Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is the ethical responsibility of media
Importance of media ethics in society
What is the ethical responsibility of media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is the ethical responsibility of media
The Buffalo News did have the right to print the story about the victim’s criminal record. Although I don’t fully agree with how the story was covered, I believe it was in the best interest of the public to be informed about the victim’s criminal history. I do not believe that the men deserved to die but, it is important that we know that they have a criminal record. When you put yourself in an environment where you are more like to be in danger, you are more likely to get hurt. For instance, I grew up in a neighborhood where many outsider where afraid to come. Personally I never felt in danger because statistically speaking there where slip to no chances of me being killed or hurt unless I put myself in harm’s way. Most of the people in my neighborhood who died passed because they had ties to something gang related or was associated with something gang related and happen to be at the wrong place at the wrong time. The news was obligated to print it because it is …show more content…
This is understandable because when the robbery and cases where going on, on campus I didn’t feel safe knowing that anyone could have been a target. I wanted to know that I was safe walking at night from my classes and back from work. I do not know if the story would have been on the front page of the paper if the victims were white. I am not sure if race would play a factor on it. I do believe that some white people would have been disappointed to see that on the front of the paper if it was. In a blog Mike Blake believes that they should not have died but he said we should not be surprised that they died. I agree with him to an extent but some of his point seemed a bit bias. For example, when he disagree with the positive depictions that people described the victims as. He already painted an image of them when he said he saw the picture on the new of them looking like
How would you like to be accused of a crime and then be disenfranchised because of your race? Well this is what happened to Mark Charles Parker because he allegedly raped June Walters a pregnant white woman on February 23 1959. In Howard Smead’s historical nonfiction book Blood Justice he describes one of the most important investigations of a racist, motivated crime in the history of the United States.
- on June 23, Williams was driving when a heavy car came up from behind him and tried to force his car off the embankment and over a cliff with a 75 ft. drop off. The bumpers of the two cars were stuck and the cars had to pass right by a highway patrol station, which was a 35 mile and hour zone, but the car was pushing his at 70 miles per hour. Williams started blowing his horn hoping to attract the attention of the patrolmen, but when they saw they just lifted their hands and laughed. He was finally able to rock loose from the other car’s bumper and make a sharp turn into a ditch. He went to the police about it, but they would not do anything because he was black. The police in Monroe never did anything to help blacks
Looking around in neighborhoods and seeing that people are shot by gangs to satisfy their ego or in other words to make sure you are not portrayed as weak when someone that disobeys you. Humanity is no longer humane, now it is wild as a tiger having no feelings whatsoever as to whom they hurt as long as they survive. People do the worse for money, not caring whether the person they killed had family or
In this case it wasn 't just social media that perpetuated the idea of the victim being at fault and not the boys who assaulted her.mainstrem media outlets depicted the boys who just fell into a bas situation and that it wasn 't their fault., discussing how the boys will be "haunted for the rest of their lives" this one quote shows just how biased the media can be. There is no discussion of how the victims life is forever shattered by this event. The article continues on with how other channelsngave the boys excuses or that they are a "cautionary tale." Many of the news outlets discussed how the young men 's lives are now destroyed. Another source proclaimed that the girl in question "caused havoc in once quiet town. There can be a multitude
...unlike the research, data, and conclusions so it complicated the over all understanding of the article. Most of the findings are to be expected, at least for someone in the Justice field. The fact the most homicides and rapes are intraracial is not something the general public always understands but most people in the field of Justice understand that fact. After I read this article I decided to look up the authors to see if there could have been so hidden bias. Earl Smith is an African American man and Angela Hattery is a white female. After I knew that I still did not believe there was any bias in the article. The only part that could have possible been biased on its emphasis was the fact the rape and homicide are intraracial crimes but there was clearly represented by the data so it still did not look like there was any bias in the conclusions.
The difficulty I had with this case, was I had multiple sources to turn to for information. I had to choose which source was reliable because I did not want misconduct information. The media sources had about the same variety of information about Gabriel’s case, but added small details that the alternative networks did not include. For example, each news network added more information on how Gabriel was found by the paramedics. The L. A. Times reported that Gabriel had a cracked skull and three broken ribs while the Huffington Post did not include this information. The L.A. times also elaborated more on the story by reporting more facts about who was involved in the investigating. They included names of teachers, and police officials that was involved. The differences between how news network presented the facts in the case proved the different ways we are influenced by the media, and the information we gather depends on where we get our stories
The first people to blame are the police that had beaten the confession out of Pitts and Lee. They were a major reason for this case, and why it all went wrong. They had no right to beat a confession out of anyone, even if they black. “CID investigators Potts and Hoag testified that Pitts looked "very tired, like he was in pain", complained that his jaw was swollen, told them he had been beaten, and asked them to feel the bumps on his head, and to see if they could tell what was wrong with his eyes which were bloodshot” (leagle.com).The army men did not report that anything was wrong with him. The second person for the blame, is the court system in Florida, they were bias in such a way that they had put Pitts and Lee in a courtroom with a jury full of white men. They should at least had colored men within the jury but they did not want Pitts and Lee to get a chance of getting away without punishment. They were given a death sentence, and that was to stay until they had gone to higher court. They went nine years with the death penalty hanging over their heads. There are many other people to blame as well, such as the media and false witness testimony as well as the corrupt police
For a young boy to be thrown into prison blows my mind, not only was the evidence against him not nearly enough to even bring him to trial, but the evidence to be so little and not 100% shows how undetermined the criminal justice system is. In Truscott’s case, there was such a rush to pinpoint who the murderer was. Although such an extreme act was committed, there should have been a lot more things done in favor of proving Truscott’s innocence as opposed to appointing the first suspect guilty. The justice system in this case was fully against a young boy and didn’t give him a chance to be innocent. Not taking into account other suspects such as previous rapist and sex offenders and not listening to key witnesses shows how little the police cared for this child to be proven innocent. Police being a team of people who are supposed to make the general public feel safe, showed a lack of sympathy for Truscott or else his case would have been dealt differently. The justice system is shown as corrupt in this situation because through new research and witnesses coming to the court on what happened the day Harper died, Truscott was still not released from prison until 48 years later. Willingly taking LSD and truth serums to prove his innocence all did not work in his favor. Truscott was sentenced to death, becoming Canadas youngest death-row inmate, his case being very popular even in the time when it took place the popularity did not help out either. The fact that Truscott’s case contributed to Canada abolishing the death penalty shows how incorrect the criminal justice system is at times. My opinion on this case as a whole is that there are defiantly many flaws in the system, this should not be a common thing when it is dealing with a person’s life. Sentencing Truscott for 48 years and been proven innocent after isn’t
How safe do you feel when you attend school everyday? Many students and faculty don’t really think too much about school being a dangerous place; however, after a couple of school shootings had taken place their minds and thoughts may have changed completely. On April 16, 2007, in the town of Blacksburg Virginia, a college student who attended Virginia Tech, opened gunfire to his fellow classmates. This shooting has been considered to be the biggest massacre in all of American history. There are many things to be discussed in this major tragedy. Some of them include the events leading up to the shooting, the timeline that the shootings occurred, the causes, and the significance in this particular shooting. The Virginia Tech is only one of the several examples of the horrible behavior and violence in our school systems today.
...t I do not think that the evidence presented is enough for a conviction to sentence any man or woman to death.
...Sheriff Lawrence Rainey. Three defendants had no verdict. Judge Cox sentenced Bowers to ten years and Cecil Price to six. In defending his sentences Judge Cox was quoted as saying, “They killed one nigger, one Jew, and a white man. I gave them what I thought they deserved.”
If an individual is familiar with their surrounding “they are more likely to help” (Altruism and Helping Behavior. Print). In the essay, the authors state “the scene of the crime, the streets, in middle class society “represents all the vulgar and perilous in life” (Milgram, Stanley, and Paul Hollander. Paralyzed Witnesses: The Murder They Heard. Print.). In society, the streets, especially at night, represents the dangerous and negative sides of society due to the crimes and chaos that occur on the streets (gangs, drive-by shootings, robberies, murders, large crowds walking, etc.). The crimes and dangers of the streets cause many people to fear being on the streets alone which leads to external conflicts. When the murder was occurring, the witnesses’ attitudes of the streets prevented them from calling the police due to the fear of the streets and since the witnesses were middle-class, they believed that Genovese was poor, a criminal, or someone who has nothing else to do and was expecting for the=is to eventually
...had such an amazing instinct that could not go unnoticed. But when word came that Bryant was dead, some extra sensitivity should have been added. Had both victims lived I believe that the picture had every right to take up the whole front page. Their survival should have been celebrated with a huge story. But once one of the victims was pronounced dead, the picture should have been toned down. I believe it should have still been placed on the front page, but at a more tasteful size. In the end though I feel an appropriate amount of information was disclosed. The public depends on the media to inform them of dangers. And in this case that is exactly what Foreman did. He may have done it in a louder fashion then necessary, but the story needed to be told. And in order to inform the public of the dangers associated with fire escapes the whole truth needed to be told.
On March 29, 1971, a thirty-seven-year-old male was convicted of killing seven people and suspected in killing another thirty-five. His methods of killing included gunshots, stabbing with forks, knives, or swords, dissecting, and battering with clubs. He showed no remorse for what he had done, but instead created a media circus in which he had a starring role (Blundell 124-30).
being shot at and killed. These problems dehumanizes a person and makes them feel as if