Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Texas vs johnson supreme court
Texas vs johnson supreme court
Texas vs johnson supreme court
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Texas vs johnson supreme court
“We, as human beings, must be willing to accept people who are different from ourselves.” What does this quote have anything to do with our first unit in english class? Some of the passages: Texas v Johnson, What of this goldfish, would you wish, and The Lottery. These passages imply why people should accept each other and what they believe in. Texas v Johnson was a supreme court case majority ruling written by Justice William Brennan. The main idea of the passage was, to inform everyone about what happened in the court case, which was when Gregory Lee Johnson burned an American Flag at the Republican National Convention in the year 1984. He thought he was simply protesting, however Texas’s law bans being able to do that. He was arrested …show more content…
and fined, but through many court cases, all the way up to the supreme court. For burning a flag? I mean yeah as a patriotic American that’s like a sin, but to some people it doesn’t mean as much as it does to others. “The way to preserve the flag's special role is not to punish those who feel differently about these matters. It is to persuade them that they are wrong”. (lines 37-39) We as a nation cannot discriminate those who feel differently about a symbol of our country. We can only try to persuade them to change how they express their opinion. Or that they’re opinion is wrong, but is there such a thing as a wrong opinion? “The way to preserve the flag's special role is not to punish those who feel differently about these matters. It is to persuade them that they are wrong”. (lines 4-6) This is a really fancy way to say, we aren’t encouraging anyone to burn a flag, but we can’t punish them for it. Someone’s expression is protected by the First Amendment, as long as it is peaceful and non harmful. Not everybody will agree with that person's decision, but we cannot throw someone in jail for what they say. The person should be accepted, and we as Americans should be open to hear what they have to say. What of this goldfish, do you wish.
Was a passage about a boy named Yoni, who wanted to make a documentary of him going up to strangers and asking them what they would wish for if they had a magic goldfish that could grant three wishes. Lets just say Yoni ended up at a man named Sergi Goralick’s house in Tel Aviv. This man Sergi was not too fond of Yoni’s idea, but Yoni didn’t realize how insane Sergi was. Sergi owns a pet goldfish, so Yoni went over towards the goldfish, then Sergi hits him over the head with a coffee burner. Yoni is laying on the kitchen floor dead, blood all over the place. Now Sergi’s pet goldfish starts talking. Turns out he does in fact own a magic fish that can talk, but Sergi only has one wish left. The goldfish tries to persuade Sergi to use the last wish on making Yoni alive, by rewinding time to before he knocked on Sergi’s door. However, if Sergi uses his last wish, he’ll have nobody to talk to, because he only lives with a talking fish. Sergi does use his last wish on Yoni, and Sergi says his final goodbye to his friend, the goldfish. Where does acceptance fall into this passage? ‘ "To wish my wish," Sergei says. "My last." The fish swishes his fish tail back and forth in the water, the way he does, Sergei knows, when he's truly excited. The goldfish can already taste freedom. Sergei can see it on him. After the last wish, Sergei won't have a choice. He'll have to let the goldfish go. His magic goldfish. His friend.’ (lines 158-163) Sergi is …show more content…
begin to accept the fact that he needs to use his one last wish, and release his pet goldfish for good. ‘“He can’t be dead,” Sergei says, with a moan. “I barely touched him. It’s only a burner. Only a little thing.” Sergei holds it up to the fish, taps it against his own skull to prove it. “It’s not even that hard.”’ (lines 110-113) Sergi came to a reality shocker when he realized what he had done. He couldn’t accept the fact that he killed an innocent kid. If Sergi just allowed Yoni to enter his home and help him with the documentary, then Sergi would’ve never lost his beloved goldfish. The Lottery may not have had a nice ending for Mrs.
Hutchinson. Death by stones isn’t the way most people would like to die, but in this story Mrs. Hutchinson didn’t get to much of a choice. The Lottery is exactly what it sounds like. A random drawing from a box, with one big winner. Although being a winner isn’t a great thing this time around. I’m sure you can picture all of the arguing and excuses everyone has when they draw the “winning” slip, because I don’t think people like giving up their life for their small village’s superstitions. ‘Tessie Hutchinson was in the center of a cleared space by now, and she held her hands out desperately as the villagers moved in on her. "It isn't fair," she said. A stone hit her on the side of the head.’ (lines 322-324) Mrs. Hutchinson says “it isn’t fair”, because she’s the one dying, but if it wasn’t her I bet she would say it’s fair. She couldn’t accept her fate. ‘Old Man Warner snorted. "Pack of crazy fools," he said. "Listening to the young folks, nothing's good enough for them. Next thing you know, they'll be wanting to go back to living in caves, nobody work any more, live that way for a while. Used to be a saying about 'Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon.' First thing you know, we'd all be eating stewed chickweed and acorns. There's always been a lottery," he added petulantly. "Bad enough to see young Joe Summers up there joking with everybody." "Some places have already quit lotteries," Mrs. Adams said "Nothing but trouble in
that," Old Man Warner said stoutly. "Pack of young fools."’ (lines 194-223) Old Man Warner thinks that the lottery is a great thing and it should always be in the village. The fact that some villages have gotten rid of the lottery is mind boggling to him. He cannot accept the other villages way of not having a lottery. “We as human beings, must be willing to accept people who are different from ourselves”. See how this quotation played a role in the first unit of our text book. The idea of acceptance fluently flowed throughout the passages. So what? Why is acceptance such a big thing? If you plan on working with people that aren’t exactly what you expect them to be, then how will you ever be able to talk to them? You will shut that person down immediately, meaning you will not want to talk to them, or want them to be a part of your life whatsoever. Not everyone you meet in life will enjoy the same type of music as you, or practice the same religion as you, or have a similar view on politics as you. That doesn’t mean you have to avoid them constantly! Being able to accept people for who they are is an important thing to be able to do.
Johnson was convicted of desecration of a venerated object in violation of a Texas statute.
A very controversial court case in American history was Texas vs. Johnson (1984). In 1984, a man named Gregory Lee Johnson followed a group of anti – Reagan protesters to oppose the American exploitation of third world countries. This act of rebellion resulted in the burning of the American flag. Out of a total of approximately one hundred demonstrators who were involved in this ordeal, Johnson was solely charged with a crime. Johnson was arrested under Texas law, which made the burning of the United States or Texas flags crimes. Johnson was convicted and sentenced to one year in jail and fined two thousand dollars for his crime in restitution. Texas reasoned that the police were preventing the breach of peace; consider the flag a symbol of national unity. At Johnson's court trial, he was convicted of aiding, abetting and encouraging the burning of the Texan flag. This, in turn, made Johnson guilty under Texas state law.
Toward the finale of the short story, Shirley Jackson, the author of “The Lottery” declares, “Although the villagers had forgotten the ritual and lost the black box, they still remembered to use stones” (873). Many of the residents display no knowledge of the lottery and only participate because of tradition. In fact, only Old Man Warner recollects the authentic purpose of the lottery. He furnishes some insight behind the tradition of the lottery by declaring, “Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon” (Jackson 871). Old Man Warner reveals the original reason for holding the lottery, but Jackson clearly demonstrates that the original purpose no longer exists. The villagers comprehend the procedure of stoning the victim but nothing else. Nick Crawford articulates in an easy about “The Lottery,” “The most disturbing thing about Tessie Hutchinson’s unexpected demise is its...
The Texas vs Johnson case didn't drastically change the way people viewed things. Yes, the trial caused a lot of uproar, especially in Texas because of its patriotism, but it wasn't a case in which a law or amendment needed to be changed but rather was a case in which an amendment needed to be understood. Johnson’s act of burning the American flag in front of Dallas City Hall, in order to protest the Reagan administration during the Republican National Convention, was deemed as a sign of “symbolic” speech. Johnson’s act was ruled to be protected by the first amendment because speech was considered more than just the written word. The Supreme Court ruled it as such because of prior cases such as “Stromberg v. California” and “Tinker v. Des
“The Lottery” is a short story about an event that takes place every year in a small village of New England. When the author speaks of “the lottery” he is referencing the lottery of death; this is when the stoning of a village member must give up his or her life. The villagers gather at a designated area and perform a customary ritual which has been practiced for many years. The Lottery is a short story about a tradition that the villagers are fully loyal to and represents a behavior or idea that has been passed down from generation to generation, accepting and following a rule no matter how cruel or illogical it is. Friends and family become insignificant the moment it is time to stone the unlucky victim.
The case was Texas v. White. The state of Texas brought suit in the United States Supreme Court to have certain United States government bonds declared the property of the state, and to prevent the present holders of the bonds from collecting upon them. Texas had owned the bonds before the Civil War. As a means of financing during the war, while Texas was a member of the Confederacy, the bonds were sold. Texas now claimed that the sale was void and the bonds still belonged to the state.
The majority opinion of the court was the most accurate for this case because of the fact that Johnson was expressing his personal beliefs and opinions. The 5 to 4 decision was the most constitutional and well thought through judgment. Johnson was not threatening the United States in any way, let alone the people of the United States. Although society may find expressive events hostile, the government cannot ban it because it’s expressive conduct and it underlies in one’s First Amendment rights. The majority opinion was the most constitutionally accurate, but one may think, does our Constitution need revising?
In the case Lawrence v. Texas (539 U.S. 558, 2003) which was the United States Supreme Court case the criminal prohibition of the homosexual pederasty was invalidated in Texas. The same issue has been already addressed in 1989 in the case Bowers v. Hardwick, however, the constitutional protection of sexual privacy was not found at that time. Lawrence overruled Bowers and held that sexual conduct was the right protected by the due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. The effects of the ruling were quite widespread and led to invalidation of the similar laws throughout the United States that tried to criminalize the homosexual activity of adults which were acting in privacy. The case attracted much of the public attention and quite a large number of briefs were filed in the cases.
On the morning of June 27 of a recent year, the 300 villagers of an American village prepare for the annual lottery in a mood of excitement. The horrible tradition of the lottery is so old that some of its ritual has been forgotten and some has been changed. Its basic purpose is entirely unremembered, but residents are present to take part in it. The children in the village created a “great pile of stones” in one corner of the stoning square. The civic-minded Mr. Summers has been sworn in and then he hands a piece of paper to the head of each family. When it is discovered the Hutchinson family has drawn the marked slip, each member of the family Bill, Tessie, and the children is given another slip. Silence prevails as suspense hovers over the proceedings. After helplessly protesting the unfairness of the first drawing, Tessie finds that she holds the marked slip.
The town's citizens are eager, gathering in the town square in order to take part in the yearly lottery. With the story focused around one particular family, the Hutchinsons, who are so anxious to get it all over with until they find that one of their members is to participate in the lottery's closing festivities, Tessie. Of course, unlike your typical lotteries, this is not one that you would want to win. The one chosen from the lottery is to undertake a cruel and unusual death by stoning at the hands of their fellow townsmen for the sake that it may bring a fruitful crop for the coming harvest season. Ironically, many of the towns people have suggested that the lottery be put to an end, but most find the idea unheard of being that they have lived in it's practice for most of their lives.
The townspeople seem to have mixed emotions about the lottery; they fear it yet on a very barbaric level they enjoy it. By standing "away from the pile of stones," and keeping their distance from the black box, the villagers show their fear of the lottery (Jackson 863). However, once they find out who is going to be stoned, Tessie Hutchinson, they seem to actually enjoy the stoning. One villager picks up a stone so big she can barely carry it; someone even gives Tessie’s youngest son a few pebbles to throw at his mother. Their overall attitude about the stoning is summed up by the phrase "and then they were...
Written by Shirley Jackson, “The Lottery” is a short story about a town that hosts an annual lottery that decides which person is stoned by the rest of the town. Jackson slowly and subtly builds the suspense throughout the story, only resolving the mystery surrounding the lottery at the very last moment, as the townspeople surround Tessie with their stones. The symbolism utilized helps demonstrate the overall significance of the story, such as the lottery itself. The lottery shows the way people desperately cling to old traditions, regardless of how damaging they may be. In addition, it can show how callous many will act while staring at a gruesome situation, until they become the victims. Jackson’s story presents the issue regarding the habit
Tessie Hutchinson was angry that her husband had gotten the lottery, so the family drew again. In the final draw, the crowd saw that Tessie had gotten the paper with the black dot. The instant the crowd knew who got the lottery, they began grabbing the stones the boys had piled up earlier. Formerly, Mr. Summers joined the crowd and said “let’s finish quickly” to be in time for noon dinner(Jackson, 7). At this instant, Mrs. Delacroix had “selected a stone so large she had to pick it up with both hands” for the ritual(Jackson, 7). This sentence shows how terrible the lottery is and how extreme it can get. Without delay, Tessie is standing in the middle of the crowd when “a stone hit her on the side of the head” and that was the signal to begin the ritual(Jackson, 7). The lottery is just a cruel thing to the victim and their family who have to watch and be a part
As soon as all the families had drawn, no one moved. Everyone just stood still waiting to see who got picked to be in the final drawing. "Then the voices began to say, `It's Hutchinson. It's Bill,' `Bill Hutchinson got it (The Lottery, pg. 5)." From a readers point of view this would be the greatest thing that could have ever happened to them, but not in this case. Moving forward in the story, Mrs. Hutchinson is found yelling, "It wasn't fair!" and "You didn't give him time to choose any paper he wanted (The Lottery, pg. 5)." People in the crowd were telling her to "be a good sport. All of us took the same chance (The Lottery, pg. 5)." Mrs. Hutchinson did not like the responses at all. She even demanded that her married daughter draw in the final round with them. This was only to lessen her chances of getting picked in the end.
In The Lottery by Shirley Jackson we are told of a small village of about 300 and the event that takes place on June 27th of every year. All members of the community are required to participate in this lottery every year. At the beginning of the lottery, the husband or eldest male of each family draws a small slip of paper from the black box. In this instance, Bill Hutchinson gets the one slip with a black spot. This means each Hutchinson family member has to draw a slip to determine who gets stoned. Bill's wife Tessie gets the marked slip. In keeping with tradition, each villager obtains a stone and begins to surround Tessie. The story ends with Tessie being stoned to death while she bemoans the unfairness of the situation.