Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of literature on society
Impact of literature on society
Relationship between literature and the Society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of literature on society
How is this global issue depicted in one literary work? No matter the book, authors always include underlying, worldwide problems beneath the surface of the ink on the page. For example, Goal 16, Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions, is portrayed in the conflict of the story "The 500 Hats of Bartholemew Cubbins" by Dr. Suess. In this story, the rules of the medieval kingdom of Didd require that everyone removes their hat when in the presence of the king. As the king's carriage rumbles down the street one day, a young man named Bartholemew seems to be unable to take his hat off. Every time he removes it, a new one takes its place. The king is infuriated by the boy's apparent disrespect, and eventually orders for him to be executed. This is where justice comes into play. Rather than just blindly obeying the king and …show more content…
killing the innocent Bartholemew, the executioner takes a second look at the situation. He realizes that it would be grossly unfair to kill the boy over a problem as ridiculous as the inability to remove one's hat, so he declares "fiddlesticks .
. . I can't execute [him] at all" (Suess 36). This simple statement reveals how a man in an important position of power, the executioner, has ideals that include human rights and justice at the heart of his profession. Although it seems ridiculous for someone with such a grisly job to be so pure of heart, this is actually how it should be. In a strong government, if a job with the purpose of killing wrongdoers must exist, it should not be given to biased people with a nasty streak, instead it should be given to people who understand the clear line between right and wrong, and are not afraid to advocate for it. Furthermore, Suess describes the executioner in a warm light when he says "in spite of his business, he really seemed to be a very pleasant man" (Suess 34). Not only does the executioner have good intentions at heart, but he is someone who the people can look up to in hard times. If he can remain lighthearted with such a dark profession, then what are they to worry about with their simple, everyday problems. Besides running the kingdom, that is the job of the government: keep the people
calm and happy by preserving a strong outward appearance. In conclusion, Suess does an excellent job of describing an issue so relevant as injustice and weak government in a childlike way so that when a young kid reads it, they have no choice but to understand at least the bare bones of the issues involved with Goal 16. Why do you think authors continue to address global issues in their literary works? Authors consistently address global issues through their literary works because their books are the loudest voice that allow them to spread their opinion on important issues whilst also teaching the readers about the issues. Remember, authors are people too, and everyone wants their voice to be heard and their opinion to be agreed with. Books are arguably the easiest way to spread opinions without dissent because once it is on the page, nothing and no one can change it. In addition, the global issues affect everyone, so authors are simply trying to raise awareness on problems that could affect them, their children, or their grandchildren. For many, it is almost impossible to convince people to get up and do something to change the world, but the title of "author" gives an automatic initial credibility to almost anything said. The gift of writing skills is also the gift of the ability to eloquently advocate for a cause to a wide variety of people.
Throughout the ages, death penalty has always been a controversial topic and triggered numerous insightful discussion. In Kroll’s Unquiet Death of Robert Harris, the writer employs pathos as an appeal throughout the whole article in order to convince the audiences that death penalty is “something indescribably ugly” and “nakedly barbaric”. While Mencken makes use of ethos and logos and builds his arguments in a more constructive and effective way to prove that death penalty is necessary and should exist in the social system.
Few books exemplify the consequences of misconceptions more than Farenheit 451. The book speaks of a world in which in citizens think they are living in a utopia, when in fact their world is constantly devoloving into a place where no human could ever flourish. This delusion along with the misconception that books are thing to be feared is the precise reason that the general populace is so easily controlled. The reason behind the propaganda campaign against books is so the people do not realize that their lives are unsatisfying and dull. In other words, this, misconception propagated by the governing force, fuels the illusion of a perfect world. The myth that the world...
In George Orwell’s essay, “A Hanging,” and Michael Lake’s article, “Michael Lake Describes What The Executioner Actually Faces,” a hardened truth about capital punishment is exposed through influence drawn from both authors’ firsthand encounters with government- supported execution. After witnessing the execution of Walter James Bolton, Lake describes leaving with a lingering, “sense of loss and corruption that [he has] never quite shed” (Lake. Paragraph 16). Lake’s use of this line as a conclusion to his article solidifies the article’s tone regarding the mental turmoil that capital execution can have on those involved. Likewise, Orwell describes a disturbed state of mind present even in the moments leading up to the execution, where the thought, “oh, kill him quickly, get it over, stop that abominable noise!” crossed his mind (Orwell.
Madame Defarge tries to kill and hurt everyone who opposes her in Tale of Two Cities. Her only hobby is knitting, and she knits as a way to show anger and bring fear to her enemies. She knits a list of people who die in the revolution. The essay shows how Madame Defarge has motives for her killings, her allies, and if the behavior is justified.
Imagine a world of uniformity. All people look the same, act the same, and love the same things. There are no original thoughts and no opposing viewpoints. This sort of world is not far from reality. Uniformity in modern day society is caused by the banning of books. The novel "Fahrenheit 451" illustrates a future in which the banning of books has risen to the extent that no books are allowed. The novel follows the social and moral implications of an over censored society. Even though the plot may seem far-fetched, themes from this book are still relevant today. Although some people believe that banning a book is necessary to defend their religion, the negative effects caused by censorship and the redaction of individual thought are reasons why books such as "Fahrenheit 451" should not be banned.
As the sweltering, hot sun signified the start of a scorching afternoon, a young boy lay in the fields harvesting vegetables for another family. He had been enslaved to perform chores around the house for the family, and was only given very few privileges. While his stomach throbbed with pangs of hunger, he continued cooking meals for them. After the family indulged in the cozy heat from the fireplace, he was the one to clean the ashes. Despite his whole body feeling sore from all the rigorous work he completed, the young boy had been left alone to suffer. As months passed by, he desired independence. He wanted to cook his own food, make his own fire, harvest his own plants and earn money. The lad soon discovered that he needed faith and courage to break away from his restricted environment. When put in a suppressive situation, every person has the aspiration to escape the injustice. This is what Harrison Bergeron and Sanger Rainsford do to liberate themselves from the external forces that govern their lives. Harrison, the main character of “Harrison Bergeron” written by Kurt Vonnegut, is a strong, fourteen year old boy whose talents have been concealed by the government. Growing up in an environment where equality has restricted people’s thinking, Harrison endeavors to change society’s views. Rainsford, the main character of “The Most Dangerous Game” written by Richard Connell, is a skilled hunter who believes that animals were made to be hunted; he has no sympathy for them. Stranded on island with a killer chasing him, he learns to make rational choices. While both Harrison and Ranisford are courageous characters, Rainsford’s prudence enables him to overpower his enemy, whereas Harrison’s impulsive nature results in him being ...
J.D. Salinger’s Catcher in the Rye tells an unforgettable story of teenage angst by highlighting the life of Holden Caulfield, a young boy who commences a journey of self-discovery after being expelled from his private boarding school. Throughout the novel, Holden struggles with issues such as self-identity, loss, and a wavering sense of belonging. Holden’s red hunting hat is consistently used throughout the story as a symbol of his independence and his attachment to his childhood.
But let us say he was not. Let us for a moment say he was not. What justice would there be to take this life? Justice, gentlemen? Why, I would just as soon put a hog in the electric chair as this."
Edward Koch, who was former mayor of New York, wrote an article about one of the most controversial talks called the death penalty. This controversial topic questions if it is right to execute a person for a crime committed or if it is wrong. He made the point that the death penalty is good, in order to conclude that murderers should be punish with this penalty. He was bias in most of the passage, yet he tried to acknowledge other people’s opinion. In this article, Koch gives his supports to the idea to convict a murderer with death penalty by using a tone of objectiveness, shooting for the individuals who opposes his position to be the audience, and have a written form of conviction for the audience.
...nations of his thought processes, it is clear that the Pardoner does not practice what he preaches. It is ambiguous, however, as to whether the Pardoner believes what he preaches, but just doesn’t follow his preaches or whether he doesn’t believe what he preaches at all. It is evident, though, that the Pardoner has an astute mind. He is highly effective in what he does. Although he exploits the church for his own personal designs, he succeeds at obtaining that which he pursues. The efficacy of his strategy is confirmed by Chaucer’s description of the Pardoner as being a “noble ecclesiastic” and as being unmatched in his trade . Thus amidst all of his flatteries, there exists a spark of genius that complements his minimal level of ethics. This intellectual finesse is the riverbed from which all of the products of his mind flow.
Savannah Lamb in her term paper, “An Eye for an Eye” explains that death is a godly thing, not something to be done by human hands. Lamb supports her claims by explaining the Death Penalty is an act of barbaric murder, and we teach our children that two wrongs do not make a right. So why do we contradict ourselves by sentencing people to the death penalty? The authors purpose is to suggest a better way to punish the criminal without sentencing the accused to death. The Author writes in a formal tone to the reader.
He compares the job of the executioner to “that of the plumber, that of the soldier, that of the garbage man, that of the priest hearing confessions, that of the sandhog, and so on.” He goes on to explain how many other jobs are essentually just as “unpleasant” as the job of an executioner but those jobs do not face the possibility of being abolished. Though it is true, some of the jobs mentioned by Mencken do require individuals to take lives, it is not their sole purpose. The job of the soldier, for example, is to complete a task that is given by a higher authority, which occasionally is required to use force when absolutely necessary. The job of the hangman can not be so simply justified. In an article written by Semon Frank Thompson, a former superintendent and executioner, he states “...my mission has been to persuade people that capital punishment is a failed policy.” A man who executed two men
In the story “Recitatif” author Toni Morrison, published in 1983, tells a story of two young girls, Twyla and Roberta, with two different ethnicities, who grow up in an orphanage together. Due to the fact that the story is narrated by Twyla, it seems natural for us the readers to associate with this touching story, as many of us have encounter racial discrimination back in the 1980s, making it clear that Morrison states the two girls grow up to always remember each based on the similarities and the childhood they both encounter together, come from different ethnic backgrounds, and as the story reveals, destiny is determined to bring the girls’ path together.
While the debate rages on about the appropriateness of capital punishment, since 1982, hundreds of Texas inmates have been executed using various methods such as hanging, lethal injections, and the electric chair. Factors such as racial and sexual profiling, increased public opinion and pressure, reliance on public polls (Ellsworth and Vidmar 1269) have seemingly affected the decision making process, which in turn has raised ethical and social concerns about the genuineness, and an unbiased implementation of the irreversible capital punishment. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, Texas and Virginia alone account for 586 of 1277 executions since 1976, with Texas accounting for over 37% of the total executions in the United States of America. The high execution rate in Texas provides an opportunity to perform a case study on the death row inmates in Texas. Irrespective of the execution method and the state in which it is performed, just before their executions, the inmates are given the chance to make their final statements. It would be intriguing to understand what goes through the mind of an individual facing death, and what they consider as the most important thought to share in their dying moments. Some may express love and gratitude toward their friends and families or remorse about their crimes. Others may be incensed with a feeling of injustice and plead innocence in an angry yet helpless manner. Some may turn pious, claiming to be at peace and going to a better place, while some exhibit apathy or shades of humor. All these notions converge toward analyzing the emotions emanating from the inmates’ statements. A research study to evaluate the theme of emotions that they exhibit would lead to empirical answers. ...
Élie, who is one out the nine killers reflect on his experience about victims suffering during that time period. He states, "Making someone suffer was up to each person, as long as he did his job. The Intimidators gave no particular order to encourage or discourage it. They repeated, ‘Just kill, that is the main thing. ' We didn 't care" (131). This statement demonstrates how the importance of carrying out orders being valued over moral values dictates the judgment for wrongdoings. Élie addressing how making someone suffer did not matter much as long as "he did his job" highlights those in power reconstructing moral values. Moral values represent an individual 's standard that contributes to that person 's behavior and choices. Taking that definition into consideration, allowing perpetrators to think it is acceptable to harm someone as long as directions are followed could possibly reshape that person 's moral values. Before, physically harming someone may have been understood as morally wrong. However, observing that nobody "encourage[s] or discourage[s] it" and the assigned job is complete may shift that actions like this can be considered moral. Overall, a person witnessing actions not being held accountable and physical harm being deems as acceptable can have an effect on someone feeling encouraged/motivated to engage in mass murder when the opportunity is