Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Xerox: adapting to the turbulent
The Xerox Case Study
The Xerox Case Study
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Xerox: adapting to the turbulent
What is the “leaking pipeline” phenomenon? “Leaking pipeline is a phrase coined to describe how women have not reached the highest levels of organizations” (Bien, 2014, pp. G-5). Based on our readings, we feel that Xerox goes against the grain of the “leaking pipeline.” Xerox has stood against this phenomenon, as demonstrated by the statistics and facts cited throughout the case. First and foremost, “In 2007 Ursula Burns was named the first African-American female president of Xerox Corporation” (Bien, 2014, pp. W-101). If that’s not enough, the next sentence reads, “In July 2009 she succeeded Anne M. Mulcahy as CEO, the first female-to-female hand-off in Fortune 500 history” (Bien, 2014, pp. W-101). Ursula Burns was then named chairman in May 2010 (Bien, 2014, pp. W-101). …show more content…
More than 50 percent of Xerox’s workforce is made up of women and minorities. Also, 48.2 percent of Xerox’s senior executives are women or people of color. Xerox is rated in the top ten by multiple magazines for top companies in hiring minorities, women, disabled, and gay and lesbian employees. Finally, to top it all off, Xerox is ranked inside Working Mother’s top 100 companies for family-friendly companies for women, for the past fifteen years (Bien, 2014, pp. W-101). As you can see, it’s pretty easy to conclude that Xerox goes completely against the grain when it comes to how it treats women (and minorities) in the
While this book by the COO of Facebook is ostensibly about women in the workplace, it's really about subconscious cognitive biases. A majority of Americans may consider women and men to be equal on the surface, but the fact that women still lag significantly behind men in both pay and leadership positions points to the fact that there is something else going on.
Sex Discrimination in the American Workplace: Still a Fact of Life. (2000, July 01). Retrieved from National Women's Law Center : www.nwlc.org
Positions of Power: How Female Ambition is Shaped by J.D. Nordell of Slate Magazine details the female disposition in the workplace. Nordell writes, “...women account for 35 percent of MBAs but only 2 percent of Fortune 500 CEOs. Women now make up 16 percent of congressional seats - and 0 percent of U.S. presidents…” (Nordell). The statistics provided above show an obvious discrepancy in the amount of influence women have in the workplace. A popular theory is that this discrepancy is caused by the influence of gender roles on the workplace - men are not taking women as seriously in the workplace. Females’ introduction into the major economy is still a relatively new concept, and the underlying archaic gender role that women should tend to the house and children is preventing women from being taken seriously by the men of the business world, and thus constraining their performance in the economy. This is further supported by the case of Ben Barres: “Recently, the transsexual neuroscientist Ben Barres, who has worked as both a woman and a man in science, noted that he is treated with more respect and interrupted less frequently now that he is a man” (Nordell). This further elaborates on the phenomenon that women are taken less seriously in the workplace. Considering the excerpts from Positions of Power: How Female Ambition is Shaped, it is easy
“The history of the Glass Ceiling Commission dates back to 1986 when Wall Street Journal reported a pattern of highly accomplished women being passed over for upper-level promotions due to an invisible barrier”. The term “glass-ceiling” first entered America’s public conversation almost two decades ago, when the Corporate Woman column from The Wall Street Journal identified this new phenomenon. “There seem to be an invisible –but impenetrable- barrier between women and the executive suite, preventing them from reaching the highest levels of the business world regardless of th...
Throughout the world, discrimination in all forms has continued to be a constant struggle; whether it’s racial, gender based, religion, beliefs, appearance or anything that makes one person different from another, it’s an everyday occurrence. A major place that discrimination is occurring at is in the workplace. One of the largest problems discrimination issues is believed to be gender. Women, who have the same amount of experience as men are not getting paid at the same rate as men, these women also are equally trained and educated. According to the article Gender Pay, it was discovered in 2007 that a woman makes 81 cents for every dollar a man earns.(“Gender Pay”) . This shouldn’t be happening in today’s society for the fact the society lived in today is suppose to be more accepting. Men are viewed as being more popular, valuable and having higher powers than women. The Reason Discrimination is involved in the equal pay equal work is because of the significance it has to how some businesses pay their employees.
In February 2015, Ellen Pao’s lawsuit against Kleiner Perkins, a venture capital firm, for gender discrimination went on trial. Pao alleged that she had been treated unfairly by her ex-bosses and passed on numerous times for promotion in favor of her male counterparts. While Pao did not win her lawsuit, the trial brought back to light the problem of gender discrimination and of the glass ceiling in corporate America. Since women started to enter the workforce, there always have been barriers and obstacles that prevented them from reaching the higher ranks on the corporate ladder. Public recognition that there was indeed a problem of discrimination helped giving women assurance
Satya Nadella once said, “We must ensure not only that everyone receives equal pay for equal work, but that they have the opportunity to do equal work.” It was found that women only earn seventy-nine percent of what men make in similar jobs. The gender pay gap has been in account for over fifty years, and yet it is still an issue today. Although businesses are required to practice fairness in compensation amongst all employees regardless of gender, age, or race this is not always the case. Businesses need to instill stricter policies against unequal pay to eliminate racial discrimination, reward and recognize performance and experience, and do away with the gender gap.
In the American society, we constantly hear people make sure they say that a chief executive officer, a racecar driver, or an astronaut is female when they are so because that is not deemed as stereotypically standard. Sheryl Sandberg is the, dare I say it, female chief operating officer of Facebook while Mark Zuckerberg is the chief executive officer. Notice that the word “female” sounds much more natural in front of an executive position, but you would typically not add male in front of an executive position because it is just implied. The fact that most of America and the world makes this distinction shows that there are too few women leaders. In Sheryl Sandberg’s book “Lean In,” she explains why that is and what can be done to change that by discussing women, work, and the will to lead.
Gregory, Raymond F. Women and Workplace Discrimination: Overcoming Barriers to Gender Equality. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Print.
Although these examples could prove a case in the corporate world some may take defense by balancing with further statistics. It is stated in Clayton Collin's article, "Why Girls May Still Need an Edge," that women in America may not be at the top of the corporate ladder, but they do hold around forty percent of all privately owned businesses in the United States. (11) So, even though women haven't quite proven themselves to the corporate world, they have most certainly conquered a portion in the entrepreneur world and in a big way. That is definitely a positive point for America's look on gender equality in the workplace.
Discrimination continues to run rampant throughout organizations in both the United States and worldwide. The Supreme Court case, Dukes vs. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., dealt with 1.5 million current and former female Wal-Mart employees that claim that they had been a victim of gender discrimination. The ensuing pages will discuss the specific issues that the plaintiffs encountered, followed by suggestions from a human resource manager’s stand point in rectifying adverse impact within the Wal-Mart organization.
It is unethical to discriminate against surface-level discrimination like: race, religion, age, gender, disabilities, etc. If organizations do not hold up to their responsibility to provide equal opportunity to their employees, the organization can face legal charges, low turnover, employee dissatisfaction, and low motivation. If the public finds out that the company is unethical with their employees, the company’s sales can also go down due to their bad reputation. Upper-level management should make policies against discrimination, hire a diverse workforce, and promote an environment where employees can openly discuss discrimination. Lower-level management should follow and educate employees on these policies, punish employees who discriminate. Johnson & Johnson state in their code of ethics that, “Compensation must be fair and adequate…There must be equal opportunity for employment, development and advancement for those qualified” (Code of Business Conduct, 2015). Johnson & Johnson pays everyone based on skill or performance and gives all their diverse employees the opportunity to advance if they are qualified. Their employees are almost half women, half men, their management is 42% women, and their new hires consists almost 25% each of North Americans, Latin Americans, Europeans/Middle East/Africans, and Asian-Pacific. Johnson & Johnson also have a
For many decades, women have faced inequalities in the workforce. At one point, they were not allowed to work at all. Although women's rights have improved and are now able to work alongside men, they are still treated unfairly. According to the 2012 U.S. Census, women’s earnings were “76.5 percent of men’s” (1). In 2012, men, on average, earned $47,398 and women earned only $35,791. This is when comparing employees where both gender spend the same amount of time working. Not only do women encounter unfairness in work pay, they also face a “glass ceiling” on a promotional basis. This glass ceiling is a “promotion barrier that prevents woman’s upward ability” (2). For example, if a woman is able to enter a job traditionally for men, she will still not receive the same pay or experience the same increase in occupational ability. Gender typing plays a huge role in the workplace. It is the idea that women tend to hold jobs that are low paid with low status. Women are not highly considered in leadership positions because of social construction of gender. Society has given women the role of “caretakers” and sensitive individuals. Therefore, women are not depicted as authoritative figures, which is apparent with the absence of women in leadership roles in companies. Furthermore, sex segregation leads to occupations with either the emphasis of women in a certain job or men in a certain job. In 2009, occupations with the highest proportion of women included “secretary, child care worker, hair dresser, cashier, bookkeeper, etc.” (3). Male workers typically held job positions as construction workers, truck drivers, taxi drivers, etc. (3). Sex segregation represents inequality because the gender composition for these jobs depends on what ...
When I first heard the song “I Believe,” by Christina Perri, something inside me clicked, causing a chain reaction of memories and events in my life that led up to each new day flood through my mind. Every word flew into my heart and reminded me of the good times and the bad times I might have never reconsidered to think of in my life. This song didn’t only describe me, it enhanced my understanding of others, sewing the fabrics of my life into a beautiful harmony that I had failed to fully understand. I believe that all the pain that we as people have felt in our lives has only made us stronger, and the deeper meaning in this song helped me realize more about myself and of those around me.
Harvard Business Review. Women in the Workplace: A Research Roundup. n.d. 15 November 2013 .