Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on zero hour contracts rationale
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on zero hour contracts rationale
Considering the advantages and disadvantages of zero hour contract to both the employer and employees, zero hour contract must be banned. A Zero-hour contracts are flexible agreement between the employer and employees. In it, it does not include the number of hours that the employee will be doing. It is a way to making fast and easy money. The way it works is by the employer telling the employee when to come to work. Part of the zero-hour contract includes holiday pay, however, it does not include sick days. In the United Kingdom about 697,000 people are on zero-hour contracts, which is 2.3 of UK’s employment rate. People in different careers are on zero-hour contracts. It is all the way from working in McDonalds to working for a doctor. Even thought many experts may argue, still, there are many advantages to zero-hour contract to the employees. Starting with the basic attraction, which is the choice of when to work; also known as “flexible hours”. A major benefit that employees gain from zero-hour contract is making fast money. Some of …show more content…
I look at it from Elton Mayo’s point of view, which is in a human relation’s perspective. The power that is employer gained from zero-hour contract is massive. This resulted to the lose of the employees’ voice. They stopped complaining because they can not hear their own voice. But No! zero-hour contracts must stop because the negativity that resulted out of it is extreme. Employees are not treated in an humane way. Employees must get benefits like sick days and holiday pay. People must demand an end to zero hour contracts because only the employers get to gain from it. Employees must stop signing zero hour contract because they are giving up their right to guaranteed work. Employers are taking advantage for too many employees for not enough jobs. All employees have the right to be provided pensions, absence policy and many
Labor’s rights, this issue have been bothering many worker since the 19th century and can still be a problem today. As John L. Lewis has said in his speech “I repeat that labor seeks peace and guarantees its own loyalty, but the voice of labor, insistent upon its rights, should not be annoying to the ears of justice or offensive to the conscience of the American people” (John L. Lewis), which under his words meant that labor is something that can be done right and peacefully but it needs rules and benefits that come with those rules which labor asks for and when labor asks for those rules and benefits it shouldn’t be taken like some annoying kid’s demands but more as something that needs to be done and done with a right mind set. Labor today consists of a man or woman going to work, working their hours, and finally getting paid for those hours at the end of the week, at least a minimum of $7.50 an hour (United States Department of Labor), but before it wasn’t like that before many workers would get paid very poorly even thought they would work for a lot of hours and they wouldn’t get benefits from their work or safety when working such as in the mines like the mine workers, but one man stood up for them and his name was John L. Lewis (John Llewellyn Lewis, Encyclopedia).
Mainly, the article focuses on the injustices people have encountered in a work environment. Rhodes appeals to her audience as everyday “average” people who identify with the plight of another. Although she makes a compelling argument referencing studies and personal stories of people this has happened to, there are flaws in her argument that could discredit the validity of her reasoning. The logic in her article highly finds favor with the general working public. It is both consistent and appropriate. However, it is not complete, nor fully believable. I will discuss the following in the next paragraphs. Her use of research and anecdotes are mostly one-sided and while it brings valid points for the workers, fail to portray opposing views on the issue, that of the employer. She also neglects to further explore and compare the validity of this claim against wel...
The amount of credits per hour depends on the job. A more physically demanding or unpleasant job would receive more points than something less taxing. This is an effective way of contracting society because it has people working enough to get the necessary work done to drive the society without overworking and tapping out the worker. When Castle and Frazier discuss whether a community can survive on such little work, we understand that the people who are working are working with intent and without distractions and not under distracting supervision. It is also useful because it allows people to choose how to spend their time.
In present lot of people are getting fire because they get involve in serious accident or the birth and care of newborn child. Most of people in this group cannot come back their position after the special period. I think this is really inhumanity. And government does not have the formal document to protect employee’s rights in this area which make the employer could fire them for their own benefit. As we got the information online we can see most of the benefits policy are only for the militaries which does not cover normal people. It also increase the jobless rate and unfair to those people. In my opinion government should come out some formal documents and the regulations for this type of situation. So that it would have the agreement between employee and employer. When employee can not come back in the certain time employer can hire another employee to filled her position. In this way people would have no confusion and complain. Also it would have the accurate time for employer to decided that when they can hire another employee so that it could also reduced their
We can see that piecework is a direct indicator of the employees output. In addition, the year end bonus is linked with the profit the company earns. The guaranteed employment provides employees the base line for their life, so they don’t have to be worried about getting fired or searching for other jobs, which makes them more concentrated on their jobs. From the combination of these three components, employees can have confidence to work and to understand that their performance will be measured properly.
The result of treating employees better and giving them better hours is that then to keep production at the same level the factory owners would have to hire more employees. Hiring these extra employees would cost them money and would be counter-productive when they could produce the same amount while paying your employees less and having them work longer hours. It is illogical to treat your employees better than your competitor if it will decrease your production. Another argument against these reforms was that to comply the companies would have to purchase door that swing outward, sprinkler systems, better fire escapes, etc. [Insert information about if it’s the responsibility of the government to protect the employees or the rights of the companies to compete in the
We are asking all the employees their opinion in the idea of 4-day work week (10 hours day shift). If you are interested in participating in this proposal, this coming Friday, November 3 at 2:30 p.m., we will have the first-round table to discuss, answering questions, and explaining more deeply the benefits and challenging of this proposal.
The employment agency even has offices in the Shirebrook Headquarters; they manage the workers from day to day, including hiring and firing. As workers are employed under zero hour contracts, they are seen under law as a worker, not a temporary employee and so is assumed that the worker receives regular work and income. This means that they do not receive the same privileges, most importantly, they are not protected from unfair dismissal and don’t have to be given any notice. In the case of Sports Direct, more than 14,500 of their workers (over three quarters of their workforce) have no option but to live on zero hour contracts. One of these workers said “You work under the impression that you could lose your job from day to day” (Dispatches, 2015: 49:24mins). This is a problem because it leaves many employees working under a constant lack of job security and can be highly demotivating; why put maximum effort into working for a firm that could fire you
In line with the continuous improvement initiative to uplift the service delivery system to the public, flexible working hour’s schedule which is also known as Staggered Working Hours (SWH) has been implemented in the Federal Territory of...
Have you ever heard of the 10,000 hour rule? It states that if you spend 10,000 hours on something you will automatically become good at it, regardless of talent or gifted traits. currently there is an argument around the 10,000 hour rule and if 10,000 hours are
The benefits to gig workers are rather evident in the reasoning behind Millennials preferring these roles. First, gig work can provide the worker more flexibility and therefore, create a better work-life balance. As the worker is in control of accepting or rejecting the work, it’s possible to plan the schedule according to one’s personal preferences or needs.
I firmly believe that with the addition of more labor hours could make the partners’ day to day tasks less stressful and increase their efficiency which will help them to focus on the speed of their service, level of friendliness and also on cleanliness of the
Zero hour contracts also know as causal contracts, allow employers to hire staff with no guarantee of work. This means that the employees are paid according to the hours that they have worked, and when needed by the employers, usually on a short notice. (www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-23573442).
Apply shift time working schedule can avoid unfriendly treating customer, because our operators will not be too tire.
In Sunshine Mining Co. v. Carver (1941), the court affirms that during this time the employee is under the control, direction and supervision of the employer, so they should be getting paid for it. The employee voluntarily offers themselves to the employer at a specific time. The employer decides the place of work and the distance to get to this destination may be short or long. Therefore, such travel time between the portal and the place of work should be considered worktime.