Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Corruption and bribery scandal
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Corruption and bribery scandal
Quiz shows are a TV staple that have kept viewers watching for decades through many different methods, both ethical and unethical. In the 1950s, these methods of manipulating contestants and rigging shows were exposed in what came to be known as the 1950s Quiz Show scandals. These scandals mostly center around one event, the scandal of the show The $64,000 Question and contestant Charles Van Doren. The producers of the show rigged it so fan-favorite Doren would beat the less-liked Stempel. The scandals were felt throughout throughout the nation, and not only changed the quiz show game forever, but also America's perception of the media. The 1950s Quiz Show Scandals opened America’s eyes to the corruption present in the media, but the wrongdoings …show more content…
were generally accepted. The 1950s Quiz Show scandals exposed viewers to the corruption present in the American media.
When the scandals were exposed in the media, it was America’s first glimpse into the things that producers would do to keep ratings high. The edition of TIME magazine that “asked 'Are TV quizzes fixed?'” was the first instance of these scandals being revealed, as Stempel and other contestants wanted to get their stories heard (Holmes 48). Even “President Eisenhower voiced his dismay over the spreading scandal, comparing it to the 1919 Black Sox World Series baseball fix” (DeLong 223). The president acknowledging the scandal proved its severity and paved the way for federal action, such as the Communications Act of 1934. As Thomas DeLong states in Quiz Craze: America's Infatuation with Game Shows, regarding the court trial following the scandal, “Its findings did not constitute an indictment but rather a presentment, calling attention to corrupt practices within the television industry without holding specific people responsible” (DeLong 222). While what the television producers were doing was not illegal, it was definitely wrong, which is why Congress created a bill to stop these practices. Overall, the scandal exposed American media’s corrupt nature, while it was not actually …show more content…
illegal. Even though the Quiz Show Scandals did expose corruption in the American Media, people generally accepted the misconducts.
Although Americans saw the corruption present in the scandals, they were oddly accepting of them. This is most likely due to likable contestants and the viewer’s willingness to be entertained. As expressed in Charles Van Doren and the Quiz Show Scandal, “While people were shocked by the deception, some were sympathetic to Van Doren, who had become a familiar and well-liked public figure.” ("Charles Van Doren”) While some people were appalled by the scandals, others sympathized with the contestants such as the popular Van Doren. Some, such as writer Gordon Cotler, thought that the deception was necessary for people to be entertained, asking “"A television play always ends the way it ought to end. Why not a quiz show?" (DeLong 219). While the manipulation may have kept viewers watching, it uncovers a flaw in American society, a lack of ethicality. The widespread acceptance of the scandals was a phenomenon that Morgenthau went so far as to say “reflected an overall lack of morality in American society.” ("Charles Van Doren”). More realistically, the acceptance of the scandals reflected America’s willingness to root for a contestant and their desire for entertainment. While Americans recognized the media’s corrupt ways, they still accepted the wrongdoings of the Quiz Show Scandals due to likable contestants and the sake of
entertainment. While at the time the corruptness of the 1950s Quiz Show Scandals was not widely acknowledged, it paved the way for many changes. In the court trial regarding the scandals, producers were not found to have committed any crimes, other than the perjury that many, such as Van Doren, committed during the trial. However, the court realized the corruption and the need for a bill to ensure that it wouldn’t happen again. This led to a 1960 bill “which declared it illegal to run a game or contest on television with intent to deceive” (Holmes 49). The fact that many Americans were not bothered by the scandals, even though they knew they were wrong exemplifies how the media was rampantly affecting people with the rise of television. The 1950s Quiz Show scandals exposed America to the corruption present in the media, but the malpractice was generally accepted.
If T.V. news or radio have morphed into reality shows, then it is only a reflection of the viewers. As a former news reporter, the author should understand that the success
The shows portrays a melting pot of each character lives with money, sex, social media, and relationships unfiltered and toxic, yet irrelevant to the real –world. Another key point is the exploitation of the television world and the millions of viewers, that it’s okay sociably to exemplify deviant behaviors in real –life. Also, culturally and sociably, the reality show creates a bigger problem as the platform provided for the cast is characterized in a negative state. On the negative side, this creates the illusion to act in like manner, from the deviant behavior portrayed on
With producing reality shows comes producing inaccuracies in portrayals in order to reach as many viewers and gain as high ratings as possible every week with each new episode. Every day life is boring, yet people tend to be attracted to the relatable shows that portray real life in eccentric ways – ways that they believe could be imitated by the average person. In many cases, these shows could remain harmless, as it is entertainment. No matter how crude or erroneous, it is just television. However, what happens when these sources of amusement actually start being damaging? Research has shown that crime shows like the ever popular CSI: Crime Scene Investigation have started becoming significantly detrimental to criminal cases, influencing a juror's perception of what should realistically be going on with acquittal rates and wrongful convictions, but researchers have also started to find a rising fault in the prosecution, using this false perception to their advantage.
The author Richard S. Tedlow in his article, “Intellect on Television: The Quiz Show Scandals of the 1950s”, sheds light on his examination of the problems inherent in commercial broadcasting, especially as they relate to the television quiz scandals of the late 1950s. The author begins his article with the events of June 1955 when $64,000 Question made its debut on the CBS television network. According to the author, the radio had been exploiting the American’s interest for facts with contests and games since the mid-1930s. Moreover, small amounts of cash or donation were given away in different formats. The specialty about Question was that even the loser got a Cadillac as a consolation prize. The format of the show was very simple, contestant
“Fake” news programs, such as The Daily Show, Zinser reasonably argues, have the potential to dilute mass media and deceive viewers. The Daily Show has been straightforward about its lack of legitimacy as a hard hitting news program, but “the show’s content and guest list suggest otherwise” (Zinser 367). Zinser indicates that The Daily Show should hold itself to higher standards because “people might well think they’re being fully or sufficiently informed while watching” (367). In other words, Zinser believes that if viewers tune in with the expectation of becoming informed and The Daily Show’s content consists of significant topics, the creators ...
President Richard M. Nixon and his involvement in the Watergate scandal were broadcast nightly on the 6 o’clock news in the early 1970’s. Americans were engrossed with the scandal and each person held his or her own view of situation. Each broadcast or newspaper article created a mistrust of political and governmental leaders. In response to this mistrust, the Freedom to Information Act was strengthened by the United States Congress in 1973 (Chamberlain). Although this act was first placed into law in the late 1960’s, the Watergate scandal provided the incentive make this law stronger.
Stone, J. and T. Yohn. Prime Time and Misdemeanors: Investigating the 1950s TV Quiz Scandal -- A D.A.'s Account. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1992.
Popular culture also plays a role in why Americans do not trust politicians. Late-night television shows use politicians in their comedy skits, where their mistakes are punch lines for comedians. A study produced by Jody Baumgartner and Jonathan Morris found that people who view late-night television shows have a more negative view of candidates, (Medvic p. 5). In particular, people who view The Daily Show have drastically less faith in the electoral process, (Medvic p. 5). Russell Peterson argues that these jokes as “implicitly anti-democratic” because they declare the entire system as fraudulent, (Medvic p. 5).
Schudson, Michael. "Notes on Scandal and the Watergate Legacy." The American Behavioral Scientist 47.9 (2004): n. pag. Galileo. Web. 30 Oct. 2013.
Following his tenure in Europe covering WWII, Murrow held a high level of credibility and trust among the American public. Divulging from the ethical standards set by CBS and operated upon by Murrow himself the stars would align during the Cold War period for a battle between truth and fear on the battlefield of broadcast television. The Red Scare period in A...
Would you lose your journalistic integrity over one million dollars just to increase your audience base? For me personally I would decline the money and not subject my audience to an unwanted change for personal gain. Neil Postman’s book, “Amusing Ourselves to Death”, argues that television is all about entertainment and nothing else. Postman makes several points in his book pertaining to televised news as examples. On the evening of January 31 2018, I decided to test Postman’s arguments by tuning into the PBS NewsHour. After putting Postman’s arguments to the test I soon found that they were correct; “if it bleeds it leads”, news anchors are just actors, stories of little value get little air time, and there is an overwhelming disconnect between stories.
A. “Reality TV Offers an Amoral Message.” Reality TV. Ed. Ronnie D. Lankford, Ph.D. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press, 2008, 32-37. Print.
During these difficult economic times sensationalism has become more prevalent in the media. Stories involving sex scandals and child murders have taken over our T.V and internet screens as well as the front pages of our newspapers. The media bias of sensationalism has been used as a sort of escapism for readers. Although it may seem that sensationalism has just started making waves, it has been around for decades. Sensationalism has been influencing viewers and contributing to media bias since the days of the penny press. Sensationalisms long history has been turbulent, self-serving, and influential to today’s reporting practices. With the influence over readers’ sensationalism’s media bias have and will continue to affect media reporting for years to come.
From the beginning days of the printing press to the always evolving internet of present day, the media has greatly evolved and changed over the years. No one can possibly overstate the influential power of the new media of television on the rest of the industry. Television continues to influence the media, which recently an era of comedic television shows that specialize in providing “fake news” has captivated. The groundbreaking The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and its spin-off The Colbert Report have successfully attracted the youth demographic and have become the new era’s leading political news source. By parodying news companies and satirizing the government, “fake news” has affected the media, the government, and its audience in such a way that Bill Moyers has claimed “you simply can’t understand American politics in the new millennium without The Daily Show,” that started it all (PBS).
Lehmann, Carolin. “Reality TV: A Blessing or a Curse? An Analysis of the Influence of Reality TV on U.S. Society.” Academia. Edu 5 Nov. 2012. 29 Nov. 2013.