Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The development of the Cold War
Rise and fall of communism
Rise and fall of communism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The development of the Cold War
During World War 2 (1939-1945), the Soviet Union and the USA were allies fighting towards the same enemy, Nazi Germany. At the end of World War 2, it could have been assumed that the two countries would have a firm relationship, however, soon after the war, enmity developed between the two, which resulted in the Cold War. Once Germany surrendered in 1945, the U.S openly formulated a policy of ‘Containment’, and at the beginning of 1948 the Cold War had escalated. Containment was the plan to diminish the rise of Soviet influence in the Western nations. The two countries had opposing economic and political beliefs and ideologies. The Soviet Union espoused Socialism and the USA feared this ideology spreading and Western Capitalist systems losing …show more content…
their dominance. Throughout the world, it is clear that many people follow the beliefs of a variety of ideologies.
A few of the recognisable ones are; Liberalism, Conservatism, Capitalism and Socialism. The prevalence of some of these ideologies, in particular socialism, are diminishing because of the immense diversity of ethics spread around the globe. The following essay will argue that in the 21st Century socialism has been superseded by terrorism, and that terrorism is the threat that socialism once was during the Cold War. It will do this by firstly discussing and outlining socialism and terrorism and then putting forward the argument that socialism was prevalent up to a certain point. Yet now terrorism has risen in dominance.
The first section will discuss and analyse the major details and history of socialism and terrorism. The second section will examine the question and argue that socialism has been superseded by terrorism in the 21st century.
Socialism and terrorism can be differentiated because socialism is an ideology while terrorism is a type of political manipulation. An ideology has been described as a new science of ideas (Heywood, 2003). In other words an ideology can be described as a set of beliefs or ideals envisioned by a person or an entire
…show more content…
community. Socialist’s support a system in which there is no private property and encourages a revolution of the working class people against the bourgeoisie. However even though the idea of a revolution resonates as extreme, the foremost socialist principles intended to introduce better equality in social and working conditions (Kilroy-Silk, 1973). A notion of the businessman and property-owning citizens exploiting working class people is what brought upon an uprising during the French revolution in 1789. Socialism was then brought about again by the European industrial revolution that swept nations in 1848. The brutal conditions that resulted in the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. This exploitation gave a rise to the socialist movement in the 1800’s through to the cold war in 1948 (Hornberger, 2014). The aim of Socialism is to change political and economic beliefs through a revolution, however terrorism is not a goal but a premeditated tactic using terror, to elicit change (Yungher, 2008). Terrorism is conducted by extremists who aim to use violent acts to alter public perception towards their government and create doubt in the minds of the citizens in a nation (Razzaq, 2015). It is complex and takes part in many objectives, some even believe it is a new doctrine. On the contrary, terrorism has been a tactic used for many years. A recent change in public perception, which can be attributed to the events surrounding 9/11, has resulted in an increase fear of terrorism. Ref It can be seen that socialism was prevalent during the 18th century up until the Cold War, yet in the 21st century, there are a wider set of enemies and fears that effect society’s everyday life. Western nations are not excessively influenced by socialist ideological perspectives, or other belief systems that are known throughout the world. On the other hand terrorism is rising in power and has a new control on people’s sense of security (Ganor, 2008). Thus it can be argued that socialism has been superseded by terrorism in the 21st century. Terrorism has overtaken socialism as the new threat in the world today.
News reports on terrorist activities and incidents are widely reported worldwide, while little or nothing is reported in the news on socialism. The prevalence of socialism is diminishing. The Eastern European revolutions of 1989-1991, along with the fall of the Berlin Wall, in some aspects symbolized the defeat and failure of socialism. Since this period, only a few Socialist regimes survive in the world and they are; North Korea, Cuba and China (Heywood, 2003). Socialism has been overshadowed by terrorism, as the fear of terrorism increases and more countries and people are impacted. In particular, in recent years, the terrorism perpetrated by Islamic State has brought terrorism to the forefront. “During this time period [2015] there was 2 860 Islamic attacks in 53 countries, in which 27 615 people were killed…” (“List of Islamic Terror Attacks”,
2015) Nonetheless socialism unquestionably had an influence during the past eras. It shaped the beginning of change in the fight against a progressive destructive capitalist system, a system which ruled the working class citizens of the world. The underlining principle was to have a society free of exploitation and social injustice (Szalai, 2005). This socialist perspective frightened governing capitalist nations, which subsequently resulted in a conflict of interest and beliefs. Socialism was a reaction to the capitalist methods in Western Europe and the United States (U.S.). During the Cold War, the United States’ use of the Containment Policy to cease Soviet influences, and the use of media and integrated education of the young and the old, demonstrates that the U.S. government created a fear of the loss of freedom. The use of propaganda materials, influenced the middle classes and heightened the mistrust of the Soviet Union and the ideology of socialism. The U.S felt threatened by the mere chance of their capitalist system being infiltrated and reformed, which demonstrates that socialism and ideas of communism were widely prevalent during the 1900’s. More importantly the rise of socialism through the policies of the Soviet Union was just as rapid as its current degeneration. At the present time there is no longer an establishment of the 15 countries that were the USSR. Its reign officially lasted between 1922 – 1991 (Spiegel, 2009). However the USSR’s idea of socialism was drastically different to the ideals of Karl Marx. Members of the Bolsheviks justified their uprisings by comparing it to the ideas of Marxism which was to have a “dictatorship of the proletariats’ (Marx, 1850). But Marx never intended it to be a dictatorship as such, more a social dominance of the working class people. The USSR interpretation of socialism resulted in a negative connotation towards the ideology and a creation of a more democratic capitalist system instead (The Myth of Soviet 'Socialism', 2009). The Soviets perception of socialism is what has drastically dissolved the ideology in the 21st century. However, in addition to this, topics such as terrorism and the threat of terrorism are currently of most concern to western nations. It is a global occurrence that is hard to define, because many things have happened in our history that were not classified as terrorism – even though the actions induced terror. “Whatever definition of terrorism is endorsed, particularly by government representatives, the term terrorism is rarely used to apply to the actions of one’s own country, or its allies, even when the actions initially fit their own definition” (Sterba, 2003). Many ordinary people do not realise that countries who aim to abolish terrorism also take part in it, when they retaliate against extremist attacks. Example from recent news – paris attacks and French retaliation The constant fight for ideological power, is resulting in a world crisis. It seems there is no way to completely eradicate terrorism. A reality is that terrorists have created a climate of fear and the public have given them a social platform of disruption that they can access whenever they decide (Sparrow, 2015). This enables terrorism to thrive, and the 21st century has been a witness to these extreme practises of terror, as well as the political manipulation that comes with it. Lastly terrorism is used by organizations, with the aim to further their objectives. In the modern world, many people blame religious groups, however terrorism isn’t confined to these minorities, as various other political organisations are involved whether they are left-wing or right-wing (Aubrey, 2004). Socialism on the other hand was an individual political regime that was the new form of society that came from capitalism. Terrorism runs counter to the principles of this ideology and ultimately has a superior grasp on all aspects of government. Socialism experienced a time when it was prevalent and expanded, and even induced fear amongst western nations. In regard to the terrorism perpetrated by Islamic state, the Foreign Minister of Australia, Julie Bishop announced that “the Islamic State represented an existential threat, worse than any danger faced during the Cold War” (Wroe, 2015). To summarize this essay has argued that socialism has been superseded by terrorism in the 21st century. Currently, the prevalence of socialist movements are minimal while the fear of the threat of terrorism is thriving considerably. Terrorism is a growing danger that westerners are fighting domestically and internationally. This is evidenced by the increased reporting on terrorist attacks around the world as well as the focus on terrorism as a political agenda for governments in countries worldwide.
The United States and The Soviet Union were originally joined together by the want to defeat The Nazi army, in 1941-1945. The alliance remained, and strengthened, among the two until the end of World War II. At the end of World War II, a rupture between the two occurred. The differences began earlier, but there was a straw that broke the camels back. The reason The United States and The Soviet Union’s alliance did not work out is because The Soviet Union and The United States were complete opposites, The Soviet Union proved to be faulty, and they were never truly allies.
The alliance formed between the US and USSR during the second world war was not strong enough to overcome the decades of uneasiness which existed between the two ideologically polar opposite countries. With their German enemy defeated, the two emerging nuclear superpowers no longer had any common ground on which to base a political, economical, or any other type of relationship. Tensions ran high as the USSR sought to expand Soviet influence throughout Europe while the US and other Western European nations made their opposition to such actions well known. The Eastern countries already under Soviet rule yearned for their independence, while the Western countries were willing to go to great lengths to limit Soviet expansion. "Containment of 'world revolution' became the watchword of American foreign policy throughout the 1950s a...
During the Cold War, the United States engaged in many aggressive policies both at home and abroad, in which to fight communism and the spread of communist ideas. Faced with a new challenge and new global responsibilities, the U.S. needed to retain what it had fought so strongly for in World War II. It needed to contain the communist ideas pouring from the Soviet Union while preventing communist influence at home, without triggering World War III. With the policies of containment, McCarthyism, and brinkmanship, the United States hoped to effectively stop the spread of communism and their newest threat, the Soviet Union. After the war, the United States and the Soviet Union had very different ideas on how to rebuild.
Michael Walzer is an esteemed retired professor from the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey. Walzer has written many books, essays, and articles. His essay, Excusing Terror, is one that best relates to the current events happening around the world. In this essay, Walzer talks about different reasons that people would want to resort to terrorism. In this essay I will argue Walzers view on Terrorism is correct in that terrorism is wrong because it is akin to murder, it is random in who it targets, and no one has immunity. I will also offer an objection to Walzer’s theory and explain why it is not a valid one.
Terrorism is not like the "ism" of communism; communism is a political ideology that infringed on our capitalistic ways, but terrorism is much more destructive. As defined by the FBI, "the unlawful use of force against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population or any segment thereof, in the furtherance of political or social objectives". Terrorism is a technique, but as we have come to know it present day it is enacted by radical religious individuals who are opposed to globalization and the western way of life. The ideologies of these Islamic extremists do not transfer an ideology to terrorism, because it is spread among many groups and has become too broad a concept.
During World War II propaganda was ubiquitous. It consisted of a wide range of carriers including leaflets, radio, television, and most importantly posters. Posters were used based on their appeal: they were colorful, creative, concise, and mentally stimulating. Posters often portrayed the artist's views on the war. They demonstrated the artist concern for the war, their hopes for the war, and reflected the way enemies were envisioned. Posters also show a nations political status: they reflect a nations allies and enemies, how the nation saw itself, and its greatest hopes and fears of the war.
The United States is the Super Power in today’s world and two reasons for that are the outcome of World War II and how the President at the time, Franklin Delano Roosevelt handled conflicts at home as well as overseas. America was going through a very difficult time dealing with the Great Depression and the problem of Germany starting conflicts in Europe where nothing was being done about it. World War II was something America stayed out of for about three years, but when we finally did get involved the “scales” were now tipped in the favor of the Allies due to the American involvement. Also, as shown in World War I when the United States gets involved with conflicts dealing with issues overseas we are very successful and are adamant on becoming victorious. Much like the conflict America is dealing with today in Iraq, although many people do not agree with the war and the grounds for the war I think that our government is doing the right thing. People need to realize that our government would not do anything to hurt the nation or its people because that is just a reflection of the government and the people who run it. They want to be perceived as the super power of the world and would not do anything to hurt that image. Much like Roosevelt helped the United States to appear the Super Power, President Bush is also doing his part by continuing the war on terror and not ending it until he feels we have conquered the men behind the 9/11 attacks.
In the article “Is Terrorism Distinctively Wrong?”, Lionel K. McPherson criticizes the dominant view that terrorism is absolutely and unconditionally wrong. He argues terrorism is not distinctively wrong compared to conventional war. However, I claim that terrorism is necessarily wrong.
Kash, Douglas A. “An International Legislative Approach to 21st-Century Terrorism.” The Future of Terrorism: Violence in the New Millennium. Ed. Harvey W. Kushner. London: Sage Publications, 1998.
A United States citizen turning against one’s own government and embracing an ideology to kill another citizen or commit an act of violence is a growing phenomenon commonly known as homegrown terrorism. This transition or radicalization process that transforms an individual into an adversary has intensified since the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The problem continues to persist in other parts of the world such as Canada, United Kingdom and even in Saudi Arabia, a Non-Western country. This form of extremism has shown its propensity in the United States since the turn of the century when Muslim extremism had its early beginnings as a venue to support a black separatist movement. Today, the threat emerges more rampantly with the accessibility and excess of information technology; as well as the political and socio-economic environment influencing many spectrums of perception and intent.
We should expect that terrorist attacks will become even more lethal for a few reasons. First, the terrorists themselves are becoming more technologically adept. Second, governments such as Iraq and Syria are providing the wherewithal for attacks against new and more sophisticated targets. Third, religious radicals are establishing new boundaries for mass violence beyond what had been previously anticipated. Finally, the threshold for new forms of attack has already been breached--such as the attacks on technological infrastructure and poisonings of municipal water supplies. Techno-terrorism is the topic of discussion for this paper, however, it is also a topic for legislators, governments, communities, and families to evaluate when molding the world of tomorrow. The purpose of this paper is to examine terrorist ideology and to explore the technology of terrorism and what impact it may have for the future of civilization.
The threat of global terrorism continues to rise with the total number of deaths reaching 32,685 in 2015, which is an 80 percent increase from 2014 (Global Index). With this said, terrorism remains a growing, and violent phenomenon that has dominated global debates. However, ‘terrorism’ remains a highly contested term; there is no global agreement on exactly what constitutes a terror act. An even more contested concept is whether to broaden the scope of terrorism to include non-state and state actors.
Yet, in addition to these shocking transnational attacks, domestic terrorism seems to be underemphasized although it causes more casualties and greater damage than transnational terrorism in the long term. Democracies are among the countries suffering from both domestic or transnational terrorism and their long term consequences. In particular, Turkey, Spain, the United Kingdom, and Italy suffered from domestic terrorism for many years and still struggle with the damaging consequences. Yet, while some democracies are targets of terrorism, it is not a problem for all democracies. This phenomenon raises the research question for this paper: Why are some democracies targets of terrorism and others are not?
Despite the end of the Cold War and the faltering beginnings of a peace process in the Middle East, terrorism still remains a serious threat in many countries, not surprisingly, given that the underlying causes of the bitter ethnic and religious struggles which spawn terrorism pre-dated the Cold War, and most of these conflicts remain unresolved.
As the hypothesis I discussed, this article is dedicated to explore if there is any correlation between poverty and people’s support for terrorism within a country. Before I start, there are many things about poverty we have to clarify. Poverty theoretically means general scarcity, dearth, or the state of one who lacks a certain amount of material possessions or money. But it is also a terminology that contains many different meanings and indications. To understand, we have to separate relative poverty and absolute poverty. When people say poverty cause terrorism, it possibly means the condition in which lack the minimum income required to maintain the most basic