Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Different interpretations of bloody sunday
Northern ireland causes and conflicts
Northern ireland causes and conflicts
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Different interpretations of bloody sunday
The Bloody Sunday in Derry in 1972
Introduction
------------
The Bloody Sunday was undoubtedly a very traumatic event for the Irish
people. Fourteen Irish men did not deserve to die and this was the
most horrific attack that took place during the troubles. Feelings of
bitterness between nationalists and unionists still last today because
of it. The Irish people demanded an explanation on why
Bloody Sunday happened and were given the Widgery Inquiry not long
after the event. The result of this inquiry did not satisfiy or
appease the Irish people as it cleared the army of all charges and
blamed the victims of Bloody Sunday for starting the troubles.
Improvements in science and technology as well as the existence of new
evidence about what happened on the day have led to a new inquiry
being set up by Lord Saville. The result of this inquiry has not yet
been published but perhaps it may arrive at an interpretation, which
may be palatable to all.
Source A
There have been many interpretations about what had happened on that
day of Sunday. Sources A and B are excerpts from newspapers. They were
both written on the same day, yet they have entirely differing
viewpoints. Source A is taken from The Daily Mail, a conservative
newspaper, so therefore it is more likely to favour the opinions of
the British Army. When reading it you get the impression that the
paratroopers did act responsibly and that they had the situation under
control although this is not the opinion of most Irish people. It
tries to suggest that it is the victims of Bloody Sunday who caused
the event as it mentions an account from one of the officers who was
there that day. He claims that they didn’t fire at the marchers until
they started throwing nail bombs and acid bombs at the army.
This article also brands the new inquiry set up by Lord Saville as “an
absolute disaster”. It tries to suggest to the reader that it is
On March 17, 1955, more than 10,000 crazed hockey fans from inside the Montreal Forum and from the streets outside gathered together to protest the suspension of Maurice "The Rocket" Richard. An outraged fan slapped and punched the president of the National Hockey League, Clarence Campbell who was quietly sitting among the spectators. This "seven-hour rampage of destruction and looting" was a result of this attack that occurred during the game that opposed the Montreal Canadians and the Detroit Red Wings (Zacharias, 2000). During this riot, there were many people who were injured and over 100 fans were arrest.
On March 5th, 1770 in Boston, Massachusetts, a soldier rang a town bell that meant there was a fire or that police backup was needed after being approached by Boston residents who were being hostile towards him. In response to the bell being rung, British commanding officer, Thomas Preston, came to the soldier’s aid with armed British troops. Because the bell also meant “fire,” many residents flooded into the area believing a fire was occurring. A mob broke out, and the hostility of the Boston citizens rose. Objects such as ice and rocks were thrown and many citizens were armed with clubs, sticks, and other objects. At one point, an object hit a soldier, causing his gun to go off. Amidst all of the people screaming “fire,” British troops thought that Preston told them to fire.
On the night of March 5th, it is believed that a small group of boys began taunting a British soldier. Over the boys’ nonsense, the soldier battered one of his oppressors with his musket. Soon after the alleged incident a crowd of about fifty or sixty people surrounded the frightened solider. The enraged crowd of people sounded the soldier, encouraging him to call for backup. Soon after calling for help, seven soldiers along with Captain Preston...
evidence, so it is hard to find out which one is right. Some of the
of the rape of a 14 year old girl by twenty GIs ... in front of the
On March 16, 1968, in the Quang Ngai region of Vietnam, specifically My Lai, the United States military was involved in an appalling slaughter of approximately 500 Vietnamese civilians. There are numerous arguments as to why this incident even had the capacity to occur. Although some of the arguments seem valid, can one really make excuses for the slaughter of innocent people? The company that was responsible for the My Lai incident was the Charlie Company and throughout the company there were many different accounts of what happened that reprehensible day. Therefore there are a few contradictions about what had occurred, such as what the commanding officers exact instructions for the soldiers were. Even with these contradictions the results are obvious. The question that must be posed is whether these results make the American soldiers involved that day “guilty”. There is the fact that the environment of the Vietnam War made it very confusing to the soldiers exactly who the enemy was, as well as providing a pent up frustration due to the inability to even engage in real combat with the enemy. If this is the case though, why did some soldiers with the same frustrations refuse the orders and sit out on the action, why did some cry while firing, and why then did one man go so far as to place himself between the Vietnamese and the firing soldiers? If these men who did not see the sense in killing innocents were right with their actions, then how come the ones who did partake were all found not guilty in court? The questions can keep going back and forth on this issue, but first what happened that day must be examined.
The 1920's were a time of Prohibition, Illegal Gambling, and Prostitution. The 18th amendment made the sale and distribution of alcohol illegal. Many people including Al Capone were involved in those illegal activities. Al Capone was notorious for this illegal activity. He got rich by manufacturing and distributing alcohol. He also owned many illegal bars. Many other gangs were doing the same illegal activity. There was competition over the alcohol. Every gang wanted it since that was how they made their money. In order to make money they had to eliminate the opposing gangs to decrease the competition. Al Capone never did any of the killings. He had his gang members do the killing. They would usually rent a room in front of the victim's house to stay hidden. Then they would wait for the victim to come outside. Then the gang members would shoot the person. Another way is they would do a drive-by and has someone in the car blast the victim with an Uzi or Thompson machine gun.
On Easter Monday of 1916, the first shot of the Easter Uprising was fired. Six members of the Irish Citizen Army shot a policeman on the streets of Dublin in the head. This was the start of a new era, an era where Ireland would be free. Pearse, the Commander in chief of the Irish Citizen Army, and Connolly, the leader of the Dublin division, led the main body of troops through Dublin to the General Post Office. The G.P.A. became the rebels’ headquarters for the six-day battle against the British Army. There were heavy casualties on the British side, but the Irish were still unsuccessful. There statement was made though, and they surrendered on the following Sunday. Two thousand people were arrested that day, and the leaders
In the roaring twenties, the life of organized crimes was at its peak. What was the greatest mob hit ever pulled off in history? Well I'll tell you. It all happened on Valentines Day, the morning of February 14th, 1929. This incident was call, "The St. Valentines Day Massacre". The man behind this infamous crime was none other than, the infamous Al "Scarface" Capone. Al Capone was the all time greatest mobster of all time. The idea of organized crime fascinates me in so many ways. Capone was the only person to have pulled off such a crime. Al Capone was top gangster in Chicago and was one of the greatest members of the Italian Mafia and George "Bugs" Moran was the leader of the Irish/German mafia and he was the main target behind this hit. He targeted Capone because Al Capones had a bounty on his head, $60,000,000, and found George Moran as a threat. George was Capone's biggest threat of all. He needed to take him out quickly. (Al Capone, True Crime Story). Writing this paper will let me learn a lot more about this massacre. There is one question I would like answered, "Why hadn't Moran's crew made an attempt to fight back?" (Al Capone, True Crime Story). Moran's men had a long history of being violent with others. This is one question that we will never know. My most used source on this essay will be internet information and a book. I feel these sources will give me the most amount of information. Using a magazine will too but it was very hard to find a 20's magazine article.
The mob rushed into the prison’s courtyard. Some individuals were not as ruthless as others. "...Those who came in first treated the conquered enemy humanely and embraced the staff officers to show there was no ill-feeling..." However, several of the protestors were hurt as they attacked soldiers from the army. "....The people, transformed with rage, threw themselves on the sodiers..." Fierce fighting followed and carried on into the evening. Finally the mob got their hands on some cannons.
ange Order's Drumcree parade; three young brothers are killed in a Loyalist petrol bomb attack in Ballymoney, Co. Antrim (12 July). So in Conclusion; both Catholics and Protestants in large majorities wont accept any new findings the Seville Enquiry can possibly find regarding Bloody Sunday, the attacks from both sides have carried on through out time, regardless of attempts to quell the hatred, both groups believe what they have been brought up to believe, and from what they experienced both in Bloody Sunday and other events, both groups wont accept anything the report says, because the Catholics have reason not to trust the British government due to past events, and the Protestants wont accept any blame laid upon them because they'll treat it as a means to quieten the Catholics, rather than the truth it's self.
the first shot of many was fired. The question of who was to blame was
Bloody Sunday Troops were sent into Ireland in 1969, to sort out the troubles. Catholics in Derry’s bogside area built barricades to protect. themselves in early 1969. They felt that they could expect no protection from the police. The situation continued to deteriorate in the following months, with some explosions, which damaged electricity.
Unfortunately, all most Americans know about the event known as Bloody Sunday, they learned from U2's smash hit, "Sunday Bloody Sunday." The source of this song's popularity stems from its ability to evoke widespread sympathy for Irish by painting an unforgettable picture of death and despair in the minds of each of its listeners. So what is unfortunate about this song being the primary source of historical knowledge concerning Bloody Sunday for most Americans? It is unfortunate not because of its lack of information or authenticity, but because of its lack of historical perspective.
When the opportunity came for them to release some of their pent up aggravations they were only too willing to. The Bloody Sunday documentary film portrayed the army as being aggravated, one soldier admitted to firing 22 rounds but he remained resolute that the marchers had fired on them first, and that nail and acid bombs had