The Birthmark Flaws

707 Words2 Pages

Human Nature is innately prone to flaw and sin…

Hawthorne’s characters in “Dr. Heidegger's Experiment” and “The Birthmark,” are far from flawless and sin tremendously, showing how prone humans are to making mistakes naturally and effortlessly. Both stories include characters who are prone to sin from their professions as doctors/scientists and show similar characteristics in how they handle experiments. The problems with their natural ways of presenting their new found remedies, along with an obsession to make appearances better, shows how prone the two scientists are to trying to better flaws, therefore creating sins.
The scientist, listed in the title, Doctor Heidegger begins to show his natural gravitation towards flaw and sin early …show more content…

Nathaniel Hawthorne’s character in “The Birthmark,” Georgiana owns a physical flaw upon her face, a birthmark. This upsetting flaw on such a beautiful person results in Aylmer’s reaction to get rid of it, “...this possible defect, which we hesitate whether to term a defect or a beauty, shocks me, as being the visible mark of earthly imperfection.” Similar to Doctor Heidegger, Aylmer knows the power of science and has the natural reaction that he can fix all flaws. This desire quickly turns into Aylmer’s flaw as he sins more and more, which upsets his wife and causes her to notice and be ashamed of her birthmark. His want to remove the birthmark is such a strong natural reaction, that his wife sees how upsetting it is and sins herself. She demands that, “Being what I find myself, methinks I am of all mortals the most fit to die.” Although the coupe was unhappy with the appearance of a flaw that was evident on Georgiana’s cheek, it would have been an even more capital sin to kill herself over the minor mark, but a worse sin for Aylmer to kill his wife. This was the result of his mental flaw that everyone needed to be spotless, and beautiful, so he finally committed a deadly sin. Hawthorne describes this flaw, leading to both of the spouses committing or thinking of deadly sins when he summarizes the problems that plague Aylmer, writing, “Yet, had Aylmer reached a profounder wisdom, he need not thus flung away happiness…” The human nature of the scientist was to abolish imperfection, instead of appreciate it as individuality, resulting in the death of his wife, the worse sin of

Open Document