The Anti-Stratford-Upon-Avon Controversy Essay

428 Words1 Page

For centuries, the question of whether William Shakespeare of Stratford-upon-Avon truly wrote the plays and poems attributed to him, continues to be a subject of intense debate. Known as the "Shakespeare authorship controversy," this longstanding debate pits traditional Shakespeare scholars against a group of doubters, known as "anti-Stratfordians," who argue that the Bard of Avon could not have been the true author of these literary masterpieces. The Anti-Stratfordian Argument The anti-Stratfordian supporters make several key arguments against Shakespeare's authorship. First, they claim the biographical details of Shakespeare's life considering his relatively humble origins, lack of formal education, and limited travel outside of England do …show more content…

They believe all of these individuals, with their elite backgrounds and connections to the royal court, are more likely to have produced the plays and poems. The Scholarly Consensus However, Shakespeare scholars have responded to these claims hold that biographical interpretations of literature are unreliable, and that the convergence of documentary evidence used to support Shakespeare's authorship is the same used for all other authorial attributions of his era. This evidence is included in title pages, testimony by other contemporary poets, historians, and official records that relate directly to the works of Shakespeare. Moreover, as Patrick Cheney, a professor of English, argues, Shakespeare had a superior education, was a great reader, and as a member of a royal acting company had ample opportunity to experience the courts of sovereign firsthand. Cheney dismisses the argument claiming a provincial commoner could not have been familiar with royalty or international settings, stating that "neither royalty nor international travel has ever been a prerequisite for good

Open Document