Texting: The Destroyer of English Grammar

637 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Effect of texting on student language skills

A topic that has been raved about in recent years is how texting is affecting the English language, or particularly how texting is killing the English language. Just like any other argument, there are two perspectives to this story, we’ll divide these perspectives into two different categories: linguistic and non-linguistic. The non-linguistic view of the effects of texting is relatively negative. Some say that texting is creating a very lazy generation, others say that it will eventually take over what we now know as grammatically correct, even infamous broadcaster John Humphrys believes that texting is “pillaging our punctuation, savaging our sentences; raping our vocabulary. And they must be stopped.” Still others, in the more linguistic point-of-view, say that texting is not apt for language decline at all, but rather the start of a very small language evolution – an evolution that is actually having a good effect on the language and the texters themselves.
I understand where these negative comments and attitudes are coming from because of the neglect of grammar in schools, and the constant interference of the media with its increase of obscene music, celebrity fashion and acceptance of profane language. But just because an argument is understood, it does not mean that is it right. It is impossible for texting to replace what we know as “proper grammar”, or “good English” because there is no consistency between texters; without consistency, it cannot become a new standard. John McWhorter goes further to argue that texting isn’t a form of writing at all, but rather a reflection of our day-to-day speech. He provides evidence that this new craze of text language really isn’t new at all and has actually been used all throughout ...

... middle of paper ...

... be someone who disapproves and critiques, and the world continues on with or without them.

Works Cited

McWhorter, John. "Talking With Your Fingers." . The New York Times, 23 Apr. 2012. Web. 28 Apr. 2014. .
Crystal, David. "2b or not 2b?." The Guardian. Guardian News and Media, 5 July 2008. Web. 28 Apr. 2014. .
McWhorter, John. "John McWhorter: Txtng is killing language. JK!!!." YouTube. TED Talk, 22 Apr. 2013. Web. 28 Apr. 2014. .
Brians, Paul. "Common Errors in English Usage." Common Errors in English Usage. Washington State University, 1 Jan. 1997. Web. 28 Apr. 2014. .

Show More
Related

  • Does Texting Affect Writing? By Michaela Cullington

    957 Words  | 2 Pages

    Michaela Cullington, a student, wrote a paper “Does Texting Affect Writing?” in 2010 for an English class. The paper is an examination of texting and the belief that it negative effective student’s writing. Cullington goes into detail about textspeak- “language created by these abbreviations”- and their use in formal writings. She organizes the paper in a way that is confusing to understand at first (pg. 1). At the end of the paper, she discusses her finding in her own research which comes to show that texting does not affect writing. But this is contradicting to the information she received from the teachers. The students and the teachers were seeing differences in the use of textspeak in formal writing. Cullington has good support for her

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Is Texting Killing The English Language

    1223 Words  | 3 Pages

    Writing, according to an article in Times Magazine titled “Is Texting Killing the English Language” by John McWhorter, is an art that has been around for about 5,500 years. Since writing is deliberate and takes more time to compose, it’s usually better thought out and sounds more sophisticated. Speech, on the other hand, is more of an “unconscious” practice.

    Read More

  • John Mcwhorter: Txtng Is Killing The English Language

    526 Words  | 2 Pages

    Three years ago, linguist John McWhorter spoke at a Ted Talk conference about whether texting is killing language and went so far as to question the definition of language itself. His video, “John McWhorter: Txtng is killing language. JK!!!” distinguished to the reader the difference between writing and speaking and how texting was one in the form of another. Texting, he said, is a way of writing as one speaks, or specifically fingered speech, rather than as many believe, a mutilated version of the English language. According to McWhorter, texting is becoming a second language for many people, and those who do text are actually, in a sense, being bilingual. Texting itself is not very different from a foreign language, other than for its strong

    Read More

  • Summary Of Txtng Is Killing Language By John Mcwhorter

    554 Words  | 2 Pages

    In John McWhorter’s argumentative speech “Txtng is killing language. JK!!!!” he uses logical and emotional appeals to showcase his argument. He begins by explaining the roles of speech and writing in language, stating that there is a natural amount of bleed between the two linguistic methods. Throughout the speech he compels his audience by using primarily logical appeals, such as since it is typical to “speak like you write” then it must be possible to “write like you speak.” John McWhorter uses historical knowledge and linguistic research, building a logical claim that texting is creating a newer advanced level of digital speech.

    Read More

  • Text Messaging: 2b or not 2b? by David Crystal

    1010 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Our generation doesn't ring the doorbell. They text or call to say they're outside,” this line is from one of the well-known social networks, Tweeter, which shows how the way of communication has change in this modern life. According to 2013 statistics by Business Insider, in United States alone, smartphone owners aged 18 to 24 send 2,022 texts per month on average — 67 texts on a daily basis — and receive another 1,831 texts (Cocotas). Nowadays, technology such as text messaging has practically replaced traditional face to face communication among the society primarily in young generations because texting allows messages to be sent fast and effortless. In order to quickly type what they are trying to say in text messaging, people are frequently using textspeak; the language created by using abbreviation rather than complete words. Based on this phenomenon, David Crystal, an honorary professor of linguistics at the University of Wales has published an article entitled ‘2b or not 2b?’ in the Guardian on July 5, 2008 comes out with the research and studies that state texting can actually improve the literacy of children and create creativity of writing. However, by observing more critically, texting do decrease a person’s ability to switch between textspeak and the normal rules of grammar and adversely affect formal writing and conversational skills.

    Read More

  • How Does Texting Affect Writing By Michaela Cullington Summary

    452 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the article, “Does Texting Affect Writing?”, the author Michaela Cullington conveys her speculation that texting does not correlate to how students write formal essays. At the beginning of the article Cullington introduces the term texting and the convenience texting brings. Later expressing her concern that the texting language “Textspeak” is actually affecting students writing; then contradicts these views by using primary and secondary sources (news articles, books, her own surveys and research). In addition, she uses an anecdote to tell of her own experience with texting and writing. Together with other evidences and research put together, she uncovers the debate between textspeak and formal writing. On the basis of her research, she concludes that the state of texting does not interfere with writing or writing abilities.

    Read More

  • Errors In Spoken English Language Analysis

    699 Words  | 2 Pages

    The second half of this essay will examine common grammatical errors within the written and spoken English language. According to Jeff Anderson in Mechanically Inclined, common errors include subject-verb agreement, sentence fragments, dangling or misplaced modifiers, comma splices, tense shift, preposition misuse, and vague pronoun reference. Karen Sneddon states the simple rules of verb agreement in her article Back to Basics. “A subject must agree with its verb.

    Read More

  • We Never Talk Anymore: The Problem with Text Messaging

    1354 Words  | 3 Pages

    Text messaging has become a norm in our generation, as technology rapidly advances and gives way to more efficient forms of communication in a fast-paced world; and many are skeptical about the influence this new form of interaction is having on our society, especially with our younger generation. David Crystal, a professor at the University of Wales, writes “2b or Not 2b?” in support of text messaging. He insists, despite those who underestimate or negate the beneficial influence text messaging has on language proficiency, that “there is increasing evidence that [texting] helps rather than hinders literacy” and that the fairly recent form of communication has actually been around for a while and “is merely the latest manifestation of the human ability to be linguistically creative and to adopt language to suit the demands of diverse settings. In contrast, Jeffery Kluger argues in “We Never Talk Anymore: The Problem with Text Messaging” that text messaging is rapidly becoming a substitute for more genuine forms of communication and is resulting in difficulty among young peoples of our generation to hold a face-to-face conversation, engage in significant nonverbal expression, and ultimately build effective relationships with family, friends and co-workers. Both writers’ present valid arguments, however, my personal experience with text messaging has led me to agree more with Crystal’s view on the matter. Text messaging is indeed having a positive effect on society by making frequent texters primarily aware of the need to be understood, as well as offering betterment of spelling and writing through practice, and reinventing and expanding on a bygone dimension of our language through the use of rebuses and abbreviations.

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism In 1984

    1296 Words  | 3 Pages

    These horrific ideas are evident in modern society, particularly the next generation of humanity that has grown up entirely with technological advancements that increase efficiency like texting, as explained by an article of the Sunday Times written in January 2010 by Sian Griffiths and Chris Gourlay titled “Textspeak leaves teens facing a language barrier in jobs market” in which they write, “Teenagers are spending more time communicating through electronic media and text messaging, which is short and brief. We need to help today’s teenagers understand the difference between their textspeak and the formal language they need to succeed in life -800 words will not get you a job [800 words is in reference to their assumption that teens only use a maximum of 800 different words

    Read More

  • Effects Of Texting On Teen Literacy

    1485 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the sources that I found about text message and teen literacy, it showed and also informed me on how teens take the next talk to the classrooms in schools and how it creates bad grammar among themselves. During my research I found out that many kids and kids use shorthanded text and it affects their literacy in so many ways. We as teens don’t think that our findings will benefit anyone unless they want to have a short knowledge in grammar. As teens we don’t really see how doing something wrong can harm us. Such as texting shorthanded, and with silly faces. It affects our literacy by not knowing how to correctly punctuate their words, grammar and speaking. In the research that I looked up, that teens send about one thousand eight hundred

    Read More

  • Technology's Impact on the English Language

    1193 Words  | 3 Pages

    Since the Industrial Revolution, technology has permeated and become an integral part of our everyday lives. In fact, a life without technology seems almost impossible to imagine. Almost everyone, around the globe, has access to technology in one form or another. Consequently this type of technology has become ingrained into our culture. Its roots are so deep that it is now peculiar to see someone without a smartphone than with one. Consequently, smartphones and the Internet have radically changed the manner in which we communicate and how we communicate with one another. Our speech has metamorphosed so much from that of our grandparents that it almost seems like a foreign language due to the incorporation of slang and “text talk.” With the sudden surge of email, blogs, and instant messaging that occurred within the last couple of decades, the impact that technology has on our linguistics has become more pronounced. Technology has helped to bridge the gap between people by allowing us to communicate as easily as we breathe. On this note, one would think that the dawn of the Era of Technology would give birth to a renaissance of the English language but, instead, the converse is taking place. With such widespread prevalence of technology such as smartphones and computers, the degradation of the English language is a problem now more than ever.

    Read More

  • John Humphrys Analysis

    1079 Words  | 3 Pages

    Languages like text speak is a reflection of social differences and relations of power and domination. The fact that Mr. Humphrys claimed superiority of the formal English language, and condemned text speech as a threat and sin, is viewable by sociolinguists as a form of stratification in the making. John Humphrys is a journalist who practices the use of formal English language on a daily basis. Therefore, it is not surprising that he would rank formal English as better due to his associations. Also, Mr. Humphrys specifically targeted younger generations as threats due to the popularity of text messaging in younger generations. John Humphrys wrote in his article, “The danger – for young people especially – is that they will come to dominate.” He seems to be worried for the younger generation at first, fearing that text messaging will destroy their formal English skills. However, younger people are only a fraction of the whole that uses text speak regularly. Mr. Humphrys ' claims backfire on his “good intention”, and can be viewed by many sociolinguists as stigmatization. If the majority of text speak users were PhD graduates and professors in linguistics, would Mr. Humphrys still have written this article? I believe that Mr. Humphrys ' confidence in his belief results from the view that younger populations are of lower-status. Thus, the popular practice of text

    Read More

  • Essay On Texting Destroy The English Language

    967 Words  | 2 Pages

    As you walk around just take the second to notice that almost everyone you passed is quickly twiddling their thumbs across their phone screen. Ding. Someone’s iPhone just received a new text, two-seconds later, Swoosh. Did you figure out what the title New Age English Language is yet? Yes, you are correct, texting. Since the first text message was sent on December 3, 1992, our English language has been growing and evolving and it is not stopping yet. Critics will claim that texting is destroying our English language as a whole. These critics do not understand that texting has formed from our modern day english. When thinking of texting, many fail to see that texting has become one of the newest form of the english language. In order to have

    Read More

  • David Crystal 2B Or Not 2b Analysis

    784 Words  | 2 Pages

    John Humphrys say that he finds himself slipping into sloppy habits. He has been accidentally abandoning cappital leters and using rows and rows of dots. He writes “ I am cross…Lynne Truss”. Lynne Truss is an English writer who wrote Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Puncuation. The book discusses the importance of punctuation and why it needs to be used properly. Thus his reasoning for calling her the “guardian of our language.” He himself doesn’t enjoy falling into those sloppy habits that is written in Truss’s book.. John Humphrys also believes that the English language is disappearing to the use of textese. Our literacy decreases as our use of textese increases. This leads to our incompetence. On the other hand David Crystal has his own idea on this topic. “Children could not… of your textese” David Crystals is simply saying before you can use the textese you need basic understanding of the English language. Children understanding how to properly text is due to the fact that they understand the English language which is actually competence. He also states “the children who were better… higher their test scores”. This is a pro-text statement. Texting actually increases literacy in this statement rather than decreasing like John Humphrys stated in article. He also states “The language as a whole… in evolution”. Texting will not lead us to decline but it leads to progress. Our language shall increase and

    Read More

  • TED Talk: Texting Is Killing Language

    533 Words  | 2 Pages

    Texting is killing language,” Ted starts off the video by saying that “The idea is that texting spells the decline and fall of any kind of serious literacy, or at least writing ability, among young people in the United States and now the whole world today (Ted, 2013). Throughout the film discussion, what stuck out to me the most was how drastic language has changed via technology.

    Read More

More about Texting: The Destroyer of English Grammar

Open Document