What Really Happened in the Boston Massacre?

921 Words2 Pages

This chapter provided information from the trial of Captain Thomas Preston. The chapter asked the question, “What really happened in the Boston Massacre”. Chapter four focused on the overall event of the Massacre and trying to determine if Captain Preston had given the order to fire at Boston citizens. The chapter provides background information and evidence from Preston’s trial to leave the reader answering the question the chapter presents. Although, after looking through all the witnesses’ testimonies some might sway in Captain Preston’s favor, just the way the grand jury did. Before the Boston Massacre even occurred, tensions were high in the city of Boston between the Bostonians and the British. At this time people were just getting over the Stamp Act and were now angered by the new taxes also known as the Townshend Duties. This new tax caused Bostonians to become more aggressive causing the British to send more soldiers to impose the laws of Parliament and to restore order among the people. The arrival of more soldiers only caused more of an uproar between the people of Boston and the red coats. Bostonians went out of their way to harass British soldiers whenever they got the chance, but on March 5, 1770 both sides acted unacceptably resulting in the Boston Massacre (84-85). On the night of March 5th, it is believed that a small group of boys began taunting a British soldier. Over the boys’ nonsense, the soldier battered one of his oppressors with his musket. Soon after the alleged incident a crowd of about fifty or sixty people surrounded the frightened solider. The enraged crowd of people sounded the soldier, encouraging him to call for backup. Soon after calling for help, seven soldiers along with Captain Preston... ... middle of paper ... ... to a miscommunication between the Captain and his soldiers. If the crowd had not been in such an uproar the Boston Massacre never would have happened. With all the testimony and the deposition from the Captain, the jury made the correct decision by determining Preston innocent. Overall, it seems that the tragedy that happened in Boston of the night of March 5th could have been avoided if the citizen of Boston had acted differently. If the crowd had not been in such mayhem, the soldiers would have been able to hear the Captain more clearly and they never would have fired without the proper command. As for Captain Preston, he received the verdict he deserved because as witnesses can attest he never yelled fire, he actually yelled the opposite. The overall massacre was one big misunderstand that sadly ended in tragedy with average Bostonians losing their lives.

Show More
Related

  • Differences between Captain Thomas Preston's Account of the Boston Massacre and Paul Revere's Image of the Bloody Massacre

    683 Words  | 2 Pages

    Captain Thomas Preston’s vision of the Boston massacre was an incident were a British soldier accidently fired his weapon and his men then followed after resulting in the death of five Bostonians including free black sailor Cripus Attucks. Starting the story Captain Thomas Preston admits that the arrival of the Majesty’s Troops were obnoxious to the inhabitants. Troops have done everything in their power to weaken the regiments by falsely propagating untruths about them. On Monday at 8 o’ clock two soldiers were beaten and townspeople then broke into two meetinghouses and rang the bells. But at 9 o’ clock some troops have informed Captain Thomas Preston that the bell was not ringing to give notice for a fire but to make the troops aware of the attack the towns people were going to bring upon them.

    Read More

  • Why Is Preston Justified In The Boston Trial

    612 Words  | 2 Pages

    On March 5th, 1770 in Boston, Massachusetts, a soldier rang a town bell that meant there was a fire or that police backup was needed after being approached by Boston residents who were being hostile towards him. In response to the bell being rung, British commanding officer, Thomas Preston, came to the soldier’s aid with armed British troops. Because the bell also meant “fire,” many residents flooded into the area believing a fire was occurring. A mob broke out, and the hostility of the Boston citizens rose. Objects such as ice and rocks were thrown and many citizens were armed with clubs, sticks, and other objects. At one point, an object hit a soldier, causing his gun to go off. Amidst all of the people screaming “fire,” British troops thought that Preston told them to fire.

    Read More

  • Why Was The British To Blame For The Boston Massacre

    568 Words  | 2 Pages

    Imagine a powerful organization from a different place coming into your town taking your jobs, destroying your possessions and telling you what you can and can't do. This is what the British were doing to the colonists during the time of the Boston massacre. The Boston Massacre was a conflict that happened on March 5th 1770. It happened near the courthouse in front of the church on a street called King Street. British soldiers had shot at a group of colonists killing 5 of them. Some think it was the British to blame for this tragedy but others think it was the colonists fault for this event.

    Read More

  • Boston Massacre Research Paper

    424 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Boston Massacre occurred on the fifth of March of 1770. The British soldiers in Boston opened fire on a mob of American colonists and ended with a result of 5 deaths. The angry colonists of the mob was responsible for the Boston Massacre. The protest was started because of the taxes that the British parliament passed. As arguments began to escalate so did aggravation.

    Read More

  • Captain Thomas Preston's Account Of The Bloody Massacre In King Street

    650 Words  | 2 Pages

    Three documents analyzed is one from the British Captain Thomas Preston’s account of what happened. Then we have to American sided documents, one being anonymous and another being from the Boston Journal which was wrote a week after the massacre. All three documents announce that it is the 29th regiment under Captains Preston’s order who was involved

    Read More

  • Captain Thomas Preston: The Boston Massacre

    954 Words  | 2 Pages

    Before the1770’s the British government started to past laws without the Colonist knowing or having representation. Such as the Stamp act which caused newspapers, pamphlets, and public and legal document to by stamp which was taxed on the Colonists . This caused tension among the Colonists, especially the citizens of Boston. Soon most of the Colonists would start protesting in the streets. Then on March 5, 1770 next to the custom house a group of soldier were being teased by a group of teenagers . This annoyed and angered the soldiers, then when the soldiers tried to scare them with their guns. A mob of people start to show up and yell. Throwing sticks and snowballs with stones in the center. The Colonists started to yell fire and other phrases that would edge the soldiers on. Sadly this lead to some British soldiers firing shots which in turn killed five people. Later having a trial framing everything on Captain Preston by telling his troops to fire. When Captain Preston said that he did no such thing. Throughout

    Read More

  • Boston Massacre Research Paper

    382 Words  | 1 Pages

    One thing that shows that the Boston Massacre was not an accident is that the colonists were yelling at the soldiers

    Read More

  • Effects Of The Boston Massacre

    612 Words  | 2 Pages

    The night of the Boston Massacre was a tragic night for american colonists, William Wyatt quotes “..where my vessel was lying, and hearing the bells ring, supposed there was a fire in the town, whereupon I hastened up to the Town-house..” (5.5) he is explaining that everything was very calm in the town, then as the British soldiers start to approach the American men are standing there in confidence

    Read More

  • Was Boston, Massachusetts A Massacre Against Innocent Colonists?

    250 Words  | 1 Pages

    The so-called "Boston Massacre", was not a massacre at all. At approximately 9:00 p.m. on March 5, 1770, an angry and rowdy mob of over fifty colonists gathered to induce a fight with only eight British soldiers, innocently standing guard as instructed in front of the Custom House. Unarmed? Absolutely not. The gang of colonists began hurling verbal assaults, ice chunks, rocks, and clubs at the severely outnumbered and frightened British, who warned the colonists to stop the violent outburst and disperse. Instead, the colonists increased the violence and continued to provoke the soldiers, even going so far as to dare the soldiers to fire their weapons into the crowd Even in a city where the British soldiers were absolutely despised, NONE were found guilty of murder. In fact,

    Read More

  • Boston Massacre Research Paper

    511 Words  | 2 Pages

    The British held their position with orders not to fire, however, the rioters started to throw clubs and snowballs. Private Hugh Montgomery fired the first shot, and after all the smoke cleared, five civilians were dead-- Crispus Attucks, Samuel Gray, James Caldwell, Samuel Maverick and Patrick Carr. Nine British soldiers involved with the Massacre were charged with manslaughter, including Captain Thomas Preston, who was the commanding officer at the time of the incident. He stated that the soldiers acted in self-defense, and that the order to fire was simply an accident due to the rioters taunting the British by yelling, “Fire.” John Adams, a public supporter of the Patriot cause and cousin to the leader of the Sons of Liberty, Samuel Adams, defended Preston and the other men due to his strong belief that people should abide by the rule of law, rather than becoming violent. In the end, Preston and six other men were acquitted of charges, with two men found guilty of manslaughter, but they only received a branding on the hand, with the alternative being a prison

    Read More

  • Boston Massacre

    1552 Words  | 4 Pages

    Many people believe that the Boston Massacre was a spur of the moment event. This is totally untrue. The French and Indian war put England in debt making England look for other sources of income. The king of England believed that the colonists should help to pay for the war because it took place in America. For a few months prior to the massacre, British troops had been stationed in Boston. The soldiers were in Boston to help with the collection of money to pay for duties on imported goods (Hansen 11). Tensions were high between the townspeople and the soldiers. Colonists greatly resented the soldiers because they believed that there should not be military personnel amongst them. The Bostonians took out their anger on the soldiers. In turn, the British troops were extremely unfriendly towards the people too. On many occasions, physical conflicts between the townspeople and the soldiers.

    Read More

  • Comparing The Boston Massacre And The Boston Tea Party

    592 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Americans screamed at the soldiers to ‘Fire and be Damned’ and kept goading the British by throwing rocks at them. Eventually, the British Army opened fire, which led to the deaths of 5 American civilians (including Crispus Attucks) and 6 injured civilians. Governor Hutchison had Captain Preston arrested the next morning. It was then discussed at Faneuil Hall (the meeting spot for the Patriots) what to do with the arrestees. On March 28th the trials began, and eventually Preston, 8 soldiers and 4 civilians were acquitted, except for two soldiers. John Adams defended Preston and helped ‘Reasonable Doubt’ become a defense with this quote: “[w]here you are doubtful never act: that is, if you doubt of the prisoner’s guilt, never declare him guilty; that is always the rule, especially in cases of life.” The term ‘Boston Massacre’ was actually the propagandized term assigned by the Patriot leaders (Samuel Adams and Paul Revere), while the British titled this event as the ‘Incident on King Street’;

    Read More

  • Unsolved History: The Boston Massacre

    215 Words  | 1 Pages

    clear that the incident was self defense. Firstly, Hugh Montgomery was struck with a stick, and then he fired his musket. This was testified by James Bailey. This shows that Montgomery was defending himself from the crowd so he fired. Also, the crowd was adding to all of the confusion by pulling the fire alarm and yelling fire to bring more colonists to the spot of the incident. This was stated in the video "Unsolved History: The Boston Massacre". The soldiers could've been confused by this because they might have thought the colonists yelling fire were actually their captain telling them to fire. Finally, Captain Preston

    Read More

  • The Boston Massacre: Guilty Or Murder?

    127 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Boston Massacre happened on a snowy night when British soldiers fired on a angry crowd on March 5, 1775. The big question today is are the soldiers guilty or innocent of murder. I think that they were all guilty of murdering innocent colonists. Now there is evidence the colonists did attack first, but all that happened was the one of the Bostonians hit a British soldier with a stick, but it still didn't make it okay for the soldiers to fire. These soldiers were well trained and should have been a lot smarter in the situation. They let their emotions get the best of them, and as a soldier, that shouldn't happen. Really what I think about this is that these soldiers were guilty of murder.

    Read More

  • Why Do British Soldiers Commit Murder

    310 Words  | 1 Pages

    British soldiers fired into a crowd on Kings Street on March 5, 1770. There was a total of 5 people killed. The eight soldiers were charged with murder. I don’t believe the soldiers did commit murder. So I will prove that they did not commit murder. It was just an act of self defense.

    Read More

More about What Really Happened in the Boston Massacre?

Open Document