Terri Schiavo Chapter Summary

773 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Personal beliefs in politics

Introduction As I read the book, I learned that Governor Bush’s goal was to have a limited, decentralized, and efficient government. However, some of his actions did not always contribute to this goal. Specifically, when Governor Bush expressed his ideas and, ultimately, intervened on the Terri Schiavo issue, his policy positions did not seem to accomplish the three goals Governor Bush set out to accomplish. Although I understand how he reconciles his views with his religious beliefs, it was difficult for me to understand how he reconciles his personal views with his duty as governor. Overall, it seemed as if this would have been more appropriate for the courts to handle as opposed to the Governor. His positions on this issue seemed as if …show more content…

It seemed that our opinions aligned in the Cuban case, but not the Schiavo case. When Governor Bush initially stated he would have someone look into the case (p. 196), I did not imagine him intervening at such a great magnitude. This is a delicate issue, and I could easily empathize with Schiavo’s family on this matter. At the same time, Schiavo consciously made the decision to marry her husband, so she may have wanted him to move on and be happy in the event that something happened to her. Furthermore, she may have expressed sentiments to her husband that she would not want to be left in a vegetative state, thereby supporting his reason to remove the feeding tubes. Since these ideas were not a far stretch for my imagination, I thought that it would be more appropriate for a court to grant both sides the opportunity to present their cases and evaluate the cases accordingly. Conversely, I did not think it was appropriate for the Governor to intervene, weighing the case in the family’s favor, without attempting to understand the other party’s

Show More
Related

  • Dr. Harold Glucksberg vs. The State of Washington

    965 Words  | 2 Pages

    The case had a many important questions to it. In one question: is physician-assisted suicide morally, ethically, legally correct, and/or fair to anyone?

    Read More

  • The Strange Case of Marlise Munoz and John Peter Smith Hospital

    1005 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are many ethical paradigms through which humans find guidance and justification for their own actions. In the case of contractarianism, citizens of a state are entitled to human rights, considered to be unalienable, and legal rights, which are both protected by the state. As Spinello says, “The problem with most rights-based theories is that they do not provide adequate criteria for resolving practical disputes when rights are in conflict” (14). One case that supports Spinello is the case of Marlise Munoz, a brain-dead pregnant thirty-three year old, who was wrongly kept on life support for nearly two months at John Peter Smith Hospital in Fort Worth, Texas. Misinterpretation of the Texas Advance Directives Act by John Peter Smith Hospital led to the violation of the contractarian paradigm. Although the hospital was following the directive in order to maintain legal immunity for its hospital staff, the rights of the family were violated along with the medical fundamental principle to “first, do no harm.”

    Read More

  • The Terry Shiavo Story

    1032 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mr. Shiavo was doing his job as a caretaker for his wife, taking her to get the necessary treatment that she needed and required, and really and truly sticking by his wife in such a rough circumstance. He stated that "my wife had said she would never want to be kept alive if she were in a vegetative state". (http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/schiavo/). He was just honoring what she had wanted to do if this type of situation would ever happen, and he was obeying what she wanted. I have to totally agree with him, and how he tried and did take care of Terry. It gets hard on families and also it can take a toll of them when there is a sick family member who is in need of 24 hour care. Ethically, I see that Michael was right; however I am also in limbo to where I think he could have turned Terry's custody over to her parents, even though he did honor what she wanted. Sometimes families find themselves in a comfort zone by trying to come to peace with there loved ones by sitting there with there loved ones while they are on the machine. I couldn't imagine this struggle between Terry's family and Michael.

    Read More

  • Neustadt's Argument On Presidential Power

    1183 Words  | 3 Pages

    He thinks that regardless of the existence of other influential performers from other branches of the government, the president can act based on many other rights he possesses, such as executive orders and national security directives. These tools will allow him to bypass the traditional legislative process. Despite that both authors define power as president’s prime influence, Howell however argues that president has more capacity in which he can partially decide the outcome of a given situation if not whole. Howell steps further and insists more on the president’s capability despite the fact that Neustadt defines power as individual power. Howell envisions that the President must influence the “content of public policy”, in contrast, Neustadt’s argument is based on the exercise of the “Effective” impact by President. Howell, on the other hand, considers that the President is way more powerful on his own than Neustadt thinks. Howell thinks that executive orders, for example, open the path to the President to make important decisions without trying to persuade Congress or the other branches of the government to gain their support. Howell uses President Truman’s decision about federal employees. Howell’s view of unilateral presidential action perfectly fits moments when of crisis when the President, as the Commander in Chief cannot afford the long process of the congressional decision making. As he writes “a propensity of presidents, especially during times of crisis, to unilaterally impose their will on the American public.”

    Read More

  • Terri Schiavo Life or Death

    636 Words  | 2 Pages

    Terri Schiavo is a forty year old women who had a severe heart attack 15 years ago which resulted in brain damage. She had no living will so there is no legal document of what she would have wanted if she became brain damage and couldn’t function on her own but her husband, Michael Schiavo, says that after 15 years of being on a feeding tube she would have wanted to die. The question is should he have the right to remove the feeding tube? Anybody who knows me will know that my answer is no! The reason for that is because I am a Christian and I do not believe in terminating someone’s life. It’s my belief that as long as a persons heart is beating he or she stills has life in them.

    Read More

  • Missing Sarah Summary

    527 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the novel Missing Sarah by Maggie deVries she writes and illustrates a sad tribute to the memory of her sister, Sarah. The author Maggie deVries makes a clear connection between Sarah's adoption by her family and Sarah's incredibly sad life. Adoption of children from another background, heritage and race into white families sometimes doesn't go well, despite the best efforts of the family. Sarah deVries was one of at least 21 women who could only be identified by DNA found on a pig farm in Port Coquitlam, BC. The women were all sex workers or prostitutes who were killed, and the cause of their vanishing was not investigated promptly possibly because they were engaged in selling sex to survive. Even the choice of whether to refer to these women as 'prostitutes' or 'sex

    Read More

  • Why Don Marquis's Essay 'Why Abortion Is Immoral'

    803 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thomson provides the example of being hooked up for nine months to provide dialysis to an ailing violinist to expose how a fetus’s right to life does not supersede a mother’s right to make medical decisions about her body (48-49). I find that this thought experiment especially helpful in understanding how even though a fetus does have a right to life, because the continuation of their life hinges on the consent of their mother to use her body, it falls to the mother to choose whether or not to allow the fetus to develop to term.

    Read More

  • The Cowboy Image

    2208 Words  | 5 Pages

    This again can be seen in the persona that they champion. In his paper “Presidential Address George W. Bush’s Cowboy Politics: An Inquiry” Stanley A. Renshon explores George W. Bush’s psychological state of mind and presents a man who is intimately tied to his home and his country. President Bush followed, and strove to uphold, a great moral and ethical code in the form of the constitution, just as Moskowitz states the mythical cowboy does. Renshon describes President George W. Bush as fiercely independent, and “his own man”, again characteristics associated by Moskowitz with the chivalric and romanticized mythical cowboy.

    Read More

  • Physician Assisted Suicide Persuasive Speech

    1080 Words  | 3 Pages

    Before, there were no breakthroughs with the opportunity of saving lives. Innovations in medical technology made contributions to correct abnormal heartbeats and save lives by using a defibrillator and modern respirator. Who would know that the rapid discoveries would include successfully giving patients surgical transplants? Furthermore, President Lyndon Johnson implemented an executive policy requiring the usage of medical response trauma teams. Since 1976, this executive order has allowed the widespread use of CPR, and organizations like the American Red Cross and the American Heart Association were founded. “About 6.4 million people now survive angina chest pain each year, while an additional 700,000 people survive a heart attack each year (pg. 15 of Last Rights) Despite these remarkable breakthroughs that help those badly injured, the law becomes vague and allows more opportunities for misinterpretation on defining death. As a result, this could be advantageously used against the best interest of others and the government. “This ten-year mishmash of laws is what led the previously mentioned President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, established by an act of Congress in 1978 , to tackle the first task of defining death.” (pg. 81). The President’s Commission forced the U.S Supreme Court and

    Read More

  • Roe v. Wade

    590 Words  | 2 Pages

    The facts of this case show that Roe, who at the time was a single woman, decided to challenge the State of Texas’s abortions laws. The law in that state stated that it was a felony to obtain or attempt an abortion except on medical advice to save the life of the mother (Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S. Ct. 705, 1973). At the time many illegal abortions were being performed in back alleys and in very unsanitary conditions. Therefore, some states began to loosen up on abortion restrictions, in which some women found it easy to travel to another state where the abortion laws were less restrictive and they could find a doctor was willing to endorse the medical requirement for an abortion. Unfortunately, less fortunate or poor women could seldom travel outside their own state to get the treatment, which started to raise questions of fairness. Also, many of the laws were vague; therefore many doctors really didn’t know whether they were committing ...

    Read More

  • The Case of Nancy Cruzan

    1129 Words  | 3 Pages

    Because the Missouri Supreme Court ruled against the removal of Nancy Cruzan’s artificial hydration and nutrition on the grounds that “clear and convincing” evidence of Nancy’s wishes was not provided, the Cruzan family appealed the decision to the United States Supreme Court arguing that Nancy was being deprived of her right to refuse medical treatment. The Supreme Court ruling affirmed that competent patients have the right to refuse unwanted medical treatment, but also noted that incompetent patients are not capable of exercising this right. Consequently, states may establish their own safe-guards to govern cases in which a substituted decision maker wishes to refuse treatment for an incompetent patient. This ruling therefore upheld the decision of Missouri’s Supreme Court.

    Read More

  • Federal Baby Doll Rule

    1161 Words  | 3 Pages

    With the guidance of their physician, Baby Does’ parents chose to withhold medical care and surgery due to the conclusion still leaving the child with severe retardation. “Officials at the hospital had the Indiana Juvenile Courts appoint a guardian to determine whether or not to perform the surgery. The court finally ruled in favor of the parents and upheld their right to informed medical decision” (Resnik, 2011). Because of the decision made to withhold surgery and medical care, Baby Doe died five days later of dehydration and pneumonia.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay: The Pros And Cons Of Euthanasia

    1907 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...t’s family should be able decide for the patient whether or not prolonging their life is moral.

    Read More

  • The Supreme Court Case Of Abortion

    1516 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...actually take the fetus out of the mother’s womb with surgical scissors and a suction device is placed through the opening of the brain so the head can collapse. The Supreme Court case in 2003 of Stenberg v Carhart in Nebraska did not allow partial-birth abortions and ruled that it was unconstitutional. Since then laws such as The Partial Birth Control Abortion Ban Act became in effect on 2003 by George W. Bush and it prohibited this horrendous act except in rare cases where it would be absolutely necessary to save the mother’s life. After that in 2007 in the Supreme Court case of Gonzales v Carhart, upheld the federal ban on partial-birth abortion and reversed the Stenberg v Carhart ruling. Gonzales created the precedent that anyone who “delivers and kills a living fetus could be subject to legal consequences”, unless it was done to save the life of the mother ().

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Euthanasia

    1464 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1936 king George V was mumbling and cursing and his doctor decided that his dignity and quality of life were being damaged. In accord with the king he administered an injection of cocaine and morphine and ended his life. Nobody questioned that choice but if somebody was to do the same thing now the press would never let him free and the doctor would be probably sued. < In the past physicians could hasten death in special circumstances without the knowledge of their peers, and sometimes without even knowing with certainty whether their actions actually served to actually accelerate the process of dying, the regularity process is now strict enough that such actions cannot easily escape legislation> (Euthanasia and distinctive horizons and moral reasoning) . The way in which the law system may get to much involved in such personal choices is evident in the Englaro case. On January 18 Eluana Englaro is involved in a car accident. She is left completely paralyzed from the neck down and in a vegetative state due to her brain damages. The family started asking for the removal of life support arguing that Eluana had declared to family and friends her will previously. After a fight of 17 years her father finally obtained the removal of life support. In this case the Italian legislation tried to make the choice instead of the family. Eluana’s father had to look at her

    Read More

More about Terri Schiavo Chapter Summary

Open Document