Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Southern perspective on slavery
Texas In The Civil War Research Paper
Why did texans fight in the civil war essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Southern perspective on slavery
THE PRIDE OF TEXAS
Before the Civil War, most Texans felt a strong attachment to the union they had joined in 1845. Concern arose because of attacks on southern lifestyles by Northern politicians would be detrimental to their prosperity. Although only five percent of Texans owned slaves, Texas citizens opposed interference with slavery because the success of Texas was dependent on it. Cotton production was the main source of the economy, and Texans would do anything to protect it and their way of life. Texas voted to secede from the union in February 1861 and joined the Confederate States of America. Governor Sam Houston declined to take an oath of allegiance to the new government; President Lincoln wanted to send troops to help support Houston
…show more content…
if he would contest the convention, but Houston refused the offer because he did not want to start a civil conflict in Texas. He retired to his home in Huntsville, where he later died on July 26, 1863. Texas acted quickly to secede, not waiting for an official vote, a Texas militia group led by Ben McCulloch and John Ford seized the federal military fort headquartered in San Antonio.
They demanded the surrender of all us Army installations and supplies to Texas forces. This action could have been the first battle of the war except that Major General Twiggs in San Antonio was commander of all US military posts in Texas and was a southerner supporter as well. He quietly turned command over to the Texans without any equivocation. With this acquisition, Texas and the South controlled ten percent of the military forces and equipment of the United States without an act of aggression by either party.
Jefferson Davis’s request for volunteer troops provided 25,000 soldiers by the end of 1861, and over the course of the war, approximately 90,000 Texans served in the southern army. Men signed up and served in units such as Terry’s Texas Rangers; this regiment fought in every major battle east of the Mississippi River. Texas military forces like John Bell Hood’s Brigade fought as part of Robert E Lee’s Army of Virginia. General Lee is quoted stating that "Texas soldiers were among his finest and most fierce
…show more content…
soldiers.” The North enacted a plan to restrain the Confederacy by using a blockade of ships that would cut off supplies to the Confederate troops and would stop the shipment of cotton to England. By late 1861 the Union Navy closed off the Atlantic sea, and in the fall of 1862, the war reached Texas. Union ships had been blockading the island ports of Galveston, but in October 1862 Union soldiers occupied the city. The Confederates needed to take the city back as it was a vital shipping port for feeding supplies to the other southern states. General John Magruder, the group commander of the Texas Confederate forces, made plans to take Galveston back. The Confederates allocated two steamboats designed to carry cargo called the "Neptune" and "The Bayou City" and turned them into warships. The decks of each boat were lined with cotton bales for protection against Union fire with places for soldiers to stand and fire their weapons. January 1, 1863, Joe McGruder gave orders to move 300 soldiers to cross and wade through the shallow waters of the bay to reach the island of Galveston. Union forces were caught by surprise and took cover under the protection of their gunboats. The Confederates used these “cotton-clad” steamboats to bombard and rammed the Union ships. Sharpshooters fired on the Union forces as the Neptune moved into ram the ship the Harriet Lane. The Union never tried to retake Galveston after they were defeated and forced out of the bay. The North maintained the naval blockade by stopping all shipping in and out of the Gulf of Mexico. On September 5, 1860, the union tried again to invade Texas, this time at Sabine Pass. Major General William Franklin left New Orleans with a military force of 5000 troops to land at Sabine Bay in hopes of capturing Beaumont and Houston. The mission was to shut down the production of military supplies and halt shipments to the Confederate forces. On the morning of September 8, 1863, a Union fleet of gunboats and troop transports sailed into Sabine Pass ready to take Fort Griffin and begin to invade Texas. This Fort was earlier abandoned, except for a small force of Confederate soldiers that were sent there for punishment. As the fleet approached Fort Griffin, they came under fire from six cannons on the river bank. "Fort Griffin’s small force of 44 men, under the command of Lt. Richard W. Dowling, forced the Union flotilla to retire and captured the gunboat Clifton and about 200 prisoners."1 As the blockage in the Gulf continued, Texas cotton made its way down the El Camino Real to Mexico.
The cotton made its way onto ships just south of Brownsville headed to the European markets. Since the ships were sailing under the Mexican flag, the Union gunboats were not allowed to stop these ships. This trade helped the Confederates support the war effort for a while longer but eventually comes to an end with a Union mounted a campaign to stop the traffic of cotton into Mexico and close down the entire Texas coast. Texans maintained the thought that states should be able to make their own political, economic and social decisions with minimal federal government interference especially when it came to slavery. Texans thought that slavery was vital to the economy as it was an imperative need that the farmers believed that they could not make money without slaves harvesting
crops. Rip Ford defeated Union troops in the battle of Palmito Ranch, near Brownsville, on May 13, 1865, the last battle of the war after the surrender of Robert E. Lee in April 1865. The first and final military action of the civil war started and ended in Texas.
James K. Polk was one of many that felt extremely strong about Texas joining the Union. Silbey uses direct quotes from politicians gives a deeper outlook into Texas annexation. “That there is a large majority who would be glad to see Texas, in some way or another, united to this country, there can be no doubt.” (Silbey 81) Shortly after this widespread idea of Texas joining the country Congress was overwhelmed with bills to make Texas’s entry accomplished.
One of the major reasons Texans fought in the Civil War, was for the right to hold and own slaves. “By 1860, 30% of Texas’ population was made up of slaves, and this might of been due to the fact that Texas was so abundant in land.” (Doc. A) Slave labor was cheap and “whites believed them to be an inferior race.” (Doc. B) John Wesley Rabb even told his mother to “send the slaves into the mountains if the Yankees were to come so the slaves wouldn’t be seized.” (Doc. C) As you can see, slave labor contributed to a great part of the Southern economy, and slaves were an invaluable resource. This is just one reason Texans fought in the
was not justified to declare war with Mexico because of the ignorance of Mexican authority, the robbery of disputed/Mexican-owned land, and the order from Polk which provoked the war. The U.S. were allowed by Mexican government to settle into the provenance of Texas. After settling in the nutritious and fertile farmland, the U.S. settlers rebelled against Mexican law and established slavery in Texas. The U.S. robbed disputed/Mexican-owned land, which led to confusion spreading into Mexico and the U.S. because of unofficial borders. Polk provoked a Mexican attack by ordering soldiers onto Mexican borders, which led to the Mexicans attacking out of pressure.
Around the time of 1821, with Texas still attained by Mexico, land was extremely cheap attracting American settlers. Mexico was full on against their new comers due to slavery. These Americans would bring their slaves to live with them, but the act of slavery was against Mexican law. The new settlers sought out the idea of cessation from Mexico and its president, Santa Ana. Texas would now fight for its independence if necessary. Of Course, Santa Ana was against the idea of Texas breaking free; he prepared an army that would follow him to San Antonio where...
Daniel Elazar created a classification scheme moralistic political culture of individuals, and traditionalistic to describe the political culture of the state. According to Elazar, Texas can be described as traditionalistic and individuals. Historically, the Texas political parties demonstrated a strong tradition, provincialism, and business dominance. The models, however, may weaken as the Republicans increase its power in the state and urbanization continues. Texas is the second largest state in the country and there are four different geographical regions: the Gulf coastal plain, the interior lowlands, Great Plains, and the basin and range province,
For almost fifty years, from 1827 to 1876, seven constitutions were adopted and implemented for Taxes and each one has its set of laws and contained specific ways, aimed at correcting the deficiencies and drawbacks of the previously adopted order. The Constitution of 1876 is the sixth one, which set the rules and laws for Texas government since the state has achieved its independence from Mexico in 1836. The constitution established the principles of Texas Democratic Government and specified the laws, which were applied to the three branches of government: legislative, juridical and executive.
So a major reason for Texas to be annexed into the United States was that the overwhelming majority of the population was former Americans. From the very time of winning independence, annexation of Texas to the United States was at the top of the list of things to do. But as soon as the Texas minister was sent to Washington to negotiate for an annexation, the Martin Van Buren administration said that the proposition could not be entertained. The reasons given were constitutional scruples and fear of war with Mexico. The real reason behind Washington’s excuses is slavery....
When the Bob Bullock Texas State History museum opened in March 2001, it advertised itself as “The Story of Texas.” It still calls itself the story of Texas in letters chiseled into the top of the building, on its Web site, on signs directing visitors to the museum, and even on the refrigerator magnets you can buy in the gift shop. When I first saw the slogan, I wondered how there could be “the” story of Texas, since Texas has been culturally diverse throughout its history as a part of Mexico that became a separate nation and later a state. Shortly Texas will have no one group as a majority. I grew up in the Rio Grande Valley, where the great majority of the population, like me, is Mexican American. How was this new museum going to present my story? I had to go and find out.
Although the formal transfer of government did not occur until February 19, 1846, Texas statehood dates from the 29th of December. Opposition to Texas' admission to the United States was particularly strong in the North during this period. If a challenge to the constitutionality of the move could have been made successfully at that time, there is little doubt that the leaders of the opposition would have instituted such a suit in the Supreme Court. Sixteen years later, in January 1861, the Secession Convention met in Austin and adopted an Ordinance of Secession on February 1 and a Declaration of Causes on February 2. This proposal was approved by the voters, but even before Texas could become "independent" as provided for in the text of the Ordinance, it was accepted by the Provisional Government of the Confederate States of America as a state on March 1, 1861.
Fearful of the loss of power if allowed into the Union, Texas expressed. in 1836 the right to join the Union under the condition that... ... middle of paper ... ...along with their masters to start up plantations in Texas after they abandoned their old ones in other southern states.
In the great state of Texas, the governor is the highest ranked official that is elected. Even though it is believed the governor has minimal power due to EJ Davis and his abuse of power in the 1800’s, the governor still has an influence on many things and has the power to implement things as well. According to the Associated Press (2011), “The governor’s chair is an increasingly powerful institution in most states, with the clout, control, and visibility that has long made it the leading stepping stone to the oval office.” (Associated Press [AP],2011). The governor of Texas is the head of the executive branch and the commander-in-chief of the state’s military forces. One key role the governor has is the power to appoint or select members to
The constitution establish major governing institutions, assign institution’s power, place explicit and implicit control on power granted. All this gives the political legitimacy. The U.S constitution gives the base model for state constitution for Texas.
... pro or an antislavery state? It took nine dragged out years to be annexed to the US. So with the new US president James K. Polk being inaugurated in 1845 and one of his priorities being to claim texas, it seemed to set things in motion.
The Annexation of Texas was one of the most debatable events in the history of the United States. This paper argues the different opinions about doing the annexation of Texas or not. In this case Henry Clay and John L. O’Sullivan had completely opposite opinions about this issue. The reasons of why not do it was because of the desire to prevent war, for division over slavery, and for constitutional rights. On the other hand, John L. O’ Sullivan wanted to do this because of his idea of Manifest Destiny. By 1845, the annexation of Texas went into effect.
The historiography of Reconstruction often failed to acknowledge contributions made by black leaders. During the latter part of the twentieth century historians began to re-evaluate Reconstruction in the southern states to include progress of African-Americans. In “Local Black Leaders during Reconstruction in Virginia,” Richard Lowe examines southern communities and black leaders after the Civil War. He concentrates the essay on re-examining historians’ negative impact of black reconstruction and argues black leaders faced a heavy burden to ensure political advancement in the aftermath of war. In comparison, Barry Crouch’s “Unmanacling” Texas Reconstruction; A Twenty Year Perspective,” also examines reconstruction historiography and support