Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Religion as cohesive in modern society
Study of religion from a sociological perspective
Study of religion from a sociological perspective
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Religion as cohesive in modern society
Text Review 2 (Religion: The Social Context ch. 5-ch. 8) Upon gaining a basic understanding of religion and the sociological perspective, it becomes possible to gain more in-depth knowledge concerning religion and its interactions with social aspects. First, surveying religious groups in relation to their social environments provides a basis from which to stem. With this root for understanding, McGuire can then begin to explore other topics, such as religion and social cohesion, religion and social conflict, religion supporting the status quo, religion promoting social change, and secularization. Chapters 5-8 of McGuire’s text, Religion: The Social Context, explores and expands upon these topics; all of which are important when attempting to gain comprehension of religion and its relation to the social environment. McGuire begins by setting up two basic classifications for religious groups and their relation to their social environment; the church and the sect. The church-group “accepts the masses,” while the sect-group “sets itself apart from the larger society,” (McGuire 2008: 150). Indeed, it can be pointed out that sect-groups often exist in tension, or even conflict, with mainstream society. Therefore, religious sects have great ability for being dynamic sources of social change (McGuire 2008: 150). Finally, a third type of religious association, “idealistic mysticism,” puts little emphasis on relationships with believers and instead resists control by authorities. In today’s modern society, it is quite difficult to apply this “church-sect dichotomy,” as modern society is much more complex. This complication led to the concept of “denomination,” which is characterized by “accommodation to society,” (McGuire 2008: 151). Tru... ... middle of paper ... ... of religion. In chapters 5-8 of the McGuire text, we really begin to see the sociological perspective of religion up close. In these last chapters, the relationship between religious groups and their social environment is emphasized and explored. Concepts such as religion and social cohesion, religion and social conflict, religion supporting the status quo, religion promoting social change, and secularization are surveyed in an in-depth manner, allowing for a much greater understanding of religion and society. In all, McGuire was able to set the basis and context for understanding, and then launch into deep sociological study and concepts in the latter half of Religion: The Social Context. The text truly surveyed the topics objectively and thoroughly, providing a great basis for religion in the social context, and allowing for further expansion into ideas as well.
Religion is considered as a pervasive force in this world. It shapes people as to how they behave and interact with almost everything present in the society. Influencing behavior, character formations, ideals, policies, standards are just among the dimensions and societal perspectives affected and impacted by religion. Because of these applications and implications in human lives and existence, religion should be understood deeply, particularly, on how it affects the world. Looking at the American perspective of the term "religion," it could be simply
The contemporary Church is so often a weak, ineffectual voice with an uncertain sound. It is so often the arch-supporter of the status quo. Far from being disturbed by the presence of the Church, the power structure of the average community is consoled by the Church's silent and often vocal sanction of things as they are.”
Molloy, Michael. Experiencing the World's Religions. 5th Edition. New York, NY: McGraw Hill, 2010. 320-322. Print.
Smart, Ninian. "Blackboard, Religion 100." 6 March 2014. Seven Dimensions of Religion. Electronic Document. 6 March 2014.
There are many knowledgeable books that introduce religions as well as specific religious traditions. However, students are naturally introduced to abstract methodological issues such as observer bias, rather than the religions themselves. If religions of the world are not approached with purpose and method, then students are likely to gain “stereotypes… of misinformation supplied by certain sectors of the media” (Chryssides & Geaves, 2014). Thus, in order to see how religion is lived in day to day life, one must “walk a mile in [the] moccasins [of religious people]” as Smart (1998) says. Therefore this essay will attempt to answer why it is important to study religion off campus and how this may challenge traditional understandings of religion.
Molloy, Michael. Experiencing the World's Religions: Tradition, Challenge, and Change. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2010. Print
Even more appealing is Fromm’s innovative understanding of religion. He calls it “any group-shared system of thought and action that offers the individual a frame of orientation and an object of devotion”(Fromm 135). In this sense, every society in the world has had a religion. He says that modern society is characterized by a new religion – the Industrial religion. It developed because of the way modern society is rooted in the having mode.
The sociology of religion is easiest to define by understanding the core of sociology. According to Ronald Johnstone in Religion and Society, the goal of sociology is to “[understand] the dynamics of group life” and “[understand] the influence of groups on individual and collective behavior” (Johnstone 2). This goal is sought under the assumption that “people become human only in groups” (Johnstone 4). Thus, the sociology of religion is the study of religion from the perspective of humans as communicative and influenceable beings, both on an individual level and more importantly, as religious groups. This means that the sociology of religion is less about specific religious belief systems and more about the implications and influence of religious
Because of the colossal impact of religion in the countries surveyed the only accurate way to peek at how these people understanding themselves and their place in the world is to first have an understanding of the major religion or religions that are at work within a given society. But that statement demands the question, how is it that through religion we define ourselves? My research relies heavily on the inte...
The new paradigm acknowledges that religion does indeed exist but is not meant as an expression for something else (sexual, political, etc.) The new paradigm found its home through theories of secularization. Many theories were Marxist while others were less extreme, such as observation of attendance rates at church combined with other data to determine if religious persuasions were inclined to believe the faith they were born with. A result of these observations and religious patterns has become the face of literature and descriptive studies. Ultimately, new movements whether new groups or expressions in traditions have reconstructed the explanatory foundation for the sociology of
Secularisation is a contentious topic in Sociology. I see that secularisation is a contentious topic as it it covers a huge range of levels of analysis such as the social side, the political side and the Economic side. I will analyse all of these three aspects through my research. Also I will give examples of secularisation in Irish Society.One example will touch on supporting secularisation and the second example will touch on where secularisation is not evident as clearly. These examples will also give insight into why the concept of Secularisation a contentious topic in sociology. Dr Gerhard Falk describes Secularisation in Sociology as
However I was quite surprised on what religion can do for our social world. According to the chapter eleven outlines it states,” Religion meets certain basic needs, It explains the meaning of life, death, suffering, and injustice”. Religion is a very important factor on how our social can run succefeul and promote different cultures around the globe. Symoblic view uses these type of religious symbolbs to connect on how a society may run. Any relgion in gernreal can provide awnsers to the big questions that groups of people may have about their social belgoning. Religion can have a huge influence towards the micro and meso levels of the social world. However if this type of power is abuse by a certain leader, there may be more harm than good when including this type of view on the world. However not all relgions are succeful due the lack of motivation and member attendences. According to chapter eleven review,” The most successful religions in the United States in recent years have been those that strengthen the sense of belonging and encourage endogamy”. Many of these successful relgions can help with issues that groups of people may face in the micro level. These types of levels can also be apllied to new generations that seek a more online appoarch of communctiaing with their peers through chatrooms. This type of enviorment is essantley a safe heaven towards different inviduals that may be
An important element of the connection of social and system integration are the institutionalized practices. These are practices that have managed to outlast in time and have a spatial ‘breadth’, meaning they are widespread across a range of interactions. The structures that organize these practices are considered as deeply layered. Each society has different conditions of social and system integration, which means different connections between the proximate and remote in time and space, and so its own form of institutional articulation. When religion becomes instutionalized, the...
John Saliba’s approach to new religious movements is secular (despite his position as a Jesuit Priest) and well rounded. He begins by exploring how new religious movements are viewed today, how they have been reacted to in the past and why that may be. He examines the original definition of the word “cult” as well as the modern derivations of it and how it affects these new religious movements. By considering multiple opinions on new religious movements as well as looking at the historical, psychological, sociological, legal and theological context in which these religions came to be and attract new followers, he is able to advocate for a more open approach to these new religions and offer a better way to handle them; to respond to them, rather than react.
Religious Fundamentalism is not a modern phenomenon, although, it has received a rise in the late twentieth century. It occurs differently in different parts of the world but arises in societies that are deeply troubled or going through a crisis (Heywood, 2012, p. 282). The rise in Religious Fundamentalism can be linked to the secularization thesis, which implies that victory of reason over religion follows modernization. Also, the moral protest of faiths such as Islam and Christianity can be linked to the rise of Religious Fundamentalism, as they protest the influence of corruption and pretence that infiltrate their beliefs from the spread of secularization (Heywood, 2012, p. 283). Religious Fundamentalists have followed a traditional political thought process, yet, have embraced a militant style of activity which often can turn violent (Heywood, 2012, p. 291).