Texas Governors Essay

1015 Words3 Pages

Governors of Texas play major roles in all aspects of the powers of each branch within the government. Texas’ governors share the same responsibilities as other state governors but with only a few differences. The role of the governor is to head a public organization as a leader or chief by directing or controlling it. Texas governors, as well as other state governors, are limited with their powers of what they can control and what they can not by way of the statues dictated in their state constitutions.
In Texas, Virginia, and California, only to name a few, governors are acting Commander-in-Chief for their state. This gives them the power to call upon their state militia forces, including the National Guard or any other state reserve …show more content…

According to Governing Texas textbook, plural executive is an executive branch that has a limited amount of power due to officeholders within the state being independent towards the election of the governor. Qualifications for an elected governor in Texas must be that of one to be at least thirty years of age, an United States citizen, and a resident of five years or more of Texas. Many of the past governors of Texas have been of Democratic standings, wealthy, educated, middle-aged, and white men Protestants. Of all the governors elected only two have been women and not one minority was successful in his/her running. There are seven seats, the only official one seat that the Texas governor appoints is the Secretary of State, the other six are elected independently and do not campaign for office, those include the lieutenant governor, the attorney general, land commissioner of agriculture, the comptroller, and the commissioner of the General Land Office. These positions are also known as the single executives and in turn are appointed by the governor and lieutenant governor to run the executive branch while serving at their own accord. Besides being independently elected, they do not have to answer to the governor or …show more content…

The governor only appoints the Secretary of State and not the other chairmen, each have their own positions and directions. They do not have to answer to the governor at any point due to their independence and the restrictions that the Texas Constitution has on him. With that being said, they do not have to work together as they do in the United States President official offices. Now does that lead to more efficient and accountability for the plural executive, probably not so much. When a group of officials can not work together or choose not to work together, it creates static between the groups. Conflict arises amongst the attendees causing friction and deadlock decisions. Rather than the group as a whole being held accountable, fingers are pointed to the one who opposed ruling in the first place. When there are unresolved disputes, nothing progresses

Open Document