The British Views of Hitler Between 1933 and 1936

850 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The political effects of world war one to Britain

The British Views of Hitler Between 1933 and 1936 In 1933 Adolf Hitler came to power in Germany, this was a cause for alarm if not panic, in many countries not least Britain. It seemed certain that Hitler’s Nazi government would challenge the existing European balance of power. But the exact nature of this problem was not easy to determine at the time and is no easier now. Possible solutions to the problems posed by Hitler where therefore even more difficult to define. Before this period British attitudes towards Germany had changed several times since the end of the First World War. From 1914 until 1923 the British attitude towards Germany can be described as hatred, because Britain had lost many men during the war, civilians had gone through much suffering and the economy was severely weakened. This then changed from 1923 until 1933 to sympathy, with Britain feeling that the terms of the Treaty of Versailles were overly harsh on Germany. The attitude changed again in 1933 to one of suspicion because of Hitler’s rearming, which later changed again to acquiescence from 1935 until 1938. There were those in Britain who certainly feared the worst. Sir Robert Vansittart, who was the leading civil servant at the Foreign Office, along with Winston Churchill warned ministers from the start about the threat of Nazism. Churchill said in 1934 to the House of Commons; “We should be in a position which would be odious to every man who values freedom of action and independence, and all so in a position of utmost peril for our crowded, peaceful population engaged in their daily toil. I dread that day, but it is perhaps not that far distant.” When Churchill said this he was warning that one day Britain could be under the control of Germany and that it may happen soon because of Hitler be I power in Germany. They were not the only ones under this impression; a Defence Requirements Committee concluded in 1934 that ‘we take Germany as the ultimate potential enemy against whom our long

Show More
Related

  • Hitler and the Appeasement Policy of the 1930s

    579 Words  | 2 Pages

    with Hitler, which allowed him to increase his Navy by thirty – five percent than

    Read More

  • Analyzing Winston Churchill's Speech 'The Lights Are Going Out'

    1301 Words  | 3 Pages

    Through his speeches, he tried to persuade America to join in the fight against the growing power if Nazism. One of his speeches are “The Lights Are Going Out”. He said this speech in 1938, to the people of the United States. The purpose of his speech was to encourage the US to join forces with Britain to overtake Nazi Germany. The subject of his speech is the loss of other countries, and America joining the war, and the tone of the speech is urgency. Churchill’s word choices in his speech “The Lights Are Going Out” are effective through his use of rhetoric and vocal techniques.

    Read More

  • The Support of the Appeasement of Hitler by the British Mass Media

    837 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Support of the Appeasement of Hitler by the British Mass Media Appeasement was the conciliatory policy adopted by Britain and France towards the aggressive foreign policy of Nazi Germany in the years preceding the Second World War. In Britain it is normally associated with the Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain but was also followed by Stanley Baldwin. It has been argued by historians such as Richard Cockett that the press in Britain was manipulated by Whitehall - especially during Chamberlain’s years as Prime Minister – to publish only pro-appeasement articles and news and therefore “no alternative to the policy of appeasement was ever consistently articulated in the press. ”[1] It is indeed partly true that Chamberlain was a master of press manipulation and the BBC broadcasts were closely monitored by the Foreign Office.

    Read More

  • Nazi Olympics

    2693 Words  | 6 Pages

    On 30 January 1933, the German president, Paul von Hindenburg, selected Adolf Hitler to be the head of the government. This was very unexpected. Hitler was the leader of an extreme right-wing political party, the National Socialist German Workers (Nazi) Party. Hitler sought to expand Germany with new territories and boundaries. Hitler also focused on rebuilding Germany’s military strength. In many speeches Hitler made, he spoke often about the value of “racial purity” and the dominance of the Aryan master race. The Nazi’s spread their racist beliefs in schools through textbooks, radios, new...

    Read More

  • Hitler and His Power

    411 Words  | 1 Pages

    Support for the Nazi party was due to the growing belief that it was a

    Read More

  • The German Community during the Hitler Reign

    1345 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the time leading up to and during Hitler’s reign in Germany, German citizens felt the impacts of the political as well as the economic situation of the country. These conditions in Germany led to the building of the Nazi party and to the Holocaust. The new government headed by Adolf Hitler changed the life of all Germans whether they joined the Nazi party themselves or opposed the ideas of Hitler or aided Jews to fight the persecution they suffered under this government.

    Read More

  • ‘We Shall Fight on the Beaches’- A Rhetorical Analysis

    1568 Words  | 4 Pages

    Sir Winston Churchill’s speech, ‘We Shall Fight on the Beaches’ was a wonderful piece of moving rhetoric. The diction that Churchill uses to deliver his message is not so advanced that one cannot understand him easily, but still manages to portray a sense of Churchill’s deeply intellectual status without being condescending. It is a very inspirational piece, a moving speech, and a powerful call to action aimed to uplift the downtrodden population of Britain at the time. Churchill responded to the need for inspiration with his now-famous speech. His use of rhetoric not only inspired Britain, but was a powerful tool that brought about a final victory over the Nazis.

    Read More

  • Chamberlain's Lack Of Appeasement Was A Mistake

    895 Words  | 2 Pages

    After the tragedy that was the First World War, Britain was too scarred by the wounds left from the fighting that another war over the occupation of Austria and Czechoslovakia was out of the question. As Phillip Larkin’s memorable poem, ‘MCMXIV’, professes: “Never such innocence, / Never before or since, / As changed itself to past / Without a word”. The First World War had such an impact on Britain that they refused to look at war the same way. Chamberlain was one of the majority of Britain’s public figures who did not wish to declare war upon any country without trying any other means necessary beforehand. Moreover, Britain’s physical detachment from the conflict (being isolated as an island) may have contributed to its inability to truly sympathise with the issue and value it as important enough to risk war over. This meant that the majority of people in Britain at the time agreed with Chamberlain’s policy of appeasement as it offered an alternative to the possibility of war, something that many were opposed to after the horrors of the previous

    Read More

  • Winston Churchill: The Great Communicator

    1031 Words  | 3 Pages

    Winston Churchill was perhaps one of the greatest public speakers in history. Some of the best speeches have come from being in life or death situations, Winston was known best for this. His small sound clips like, “this was their finest hour”, and “this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning”, encourage his troops and his people that they will win this war and will overcome the greatest odds. Although Churchill told many speeches, his speech on June 18, 1940 showed the most emotion and courage of any other speech he told. In this speech he explained that the war in France is over and the war in Britain would begin. He said that if we fail then the world sink into an abyss. This emotion that he shows would give Britain hope, courage and most of all determination.

    Read More

  • The Significance of the Night of Long Knives

    1923 Words  | 4 Pages

    Bibliography Primary Sources J Hite and C Hinton, ‘Weimar and Nazi Germany 2000’. Manchester Guardian Report, 13th April 1933. Franz Von Papen’s Speech at Marburg University, 17th June 1934. Rohm’s Speech to foreign press April 18th 1934. Field von Weich’s account of Hitler’s Speech to the leaders of the SA and most of the senior Reichswehr generals 28th February 1934.

    Read More

  • Winston Churchill: We Shall Fight on the Beaches

    930 Words  | 2 Pages

    “We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender,” exclaimed Winston Churchill in a speech in the midst of World War II on June 4, 1940. This is a small passage of the passionate speech he delivered in the United Kingdom, House of Commons in Parliament. Churchill was your typical British speaker. He acquired a stiff upper lip, which enabled him to suppress emotions and refrain from trembling ensuring his powerful delivery. This particular speech was given during a time of a crucial importance. The British Isles were left to fight the Nazi’s singlehandedly due to the majority of Europe being occupied by Nazi Germany. Churchill’s speech was delivered in order to raise the morale of the British citizens as well as its military personnel during the war, to continue the struggle, and to ultimately overthrow the Nazis.

    Read More

  • Hitler's Enabling Act Essay

    568 Words  | 2 Pages

    If one is to put themselves into the shoes of an ordinary German in 1936, they would be completely perplexed. Germans had a multitude of fears, ranging from the control of information, the threat of the brown shirts, the fear of being exploited by corporations, the risk of becoming unemployed and not contributing to german autarky, &c… What Hitler did was, he took all of these fears and directed them away from his party and onto the jew. Furthermore, the Anti-Semitism allowed Hitler to pass police state protocols. In effect, causing the SS, SA and Gestapo to grow to undefiable proportions, making it impossible for any civilian uprising to take affect. A lot like the the way the United States government today uses the fear of terror to pass laws such as detaining without trial, the patriot act & the NDAA. In effect, causing events such as the Ferguson riots to be shut down

    Read More

  • Appeasement Essay

    966 Words  | 2 Pages

    After the First World War that led to death of millions of people, many countries decided to put measures to avoid any future conflict. The League of Nations in the 1920s came up with the idea of collective security where countries acting together would discourage aggression and act to stop the aggressor. This did not work out well as countries failed to agree on common policies. As a result, appeasement was considered. It was a policy that was adopted by the British government in the1930s. It was formulated from the belief that some countries such as Germany were unfairly treated in the Versailles treaty of 1918-1919. Adolf Hitler came into power in Germany on January 1933 after exploiting the depression-afflicted economy and the vehement popular resentment against Versailles treaty. The Nazi leader started by alarming the diplomats on his hatred towards the parliamentary system of governance and democratic government. The policy of appeasement had good intentions, but failed to put measures against aggression by the Germany government, which eventually led to World War 2.

    Read More

  • The Success of Hitler's Domestic Policy

    889 Words  | 2 Pages

    The first of which is the drive for a single race Germany. Most of the

    Read More

  • Hitler’s Rise to Power

    868 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the year of 1933 Adolf Hitler seized the position of chancellor of Germany and this power that he received in January 30th is what shaped one of the most bloodlust dictatorships that this world has ever known. Hitler’s desire for power and victory made him one of the greatest leaders the world has ever seen but it also made him one of the most cruel and heartless people known to mankind. But how did he do this, how did he become one of the greatest and cruellest dictators? Throughout this essay we will explore the long, short and immediate causes for Hitler’s sudden success.

    Read More

More about The British Views of Hitler Between 1933 and 1936

Open Document