Party System. In Reconstruction after the Civil War (late 1860s) the newly freed slaves became citizens, and they were given the vote as well." (Web, 1) "After 1815 Americans transformed the republic of the Founding Fathers into a democracy. State after state revoked property qualifications for voting and holding officethus transforming Jefferson's republic of property holders into Andrew Jackson's mass democracy. Democracy, however, was not for everyone. While states extended political rights to all white men, they often withdrew or limited such rights for blacks. As part of the same trend, the state of New Jersey took the vote away from propertied women, who formerly had possessed that right. Thus the democratization of citizenship applied exclusively to white men. In the mid19th century, these men went to the polls in record numbers. The election of 1828 attracted 1.2 million voters; that number jumped to 1.5 million in 1836 and to 2.4 million in 1840. Turnout of eligible voters by 1840 was well over 60 percenthigher than it had ever been, and much higher than it is now." (Remini, 1998) At the same time, however, popular political activity other than voting declined. Judging by available evidence, state and national governments ... ... middle of paper ... ...0s and 1840s Democrats and Whigs built the most completely national twoparty system that Americans have ever hadboth parties relied on support from all sections of the country, and both were evenly matched in most states. Within that system, politicians knew that arguments between the North and South must be avoided. Such arguments would, first of all, split the Whig and Democratic parties in which politicians were making their careers. Second, and more dangerous, the breakdown of the national twoparty system could realign the parties along NorthSouth lines and focus national politics on the differences between the North and South. Political leaders feared that such a breakdown could lead ultimately to disunion and perhaps civil war. Most historians agree that the national party system's eventual breakdown was a crucial cause of the American Civil War (1861-1865).
Characterized by constitutionally-limited government, an emphasis on (and a wide-spread popular ideological enshrinement of) individual civil rights and liberties, and economic policy exhibiting strong laissez-faire overtones, the American political system certainly warrants the designation liberal democracy. This designation distinguishes the United States from similar advanced industrial democracies whose political systems lend themselves to preserving the public welfare rather than individual rights. With their government bound to precepts established in a constitution drafted and revised by a group of tyranny-fearing individuals, the American populace enjoys one of the most liberal, unrestrictive governments
...ns of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.” George Washington believed a party system would pull apart our country and our government. His prognosis was true. The death of the Whig Party marked the beginning of an era marked by the two-party voting system in the United States, changing its course forever.
Democracy developed in Colonial America from 1607, at the founding of Jamestown, up to 1783, with the signing of the Treaty of Paris. Democracy is defined as a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system. Ideas from documents created in England, such as the Bill of Rights, were brought over to the colonies. These ideas were implemented into the society of the colonists. The colonists also created their own democratic documents and ideas.
Between the Authoritarian government and the American democracy, there are many differences. Some are small, but you can definitely see the big differences. Most are between how the government acts to certain situations and how they treat the people of their country.
The American Democracy is one of the strongest and most powerful in the world with many influences that has tailored the constitutions and laws of other countries. In the 21st century the Constitution of the United States still remains one of the simplest, shortest, most envied, most difficult to change and predominant role of how effective democracy can be. However, American Democracy is not static; it is constantly evolving. Even though democracy offers a number of advantages over other forms of government, no system is perfect and federalism offers, and still offers, both advantages and disadvantages. The Declaration of Independence of 1776 and the Constitution of 1789 form the foundations of the United States federal government. The Declaration of Independence establishes the United States as an independent political entity, while the Constitution creates the basic structure of the federal government. This paper is will examine a number of factors that prove to establish and define the strengths and weakness of the Constitution, the impact of policy on federal bureaucracy, the efficiency of branches of government and the impact of interest groups. The forecast for democracy is anything but certain, and many opinions
~The Problem with American Democracy is not too Little Democracy, but too much. Discuss ~
Political Parties have been an integral part of country and divided the country since their birth. Political parties in the United States began in the late 1700’s into the early 1800’s when Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson were debating the strength of the central government for the new nations. Hamilton believed in a strong central government, and those that followed him formed a party called the Federalists. Jefferson advocated for a weak central government, and him and his followers founded the Democratic-Republican Party. Both Hamilton and Jefferson were against the idea of political parties but their strong, differing views forced them into the creation of their respective parties (Flanders). Hamilton and Jefferson’s creation of their political parties led to a split among the nation, ultimately leading to the Civil War. The parties were helpful, in that they gave people an entity to rally their idea behind, they were also harmful as they split the nation and set specific ideas for people to live by. This is what they have done ever since. They have given citizens and institution to gather around and work with to give them a voice, but they have also conf...
The American Democracy Many people may think that the American way of doing things is the right way of doing things; well at least Americans may think so. I for one reckon it is strange that, like Britain, the US consists of a two-party system, which in my opinion eliminates many thoughts and point of views. Although there are smaller parties in the US today, they do not achieve much power. Therefore the presidential position can only be taken by either a democrat or a republican.
The collapse of the second party system was between the Democrats and Whigs, competing factions within the old Republican Party. They were split into opposing parties during Andrew Jackson’s presidency, the Democrats, Jackson’s faction, and the Whigs were his opponents. The social and economic transformation the United States had made by the 1850s contributed to the rivalry of the Whig-Democratic party system and eventually the fall- but immigration, nativism, slavery and expansion of slavery were the main factors.
Andrew’s Jackson’s election to the presidency in 1830 was particularly significant. Mainly, it expanded the inclusiveness of the political process. Class distinctions were nearly obliterated when Jackson granted suffrage to all men that were white and over 21 (Mackey 64). With this increased participation in government, the common man was elevated to a new and higher plane. This inclusiveness widened the democratic community by including multiple voices and various perspectives, instead of only the select few of the aristocracy.
In the United States, democracy has always been a key concept, and as effective as this may seem the idea was not used to its full potential, especially in the industrial era. Immigrants from out of the US had no say on issues in the country they now lived in. Also, American born citizens also struggled with letting their voice be heard, and staying in the lower class. These men were often referred to as "the working men of America" to which Upton Sinclair dedicated his book, "The Jungle." His dedication also reached the lives of immigrants, making sure to expose very little wages and horrible working
Democracy has changed the way American’s view certain topics in a positive way. For example, when people came to the “New World,” they wanted freedom from King George III but still have structure, which was provided by democracy. However, democracy can cause disputes between the people within the country, along with those from other countries. Conflict shapes the United States through separating us by our physical differences, condemning other’s political opinions, and disputing over someone’s personal beliefs.
Both democracy and diversity have been crucial in creating a unified and prosperous American society. Through the arduous efforts of American residents, the country has been able to, arguably, be deemed great. Democracy is the foundation of government, and diversity is the foundation of people and their culture. Seeing that America is a country that has been predominantly focused on the individuality and unique characteristics of its people, diversity is more influential on other societies. This allows the country to be seen as an ideal community for other nations. Although America has also established a successful democracy, it is the widespread diversity that has been more influential in its aspect of greatness.
Democracy is one of the founding principles of the nation in that the majority should be represented by using their voting rights. This means that if even one person from out of the state of Alabama voted then it is an actual atrocity taking place before our eyes. This is how Democracy dies as the most corrupt and wealthy candidates, who pay their activists and potential voters, win out over those who campaign on policy.
The extension of the right to vote and the elimination of limitations to vote have been progressively achieved in the United States. Initially, in the 1800s only white men and property owners over the age of 21 could vote. From the year 1971 to the present, every person aged 18 or over, whether a Citizen, a resident of a State and not a criminal convicted, has the right to vote. Likewise, Also, over the years, the participation of the population in voting has changed. For example, in the year 1896, 80% of the electoral population exercised their right to vote, while in 2008 the voters´ percentage was 61%, even though the population with the right to vote has increased. One of the possible causes of non-participation in the elections was indicated