Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Structure of international financial reporting standards in various countries
Objectives of the international accounting standards board
Objectives of international accounting standards committee foundation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
IFRS stands for International Financial Reporting Standards, which is a set of accounting standards that can be used globally by public companies for financial reporting. The set of standards are governed by the International Accounting Standards Board that is based in London. The purpose of converting the U.S to these standards is to streamline all the companies that are abroad and in the United States as far as financial reporting. This process is supposed to produce cost savings for companies that operate in the U.S. and abroad; produce more efficiency and transparency. The IGAAP are and GAAP are very similar and can eliminate duplications of different principles when companies produce financial statements by adopting the IFRS standard. …show more content…
The convergence to the IFRS may be a cost driver issue for certain companies. For example, a company that does not operate globally, but only in the U.S. will be required to adhere to the new accounting guidelines as well. Also, accountants and finance professionals will have to adapt to the new financial reports and will take some time to understand it. This will require companies and people investing in more training and education to ensure the new financial reports are completed correctly and for understandability. Also the U.S. will lose its originality as far as having its own accounting principles, better known as GAAP. Ultimately the cost/benefit analysis, which is used in accounting for decision usefulness may be outweighed. (Kieso Weygandt Warfield. Thirteenth Edition.page 34) The IFRS could become a burden to certain companies and can face possible resistance from the public sector companies affected by the convergence.). If the IFRS convergence was optional based on the companies market it would be more efficient and eliminate the need for companies that are only U.S. based to make the …show more content…
The FASB would ensure there are updates and IFRS principles are productive in the U.S. Most likely they would make sure there is no duplication in any of the new accounting principles that are adopted and receive expertise from the IASB to ensure the U.S. companies are reporting there financial information correctly. Additionally, the FASB and IASB would probably coordinate to ensure classification and accounting practices are being used correctly and ensure there are no violations that are occurring due to lack of education. Overall, FASB would probably work together to ensure the U.S. recommendations prior to convergence have been either adopted or a sensible alternative be
Switching to IFRS will help not just companies but also investors and public globally to compare financial statements. If every country has different financial standards, if would be problematic to compare how each company stands because they are not the same.
The FASB Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards form on governmental entities. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative.
The government designates certain professionals within society as mandated reporters. This means that if a person, who holds a position identified by the government, suspects that a child is being abused or neglected, they must go through the process of reporting the abuse/neglect to their local Department of Health and Human services office (“Michigan Child Abuse Laws”, 2017). This policy is relevant not only to those working within the social work field, but also to those who work closely with children, such as teachers and day care workers. Michigan’s Child Protection Law identifies citizens in the following positions as mandated reporters:
What is IFRS, and what is its significance in the world market? In 2001 the International Accounting Standards Board, or IASB, was created to develop a set of standards by which global financial statuses could be reported. According to financialstabilityboard.org, this set of standards, known as the International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, falls under the jurisdiction of the IFRS Foundation, which is a non-profit, private and independently run entity that exists for the public interest, is based on four principle objectives. The first is to develop a single set of international financial reporting standards (IFRS). This set would be high in quality, readily understandable, easily enforceable, and acceptable world-wide. The second objective is to encourage the use of this set of standards in the international business world. Thirdly, the ISAB would like to monitor the needs of different sizes and types of businesses in different settings. The fourth objective is to promote the adoption of the IFRS by converging national accounting standards wit...
Out of the 38 effective IFRS standards, there are only 2 standards in India that have no difference with IFRS and six have minor differences. Eighteen standards of IFRS will need a level of technical preparedness by the industry and the professionals for implementation or would have conceptual differences with the Indian standards. Ten standards need changes in laws and regulations for them to comply with the principles of IFRS. There have to be significant amendments in various regulations and acts like that of the Companies Act, RBI Act, tax laws, laws for specialised industries including banking, insurance etc, for compliance with IFRS
IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) is used in 110 different countries, however the GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) is only used in the U.S. These two accounting practices report financial data differently, specifically intangible assets. Intangible assets under GAAP are recognized at fair value, however under IFRS “they are only recognized if the asset will have a future economic benefit and has a measured reliability” (2015, GAAP vs IFRS). There are other differences between these two practices for revaluations, advertising costs, goodwill, and internally developed intangible
George Iatridis(2010), “IFRS Adoption and Financial Statement Effects: The UK Case” This study investigates the impact of the implementation of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) on key financial measures of UK firms and the volatility effects of IFRS adoption. The findings show that IFRS implementation has favorably affected the profitability and growth potential of firms. In 2007 Marchal also found out in his research increase in Profitability under
I have applied the IFRS to audit half-year income statement and statement of finical position from domestic sub-company or oversea branches. This allows me to understand the difficultly of dealing with accounting report form different nations. For example, we have to negotiate each report from the U.S. with their reporter by phone. It would take incredibly long time to explain the difference in order to adjust the figures in the reports. During the stuff training, we have been taught that to be professional at everywhere and anytime. Moreover, I realise that the most important feature to be a professional accountancy is responsibility. This is because that a unit of misallocation will cost other team number a huge amount of work to correct it. The experience of taking notes of weekly conferences between senior managers and PWC partner has indicates that how does change in financial policy influence the accounting treatment. For instant, since vice-perminster Mr Le Ke Qiang who visited China Construction Bank at earlier May. He point out that the Rate of Non-Performing Loans could not exceed 7% in the “BIG Four” Chinese bank. This has led Chinese bank to relax its accounting standard of credit rating. It allows me to understand the relationship between government and financial
He highlighted that a common set of accounting standards increased the comparability of companies in different countries and facilitated the easy consolidation of group of companies based in different countries. Although IASB sets standards after close scrutiny from different national standard setters, it is evident that it is involved more with convergence than harmonisation. This may in a way also support the sentiments expressed by UK finance directors during a survey that IFRSs undermined UK (and obviously of all other countries) reporting integrity, (Elliott and Elliott, 2009). Countries still need to maintain their national pride as they exhibit substantial economic and cultural differences.
Private and public accounting has long been discussed and disputed in regards to financial reporting. Since the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) was created in 1973, accountants have called for different accounting regulations for private and public accounting sectors, as private companies do not have the resources to meet the complex requirements of public companies. Private companies currently are not required by law to issue annual or quarterly financial statements (James, 2012). Private companies do, however, have the option to apply the U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), cash basis, or accrual accounting to their financial statements (James, 2012).
...pt. That is however, not to say that it is without its problems, as previously discussed, it can possibly lead to a two tier system of reporting, despite reducing complexity its flexibility can limit comparability and place a heavy onus in terms of judgement of the preparer. Finally its simplifications may perhaps infringe upon the ease of which a private entity wishes to become public listed company. However, the disadvantages of adopting the standard are fat outweighed by the potential benefits it offers. As more time goes on, we will no doubt see more countries and companies adopting the standard. If capital providers (primarily banks) clearly understand and have confidence in the financial statements prepared under the guidance of the standard; then an SMEs ability to obtain the capital it need improves. Ultimately the economy in which it operates improves.
The International Accounting Standards Board, (IASB), began life as the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) in the 1973. The IASC was created in June 1973 as a result of an agreement by the accountancy bodies of Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Ireland and the United States. These countries constituted the Board of IASC at that time.
For some investors, it will result in some direct merits, for instances, there will be no need for them to spend an extra fee on learning different kinds of accounting regulations any more. Except this, the risk of taking poor decision caused by misunderstanding different accounting standards will also be reduced. What’s more, Miles and Nobes (1998) stated that the global accounting standards can reduce the risk of missing investment opportunities through avoiding unfamiliar national accounting. That means global accounting standards can promote the cooperation between companies to contribute more financial transactions. Obviously, the appearance of direct merits sometimes comes along with the indirect merits. It is clear that this accounting standard can cut down the cost of adjusting and removing some barriers to international transactions. By the way, engaging more share investment may cut down the capital cost of a company can also be viewed as one of the indirect advantages. And, it seems that there will be no need for governments to regular and monitor domestic accounting regulations by using global standards any more. Moreover, the global standards can also improve the governments’ efficiency instead of making a wasteful duplication
157, they can be referred to as the two gates mentioned by Jesus in Matthew 7:13-14 (ESV) as it says, “Enter by the narrow gate. For the gate is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few.” FASB and IFRS have a difficult task in that they are pressured by many special interest and political groups to write standards in a particular way. When it comes to their explanations, their response can take two roads, one that is wide and easy or one that is narrow and difficult to make. Based on the roads they take will display their independence to the end user. As the end user of financial statements increase, so will the pressures of accommodating special interest groups. But as Jesus stated, the way is hard and few will find
... FASB face challenges in pursuit of joint conceptual framework’, Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, vol. 18, issue. 1, pp. 39-51, Wiley Online Library Database, viewed 28 April 2014, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-646x.2007.01007.x