Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Commentary on the adventures of huckleberry finn
What is literary censorship
Conclusion to book bannings
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Commentary on the adventures of huckleberry finn
Banning the book from the shelves and classrooms seems unnecessary for many people. Many people believe the book should not be banned but only modified to replace the “N-word” with the word “slave.” With the modification, people claim that the book would still send its message across, yet in a less offensive way. Mark Twain scholars believe that the modification will make the book more adaptable for teaching and it will still manage to send it’s message across, without the need of the “N-word.” Professor of Syracuse University, Boyce Watkins, stated in The Joey Behar Show that there is censorship present in our society already in “movies, television, and other forms of art” and that censorship on a book is not an exception. Modifying the book
is not an attempt to destroy the books historical significance but rather allow the book to accommodate to a school's curriculum. In Byron Pitts interview for CBS, a student claims that “the n-word is not necessary”(Schneider )and he feels uncomfortable when the book was taught in class. The main motive for the modification of the book is primarily to make students feel comfortable when reading this classic novel. Although many argue that the book is a “literature classic”(Beck) in the end of the day many “children will not- or do not- truly get the classical part” (Beck) which is why the modified version of the book not only to diminishes the racial aspects of it but makes it more understandable for children. The supporters of the original book claim that replacing the n-word with “slave” is not a fair trade; both words are unlike one another, and therefore by replacing the n-word,they are changing the whole book itself. A simple modification of a word will make the book adequate for school teaching and it will not take away its historical significance. Replacing the N-word white slave as a Mark Twain Scholar proposed will preserve the historical significance of the novel yet is a less racist way. A modified version of the book is not an attempt to eliminate the original copy of the book, but to serve as a reinforcement of Mark Twain's teachings in a less racist way for people who feel the original book is too much. The modified novel will serve as a safety outlet for parents who are concerned with what their children are exposed too, yet will still manage to send its historical significance across the classroom.
Twain’s use of profane language, namely the inclusion of the word “nigger” over 200 times, is condoned by the exceptionally realistic setting it creates. For proponents of banning the book, the use of obscenities are seen as justification enough to ban, but according to United States federal judge John Woolsey, the obscenities are not in fact obscenities at all. Determined by the Courts, a book can only be found obscene if it stirs sexual impulses or is “dirt for dirt’s sake” (Woolsey). Neither part of this definition fits Twain’s writing. Twain uses vulgar language to realistically depict the Southern antebellum society in which the story takes place. The only impulses that Twain intends to stir are a person’s moral compass in an attempt to rid society of their negative outlook toward African Americans. In the Explanatory...
The decision to ban the novel Huckleberry Finn from classrooms and libraries has been an ongoing controversy. The presence of the 'n word' and the treatment towards Jim, and other blacks in general, has made many readers uncomfortable. Despite this fact, Huckleberry Finn has been and remains a classic read. I do not believe the novel should be banned or sanitized because it is a part of American history whether it is good or bad, also we have no right to change someone's writing simply because we do not like how it is written, Mark Twain's writing should not be penalized because of the ideals of today.
The practice of the censorship of books in schools has been prevalent due to the explicit content of them. Parents have been complaining to schools about books that count as required reading because they disapprove with the points made in the book. If a book consists of offensive or sexually explicit material, then parents would challenge the schools about them in order to prevent their children from reading them. Censorship in general has been an intensely debated issue because it is considered an infringement to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution while others argue it is used to conceal inappropriate things (Aliprandini and Sprague). The banning of books in school curriculum has also been debated since parents see certain books as inappropriate while others argue that banning them hinders student learning. Against the censorship of books in schools, Fenice Boyd and Nancy Bailey, authors of Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, believe that banning books creates a barrier between students and intellectual development (Boyd and Bailey, 655). Banning books from schools and removing them from the curriculum prevents students from exploring different ideas and developing creativity and critical thinking skills.
Countries worldwide actively call for the banning of books that are found to be politically inconvenient, religiously awkward, or embarrassing in one form or another. But for writers like Russia's Vasily Grossman, a book's ban means far more than just a dip in sales. In 1961, he pleaded with the Soviet censors, "I am physically free, but the book to which I have dedicated my life is in jail." (Merkelson). A book represents an idea, thus limiting access to a book is banning the representation of an idea. The banning of books in American schools should not be allowed, because banning books will prevent students from learning the reason for the controversy and alternate viewpoints they can come to on their own.
The classic American novel The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn By Mark Twain has been a source of controversy since it was published. The controversy is centered around Twain’s use of the N word. It is a very heinous, powerful word that is almost always offensive. Mark Twain is well known as a satirist, in laymen's terms he makes light of social issues through his use of language. The story takes place in pre-civil war America so in order to effectively show the racism of the decade he had to use their vernacular. He did not intend to offend. He actually meant to make you feel uncomfortable with the racism. Huck Finn should not be censored because literary decisions should be left to the authors to make (5 Kathleen Parker), we need examples of ignorance to provide contrast to how far we have come, and because The powerful language Twain uses is necessary for the story and the story would be worse off for it.
Banning Books “It’s not just the books under fire now that worry me. It is the books that will never be written, the books that will never be read. And all due to the fear of censorship. As always, young readers will be the real losers” (Blume 1999). Judy Blume can not explain the problem of book censorship any clearer.
Banning books from public schools and public libraries is wrong. It’s irrational to have a parent or school board member’s opinion determine what a school district should be reading. Books including and not limited to, The Scarlet Letter, The Great Gatsby, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Lord of the Flies, and Animal Farm all have one thing in common. They have all at one time or another been subject to banishment. These literary classics have been around for a long time and proved to be vital to the education of many, especially children and adolescents. These novels teach values and educate children about world affairs that can not come from an everyday experience. These controversial novels encompass the materials that ultimately boost our educational wealth. Banning books infringe
School boards and teachers have a responsibility for protecting the minds of their students and covering age appropriate material. However, does this responsibility cover the extreme act of banning books from school classrooms? Does not the teacher have a duty to introduce to their students world issues in order to better the students ability to cope with problems in the world? How does a school decide which books should be banned from the classroom, and should it be left up to the teacher to decide what is decided in his/her classroom. By banning books from the classroom, we prevent our students from learning about controversial topics in a safe environment, and we also encroach upon the student’s freedom of reading what they want in school.
Huck Finn has been named “the great American novel” by the English writer Andrew Lang, and deemed “the most admirable work of literature produced on this continent” by Harvard. Unfortunately, over the last 25 years, this thought provoking satire has faced intense scrutiny due to its alleged promotion of racism and racial stereotypes and specifically due to the use of the “N-word,” which appears 219 times in the novel. “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn,” has been banned more than 150 times by various school systems and libraries since its first publication in
This book has been banned from school libraries all over the country because of the main character's teenage angst, which many feel is too graphic for teenagers, and its profanity. Profanity, whether it be frequent or a rare occurrence, is a characteristic of many literary classics, as is the use of racial epithets.In the book Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain (ranking number 2 on the list), an epithet is use many times over to describe the people of color in the book. Now since the book was published in 1885 and such language was common at the time, I do not belie...
They make the point that while reading the book, you must remember that Mark Twain was not a racist. He rarely spoke or wrote of race, but when he did it was more favorable to blacks than whites. "You must understand what Twain was trying to do with his story; trying to reveal the plight of the slave. And he was doing it with the vernacular of the time". Twain wrote Huck Finn in mindset of Americans during the 19th century, and it is important for readers to see how far Americans, have come since then. "Huck Finn is a novel that, despite the N-word, portrays great values that should not be overlooked. If we ban Huck Finn, then we are ignoring our history, and racism was a part of our history, whether we like it or not, and reading the book helps us remember the mistakes of our American past". It is also argued that banning books often robs students literature. "Do we remove Macbeth' because of the murders and witches?". It is argued that censorship of any kind is an attack on our freedom, freedom that our country was found upon, freedom that Huck and Jim both sought and found in Twain's
Throughout Mark Twain's The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn the word “nigger” is mentioned more than 200 times. Because of this offensive term, the book has been subject to bans all across America. In result of the many bans, a new edition of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn was released, one in which the word “nigger” has been replaced with “slave.” To some this seems the right call but in reality, the use of the word “nigger” is imperative to the novel. The censorship of the word “nigger” takes away from the novel in many ways. Replacing it would take away from the development of the characters and the messages within the text. The use of the word “nigger” correctly illustrates the 1800s Southern culture that the book takes place in. Replacing
Do you read books about our country's past? Do you think books should be banned because of romance and sexual language? Banned books could be used as a tool to learn about our history not to make parents made,however, i can understand if the language is very explicit. One of the key things about books is they show you the evolution of our past. Some people believe that books should not be banned because they shape our history.
People read books about dystopians all the time, you know those books that have everything possible go wrong. Books like The Hunger games, or Fahrenheit 451, Ect. Some people look at them as just stories, just fictional books. Those books are all about censorship and having the government controlling and watching your every move. What most people don't realize is that there is censorship happening right now, every time you send a text or make a phone call, the government can see/hear it. There is censorship on books at schools and ratings on movies. There is censorship happening all around you and most of us don't even notice it. That's because they are minor, but, over time things can progressively get worse. Someday those fictional books could become history books. Every great government has its downfall, and censorship could be the cause of it. For instance, a form of censorship that is happening right now all over the country in many schools is the banning of certain books in school libraries/ classrooms. This could very well lead to something more major because people don't like the idea of having their rights taken away from them. Also because the government is controlling what kids can and cannot read. And, finally because its imposing a threat on reading, learning and thinking.
Our system for banning books is flawed. Classic books are important to readers. The religion you in believe will play a factor on what people think about books. Therefore, the law will limit parents ability on banning books. Banning books is outrageous and should not be accepted.