The Call Of The Wild Jack Comparison

676 Words2 Pages

“Dear brothers and sisters, if another believer is overcome by some sin, you who are godly should gently and humbly help that person back onto the right path. And be careful not to fall into the same temptation yourself. Share each other’s burdens, and in this way obey the law of Christ. If you think you are too important to help someone, you are only fooling yourself. You are not that important.” (Galatians 6:1-3) Unlike Buck, Joseph had accountability to God, while Buck was only accountable to himself. We should wish to be more like Joseph in our relationship with God. We should be more similar to Joseph for three reasons: it will help us in our relation to the Lord, we would be a good role model to other Christians and even non-believers …show more content…

A third-person, limited omniscient narrator tells the story of Buck's struggles to overcome his breeding and upbringing to become the leader of a wolf pack in the wild. The third-person, limited-omniscient narrator knows all there is to know about a single character, and relates that character's thoughts, feelings and actions. The narrator does not include the thoughts or emotions of other characters, and only provides the actions of other characters when the main character is present or learns of them second-hand. In "The Call of the Wild," London focuses solely on the character of Buck. He explains the world of the story only through Buck's canine perspective and …show more content…

Being like this will help us in our relation to the Lord. By strengthening our walk with God, we will be more prideful in our faith, and thus more willing to share it with others. Jesus Christ is our role model. In John 13:1-17, Jesus got up from his meal (Passover Festival), took of his outer clothing and wrapped a towel around his waist (This is what the servants do), he poured water into a basin and began to wash his disciples’ feet drying with the towel that was wrapped around him. He was showing an example of being a role model. If we define nationalism as it is the Merriam Webster dictionary which is, “loyalty and devotion to a nation; especially: a sense of national consciousness exalting one nation above all others and placing primary emphasis on promotion of its culture and interests as opposed to those of other nations or supranational groups”, then the question of whether nationalism is an asset or hindrance in today’s world depends on the underlying values of the country in question. That is, if the values and ethical premises of the country in question are ones that lead to a more prosperous and peaceful world then, under those circumstances, nationalism is a good thing. If, however, the values and ethical premises of the country in question lead to a less prosperous and more war ridden world, then nationalism is not

More about The Call Of The Wild Jack Comparison

Open Document