Edward Koch Death Penalty Analysis

1581 Words4 Pages

Edward Koch, who was former mayor of New York, wrote an article about one of the most controversial talks called the death penalty. This controversial topic questions if it is right to execute a person for a crime committed or if it is wrong. He made the point that the death penalty is good, in order to conclude that murderers should be punish with this penalty. He was bias in most of the passage, yet he tried to acknowledge other people’s opinion. In this article, Koch gives his supports to the idea to convict a murderer with death penalty by using a tone of objectiveness, shooting for the individuals who opposes his position to be the audience, and have a written form of conviction for the audience. The purpose of this argument is to support …show more content…

In the two cases, the murderers were convict with death penalty, which they did not like. Those individuals, tried to safe their life by stating that the law should not do what they did, talking about murdering. Edward Koch clearly did not accept the statement of the convicted. As he concluded the back-story of these two murderers, he said that the law should not take the word of a criminal. In other words, he meant that what the criminals said it was a door for them to try to escape their punishment and safe themselves from being …show more content…

Pathos was use often in this story to show his compassion to those affected victims, and his disagreement toward the opposing individuals of the death penalty. In the article, the writer put sentences that had emotion that the writer convoke to the audience. For example, in the last two paragraphs he mentions the case of a murder victim that is not help. At the beginning, Koch showed sadness, then toward the end, he displayed the madness he felt toward those who did not do something to help. He believes that the opposing group toward death penalty are the same as the people that did not do anything to help. With this emotion, the author was able to make the reader thoughtful whether not supporting death penalty makes justice of the inoffensive victim. Although the writer uses a considerable amount of emotion, he does not go to an extreme, which would made his argument emotional for the reader to lost interest of

Show More
Related

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Kroll's Unquiet Death Of Robert Harris

    449 Words  | 1 Pages

    Throughout the ages, death penalty has always been a controversial topic and triggered numerous insightful discussion. In Kroll’s Unquiet Death of Robert Harris, the writer employs pathos as an appeal throughout the whole article in order to convince the audiences that death penalty is “something indescribably ugly” and “nakedly barbaric”. While Mencken makes use of ethos and logos and builds his arguments in a more constructive and effective way to prove that death penalty is necessary and should exist in the social system.

    Read More

  • David B. Muhlhausen's Article: How The Death Penalty Saves Lives

    869 Words  | 2 Pages

    “How the Death Penalty Saves Lives” According to DPIC (Death penalty information center), there are one thousand –four hundred thirty- eight executions in the United States since 1976. Currently, there are Two thousand –nine hundred –five inmates on death row, and the average length of time on death row is about fifteen years in the United States. The Capital punishment, which appears on the surface to the fitting conclusion to the life of a murder, in fact, a complicated issue that produces no clear resolution.; However, the article states it’s justice. In the article “How the Death Penalty Saves Lives” an author David B. Muhlhausen illustrates a story of Earl Ringo , Jr, brutal murder’s execution on September ,10,

    Read More

  • Death Penalty: Edward Koch Vs David Bruck

    1205 Words  | 3 Pages

    Suppose you live under someone else's command: Night and day, they are the one who have the privilege of deciding when or what you eat, sleep, wake up, what to wear, and where to go. Suppose this other person even gets to decide when and how you die. Who gives them this right? Who instilled in them this power? The death penalty – an extremely controversial issue – seems to be a topic great debate in the 1980's.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Death And Justice By Ed Koch

    987 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the essay “Death and Justice”, Ed Koch, the former mayor of New York City, presents an argument defending the use of capital punishment in heinous murder cases. In advancing his viewpoint on the subject matter, Koch addresses the arguments made by those who oppose the death penalty. This novel approach to making an argument not only engages the reader more in the piece, but also immediately illustrates his balanced understanding of both sides of the argument. Rather than simply presenting a biased or one-sided argument regarding his opinion, Koch explores a full range of issues surrounding the incendiary issue and displays both balance and erudition in expression his opinion on the issue of capital punishment.

    Read More

  • Persuasion Of The Death Penalty By Ed Koch And David Bruck

    1021 Words  | 3 Pages

    The death penalty, a subject that is often the cause of major controversy, has become an integral part of the southern justice system in recent years. The supporters and opponents of this issue have heatedly debated each other about whether or not the death penalty should be allowed. They back their arguments with moral, logical, and ethical appeals, as seen in the essays by Ed Koch and David Bruck. Although both authors are on opposite sides of the issue, they use the same ideas to back up their argument, while ignoring others that they don’t have evidence for. Koch and Bruck’s use of moral, logical, and ethical persuasion enhance both of their arguments and place a certain importance on the issue of the death penalty, making the readers come to the realization that it is more than just life and death, or right and wrong; there are so many implications that make the issue much more 3-dimensional. In dealing with politics and controversial issues such as capital punishment.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Death And Justice How Capital Punishment Affirms Life By Edward Koch

    144 Words  | 1 Pages

    Since this essay was found in The New Republic, Koch most likely wrote this essay to high society, politically minded people that were deciding if they should support the death penalty or not. Koch also wrote this to people that supported the death penalty but weren’t exactly sure how to convince others of it. That’s why Koch

    Read More

  • The Death Penalty by David Bruck

    1121 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...uasion by the use of varies cases to support his argument. He mostly employs techniques such as juxtaposition, rhetorical question, and pathos and logos to strengthen his argument. However, his lack of use of an array of techniques makes his essay come short. In addition, when he states that “these are just the tiresome facts” he disregards his whole argument before that sentence by making it seem like his argument is irrelevant. Moreover, he fails to mention to his readers that he is a lawyer and also does not mention his cases which would have given him an authoritative position far better than Mayor Koch to state his view on the subject of death penalty. However I do agree with in saying that justice does demand that we punish murderers but not by execution but rather by imprisonment in which their bad conscience would become their enemy and tormentor for life.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Death Penalty

    1653 Words  | 4 Pages

    Employing pathos and logos, Baude gives an explanation for why the death penalty is flawed as he tells the tale of a man on death row. Baude claims “.Judgments, right or wrong. This concern with concepts such as finality, jurisdiction, and the balance of powers may sound technical, lawyerly, and highly abstract. But so is the criminal justice system. Law must provide simple answers: innocence or guilt, freedom or imprisonment, life or death.”

    Read More

  • Anna Quindlen Death Penalty Rhetorical Analysis

    1194 Words  | 3 Pages

    On the topic of the death penalty, she says, “The only reason for a death penalty is to exact retribution. Is there anyone who really thinks that it is a deterrent, that there are considerable numbers of criminals out there who think twice about committing crimes because of the sentence involved?” (p. 553). Here, she brings up a good question: do criminals care about the sentence? Is the death penalty only for the gratification of those who the criminal wronged? Quindlen seems to think so, with her reason being that “the ones [she has] met in [her] professional duties have either sneered at the justice system, where they can exchange one charge for another with more ease than they could return a shirt to a clothing store, or they have simply believed that it is the other guy who will get caught, get convicted, get the stiffest sentence” (p. 553). This makes her claims make more sense: she compares criminals exchanging charges for lesser ones with shirts being exchanged for different ones. It is a form of personal experience: criminals do not fear the justice system in the way we want to believe they do. By using her own experience for this, Quindlen not only furthers her beliefs that the death penalty is useless, but shows her readers why she thinks it is useless. Criminals are not afraid of any form of punishment as is, thus there is no reason to believe they are afraid of the death penalty as

    Read More

  • Summary Of Death And Justice By Edward Koch

    525 Words  | 2 Pages

    One argument that Edward Koch examines is that the death penalty is inhumane. He mentions the “tales of lingering death on the gallows, of faulty electric chairs, or of agony in the gas chamber” (97) that his opposition uses to justify their stance against capital punishment. Koch concludes that these people are not upset with the method to carry out the punishment, but the punishment itself. He states that although some may not like the death penalty as a form of justice, that any other punishment would be an injustice. In Scripture, it reads that he who strikes a man, so that he dies, shall be put to death (Ex. 21:12). Koch’s position, that capital punishment is the only way to deal with murder, is shown in Scripture.

    Read More

  • The Death Denalty, An Annotated Bibliography To The Death Penalty

    1346 Words  | 3 Pages

    When someone is legally convicted of a capital crime, it is possible for their punishment to be execution. The Death Penalty has been a controversial topic for many years. Some believe the act of punishing a criminal by execution is completely inhumane, while others believe it is a necessary practice needed to keep our society safe. In this annotated bibliography, there are six articles that each argue on whether or not the death penalty should be illegalized. Some authors argue that the death penalty should be illegal because it does not act as a deterrent, and it negatively effects the victim’s families. Other scholar’s state that the death penalty should stay legalized because there is an overcrowding in prisons and it saves innocent’s lives. Whether or not the death penalty should be

    Read More

  • Bruck Death Penalty

    526 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the feature essay “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life,” the author, Edward I Koch illustrates his opinion about why he supports the death penalty and believes all life is precious. In the essay he provides seven arguments that people have when they are against capital punishment and those seven arguments are; the death penalty is “barbaric,” No other mayor democracy uses the death penalty, an innocent person might be executed by mistake, capital punishment cheapens the value of human life, the death penalty is applied in a discriminatory, Thou shalt not kill, the death penalty I state-sanctioned murder.

    Read More

  • The Death Penalty Robert Blecker Summary

    1439 Words  | 3 Pages

    Robert Blecker the author of the article “With death penalty, let punishment truly fit the crime” believes the death penalty should be abolished. He thinks sentencing offenders to death is just giving them a taste of death and “satisfies our deepest instincts of justice” (Blecker), but they do not really realize the mistakes they made. In addition, Blecker describes his personal experience as a witness to an execution which made him “shuddered” (Blecker) and he notes the “lethal injection appears, feels and seems medical, although it sole purpose is to kill” (Blecker). The medicine is usually used as a treatment but for the defendant it is the poison brings them to hell. According to Blecker’s observation, he finds out instead of those misdemeanor inmates, who commit serious crimes lived a more comfortable prison cell. Moreover, Blecker also satirized the justice system: “we recoil from punishing those who most deserve it, we readily over punish those who don’t” (Blecker) by saying that is to ironically the American prison give the felony a better living condition as a “punishment” for what they did, the justice system need to be fixed. In the end of the article, he suggests the rest of us to stand up to protect the right of prisoners and hopes to change to way of punishment give every prisoner an equitableness

    Read More

  • Death Penalty Position Paper

    924 Words  | 2 Pages

    “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” is how the saying goes. Coined by the infamous Hammurabi’s Code around 1700 BC, this ancient expression has become the basis of a great political debate over the past several decades – the death penalty. While the conflict can be whittled down to a matter of morals, a more pragmatic approach shows defendable points that are far more evidence backed. Supporters of the death penalty advocate that it deters crime, provides closure, and is a just punishment for those who choose to take a human life. Those against the death penalty argue that execution is a betrayal of basic human rights, an ineffective crime deterrent, an economically wasteful option, and an outdated method. The debate has experienced varying levels of attention over the years, but has always kept in the eye of the public. While many still advocate for the continued use of capital punishment, the process is not the most cost effective, efficient, consistent, or up-to-date means of punishment that America could be using today.

    Read More

  • What Is The Death Penalty Ethical?

    265 Words  | 1 Pages

    One of the most highly controversial topic in regards to ethics, is the application of the death penalty. Numerous groups have protested against it, as they claim it falls under “cruel and unusual punishment”, which citizens are protected against. However, other groups declare just the opposite, stating that unspeakable crimes need to be paid with retribution. Many of these groups consist of general public members, simply everyday people who strive to have a large impact on this topic. With regards to politics in America and an array of other countries, the public plays a large role in shaping political and criminal laws. For that reason, any policymaking needs to take in the public’s view and analyzation of public view is essential.

    Read More

More about Edward Koch Death Penalty Analysis

Open Document