Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ancient greek and roman societies
Ancient greek and roman societies
Ancient greek and roman societies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Collapse of Cahokia
Imagine an ancient world where the city is surrounded by mounds of earth, and one of those mounds is filled with corpses. These mounds are the Cahokia mounds, huge piles of dirt built up through generations of work. The reason behind the corpse-filled ‘Mound 72’ is most likely human sacrifice. However, the reasons behind the collapse of the Cahokian civilization are unknown. The civilization of Cahokia was a powerful and stable society. Cahokia was advanced enough that they had a strong government, excess food, and unfortunately a devastating impact on the natural environment around them. But their reign did not last forever, no matter how advanced they may have been. Cahokia’s collapse is still a mystery, but through
…show more content…
exploration and research some theories have become confidently reliable. The collapse of Cahokia was caused by multiple issues including climate change, environmental damage, and their response as a society to environmental issues. Droughts combined with global cooling brought on hardship for the Cahokian civilization.
As a writer for the institute for American history stated in his essay on Cahokia, “In the late 1100s - 1200s, there were severe droughts, causing a lack of food. The cooling climate made it more difficult than ever to grow crops.” Cahokia existed around 1000 - 1400 AD, times which coincide with the droughts Pauketat writes about. Droughts cause plants to die, which can lead to a lack of food. These droughts would have harmed Cahokia after a period of time. Cahokia became powerful during a time of excellent climate, and their downfall coincided with a time of bad climate. This shows that Cahokia’s rise and fall was impacted by climate …show more content…
change. Another detriment to the Cahokian civilization was their overuse of their resources, which harmed the environment as well as themselves. While we do not have evidence that this was the main cause of Cahokia’s collapse, “A slow but irreversible overuse of the resource base by a too-large population is generally the best guess,” as stated by a journalist for the Illinois Periodical. As the Cahokian civilization grew, their effect on the environment grew as well. The people of Cahokia cut down many trees for firewood, which quickly became problematic. While trying to get enough wood for their fires so that they could keep cooking food and staying warm, the Cahokians ended up keeping themselves from harvesting as much food. When the hills eroded due to lack of trees, the Cahokian farmland below the hills became marshy and unsuitable for the Cahokian way of farming. This meant that the Cahokians were the cause of their own food shortage. The Cahokians wasted their natural resources and in doing so began their downfall. The way that Cahokian society responded to the environmental problems they faced was ultimately what led to their inevitable downfall.
When the climate was changing and their environment was collapsing, the Cahokian civilization decided to create stronger leadership for themselves. This powerful new leadership of Cahokia was based in the center, with the rest of the communities radiating outward from it. “Yet, as the fetters apparently grew tighter about the members of the Cahokian polity, recent researchers have also documented the signs of disintegration,” explained Thomas Emerson of the University of Alabama. The hegemony of Cahokia brought them wealth, but it also dissatisfied the people. This controlling, elite government was not what the people wanted. Therefore the furthermost communities from the center, the rural population, developed their own independent way of government. This split between the rural and center communities was devastating to Cahokian civilization. “Another factor that may have played a role in the disintegration of the center was the inherent stability of the rural population organization.” Without people to govern, the center collapsed. But the rural community could not survive on its own either, so their way of life deteriorated. Thus the Cahokian civilization
collapsed. Cahokia’s collapse was due to many problems, the major ones being climate change, environmental damage, and their response as a society to environmental issues. Climate change caused the Cahokians to have less food than they needed. Droughts and global cooling allowed fewer plants to prosper. The damage done to the environment by the Cahokians ended up damaging their civilization as well. The Cahokians cut down too many trees, and ended up with erosion problems that harmed their farms and crops. While dealing with all these problems, the Cahokians established an overbearing governmental system. But the people didn’t approve of this system, and their civilization split. This split ended up destroying Cahokia for good. In the end, human sacrifice was the least of Cahokia’s problems.
With time, the population grew so much as a result of immigration and high birth rates. The Cahokians practiced human sacrifices attributed to the mound with mass burials. Residents of Cahokia engaged in farming to feed the city people i.e. the administrative leaders, religious leaders, traders and astronomers. The farmers were from the low economic class and were looked down upon by their leaders from the high society. Power was inherited in families disadvantaging members from the low social
The theory that an entire civilization was wiped out or forced to leave because of a severe drought is a possible connection. During 1100 A.D. there where many severe droughts that might cause the people to migrate to a new region, but without even taking there tools or even food? For no trace of them to be found after that they would have had to change there entire way of living. Appearance, religion, their culture, because no further traces of their civilization was found. “Current research suggests that the great drought was no where near as severe as scientists believed ten years ago, certainly not severe enough to drive a nation of people to abandon their homes.” (Leigh).
Prior, Plutarch accounts for the unequal social framework within Sparta, where tribal leaders owned vast domains of land, in great contrast to the average Spartiate. Furthermore, Hodgkinson suggests the success of social reform in Sparta stems from the redistribution of Messenian land and the Agoge; reinforcing the belief that dissent from this social order would threaten the established hierarchical status of the Spartiates.
Evidenced examples of this evolution reside in the Cahokia of the Mississippi valley and the Anasazi of the southwest. The Cahokia society was particularly advanced in the use of tools in agriculture. Their skill allowed for a surplus of resources that fueled the development of trading relations (Salisbury 26). The Anasazi were also skilled in agriculture and utilized a system of irrigation in the desert environment. The intricately planned villages of the Anasazi were home to approximately fifteen thousand people, and these villages displayed their skill in architecture and planning (Salisbury
Hunt discusses the way in which Ancient Greece and Rome forced many people into slavery and created many treatises in order to organize society by decree of ideology. Society had to be structured in order to properly operate, as Diamond conveys the idea that ideologies must be present for the society to have structural integrity. Once again, in chapter 14, Diamond discusses the importance of ideology as groups structure in bands, tribes, chiefdoms, and states. As groups progress and evolve their ideologies, society advances and allows prosperity and welfare among the people. On the contrary, Hunt discusses the importance of custom and tradition within medieval societies. Many of these societies lacked the central authority that allowed for organization, so many systems were based off the mutual obligations and services of the people. This allowed for various ideologies to facilitate the advancement of society as their changes altered the changes of society. Thus, the medieval societies required much attentiveness to following ideology in order to operate on a sound
Some of the direct effects of the droughts were that many of the farmers’ crops were damaged by deficient rainfall, high temperatures, and high winds, as well as insect infestations and dust storms that accompanied these conditions. What essentially happened was that the soil lacked the stronger root system of grass as an anchor, so the winds easily picked up the loose topsoil and swirled it into dense dust clouds, called “black blizzards.” The constant dry weather caused crops to fail, leaving the plowed fields exposed to wind erosion. The effects of the drought happened so rapidly and progressively over time that there was very little preparation and planning the farmers could do before having to abandon their homes.
Both the first civilizations and Ancient Greece were marked by great leaders, though one society gave its citizens more jurisdiction over their own lives than the other. The people of the first civilizations had more power than those of Ancient Greece as shown by their powerful kings in The Epic of Gilgamesh and their leader’s ability to listen in The Tale of the Eloquent Peasant, versus the supreme rule of the king in Plato’s The Republic.
The Bronze Age ended at the beginning of the twelfth century in a collapse that appears to have been both sudden and difficult to define. A key reason that the cause of this collapse is so difficult to identify is because the collapse was so wide spread and complete. The groups we would look to for evidence on this event ceased existing, from the residents of Crete to the Greek mainland, removing their recording capabilities. We have archeological evidence, in the form of ruined cities, but most written records that provide insight into the collapse of the Bronze Age and the events of the world are Egyptian in origin, and thus are limited in their scope and reliability. In fact, these Egyptian records at
Caere was strategically located at the junction of the coastal plains and the hills, and history suggests that it may have also had access to the mines of Tarquinii. The people of Caere were very strong on the sea. They were very involved in importing ...
By the 1970s, Historian Peter Brown sparked an interesting debate about the Roman civilization. He dubbed a period in Roman history, ‘The Late Antiquity’, starting around 200 AD and lasting up until the eighth century, marking this was a period in time where the Roman civilization was not in decline, but in a state of transformation due to religious and cultural revolution, and causing many historians to agree or debate about this matter. Bryan Ward-Perkins, author of The Fall of Rome and the End of Civilization, critique the theory of ‘The Late Antiquity’ and firmly believe the decline of Roman civilization instead of its transformation influenced by its barbaric invaders. He supports his position of Rome’s Fall with evidence from the diminishing
The population size of the polis were small, and each male citizen was cognizant of their role and value within the community, and developed a strong spirit of independence. This sense of independence is what led the citizens within the polis to choose their own leaders, and overthrowing leaders that had done wrong by the greater populist or that the populist felt had abused their power. Athens, furthered this sense of independence by creating a democratic Athens, where full citizens were expected to run the governme...
All the way from the start of civilization through to the Early Christianity there has been a pantheon of; destruction, recognition, wars, cultural diffusion, religious breakthroughs, laws that have been established, kings and queens crowned and dethroned. The Mesopotamian Civilization it was the land between two rivers the Tigris and the Euphrates Rivers that civilization first began.
A civilization is the starting point of a society. Civilizations have existed for millions of years and are the basic unit of structure for a society. Civilizations were the base of great societies such as Egypt and Rome. If not for civilizations these societies would not have flourished or even existed.
This assignment is both a comparison and an analysis of two essays; The Decay of Ancient Civilization written by Michael Rostovtzeff and Mohammed and Charlemagne by Henri Pirenne. The two essays offer varying perspectives on the fall of the Roman Empire and more specifically the transition between late antiquity to the beginning of the middle ages. The collapse of the Roman Empire is generally known to have concluded through one particular event; the sack of the great city of Rome. Although both essays give different accounts as the eventual collapse of the Roman Empire entails more than the “Barbaric” invasion as they further delve into from different perspectives. When further examining the Historiography and perception of the Authors we
The factors that lead to the “collapse” of civilizations are almost directly related to those that created it. Archaeologists characterize collapse by a number of elements, some of which we have evidence for, others we do not. Most archaeologists are unsure of exactly what caused the decline of most civilizations in the ancient world, yet there are many clues to some of the events that could have contributed. The collapse of the ancient Roman Empire, the Mesoamerican Mayan, and the Egyptian cultures will be discussed in the following paragraphs, with a focus on the uniqueness of each.