Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of technology on the music industry
The impact of technology on the music industry
How the music industry changed question
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of technology on the music industry
Should the right holders of the Beatles’ music (Apple Corps) allow their songs to be “streamed” on websites such as Spotify?
The music industry has rapidly changed over the past several decades, moving away from records and cassettes and through CDs. No longer is the age of hard-copied music, but rather digital copies. iTunes transformed the music industry, but now people are starting to look to other options where they can get more songs for less money. This is where streaming services come in. Many companies, the biggest being Spotify, offer access to practically unlimited music for a low monthly fee. Rather than paying for each individual song, avid music lovers can listen to as many as they want for a flat rate price. Although this sounds like a great deal from the music listener’s perspective, there have been questions raised as to whether it’s detrimental to the music artists. Some feel as they would be missing out of money since people would not be buying their music directly, and instead buying into the services as whole. Hence why some artist’s music seems to be mysteriously missing from streaming services such as Spotify. One of these artists is the Beatles. If you were to search on Spotify for music by the Beatles, you would be able to find mediocre cover versions by other artists, but unfortunately, the real versions are not there. The reason for this being that Apple Corp, who is the rights holder of the Beatles music, has decided not to allow their music to be streamed through such services. As Beatles fans begin to pester Apple Corps, the question raised is whether or not they will join into the streaming services.
The Beatles’ music has always been held on a tight leash. Apple Corps seems to be wary of the changi...
... middle of paper ...
...ee these promotions and are driven to perhaps buy an album through other mediums, like iTunes or Amazon. There are practically no detrimental effects that introducing Beatles’ music to Spotify would bring to the marketing mix.
In conclusion, I see no reason as to why Apple Corps has not negotiated a deal with Spotify yet for the Beatles music. Spotify’s business model is not at all selfish. Market research proves that Spotify is actually solving a problem, not creating one for artists. Introducing the Beatles’ music to the Spotify market would be very beneficial for Apple Corp’s marketing mix and the benefits of e-commerce can bring their income to a whole new level. I believe that Apple Corp is missing out on lots of revenue by withholding music from Spotify. The Beatles music will forever be classic, but it’s time for Apple Corp to change with the changing times.
...nd the permission that The Beatles gave to those who followed was a tremendous one. The generations that followed The Beatles continued their legacy and we are still living in their echo, but through innovation and revolutions of our own we are changing the music everyday. I believe that there won’t be any band that will come close to The Beatles and their invasion of the world. I know that I can personally thank The Beatles for their contribution, because without them I wouldn’t have the music that I have today.
The Beatles are a band that has made a huge impact into our world. The impact of the Beatles influenced many things. Such things would be types of music, the people, and a world movement.
This one-two punch has left the industry experimenting with different ideas, trying to find their next revenue stream. No one is sure where the music industry will be in the next five years, but things are already changing. Musicians have more and more avenues to reach fan bases, and huge record companies no longer dominate the scene. This is good for musicians and even better for fans.... ...
During their time together, the members of The Beatles experimented with several different drugs. Drugs played a major role in the career of the Beatles as they influenced many of the songs as well as played a significant role on the bonding the band shared. Each band member had his own preference of drugs. However, the most significant impact drugs had on the Beatles were due from Preludin, cannabis, and LSD for reasons that were quite different.
Beatlemania was undoubtly , result of the music that Beatles gave to the World. It was also a product of brilliant work by people who surrounded the band. However,it is quite clear that the World was ready and waiting to undergo many changes .As a result of its perfectly timed arrival on a hystorical scene , Beatlemania was eagerly embraced by young post -war generation thus becaming the igniting force and the vessel for future changes in society, much more than Beatles themselves or anyone else could have predicted. It’s legacy lives.
The Beatles made a lasting mark on the music industry and continue to be celebrated for their talent today. Sgt. Pepper was one of their first attempts to mature as artists, the concept of a fictional band allowed them to do so. “Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds” is just one example of The Beatles’ experimentation.
...rickson, Steve. "No Ordinary Fad: Making Sense of the Beatles, Whose Music Has Been Digitally Remastered and Featured in a New Video Game." Los Angeles Magazine 1 Sept. 2009: n. pag. Print.
The issue surrounding this problem arose when the Recording Industry Association of America claimed that Napster was basically giving out free music and was not paying the fees to issue “free” music. Napster claimed that all the music was shared among its users and were shared from computer to computer rather than a free website issuing free files for all to download. With the innovation of new technologies today, new problems will always come up due to better ways of getting things done. The same incident happened with the “new and improved” VCR. After fighting some battles, it was made legal for consumers to record from their own home and uses it for personal matters. Again, this situation is similar, but with more strings attached.
Spotify is an on-demand music streaming service that provides a two tiered service to its users. The free service allows users to listen to any song on demand within the application’s music catalogue, but with the presence of ads. The premium service, however, is completely ad free. Launched in 2008 in Sweden, Spotify has grown and currently has over 24 million active users. (Sisario, B) As a result of several deals struck with EMI, Sony, Universal, and Warner Music Group, Spotify currently holds a music catalogue of roughly 20 million songs.
When people think about the 60’s the majority of them all think about the Beatles. The Beatles is a band that made Rock and Roll a totally, different type of music. Even though The Beatles were such a hit, as time went on they started to fall apart. Over 50 years later, the Beatles are still classified as one of the best band of all time.
Consumers rely on their smartphones and laptops to listen to music on-demand. Although there are many music streaming companies, Spotify was one of the first to let consumers access millions of artist without buying individuals songs or albums. With Spotify, consumers pay for a premium subscription that allows access to every artist, album, and song within their library of
"The mass production of free, high-quality re-recorded music became a serious threat to the music industry" ("Music Industry"). This mass production is costing artists and producers money that they would have made from people buying their music. Listeners have turned to streaming services as a cheaper alternative to purchasing to songs they love. Streaming services have increased the availability of music, which one may think is a good thing but is in fact a fulmination to the music industry because artists are not making as much money as they would have if songs were being purchased individually. People who worked in the music industry had showered praise on to streaming services, considering them a savior that would help the music industry and increase revenue, but they instead had an adverse effect on music sales and artist salary (O’Brien). Streaming services have led to protests from artists on many different levels due to the amount of payment that artists are receiving. "Prince, Neil Young and Ms. Swift have withdrawn their music from some streaming outlets, and various musicians have called for greater transparency in how the music industry operates (Sisario).” While the protests have been successful, it is only when famous high-level artists bring attention to the issues. This controversy is one of the negatives of streaming services because
First of all it’s successfully fighting against piracy, and turns former pirates into music consumers. Because there’s no reason why one would steal music when it can be easily “taken” for free in an absolutely legal way that benefits not only music consumers but artists too. And even though you can use Spotify for free more and more people are getting premium membership and paying the $9.99 monthly fee in return to get add free music streaming and the availability to listen to music offline. But some major labels are pushing Spotify towards limiting freemium membership, to convince more people to pay monthly fee, Ek refuses to do it, for obvious reasons – people will always find ways to get music for free, so if they won’t get it on Spotify they will find other places to do it and most likely in an illegal way. But still quite a few well known artist like Radiohead’s Thom Yorke, Taylor Swift, Johnny Marr and many others who are against Spotify, stating that it’s paying pennys for artist and that they are giving up their music for free, and staying with iTunes rather than Spotify. iTunes, in my opinion, is good for short term income, as when people buy a song they can listen to it as many times as they want and artist don’t get any more income from that song after someone have bought it, where as if an artist have their songs on Spotify even after 20 years
Spotify is on-demand streaming music player. After registration and downloading the desktop application user gains access to more than 20 million songs that are currently available on Spotify [1]. The main characteristic of Spotify’s streaming service is that it does not sell music, but it gives access to it. Streaming digital music is based on agreements with content owners - record labels, digital distributors, aggregators and publisher collecting societies, to whom Spotify pays out royalties [2]. Without these agreements there would be no music to stream. Basically, Spotify has an intermediary role as it distributes music content from right holders to listeners.
Think back on a time when you experienced something stressful. How did you cope with it? Recall a time when you needed to relax. What did you use to help you? Chances are your answers involve music. The desire to play music while working, studying, or even relaxing is universal. Whether playing the music, singing along, or just listening, music can have many positive effects that aren’t often recognized. Music is unique in its ability to stimulate more than just one brain hemisphere, incorporating both the right and left sides of the brain. Because both sides of the brain are being affected, there are both creative and analytical benefits to making music part of daily routines. It’s no secret that listening to or playing music is enjoyable, but studies have proven that music can boost more than just your mood.